Gaddafi highlights nuclear 'double standards'
Digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Reddit
Google
Stumble Upon
Fark
Newsvine
YahooBuzz
Bebo
Twitter
Independent Minds
Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi today said that the Palestinians should be allowed to have nuclear weapons if the world does not act to disarm Israel of its arsenal.
Colonel Gaddafi accused the international community of "double standards" because Israel is allowed to maintain a barely-hidden nuclear capability while Iran comes under massive pressure not to develop its own.
In a wide-ranging interview with Sky News, Col Gaddafi said he was "sorry" about the death of Wpc Yvonne Fletcher, who was shot outside the Libyan Embassy in London in 1984, but insisted he had no idea who was responsible.
Just months after the fierce controversy over the return of Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi's return to Libya on compassionate grounds, he described UK-Libyan relations as "very good" - claiming that the links continued on an economic and commercial level throughout his country's years as an international pariah.
And he said the Nobel Peace Prize for US President Barack Obama was "premature" and inspired by "sycophancy" on the part of the awarding committee.
Col Gaddafi smoothed the path for Libya's return to the international community when he announced in 2003 that he was giving up weapons of mass destruction programmes.
But asked if he would advise Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to do the same, he told Sky: "Iran, up to now, hasn't said it is manufacturing a nuclear weapon: Iran says it is enriching uranium.
"If Iran were to manufacture nuclear weapons, nuclear arms, then all of us, including us, will be against them. But Iran has not said so."
Denouncing the "double standards" which saw Iran treated differently from Israel, he added: "If the Israelis have the nuclear weapons and the nuclear capabilities, then it is the right of the Egyptians, the Syrians, the Saudis to have the same - even the Palestinians should have the same because their counterparts, or their opponents, have nuclear capabilities. Why not?
"Even the state of Palestine, when one day it is established, should have a nuclear capability because the counterpart of such a state, the Israeli state, already has nuclear capabilities.
"If we don't want this situation, we'll have to disarm the Israelis from their nuclear weapons and capabilities."
Col Gaddafi was asked what his message was to the family of Wpc Fletcher, who are still waiting for her killers to be brought to trial 25 years after her death.
He replied: "I know that such a thing happened. I know a policewoman was shot and killed when she was doing her duty.
"She is not an enemy to us, and we are sorry all the time and our sympathy, because she was on duty, she was there to protect the Libyan Embassy.
"But this is the problem that should be solved - who did it? That is the question. It is always like a persistent matter."
Col Gaddafi said that his country's relations with the UK were "very good" a decade after the restoration of full diplomatic links, which were broken off following Wpc Fletcher's murder.
"We have economic relations, investment relations, British companies, banks and, indeed, investments over there in England," said the Libyan leader.
"Let me say that economic relations were good even during the time of Lockerbie between our two countries. They were never affected.
"Even during the time when we had no diplomatic relations, when diplomatic relations were cut off, British companies were working in the oil sector and British banks were dealing with Libyan banks and we had commercial ties and economic relations never affected, although we had no diplomatic relations."
Asked about the award of the Nobel Prize to Mr Obama, Col Gaddafi said: "It goes without saying he is an African and we are proud that we Africans, we on the African continent, Africa as a whole, presents someone who is an African to be President of the United States of America.
"But, as regards the Nobel Peace Prize, I do believe he deserves it, but to be given right now I think it is some sort of hypocrisy, sycophancy, and I think it is premature. It is not due yet."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
The attitude of the west towards Nuclear Weapons is profoundly hypocritical. We threaten, and occasionally invade, any country that looks like it is planning to develop Nuclear Weapons, unless of course it happens to be a friend. It is not only Isreal that has developed Nuclear weapons without any real attempt by the west to stop them. The same is true of India and Pakistan. The major Nuclear powers also ignore the fact that the Anti-Nuclear treaties do not just forbid countries like Iran from developing the Bomb, they also impose a obligation on the existing powers to work towards total disarmament, something which is clearly not being done.
Why is the PM not asked about this all the time?
Can Israeli Nucks hit the UK in 45 minuets? (or a few hours anyway)
If so what is the Pm's plan to counter this?
It must be the mods day off seen as we can talk about Iran and Israel today.
If the Zionists and the Jew haters buggered off, it might happen more often, but what can you do, they have opinions too. Even if they don't lend to debate.
Hey, theres an incentive! Get Obama to get the peace process going to shut me up ^^
It would be almost funny if it wasn't such a grim subject eh?
Yeah, i agree the nutter does have a point; the West is performing summersaults to prevent one aggressively religious country that refuses inspection of its nuclear facilities and constantly ignores UN resolutions from acquiring nuclear weapons, but is happy that another country in a roughly similar position to has a stockpile of over 350 warheads.
And we wonder why the Arabs distrust us......
Whole volumes could be written on the subject but possibly one quote from a former Israeli PM sums up the case:
Wednesday, October 3, 2001
OCCUPIED JERUSALEM -- An acrimonious argument erupted during the Israeli cabinet weekly session last week between Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his foreign Minister Shimon Peres during which Sharon reportedly yelled at Peres, saying "don't worry about American pressure, we control America."
According the Israeli Hebrew radio Kol Yisrael Wednesday, Peres warned Sharon that refusing to heed incessant American requests for a cease-fire with the Palestinians would endanger Israeli interests and turn the US against us.
At this point, a furious Sharon reportedly turned toward Peres, saying "every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it."
If you control the Superpower then you can get away with anything.
Just the Western world (at the moment).
It is very likely that when Israel loses its big "stick" in the form of blanket American support, Israel will be in a very dire position.
This event has been prophesied thousands of years ago. The prophecy is about the Jews as a race, not about specifically about Palestine/Israel.
The prophecy states that there will come a time of reckoning for their actions against God and man, when there will be no hiding place for Jews. Its one of the end-of-days prophecies.
Sounds like a calamity awaits them, but to a large extent it seems to be self inflicted.
The piece that made me smile is that despite the fact we did not approve of Col Gaddafi, did not like WPC Fletcher being shot, were underneath a PanAm flight that was blown apart etc., we still managed to keep the banking system going & invest in oil!
Good old UK, knows which side the bread is buttered!
If you look at the history of something like the Roman Empire, it achieved peace by either conquering it’s neighbours or forming alliances with them.
Peace was maintained by one side being much stronger than the other.
For instance, someone I knew who lived in Northern Ireland told me that communities would be peaceful depending on a demographic structure.
A community that was 10% Catholic and 90% Protestant would be peaceful.
A community that was 90% Catholic and 10% Protestant would be peaceful.
A community that was 50% Catholic and 50% Protestant would NOT be peaceful, however.
According to Boris Johnson’s book on Rome, it was quite possible to live in Roman Gaul without seeing a soldier in your lifetime.
Actually the Israelis could not use their nuclear weapons against the Palestinians without killing their own people off via radioactive poisoning.
Israel minus the West Bank is only seven miles wide at it's narrowest point.
Wow, what an idea, I like it!
If Israel allowed Palestinian refugees to return, would they really make up only 10% of the population.
Whilst it is true that the 1947-48 war created 800,000 Arab refugees, it is surely an anomaly that their 4 million descendents are classified as refugees. This is quite unique, a status which is afforded to no other group of refugees in the world. For instance, Hindus fled Pakistan when India was partitioned when it gained independence. How much do we hear about the “right-to-return” of Hindus to their ancestral homelands in Pakistan? And if they did would they not be treated as second-class citizens because of Pakistan’s draconian blasphemy laws against Islam? The Indian Republic has no such blasphemy laws favouring one religious group.
I would certainly stop the casual massacares Isreal inficts on its occupied and its neighbours...
however, as is the way of the world these days, the people who should be telling us the truth, don't; and those that we (are supposed) to suspect of lying, do. Sad irony of the World post 9/11
the zionists have eyewateringly huge stockpiles of nuclear weapons of mass destruction,
and the US or UK can barely bring themselves to even whisper a word about them.
and the zionists have shown the willingness to indiscriminately and illegally use wmds against innocent people.
but when it comes to iran *legally* enriching uranium for *peaceful* purposes,
the 'west' almost cannot get the words out fast enough and often enough, condemning iran in 'the strongest possible terms'.
Double Standards of the worst kind!
At that time, peace will be taken from the earth and the "great sword" - nuclear sword - will be used. (Revelation 6:4) However, it will be neither the great tribulation nor "the end of the world" (Armageddon). As Jesus foretold, that will be "the beginning of birth pains". (Mathew 24:7,8)
If the Heavens planned a full return of Russia (and much suggests this) the present economic crisis will deepen. Then also the European Union and NATO will not stands.
In the same way the earlier prophecy had fulfilled: "And (he) [the king of the north = Russia] will go back (to) his land with great wealth [1945]; and his heart (will be) against the holy covenant [state atheism]; and will act effectively; and turned back to his own land [the break-up of the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact, the return of Russian troops to country]." (Daniel 11:28)
There is no end to the cunning of these Mossad assassins........
Israel is a bully who destabilises the whole area so the sooner balance is restored the better. But, our leaders cry 'foul' without, on the face of it, bothering to link this to the unutterable indeed ineffable cruelties forced on Palestinians and Palestine by thieving, lying cheating Nazirael Israelis.
Based on this irrefutable logic, Iran should get the bomb as soon as possible, and the sooner the better.