UK

6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 4°C

The first sister of feminism

She threw off her habit and put women on the stage. Simon Caldwell tells the tale of the feisty nun set to become a saint

Mary Ward was put in prison after asking the Pope to approve her order of nuns

ALAMY

Mary Ward was put in prison after asking the Pope to approve her order of nuns

In 1631, an exhausted 46-year-old woman arrived at the gates of the Vatican. Mary Ward, a Yorkshire-born nun, had walked more than 1,500 miles from her order in present-day Belgium to Rome, knowing that she might end up in prison.

For more than two decades, she had been leading an order of devotees that lived in defiance of the Vatican's strict rules that confined nuns to their cloisters.

Ward had taught her religious sisters not to wear habits and trained them to work with the poor and the persecuted, and to found and teach in Catholic schools. She also encouraged women to perform in plays, a move considered scandalous in Shakespearean times when all female roles were played by boys.

She was living at the height of the Roman Inquisition where accusations of heresy abounded. The pope at the time was Urban VIII, the same pontiff who threw Galileo in prison for daring to suggest that the Earth orbited around the Sun.

Now this revolutionary woman had gone to Rome asking him for official approval of her rebellious order which lived in defiance of centuries of Catholic teaching.

It was, therefore, perhaps of little surprise that Urban threw Ward in jail and issued a papal bull ordering her movement to be suppressed.

But now the same institution that declared her a "heretic" has taken the first decisive step towards making Ward a saint. A panel of Vatican theologians from the Commission of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints has concluded that Ward lived a life of "heroic virtue". They are recommending that she should be declared "Venerable" – the first major step toward recognition as a saint.

Ward was born in Ripon in 1585 to a staunchly religious family at a time when Catholicism was under persecution. Two of her relatives were involved in the Gunpowder Plot and as a young girl she spent much of her life on the run.

At age 15 she crossed the Channel to become a Poor Clare, a strictly orthodox Franciscan order of nuns who led a life of prayer and penury. But she soon grew tired of the rigid strictures placed on Catholic nuns and in 1609 founded her own order at St Omer. Based on the Jesuits, her sisters were highly active within their community and believed in educating young women and preserving Catholicism across the Channel – an increasingly dangerous task.

Most controversial was Ward's insistence that women should be allowed to act in plays, at a time when female roles were almost always played by young men. In England it led to the nuns being derided as "chattering hussies" and caused shock on the Continent, where actresses were viewed with the same contempt as showgirls or prostitutes. Urban also singled this idea out for vehement criticism.

The Pope placed Galileo under arrest a year after meeting Ward, whose supporters argue that she is comparable to Galileo not only in the way she was treated but because her ideas were just as revolutionary.

Sister Gemma Simmonds, a member of the Congregation of Jesus, the name by which Ward's order is known today, said: "The Church has apologised for its treatment of Galileo and there is a statue of him in Rome. We are still waiting. Mary Ward had a vision of what women could do in the Church and in society not only decades but centuries before anyone else saw it. She was given this insight directly by God."

Sister Simmonds, who lectures in theology at Heythrop College, the University of London, believes that Ward should be regarded as a feminist icon for Catholics and non-Catholics alike.

"She had a vision of the equality of men and women before God and a vision of the capacity of women to do good and to work for the kingdom of God," she said. "She had this at a time when universities were still discussing whether women had souls.

"She was ferociously persecuted by the Church and she submitted to this because she had to. But she never grew bitter and she never allowed a word of bitterness or resentment against those who persecuted her to appear in her writings. Even in prison, even when they thought she was dying, she never lost that extraordinary gift of hope and trust in God. I want her to be canonised. I want justice for her and I want the justification for what women can do in the Church." Ward spent a year in prison in Munich and after her release, she ordered that the Pope's wishes to close down her order be carried out. She died in 1645 in the siege of York during the English Civil War and was buried in the parish church of Osbaldwick, on the outskirts of York. In the century that followed, English nuns persuaded various popes to lift the suppression on the order but they would only do so on the condition that Ward was not recognised as its foundress.

Then in the 1900s, a French member of the order, Sister Magdalen Gremion, asked Pope Pius X to his face to restore Ward as foundress. He immediately denounced Ward as a heretic but later concluded that there was no case against her.

His successor, Pope Pius XI, opened Ward's cause for sainthood in 1932, and Pope Pius XII later praised her as an "incomparable woman".

Father Peter Gumpel, the Rome-based Jesuit who is in charge of the cause, said that he expected Pope Benedict XVI to declare Ward "Venerable" by next year.

The bishops and cardinals of the Vatican's Congregation for the Causes of Saints will first review the decision of the theologians and scrutinise a 5,500-page position paper on Ward's life. "I expect the decision to be unanimous in favour of the cause progressing," said Father Gumpel. "I think it would be very strange if the cardinals and bishops disagreed with the view of the theologians and I have no reason to think that they would do that."

Today, Ward's order has about 4,000 sisters in two branches – the Institute of the Blessed Virgin Mary, or Loreto sisters, and the Congregation of Jesus – working in every continent, and in places as far afield as Cuba, Siberia, outer Mongolia and East Timor.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Feminism - the ultimate attack on the human race.
[info]colin_brown wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 09:21 am (UTC)
Have any proponents of the Feminism movement heard about 'a wall of silence' that's descending upon women across America? I guess not. Most of you are probably too busy nailing men to the wall for having the audacity to pay you a passing compliment. Am i right?

The wall of silence: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goziG2mMn8c
Re: Feminism - the ultimate attack on the human race.
[info]vgnwtch wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 04:59 pm (UTC)
No, you're not.
Re: Feminism - the ultimate attack on the human race.
[info]collin_brown wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 06:34 pm (UTC)
Do explain.
[info]regina_mia1 wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 11:39 am (UTC)
Feminism is just another name for humanism. When girls are brought up to aspire to their greatest potential, and boys are brought up to feel free to express themselves, unpressured by macho stereotype, we may yet see a peaceful, balanced world.
Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race
[info]fadime wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 11:40 am (UTC)
Actually, you are wrong. Your comments are uninformed, reductionist, ignorant and thoroughly depressing. Allow me to give you a brief and general summary of the aims of Feminism. Feminism's principle aims are universal suffrage, universal education, equal pay for men and women in the same occupation, as well as equal representation in the corridors of power, government and industry.Oh yes, I almost forgot, we proponents of Feminism would like to see an end to rape and violence towards women, whether this is marital rape, stranger rape or indeed rape as a weapon of war. Of course, this is a general summary to enlighten you as you seem to think Feminism is simply a war between male and female, which it is not. It is a war against an entrenched system which represses women and as a consequence, men. It is a proven fact that ALL OF SOCIETY thrives and flourishes once female empowerment is engendered. It astounds me that you and many like you are so repelled by the fight by both women and men, for female equality. Women's rights are human rights and surely we all benefit from their recognition in our global society?
The only thing I would like to nail to the wall Mr Brown are my convictions. But do feel free to say my hair is looking good today.
(no subject) - [info]colin_brown - Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 04:05 pm (UTC)
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race
[info]fadime wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 04:59 pm (UTC)
Apologies, I thought you were addressing the bigger political picture but now I realise your self-pitying diatribe is induced by what appears to be a profound dislike of the unforgivably opinionated women who have crossed your forecourt. You are unable to process any of my posted comments, nor are you able to respond rationally to them. Your embittered, emotional whinning and shockingly narrow comments do you no favours. Can you at least try to envisage a different reality, one in which men and women strive for a greater goal than just being attractive or acceptable to the opposite sex? I do feel sorry for your apparent loneliness but please, for the love of god, re-read the nonsense you have written and perhaps reflect a little! And if I may be so bold as to change your words to underscore my point... No woman, no children, just a great car on the driveway? Is that it? indeed.
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race
[info]collin_brown wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 08:10 pm (UTC)
I don't think you are seeing the 'bigger' picture here. A process of 'two-way attraction' involving opposite sexes is THE vital component to the survival of the human species.

Feminism, at least (in my opinion) turns men off of women - however visually attractive they happen to be. Women, just like men, are genetically predisposed with an innate evolutionary ability to select an appropriate mate (match). This natural process is interrupted when feminism comes into play. The feminist gives off an aura that signals males (potential mates) to keep clear of them. This could explain why a lot of young men when interviewed mislabel feminists as lesbians. Men aren't scared of the feminist. It is more accurate to say that men know when they are not welcome and unfortunately, the feminist-convert sends this message out loud and clear.
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race
[info]colin_brown wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 04:34 pm (UTC)
During my career I've served countless numbers of 'empowered' women. In my experience dealing with them one just can't please them. They return everything as 'faulty' when they can't figure out how to make it work. When I demonstrate to them that there's nothing wrong with the product they imply I'm suggesting that they're stupid or something.

Feminists are never wrong.

Sure, I see the cars they pull up in, BMW's, 4x4's Mercedes sports coupes and so on and I'm happy that they're doing well for themselves - but at what price? No men, no children, just a bunch of like-minded friends? Is that it?

I'd never ask an 'empowered' women on a date. I'm put off by their ultra-defensive - 'I can never be wrong' attitude. Feminists are pushy and argumentative to the point where just don't know when to quit. How does a sensitive/caring guy who could otherwise love such a woman get close to such a creature?

What have 'us guy's' got to do to date these liberated women? Turn into assholes? Many men are repelled by the feminists' attitude. Take it from me. I'm a solvent, heterosexual guy with a house that's paid for and I have a great car on the driveway, but, the last thing I'm looking for is an egotistical, empowered feminist to share the rest of my life with.

To put it bluntly, good men don't find feminists attractive at all. We automatically reject them as a life partner choice.

Isn't that a sad admission. I think so.
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race
[info]gobacktosleep1 wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 06:35 pm (UTC)
Considering you're 40 and single and that there are plenty of women out there who aren't feminists, do you think that you lack of success so far in finding someone to spend the rest of your life with might be down to other factors?
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race
[info]collin_brown wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 07:35 pm (UTC)
I don't lack female company. I simply avoid the 'feminists' variety of the species. And this is why.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1uTUO1nKTw
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race
[info]gobacktosleep1 wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 08:03 pm (UTC)
I doubt that. You keep posting about the importance of having children and family. You don't have that and judging by your prolific posting I can't see you spending much time with anything other than your computer.
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race
[info]collin_brown wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 08:33 pm (UTC)
Yeah I know. There's a torrent of 'fems' on the scene right now. I'm trying to deprogram some of them using the PC. Very Few fems want children these days. They prefer careers instead. It's all part of the Marxist grand plan to turn the two species against one-another by placing women in the 'victimhood' category - (club).

That ought to ruffle a few feathers.
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race - [info]gobacktosleep1 - Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 08:48 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race - [info]collin_brown - Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 08:52 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race - [info]gobacktosleep1 - Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 08:57 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race
[info]collin_brown wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 09:24 pm (UTC)
How does the "equal pay for men and women in the same occupation" scenario pan out in practice?

Let's imagine that an 20 stone man is trapped screaming for his life on the third floor of a town house (40ft up) that's been set ablaze by some young punks just for kicks.

You, (all 5'4" and 10 stone of you) as the nearest available firefighter get the call to rescue the unfortunate chap. When you arrive on the scene he's passed out overcome by toxic fumes. You scale the ladder and discover him flat-out on the bedroom floor.

How, do [you] pick up someone twice your body weight who is now (a dead weight) because he cannot assist you in any capacity?

He dies that night. But you get to go home because you fulfilled your duties by attempting the rescue. How many more failed rescues would you perform before you begin to question the 'equality' aspect of your new found feminism?

I can't say if there is a God with absolute certainty. But if there is, I am quite sure he didn't design one of us with a 20st lifting capacity and the other with a 5 stone capacity without a very good reason in mind.

Now tell me again. Why is feminism good?
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race
[info]gobacktosleep1 wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 09:57 pm (UTC)
I know several fire fighters, 2 of which are women. Neither is the weight or height you have described, in fact judging by your picture, both of them are a lot stronger than you, and you are of course a male. I think the rational feminist argument, not perhaps the argument of a few loonies, is that anyone who is physically and mentally capable of doing a job should do so. Regardless of what sex they are.
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race
[info]collin_brown wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 10:28 pm (UTC)
Even a 20 stone women doesn't have anywhere near the same (muscle mass percentage) as men do nor, the additional strength that accompanies such a physical advantage.

I'd like to add that I find 20st women less attractive on the eye than the 10st variety. Natural selection at work I'm afraid. I dare say, my 11 stone frame is unappealing to women who prefer muscular, heavier built men. This is simply Darwin's theory of natural selection in action.
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race
[info]gobacktosleep1 wrote:
Friday, 12 June 2009 at 06:37 am (UTC)
There aren't many 20 stone firefighters about of any sex and they tend not to fight fires solo either. So you can forget about that. And as for muscle percentage and strength that comes down to what the person does with their body. One firewomen I know is a dead weight lifter who represented her country, she can lift a lot more than most firemen.

You're example isn't well thought out. And as for the comment on Darwin's theory, both of them are younger than you and have children
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race - [info]colin_brown - Friday, 12 June 2009 at 07:49 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race - [info]collin_brown - Friday, 12 June 2009 at 05:36 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race - [info]collin_brown - Friday, 12 June 2009 at 06:04 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Feminism-the ultimate attack on the human race - [info]collin_brown - Friday, 12 June 2009 at 06:30 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]barbaramurphy wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 02:06 pm (UTC)

" FEMINISM IS THE RADICAL NOTION THAT WOMEN ARE PEOPLE "

A big thank you to' The Independent ' for this story; Simon Caldwell
did an excellent writing job - informative and brought Mary Ward to life.
Feminism is sexism
[info]luke3333 wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 02:53 pm (UTC)
Feminism is sexism, it means the promotion of the interest of half of the population at the expense of the rest.
Re: Feminism is sexism
[info]fadime wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 04:00 pm (UTC)
I think you need to do some research because your knowledge of Feminism is woefully limited. Feminism strives for EQUALITY and is the antithesis of discrimination. If human rights abuses are anathema to you then surely you must champion the legal, cultural, economic and political rights of women? The fight for women's rights emerged as a response to patriarchal self-interest and power agendas. Surely even you can see that it is paternalism that has promoted 'the interest of half the population at the expense of the rest'. Your dualistic, simplistic view of pitting men against women is not helpful in what is a HUMAN endeavour for an equal and balanced society.
Re: Feminism is sexism
[info]luke3333 wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 04:55 pm (UTC)
Oh Yeah...well when feminism campaigns to give men an equal right to decide if a foetus (his baby) should be aborted or campaigns to close the death gap (women living on average 6/7/whatever years longer than men) or an equal share of the family on divorce - I will believe that feminism is really egalitarianism - until then it is SEXISM - and is only interested in the "pay gap", violence against women (not violence against men mind you) and anything else that women feel they can find to complain about.
Hey luke3333 , get an intelligent education about feminism!
[info]nooraza wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 06:46 pm (UTC)
Can you expalin why in the Vatican for example, women are not allowed to be priets! Or in Islamist culture, women/girls have to cver up from head to toe, for no rational reason, whereas men can dress whatever tehy like? Or that most pedophiles are MEN! It looks like, in the 21st. century, wmen & girls are still regarded as uneqaul and unfree, whereas, God originally graced every human being free and equal, as in the great libeartion message brought by Christ! And this wonderful nun, Sister mary ward, sounds fantastic - we, modern women owe so much to such just women and MEN like her!
Re: Hey luke3333 , get an intelligent education about feminism!
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Sunday, 14 June 2009 at 01:22 pm (UTC)
Oooh Nooraza, I knew you would be here...

Can you evidence please that "most" paedophiles are men?

As it stood on a report a couple years back, the actual split between men and women is very close indeed with both wavering around the 50% mark, however most men that commit an offence of this nature are immediately imprisoned whilst there is still much reluctance by some Judges to imprison women in the same manner or there are other issues such as post natal depression.

But then the message that all men are paedophiles is one sent out by the NSPCC, an organisation steered by a radical feminist group called Women's Aid if I remember rightly, an organisation that is so rabidly anti-male it makes even the neo-nazis look tame.

And three years ago when this portrayal of "all men is evil" advertising campaign by the NSPCC came out, we got it taken off the air...
Re: Feminism is sexism
[info]4215christine wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 07:19 pm (UTC)

The foetus one is difficult - it can't survive without the woman who doesn't want to be its mother, so no compromise is possible. Reducing the death gap would be great. Men can live to 113 if the circumstances are right - the officially recognised world's oldest woman was only 115 when she died recently. I suspect the younger generation of women's drinking and smoking (I know I generalise!) might bring the future average down.

When I first discovered feminism, in the 70s, the Six Demands included equal pay, equality at work, free contraception, abortion on demand and 24-hour childcare. I must admit that, after all this time, I couldn't have remembered all six without googling; different sources have suggested education as the sixth, or sexuality. Even then, there was a split between radical feminists, who didn't have anything good to say of men, and middle-of-the-road feminists, who did.

I was a feminist in 1973. I'm a feminist now. I've been happily married for twenty years. My mother-in-law was a wonderful woman.

I thought the Pope was infallible
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 07:34 pm (UTC)
So if the Pope has said she is a whore and a heretic so must she be. Why reopen the book again, his holiness has spoken...

Most popular in UK News

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date