Tories turn party-poopers to end era of cheap alcohol
Steep increases in the cost of super-strength lager and alcopops were promised by the Tories in a drive to combat binge drinking.
The first Budget after a Conservative election victory would include large rises in taxes levied on the products blamed for causing drunken violence.
Chris Grayling, the shadow Home Secretary, said that the cost of a four-pack of high-strength lager would increase from £6 to £7.33, while a four-pack of strong cider would go up from £3.64 to £4.38. The price of a large bottle of Smirnoff Ice would leap from £2.97 to £4.47.
Following reports that large cans of lager are on special offer in supermarkets for as little as 22p each, Mr Grayling announced that retailers would be banned from selling from alcohol at below cost-price. He said the moves were aimed at the "problem of 14-year-olds hanging about with bottles of super-strength beers or ciders". He said: "It's much too easy for them to get very drunk quickly and cheaply."
Mr Grayling promised the rises would not hit responsible drinkers or increase the cost of an "ordinary pint in the pub". But, he told the Tory conference in Manchester, "We'll call time on the drinks that fuel antisocial behaviour". Pledging to "tear up this government's lax licensing regime", he said councils would be given tougher powers to deny licences to pubs and clubs and to shut down those that sell alcohol to the under-18s.
The moves will face opposition within the drinks industry and attempts to ban cheap alcohol promotions could fall foul of European competition law.
But the chief executive of Alcohol Concern, Don Shenker, said the increases would deter teenage drinkers. He said: "Strong cider, strong beer and alcopops are some of the most irresponsibly priced and problematic alcoholic drinks available in Britain."
Mr Grayling also promised that a Tory government would impose "instant punishments" on youngsters guilty of antisocial behaviour. They include "grounding" troublesome children – ordering them to stay indoors apart from going to school – and forcing them to undertake community punishments such as cleaning up parks.
He launched a wide-ranging attack on the "broken" criminal justice system, protesting: "There are too many serious offenders getting away with it."
Mr Grayling promised to get rid of the "mountains of bureaucracy" swamping police and to attack the "caution culture" that meant serious offenders avoiding jail. Accusing Labour of losing control of the nation's borders, he insisted: "A Conservative government will be robust in the way it controls immigration. There will be no open door to Britain."
Mr Grayling claimed that Britain was still too soft on those who "spread a doctrine of hate" and announced he would immediately ban the extreme Islamist group Hizb-ut-Tahrir upon becoming home secretary. The party also promised to give greater powers to police to warn communities about dangerous criminals living in the area.
Dominic Grieve, the shadow Justice Secretary, claimed offenders enjoyed "automatic privacy" because of the Human Rights Act. He said the Tories would make it "crystal clear that protecting the public takes precedence over the privacy of criminals". He also committed the Tories to building more prison places to address overcrowding.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
My question is: what are they going to do about high-level corruption? Anything at all?
Tories love to put up the price of mainstay working class 'mass consumption' products - petrol, food, booze, cigs, transport. Such products represent a very small % of daily expenditure for the rich, but a HUGE % for the poor. Its the same tired old see-saw (this not a plug for Labour, who is equally crap).
It amazes me that politics & class divisions have changed so little in the last 30 years in Britain since I left the place. And no, you are not a class-less society, the same divisions are still deeply entrenched. Sorry, but much as there is still a lot to admire about blighty, you all seem to be stuck in an ultra-conservative time warp (conservative with a small 'c').
And as for your medieaval monarchy - do you realize how much scorn you invoke when you attempt to impose democracy on other nations like Hong Kong & Iraq? Your head of state is not even democratically elected.
Surely if they want to prevent the city/town centre binge drinking culture/problem they should arrest anyone who is beyond incapable of theirs or others safety & take them before all night magistrate sessions where fines of such proportions are handed down the national debt would be cleared within 6 months. Those who are found incapable & need the attention of the paramedics/hospital services could be fined with a further full charge for the NHS services provided for their idiocy.
Offenders may become a tad more circumspect in their behaviour whilst the courts removal of their alcohol funding would reinforce the reduction in the numbers of offenders.
Perhaps I'm forgetting how much VAT/Tax revenues would be lost by this suggestions, or should their be a a tax on such cynicism.
What a splendid idea, so much better than awareness raising campaigns (how many tramps or teenagers do you know that pay attention to such things) or cracking down on alcohol-related disorder and violence (aren't the prisons full enough?)...political opposition and the drinks industry will always bang on about 'penalising the responsible drinker' when they try to counter such arguments, but it's only irresponsible drinkers that will be seriously affected...if you don't drink that much then you will barely notice the difference, but if you drink to the extent that this would have a serious effect on your finances then its probably time to cut back anyway...
Like I said
Labour made a lousy job, but theres nothing new with this bunch its just back to the burner.
Our Prime Minister is not democratically elected either