World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 14° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Millions facing famine in Ethiopia as rains fail

International aid agencies fear that the levels of death and starvation last seen 24 years ago, are set to return to the Horn of Africa. Paul Rodgers reports

Women and children gather at a food distribution centre in Ethiopia's Oromiya region

reuters

Women and children gather at a food distribution centre in Ethiopia's Oromiya region

The spectre of famine has returned to the Horn of Africa nearly a quarter of a century after the world's pop stars gathered to banish it at Live Aid, raising £150m for relief efforts in 1985. Millions of impoverished Ethiopians face the threat of malnutrition and possibly starvation this winter in what is shaping up to be the country's worst food crisis for decades.

Estimates of the number of people who need emergency food aid have risen steadily this year from 4.9 million in January to 5.3 million in May and 6.2 million in June. Another 7.5 million are getting aid in return for work on community projects, as part of the National Productive Safety Net Program for people whose food supplies are chronically insecure, bringing the total being fed to 13.7 million.

Donor countries provided sustenance to 12 million Ethiopians last year, more than half of it through the UN's World Food Programme (WFP). Having passed that total only eight months into this year, and with the main harvest already in doubt, aid agencies fear the worst is still to come. "We're extremely worried," said Howard Taylor, who heads the Department for International Development's office in Ethiopia. DfID has given £54m in aid to the country this year, and Britain has also contributed through the EU. "This is exactly the time when we shouldn't turn away from the people in need," he said.

"Critical water shortages" were reported in some areas by the UN's Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs last week with water-borne diseases such as acute diarrhoea spreading as communities resort to drinking from insanitary wells and ponds. Unicef said that the outbreaks are putting extra pressure on its Out-Patient Therapeutic Programme, which provides healthcare in some of the most needy areas.

In Somali, the hardest hit region with a third of the humanitarian caseload and complications caused by a low-intensity insurgency, the mortality rate for infants has risen above two per 10,000 per day according to a regional nutrition survey, which gives newborns roughly a one-third chance of dying before their fifth birthdays. While there is no clear definition, one widely used threshold for famine is four infant deaths per 10,000 per day.

Declaring a famine is a political decision. While it can galvanise public opinion and bring millions into aid programmes, it is widely seen as a political failure. President George Bush challenged his officials to avoid the word, a policy known as "No famine on my watch". Ethiopia's Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Commission is charged with preventing famines of the 1984-85 type, the sort that bring down governments, argued Tufts University academics Sue Lautze and Angela Raven-Roberts in a 2004 paper.

Dismissing the warning signals, Ethiopia's Prime Minister, Meles Zenawi, said earlier this month that there was no danger of famine this year. And Berhanu Kebede, Ethiopia's ambassador to Britain, said at the weekend: "We are addressing the problem. Food is in the pipeline."

The main practical difference between a food crisis and a famine is whether enough aid arrives to keep the starving alive. So while the scope of the problem can be measured in the number of hungry people, the severity depends on the generosity of those in the rich world. And this year they have been miserly. Despite the promise of G8 leaders at their summit in L'Aquila, Italy, last month to provide $20bn (£12bn) to improve food security in poor countries, contributions have slumped dramatically this year as donor states have shifted priorities to supporting banks and stimulating their own economies. "The international community is not living up to its promise to the World Food Programme," Mr Kebede said.

The WFP had little trouble raising its $6bn budget last year, but in 2009 it has collected less than half of that. Its Ethiopian operation, which had $500m in 2008, is short $127m this year, equivalent to 167,000 tonnes of food. The Famine Early Warning Network forecast this month that the shortfall would reach 300,000 tonnes by December. Rations for the 6.2 million people receiving emergency food aid have, as a result, been slashed by a third from a meagre 15kg of cereals, beans and oil a month to just 10kg. Even if the shortfall were made up today, it would take three months for supplies to be loaded on to ships bound for Djibouti, then transferred to trucks for the arduous overland journey to land-locked Ethiopia.

Aid agencies are worried about the main harvest this autumn, arguing that the time for action is now, not when the food runs out in November – usually the driest month – let alone when starving children with distended bellies capture the attention of the West's television viewing public. Despite its good intentions, Bob Geldof's Live Aid came towards the end of the 1984-85 famine, which killed more than a million people. Since then, Ethiopia's population has doubled to 80 million.

Mr Zenawi's government has set up a strategic food reserve which has at times reached 500,000 tonnes – though it is currently thought to be just 200,000 tonnes – which it uses to speed up delivery. As soon as they get funds, aid agencies can borrow food from this reserve, replacing it with supplies from abroad when they arrive. Although the government could release this food without promises of replenishment, it would soon run out; after covering the WFP's 167,000 tonne shortfall, the stockpile would be barely enough to feed a million people for three months.

The underlying problem for Ethiopia is the erratic behaviour of the country's climate, or rather its regional micro-climates. Moisture-bearing clouds scudding in from the Indian Ocean can pass over the parched eastern lowlands to dump generous amounts of rain on the fertile western highlands. The famine of 1984-85, revealed by BBC reporter Michael Buerk, was actually two separate famines, one in Tigray, in the north, the other in Somali, in the south-east.

Two main rains sustain the people of Ethiopia, the belg in spring and the kiremt, which usually start in July. Both are influenced by variations in sea-surface temperature. The El Niño phenomena in the eastern Pacific usually bring droughts to Ethiopia, and America's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration predicts that the current El Niño will strengthen over the next six months. The belg has failed for two years running now, while the kiremt started three weeks late this summer and the amount of rainfall when they did come was below normal. Aid agencies fear that the season could end early, or, equally bad, produce delayed downpours just when farmers need dry weather for the harvest. Even if the kiremt ends on time in October, some crops may not reach maturity because of the late planting.

Ethiopia is overwhelmingly dependent on agriculture, and some 90 per cent of its crops are watered by nature rather than by man-made irrigation systems. During droughts, farmers and nomadic herders tend to sell off their assets to buy food, leaving them with nothing when the next growing season begins. It can take three to five years for pastoral tribes to rebuild their herds.

Although Ethiopia is particularly hard hit, drought has also affected neighbouring countries. Resources in Somali are under additional strain because nomadic tribesmen from Somalia and Kenya have driven unusually large numbers of cattle across the border in search of water and pasture. Estimates of the number of cattle coming into the country range from 95,000 to 200,000.

The spike in global food prices in 2008 exacerbated a worsening situation, hitting the urban poor particularly hard. While they have fallen back this year, the price for grains in the markets of Adis Ababa are still some 50 per cent higher than their average in the four years to 2007.

The Ethiopian government is acutely aware of the danger of famine, not least to itself. Emperor Haile Selassie was deposed a year after the 1973 famine and the Derg military junta led by Lt Col Mengistu Haile Mariam was overthrown in 1991 after a civil war driven in part by the 1984-85 famine. While most other countries with food shortages allow charities to distribute food, Ethiopia's government insists that the bulk of food aid must pass through its hands.

The irony is that the Zenawi regime has done a reasonable job of boosting food production, achieving self-sufficiency in the late 1990s. One agency described it as the "bread basket" of Africa, harvesting more grain in a good year than South Africa. The government promotes best practices and distributes fertiliser to farmers. It also has an ambitious scheme to relocate 2.2 million people to more fertile areas. But even it can't control the rains.

Many Africans blame climate change for the erratic weather patterns and resulting food shortages. Jean Ping, the chairman of the African Union, said last week in Adis Ababa: "Although Africa is least responsible for global warming, it suffers most from a problem it didn't create."

The BBC R4 Reunion series, at 11.15am today, examines the 1984 Ethiopian famine. Guests include Michael Buerk

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Help, but let Ethiopians decide!
[info]haleway wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 12:21 am (UTC)
"While most other countries with food shortages allow charities to distribute food, Ethiopia's government insists that the bulk of food aid must pass through its hands."

That does not mean other countries are right.

What is wrong with the bulk of the food aid passing through government hands?
And What Are Other African Nations Doing
[info]mike4626 wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 10:43 am (UTC)
nothing the same as always - asking for charity and blaming their poor future on history.
Re: And What Are Other African Nations Doing
[info]haleway wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 12:59 pm (UTC)
this time, it is the NGOs who are asking.

Burkina faso has 60,000? NGOs!!!!!!!!!!!!! Is this really help?
you reap what you sow
[info]rexxxxxxxx wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 12:52 am (UTC)


I find it imposible to believe that the parents of this generation of starving children were not aware of the slim chance they would survive

it makes me desperately unhappy for these poor kids and cannot understand a culture that breed like cattle in the good times knowing the risk of drout and starvation when they over populate

a microcosm of the earth as a whole I suppose

glad I wont be arround in 200 years time when the whole planet will be locked into the same cycle of mindless breeding followed by mass starvation



Re: you reap what you sow
[info]bevfor wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 09:56 am (UTC)
I bet the women had little choice about sex or childbirth and realistically people consider children to be insurance for old(ish) age where there is no other provision. Surely it is far more selfish of impoverished Brits who know have access to family planning and pensions/benefits to keep breeding when there children have little chance of escaping the sink estates they were born in?
Re: you reap what you sow
[info]rexxxxxxxx wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 12:04 pm (UTC)


Oh yes, of course that is much worse.
Re: you reap what you sow
[info]jalb1960 wrote:
Monday, 31 August 2009 at 08:07 am (UTC)
The problem is that if you don't have children, who will look after you? Who will farm the land? Who will harvest the crops? Children aren't just mouths to feed, they are also the hands that will feed everyone else. Bearing in mind that a proportion of them won't survive, the pressure to have large families is immense, and understandable.
[info]nangyale wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 01:09 am (UTC)
"Since then, Ethiopia's population has doubled to 80 million." and was involved in the invasion and occupation of Somalia last year and is still keeping its forces in somali border towns while arming and financing some of the militias torning that country apart.
I think something is wrong with this country, as it cannot feed its own people but keeps its troops fighting a useless war. At the same time doubling its population in 25 years while being sustained by food aid. The easiest solution to Ethiopia's problems would rather be an arms embargo and sending it contraceptives rather then grains
Pitiful as it is...
[info]thisanthat wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 05:17 am (UTC)
much of it is self inflicted.
What else!
[info]over325one wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 06:21 am (UTC)
The population of this country doubles every few years. The problem is un-solvable. The are too many people in the World. This is the root of most environmental problems. All governments should be working to reduce population.
all part of the plan ?
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 08:08 am (UTC)
Failure of rains is a perfectly normal phenomenoin, and until recently the poplation was kept under comtrol by nature. humanity's meddling with Nature has created the problem

And untiil recently it was possible to shift food fairly cheaply around the wolrd and permit fairly continuous overshoot of the carrying capacity of the land, but those days are rapidly coming to an end.

At the moment people in Africa starve while people in Britain, America, Australia etc. die of disorders related to over-consumption, but western nations will soon face malnutrition, if not outright starvation, as the industrialised agricultural system goes into decline (as a consequence of governments' abject failure to address peak oil).

Perhaps it is all part of the plan the elites have for the world: grandscale depopulation via starvation/disease to get the population back down to a sustainable level of 0.5 to 1.5 billion, starting with Africa (it makes it so much easier to extract resources if the population is reduced to walking skeletons -they are too weak to resist).

On thing we can be certain of: the fat cats in the capital city will be feasting on luxury goods flown in at great expense.
stupidity.
[info]darryn87 wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 08:09 am (UTC)
have they lowered their large birth rate to more sustainable levels in the past twenty five years? have they educated their women about family planning, knowing ethiopian land is hostile to food production? probably not, and yet again the west takes the blame because useless africans will not learn to help themselfs. maybe there is nothing more to be done other than to let some die off, and save those who genuinely want to change their fertility habits and cultural backwardness in regards to their treatment of women as nothing more than breeding machines. one thing i do not want is any more of these cavemen gaining asylum in europe, like before. do we really want an eternally damned people such as these africans burdening our civilization? because they certainly are a burden to their own.
Re: stupidity.
[info]haleway wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 08:47 am (UTC)
that is a stupid comment. Africans don't wish to be where they are now. And they are making effors to change their unfortunate situations.

if the author were smarter, he/she would also equally blame western industries for the climate changes of which Africa is not responsible.
Re: stupidity.
[info]haleway wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 08:49 am (UTC)
that is a stupid comment.

if the author were smarter as s/he wishes to appear, s/he would equally blame also the western industries for the climatic changes that Africa is suffering
Re: stupidity.
[info]mj0911 wrote:
Monday, 31 August 2009 at 02:16 pm (UTC)
Yes, if you'd taken the time to look, you would see that birth rates have significantly lowered in Ethiopia in the last 50 years. Unfortunately these things do not happen quickly. They didn't in Europe, the Americas or Asia, and they won't in Africa. As for Ethiopian land being inhopsitable - didn't you read the bit about Ethiopia being hailed as the breadbasket of Africa? Or were you too busy racing to assumptions about African "cavemen" and "backwardness" to take any notice?
famines in arfica are laregely political
[info]mind_ful wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 08:09 am (UTC)
famines in ethiopia are largely political as can be seen by the insisten e of the govenment to handle all incoming donations, and divert a lot of it for themselves. ethipia is one of the richest countres in the world and was during the last famine which was also the result of rich leaders ignoring the poor. it needs to re-construct itself as a modern country.
NGO politics
[info]haleway wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 09:21 am (UTC)
NGOs want food aid in the name of Ethiopia (even when the Ethiopian government says 'we have enough food') and want to control its distribution. Why?

Western readers should know that NGOs are doing more harm to Ethiopia than good. The article written above can be true for most other African and some asian countries. But why Ethiopia? because it was a victim of a publicized famine in 1984 and it makes good news. But be informed that the context of 1984 famine was different. There was civil war and one region did not have access to resources of other regions. The situation now is different and better. There is drought sometimes but it is not something that cannot be controlled by the government. There are regions in Ethiopia where food production is high and enough. NGOs are accountable to whom?
No aid without population control
[info]merseymike wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 10:30 am (UTC)
I think that any attempt to give aid would be utterly pointless unless a strict system of population control is introduced - compulsorily. If this is not accepted, then no money or aid should be provided.
ROUND AND ROUND
[info]ameliemaryann wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 12:16 pm (UTC)
It's hardly surprising that millions are facing famine once again in Ethiopia because millions have been bred there since the last time that millions were facing famine, thanks to the food aid. Until the population levels are controlled, either naturally or by education (very long process) and the infrastructure built up with the help of 'Empire builders' so reviled in our hopelessly pc rubbishy societies, Ethiopia will continue to languish in the dark ages - unless, of course, we can invite them all into Britain, which is probably being considered. So long as aid is given in the form of food, this cycle of famine will continue with ever exploding populations, who eventually starve, as the human output is exceeding what the land and infrastructure can provide.
Another third world tragedy unfolds as Western society..
[info]workerholic_joe wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 12:46 pm (UTC)
..faces it's own struggle for survival. Unless we can find a way to close the moral-vacuum created by decades of deceit by politicians entrusted with our vote, the third world will to continue suffer.

A virulent-cancer - spread by elitists and mind-corrupted liberals rots away at the very tolerance of Western society.

Endgame: http://tinyurl.com/lk3xjc

(Part 1 of 16
"POP STARS BANISH FAMINE"
[info]georgesign wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 01:11 pm (UTC)
You mean all that self-sacrifice by Bono, Sting, Geldorf and various other Pop Stars didn't work?
DARFUR IS GONE AND THIS IS NEXT??
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 03:05 pm (UTC)
A yet another gone case like Darfur No one can tell
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla
Ethiopia and the world
[info]richspiv wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 05:07 pm (UTC)
Your article on Ethiopia ends with that comment from the African Union: "Although Africa is least responsible for global warming, it suffers most from a problem it didnt create". That's not strictly true. The most striking fact is that if Ethiopia could not feed itself in 1984 with 42 million people, how on earth was she going to be able to feed herself now with almost 90 million people, not to mention in 2015 when the figure will almost certainly be over 100 million. Even if there had been no such thing as climate change, the overwhelming likelihood would be that population pressure would lead to severe stress on land and water supply. Another vast drought was inevitable even without global warming, Ethiopia is an extreme case, but the same is true of most of the planet. We won't be able to feed the nine billion people of 2030, or even the 74 million cramming into Britain, and by that time the third world will be producing far more CO2 than it does today.
Any attempts to help starvation now must go hand in hand with programmes to help people limit the size of families.
Famine in Ethiopia
[info]jsknight100 wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 06:09 pm (UTC)
Since then, Ethiopia's population has doubled to 80 million. Is that the crux of the matter we cannot carry on feeding an expanding world population. Global warming also would be helped by a declining world population.
[info]edpell wrote:
Sunday, 30 August 2009 at 11:40 pm (UTC)
The four horsemen are the traditional way that nature limits the population. If humans do not choose to put in place an alternative method then nature will carry-on with the tradition. The four being starvation, disease, war and pollution (formerly pestilence). The world is a system too many people in leads to too many people starving. There is no new news here, no surprise. I hear England imports 45% of its food. Good luck chaps. I would say you have breed beyond your carrying capacity.
Africa's population
[info]paul_rodgers wrote:
Monday, 31 August 2009 at 07:14 am (UTC)
The Economist argues in this week's issue that the population explosion in Africa could be a good thing, with the large working population driving urbanisation and industrialisation.

It also argues that the ceiling population for many African countries could be considerably higher than at present. Much of the agriculture is split into tiny, inefficient plots with no irrigation and few inputs such as fertiliser and pesticides.

The article can be found at:

tinyurl.com/kuqlpy
population growth is not a problem
[info]dirbge wrote:
Monday, 31 August 2009 at 05:16 pm (UTC)
Consider people as resource with 'God given' potentials. Given the opportunity, they can do well. The more people are there...the better! Population growth is a problem when we look at people as 'bundle of needs'.
Read Dambisa Moyo's new book "Dead Aid" too.
Let who don't understand that we are interconnected blame the Ethiopians.
Ethiopian famin is also government agricultural policy failure
[info]gashtesfa wrote:
Tuesday, 1 September 2009 at 08:21 am (UTC)
The Ethiopian government is leasing agricultural land for Saudi Arabia, India and Malesian companies to produce Bio diesel and grain for export. The money goes to Meles family and party leaders. So the catastrophe is also coruption not only natur caused. Prime minister Meles is sailing farmers land for Arab milioners. The land which is not part of the Tigray ethnic oprigion of the leading party TPLF is located in the Amhara, Oromo and Afar region of Ethiopia. It is deliberately done to harm the people of these Ethnicity.
Why blame the West and nature time and again?
[info]abdatta wrote:
Tuesday, 1 September 2009 at 09:00 am (UTC)
It's unfortunate that Ethiopia became once again a subject of hunger and starvation. And again we are blaming nature and the West for our own dismal failure to feed ourselves. Scarcity of rain or water is a global phenomena-it's never been only a national issue. but still Ethiopia has lots of rivers including some that cross border taking tonnes of water and life-saving soil with them. Ethiopia still has more moisture and rain than Mali, Senegal, Djibouti, Sudan, Eritrea, Israel, Egypt, and the entire north African and middle east countries. Why do not we see mass hunger and starvation in other more arid, drought prone countries? Ethiopia's problem is not the West, nor it is nature. Our biggest problem is dictatorship, bad governance, bad policies and lack of national strategy and vision. The government that has no trust of its people cannot mobilize public action against misery and destitution. It cannot mobilize citizens to harness natural resources of the nation. I do not even know why we need a government in Ethiopia if we are not that better or no more than, for instance, the country of Somalia -the nation that has no government for the last two decades.
Abdatta
[info]justineparer wrote:
Tuesday, 1 September 2009 at 12:25 pm (UTC)
shame on all you people who have written here that these people are to blame, that they got what was coming. they are the VICTIMS.
how would you feel if it was your little child with rib bones sticking out?

you use a case as tragic as this so you can sit back and say, "well, they should have known better. let nature take its course." i bet when you are on your deathbed you wish for companionship and help. these people are no different.
[info]ethiomind wrote:
Wednesday, 2 September 2009 at 11:17 am (UTC)
As a development worker in Ethiopia I feel compelled to comment on some of the views expressed here. Whilst I understand frutsration with issues such as the population explosion here, there are far more complex issues at play than the Western world can easily understand. In a country with problems regarding gender equality, bearing children provides women with security, not simply in the future but also in the present. It provides them with status as a wife, family member and community member, all of which are required in order to survive what can be a very difficult life for the people of Ethiopia. With a high child mortality rate for a number of reasons the birth rate is high. Yes, Ethiopia does need to tackle gender inequality including family planning, and it is doing so with the help of development organisations. Whilst foreign'aid' is questionable in the long term, impending famine is a very worrying development and I hope that the world will help Ethiopia through this and allow its people to continue its development.
Famine in Ethiopia
[info]tesgiz wrote:
Wednesday, 2 September 2009 at 04:38 pm (UTC)
I think it is time for the international aid agencies to start thinking what the real causes are for the recycling famine in Ethiopia happening every now and then. It is not the shortage of the rain to be blamed always. Ethiopia has a lot of rivers flowing throughout the year. The waters from these rivers could be stored by building dams to guarantee even better "food self sufficiency". I would highly recommend the aid agencies to do what ever they can to help Ethiopia in this regard besides their effort for the humanitarian assistance they are carrying out now.
let stop talk and work togather
[info]mesafint wrote:
Wednesday, 23 September 2009 at 01:09 pm (UTC)
Now, we should n't talk about environment. Millions of life is being dampen in a soil. Our government is working to sustain its life on power rather than working to reduce the number of people starving each year. "The one who filled its belly do not thnk that others are being starved" local saying. We have to stop those rubbish talk on poletics and ethnicity and work togather

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date