UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Scrapping ID cards 'would cost £40m'

By Craig Woodhouse, Press Association

Scrapping plans for a national identity card scheme would cost £40 million, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said yesterday.

In an attack on the Conservatives, who have pledged to abolish the scheme, Ms Smith said doing so would "not free up a large fund of money to spend on other priorities".

But the Tories accused the Government of deliberately increasing the costs to make it hard for them to abolish the scheme.

During Commons question time, Ms Smith said the Government was "on track" to introduce ID cards this autumn.

She told MPs two contracts would be awarded next month - one to upgrade passport application systems and another for the biometric database for the next generation of passports and ID cards - with the contract for the ID cards themselves being awarded later in the year.

"As is normal, these contracts have been written to protect the public purse with standard clauses in the event of termination," Ms Smith said.

"Cancellation of the ID cards contract and partial termination of the application and database contracts would cost in the region of £40 million in the early years.

"Therefore, as I have made clear on many occasions, scrapping ID cards and the identity database will not free up a large fund of money to spend on other priorities."

Outside the Commons, shadow home secretary Chris Grayling accused Ms Smith of "poison pill" tactics to increase costs for a future Tory administration.

He said: "It looks as if the Government is deliberately making it as expensive as possible for a future Conservative government to scrap ID cards.

"At a time when the public finances are under such pressure, it is simply outrageous for ministers to employ a poison pill strategy against their opponents."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

martin
[info]doomsdaybug wrote:
Tuesday, 24 March 2009 at 09:56 am (UTC)
better to spend 40m ( don't beleive the figure anyway ) that squander 16 billion
Re: martin
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Tuesday, 24 March 2009 at 12:03 pm (UTC)
Agreed, what sort of economists would think it great to waste billions at the saving cost of 40 million?

And there is also the potential like Poll Tax that this will inflame the people and cause civil unrest costing far far more than this sum.

Its because nuLabour have already given out the contracts by funny/grubby handshake.
Peanuts
[info]tallbendyman wrote:
Tuesday, 24 March 2009 at 11:10 am (UTC)
then, compared to what they have stolen from the taxpayer to keep their banker friends afloat.
because they've already lashed out the dosh
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Tuesday, 24 March 2009 at 03:38 pm (UTC)
and worse on American companies, no-one wants them and they would achieve sweet FSA
The Tories won't "undo" anything
[info]red_planet92 wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 04:05 pm (UTC)
The Tories have said they will "undo" many things, some I agree with and others I don't.

1. Fox hunting ban
2. Lisbon Treaty ratification
3. ID cards
4. Various bits of anti-civil rights legislation

But does anyone here actually think they will undo any of these?

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date