World

Rain (AM and PM) 4° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

14-year-old survives Airbus ocean crash

By Daniel Howden, Africa Correspondent

'This A310 (above) has posed problems for a long time,' says Stephane Salord, honorary consul for the Comoros Islands

AFP/GETTY IMAGES

'This A310 (above) has posed problems for a long time,' says Stephane Salord, honorary consul for the Comoros Islands

Rescuers were last night hailing the “miracle survival” of a single child after a passenger jet crashed into the sea off the Comoros Islands in the Indian Ocean. With the remaining 152 passengers and crew aboard Yemenia flight IY626 feared dead, it emerged that the aircraft had been the subject of an EU investigation two years ago.

Relatives were last night waiting for news in Paris, Marseille and Sana’a, the capital of Yemen, after officials said the airbus had plunged into the ocean short of its final destination on the island of Grand Comore.

The Yemenia flight’s complicated route had seen passengers collected on a different plane from Paris and Marseille before switching to the 19-year-old Airbus A310 in Sana’a to make the final leg of the journey to Comoros.

According to rescuers, the sole survivor was a young girl called Bahia, who was making a good recovery in hospital on the largest of the Comoros Islands. The girl, 14, who was said to have been travelling with her mother, was plucked from the sea near the crash site and then confirmed her identity to local officials. “She is well now,” said a spokesman. “She was able to talk to the authorities.”

Rescuers continued to comb the wreckage with help from the French navy last night, battling 40mph winds and high seas. Initial reports that a five-year-old boy had been rescued were later corrected as officials said no other survivors had been found.

Back in France, anger was mounting over allegations that authorities had known the aircraft was unsafe |to travel. Many of the missing passengers were French, or holders of dual French-Comoran passports, and EU officials admitted that they were considering blacklisting Yemenia Air over safety concerns.

Speaking from Marseille, home to around 80,000 Comoran immigrants, honorary consul Stephane Salord compared Yemenia’s planes to “flying cattle trucks”.

“This A310 is a plane that has posed problems for a long time. It is absolutely inadmissible that this airline Yemenia played with the lives of its passengers this way,” he said. “It is an absolute disgrace that we tolerate this kind of thing and I think the company’s responsibility is considerable.”

Much of the controversy centred on the practice by which passengers were taken out of European air space on planes that met stringent safety requirements before being switched to older planes to make their onward journey. In addition, there were particular concerns with the specific Airbus, which had clocked up more than 51,000 hours flying prior to the crash in the early hours of yesterday morning.

France’s Transport Minister Dominique Bussereau said French aviation inspectors found a “number of faults” during a 2007 inspection of the plane. Meanwhile, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) said it had suspended Yemenia’s permission to maintain EU-registered planes in February after the carrier failed a set of audit inspections.

However, the airline owned jointly by Yemen and Saudi Arabia was not on the EU’s airlines blacklist, set up two years ago. EU Transport Commissioner Antonio Tajani defended the decision not to blacklist Yemenia saying it had passed the necessary tests.

“The airline wasn’t on the EU blacklist because it had passed the checks ... After today’s accident we shall be contacting the company and we should verify the blacklist,” he told a news conference in Brussels. “The European blacklist works pretty well in Europe,” he said, before proposing that a worldwide blacklist be set up.

Those reassurances were of little consolation to the scores of relatives

who yesterday gathered at Paris’ Roissy Charles de Gaulle airport and at Marseille Marignane airport to wait for news. “They put us aboard wrecks, they put us aboard coffins. That’s where they put us. It’s slaughter. It’s slaughter,” one relative in Paris told French TV.

Thoue Djoumbe, another Comoran in Paris, said she and other passengers had been complaining about flight conditions on the airline for years.

“It’s a lottery when you travel to Comoros,” she told Associated Press. “We’ve organised boycotts, we’ve told the Comoran community not to fly on Yemenia airways because they make a lot of money off of us and, meanwhile, the conditions on the planes are disastrous.”

On Grand Comore, the largest of the three Comoros Islands about 190 miles north-west of Madagascar, a crowd of relatives were said to be trying to force their way into the airport for news.

The Yemenia flight was the second Airbus to crash into the sea in as many months and the second air tragedy to strike France after Air France Airbus A330-200 flying from Rio de Janeiro to Paris crashed into the Atlantic on 31 May, killing all 228 people on board.

Yemeni civil aviation deputy chief Mohammed Abdul Qader said it was too early to speculate on the cause of the crash as the flight recorder had not been recovered.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Coincidence?
[info]fitzeye wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 09:09 am (UTC)
Two Airbus's both French... I think they should ground the French Carriers and close their airports until the cause has been established, to say it is nothing to do with the plane is ridiculous...what was it a security breach?

They are quick enough to close their ports aren't they...and for what a few Euro's?

The truth is out there.
Re: Coincidence?
[info]ourmaninferney wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 10:30 am (UTC)
Get your facts right: one French plane and one Yemeni/Saudi plane; one leaving Brazil, one leaving France; one well-maintained, one apparently not.

But don't let facts get in the way of your conspiracy delusions.
Re: Coincidence?
[info]media_myths wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 10:38 am (UTC)
One of the planes was from Yemen. The coincidence is that they were both made by Airbus. Maybe if British workers were quicker to take action over their jobs we wouldn't be the country who's about to have the worst effects of this recession as we'd still have a manufacturing base, just like France.

The truth is definitely out there.
Re: Coincidence?
[info]turk_diddler wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 10:46 am (UTC)
Thanks for the warning, I'm rushing next door to tell my neighbour to catch the train, no way can I let him drive his Citroen to work.
Re: Coincidence?
[info]oldbristolian wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 12:16 pm (UTC)
I should warn your neighbour because some current Citroens do have a software bug and you may find the central locking failing and then it becomes impossible to lock the doors. Not fatal though!
Old plane
[info]lasvegasrich wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 03:54 pm (UTC)
We may never know what happened to the Air France plane flying from Brazil, but this Airbus had 19 years of service. It's very possible that if wasn't maintained properly, a crash was inevitable. There should be a general rule that old planes be restricted to carrying freight instead of passengers.
Could Be Anything
[info]us_citizen wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 04:47 pm (UTC)
could be anything from a passenger on the plane that Mi5 or their cousins in Langley didnt want around, to being a faulty component on the plane, to bad weather....who knows the truth for real.....could be anything

what is wrong with the airbus?
[info]talebosh wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 05:04 pm (UTC)
there is something wrong with the airbus, that is starting to become evident. Just what is it? I don't know. like the euro fighter it relies completely on computers to stay aloft. Whether these computers fail or lose their 'bios' i don't know, but there is something wrong
Airbus?
[info]colinscarr wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 02:28 am (UTC)
The Airbus in your photo above is actually a Boeing 737. Get your facts right Independent!

As for possible causes of this accident, it is far too early to tell. The full accident investigation will take months, possibly even years. For those who find this hard to understand, the investigation will be extremely detailed and will look for all the contributing factors. It involves a huge amount of work, so it takes a long time. Jumping to conclusions along the lines of, "Airbus aircraft aren't safe!", or, "All old planes are dangerous." simply fails to take account of the sometimes highly complex and anti intuitive, facts

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date