UK

7° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

Super-jails are first to feel squeeze from Whitehall

Jack Straw abandons contentious proposal to fix overcrowding in prisons

By Andrew Grice and Nigel Morris

Plans to build three giant "Titan" prisons are to be scrapped by the Government as it begins the squeeze on public spending which was announced in Wednesday's Budget.

The Independent has learnt that Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, has abandoned his flagship proposals for the 2,500-place jails after the Treasury objected to the cost of his £1.2bn prison building programme.

But government sources last night insisted that Mr Straw decided to retreat because of the strong objections raised by penal reform groups as well as local opposition in the areas where the super-jails were planned.

Although the total number of prison places will not be cut, he will announce on Monday that the Government intends to instead build five jails, each with 1,500 places. But only two of the new prisons will go ahead immediately.

A plan to buy a prison ship with 450 places has also been abandoned, after building a traditional jail was found to be 25 per cent cheaper. Proposals for a new generation of multi-storey "Titan jails" holding up to 2,500 inmates each were drawn up by Mr Straw in 2007 in response to prison overcrowding.

They were the key element of a building programme designed to bring prison capacity in England and Wales to 96,000 by 2014. Last week there were 82,757 offenders behind bars – an increase of more than 1,000 since the beginning of the year.

The first super-prison was planned to be built by 2012 near London, where pressure on space is the most acute. It would be followed by giant jails in the West Midlands and Lancashire.

They were planned to hold between 2,100 and 2,500 offenders, although the Ministry of Justice conceded they were likely to take the maximum number as soon as they opened. They would hold a mixture of medium-security offenders and remanded prisoners.

The Ministry of Justice believed sites of at least 50 acres – twice the size of Wembley Stadium – would be needed for the prisons. It was resigned to facing a series of bitter planning battles from residents horrified by the giant prisons being sited in their communities.

Ministers dismissed accusations they were penal "warehouses", arguing that they would comprise four or five smaller units behind a perimeter fence. But penal reformers insisted that building "super-jails" would backfire as it would be harder to rehabilitate offenders in such large institutions. The plan was also condemned by Anne Owers, the Chief Inspector of Prisons.

The Prison Reform Trust denounced the scheme as a "gigantic and costly mistake that others will live to regret".

The Howard League for Penal Reform, said the plan was aimed at "delivering justice on the cheap". Consultation on the proposals also revealed almost universal opposition to Titan jails.

The retreat is the first major casualty of the clampdown on state spending that was disclosed by the Chancellor Alistair Darling, who said the planned overall growth of 1.2 per cent in real terms from 2011-12 would be cut to just 0.7 per cent.

The squeeze on Whitehall departments will be even greater because rising bills for debt repayments and state benefits will be unavoidable.

Yesterday, the Tories claimed that Gordon Brown would no longer be able to fight the next general election on his favourite ground – contrasting "Labour investment" with "Tory cuts" – because "Labour cuts" are now in the pipeline.

But Labour insisted the "dividing line" would still work because the Tories were committed to an immediate and deeper spending squeeze. It will now challenge the Tories to spell out where their axe would fall.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

PLan B
[info]macleod75 wrote:
Friday, 24 April 2009 at 02:29 am (UTC)
If only the ID card could go the same way...
Every cloud has a silver lining
[info]mannygoldstein wrote:
Friday, 24 April 2009 at 04:46 am (UTC)
These jails were never about penal sentences, they were always about politics and economics.

"Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime" - political posturing, what has happened under this administration has bee na massive increase in the number of criminal offences for which people can be sent to prison rather than seeking alternative, less damaging ways to deal with offenders.

Like the plans for giant casino's, these prisons were never wanted by the general public or the communities that were to host them, they were simply being foisted on them by a government following its own agenda. Do not forget, these prisons were to a vehicle for private companies to make massive profits from building them, staffing them, maintaining them and supplying them.

Look at the comments from the independent experts such as the Prison Reform Trust and the Howard League for Penal Reform, unanimous in their rejection of the prisons.

The UK already locks up a greater percentage of its population than any other Western nation, but crime and fear of crime are at record levels.

Let us be clear about one point "Prison does not work!" since it neither acts as a deterrent or results in repentance, remorse or rehabilitation of the offender.
Re: Every cloud has a silver lining
[info]pozac wrote:
Friday, 24 April 2009 at 06:51 am (UTC)
That's a good post...here in the US you can't live in a city or town with a population of approximately more than 10,000 without a federal or state prison being nearby.
Re: Every cloud has a silver lining
[info]mannygoldstein wrote:
Friday, 24 April 2009 at 09:43 am (UTC)
Thank you for your kind remark.

The financial benefits of such as system were revealed earlier this year in the US when two judges in Scranton, Pennsylvania were found guilty of accepting bribes for sending juveniles to a prison built by a businessman;

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/13/us/13judge.html
joy of joy's
[info]speedboat1 wrote:
Friday, 24 April 2009 at 07:22 am (UTC)
MAYBE NOW THERE WON'T BE 'JOB FOR THE BOYS' BUT REALISTIC SPENDING. AGAIN AS WITH MOST THINGS, WE HAVE TO LOOK TO EUROPE AND SEE WHY THEY MANAGE TO KEEP THEIR PRISON POPULATION LOWER THAN, THE U.K. (CHILD PROTECTION ETC.)
WE FOLLOW, BLINDLY, THE U.S.A. OUR LEADERS GET HOOKED UP TO THE STATES, HOLIDAYS ETC.
GORDEN HAS BEEN IN TO COPYING A GREAT DEAL.
SO WE SAVE ON PRISONS; WHAT ELSE

OVERCROWDED PRISONS
[info]fantazamaraz wrote:
Friday, 24 April 2009 at 01:19 pm (UTC)
Jack straw and the rest of the Cabinet and MP's should be made to spend a week in the uk's overcrowded prison hellholes.! They would then get a well deserved taste of what their fellow Citizens are subjected to.!
Prison, regardless of the crime, is supposed to be an environment of rehabilitation, not mental, physical and emotional torture.! No wonder nearly a thousand inmates have suicided recently.! The degree of civilization in a society can best be judged fro within it's institutions a wise saying goes. If you are going to punishing people for lawbreaking is one thing.....throwing weaker prisoners in with violent, crazy loonies
at the mercy of apathetic prison guards and governors is another.! The majority of these people will be released someday, who can blame them for hating society even more because of their treatment at the hands of the justice ? system and insensitive morons like Straw.!
Jails
[info]oakley_ten wrote:
Friday, 24 April 2009 at 01:27 pm (UTC)
The manner in which the 'Police State' keeps marching forward, all the Home office has to do is take away an offenders passport for a given period and they'll automatically be doing a custodial sentence.

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date