World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

America unmasked: The images that reveal the Ku Klux Klan is alive and kicking in 2009

The USA has a new president but an old problem - and nothing typifies it like today’s Ku Klux Klan. The photographer Anthony Karen gained unprecedented access to the ‘Invisible Empire’

Words by Leonard Doyle

Klan members gather at a cross 'lighting' in Scottsboro, Alabama

Klan members gather at a cross 'lighting' in Scottsboro, Alabama

These images show members of the Ku Klux Klan as they want to be seen, scary and secretive and waiting in the wings for Barack and his colour-blind vision for America to fail. Anthony Karen, a former Marine and self-taught photojournalist was granted access to the innermost sanctum of the Klan. He doesn’t tell us how he did it but he was considered trustworthy enough to be invited into their homes and allowed to photograph their most secretive ceremonies, such as the infamous cross burnings.

When he talks about the Klan members he has encountered he tends not to dwell on the fate of their victims. Karen’s feat is that he takes us to places few photojournalists have been before, into the belly of the beast. The scenes he presents portray a kinder, gentler Klan. The mute photographs present an organisation that is far less threatening than the hate group of our popular imagination. Consciously or otherwise, his photographs hold our imagination in their grip while doing double duty as propaganda for the extremist right, much as Leni Riefenstahl’s work did for the Nazis.

Today the Klan is a mere shadow of what it used to be and there are at least 34 differently named Klan groups. “They are a fairly low-rent bunch of people, many of whom use their local organisations as a way of raising money for themselves,” says Mark Potok, director of the Intelligence Project at the Southern Poverty Law Center in Montgomery, Alabama.

Photographs of the Klan folk in their hooded regalia aren’t all that rare. The archives of America’s newspapers contain plenty of front-page photographs of lynchings throughout the past century. Three years ago, James Cameron, the last survivor of an attempted lynching died, thankfully of natural causes.

The older generation of Black Americans grew up hearing about Klan lynchings whispered over the dinner table but never mentioned outside the home. At the Klan’s height, around the turn of the 20th century, some 30 to 40 lynchings a year were being recorded. It is believed that there were in fact many more unrecorded deaths, especially in the cotton-growing south where the deaths of black field-hands were often not recorded.

Karen’s photographs show an entirely different side of the far right. He presents a 58-year-old, fifth-generation seamstress he calls “Ms Ruth” and he has photographed her running up an outfit for the “Exalted Cyclops” or head of a local KKK chapter. She gets paid about $140 for her trouble. Karen tells us that she uses the earnings to help care for her 40-year-old quadriplegic daughter, who was injured in a car accident 10 years ago.

Karen’s images of the Klan and its supporters regularly appear on the recruiting websites of the far right. Out of context, the images of hooded Klansmen and their families tell us little of the real story – the inexorable rise in the number of extremist organisations in America.

The number of hate-crime victims in the US is also rising and as America’s middle and working class gets thrown out of work, the hate groups behind the crimes are flourishing. As people lose their homes to foreclosure and, without the benefit of a safety net, find themselves slipping into poverty, there is already a search for scapegoats underway. Immigrants from central and South America have become particular targets as the grim economic times take hold.

Anyone who doubts the capacity of the modern KKK for violence need look no further than the recent case of 43-year-old Cynthia Lynch of Tulsa, Oklahoma. She had never been out of her home state before she travelled to Louisiana to be initiated into the Klan. She was met off the bus by two members of a group that calls itself the Sons of Dixie and taken to a campsite in the woods 60 miles north of New Orleans.

There, Lynch’s head was shaven and after 24 hours of Klan boot camp, including chanting and running with torches, she had had enough and asked to be taken to town. After an argument, the group’s “Grand Lordship”, Chuck Foster, is alleged to have shot her to death. He was charged with second-degree murder and is awaiting trial. Just as shocking is that the event happened in Bogalusa, a backwoods Louisiana town that was once known as the Klan capital of the US.

In the 1960s the Klan operated with impunity in Bogalusa and once held a public meeting to decide which black church to burn down next. Local Klan members were suspected of ambushing two black policemen in 1965, killing one and wounding the other. No one was ever tried for the crimes.

Despite all its notoriety the Klan has been a spent force for decades with nothing like the clout it once wielded. At its peak the KKK boasted four million members and controlled the governor’s mansions and legislatures of several states. Since the 1930s the KKK has been in a state of disorganisation and today it probably has 6,000 members. But the economic crisis is swelling their ranks and already, a month after the inauguration of the first black president, the tidal wave of interracial harmony that greeted Obama’s election is starting to recede.

“Things are certain to get worse,” says Potok. “The ingredients are all there: a dire economy that is certain to get worse; high levels of immigration; the white majority that is soon to turn into a minority and a black man in the White House.”

More than 400 hate-related incidents, from cross-burnings to effigies of President Obama hanging from nooses have been reported, according to law-enforcement authorities and Potok’s organisation, which files lawsuits against hate groups aimed at making them bankrupt.

Late last year, two suspected skinheads who had links to a violent Klan chapter in Kentucky were charged with plotting to kill 88 black students. They were then going to assassinate President Obama by blasting him from a speeding car while wearing white tuxedos and top hats. They were never going to succeed, given the huge security net around Obama, but the fact that they had planned such an outlandish attack may be a harbinger of things to come.

“There is a tremendous backlash to Obama’s election,” says Richard Barrett, the leader of the Nationalist Movement, another white supremacist group. “Many people look at the flag of the Republic of New Africa that was hoisted over the White House as an act of war.

www.powerhousebooks.com

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>
KKK: A spent force but Eurp[e watchout
[info]iconoclast786 wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 04:04 am (UTC)
The election of Barak Obama as the president is a testimony to how far the US has come from its days of segregation, this in a time when we face the most sever economic crisis of our times. KKK is a spent force without a doubt because if it were not for people of the Caucasian race, still the majority in America, Obama would not have been elected. It was heartening to see the young voters, our future, breaking the race barrier by voting in numbers never seen before. This leaves little hope for groups like KKK and spells a bleak future for them regardless of what the likes of Richard Barrett may prophesies. I just wish I could say the same for Europe where traditionally economic downturn has always resulted in increased recruitment for racist outfits and increased harassment on non-white minorities. Some learn from history but some repeat history.
Re: KKK: A spent force but Eurp[e watchout
[info]migueld wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 05:06 pm (UTC)
And you have proven just how debased and ignorant you are by stating that voting for someone to a political office based on skin color is somehow "moving ahead"..maybe in just under 4 years, we can vote for someone because they have blond hair.......
Re: KKK: A spent force but Eurp[e watchout - [info]iconoclast786 - Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 05:19 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: KKK: A spent force but Eurp[e watchout - [info]jpaultel - Monday, 6 April 2009 at 01:38 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: KKK: A spent force but Eurp[e watchout - [info]jpaultel - Monday, 6 April 2009 at 01:39 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: KKK: A spent force but Eurp[e watchout - [info]boeticia - Saturday, 7 November 2009 at 12:23 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]andre_t wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 06:27 am (UTC)
KKK, NF, BNP
The least educated of America..We can do without it...
[info]karloski wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 09:06 am (UTC)
I do not wish to cast aspersions on the education of all of those from the southern states of America but I find it significant that these pictures are all from states that have the lowest rates of high school graduation, literacy, legitimate birth or even hygiene. I lived in Mississippi for a short period in the 1970's and at that time parents had no obligation even to send their children to school.

I am sorry that the pig ignorant and racist swine in these pictures might be construed as representing America as a whole. I am very sorry that they are allowed to raise children and to poison the minds of those children.

Something ought to be done about that. Giving the parents a nine gram high velocity lead injection to the cerebrum might be a good starting point.
Re: The least educated of America..We can do without it...
[info]mariabrowning wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 02:48 pm (UTC)
Wow, what a nasty, hateful little screed.

The states with the lowest graduation and literacy rates are also (surprise!) the poorest states. Maybe what folks there need is a bit more of the wealth enjoyed by those in liberal states such as New York and Connecticut. But then, why would the rich want to share their resources to help people improve themselves? Then they'd have no one to look down on.
Re: The least educated of America..We can do without it... - [info]the_town_crier - Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 04:40 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The least educated of America..We can do without it... - [info]the_kegs - Monday, 23 February 2009 at 07:46 am (UTC) Expand
Re: The least educated of America..We can do without it... - [info]schumi2008 - Monday, 23 February 2009 at 09:28 am (UTC) Expand
Re: The least educated of America..We can do without it... - [info]wellabaloo - Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 04:36 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The least educated of America..We can do without it... - [info]wellabaloo - Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 01:38 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Ku Klux Klan
[info]slyfas wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 10:04 am (UTC)
I think a lot of valuable press time is disproportionately given to this criminal gangs called the Ku Klux Klan. There is no point glorifying them or trying to evince a nostalgia of evil-minded thuggery. If they are so important, why do they have to operate covertly? If their cause is just, why do they need to hide under the shadow of darkness to make initiation? Bunch of cowards! That is what they are.

The world has moved on. Any Klan member who intends to sow hate or cause pandemonium will face the wrath of the law. Besides, they will not escape the vigilance of respectable men and women of decency.
(no subject) - [info] - Saturday, 4 July 2009 at 01:43 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Ku Klux Klan - [info]slyfas - Saturday, 4 July 2009 at 11:43 pm (UTC) Expand
KKK alive & kicking in 2009? What? Both of them?
[info]jackkrak wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 11:07 am (UTC)
As a long time resident of the American South, it's tiring to see another installment in the endless stream of "The Klan is Still Out There..." press stories. A meeting of every Klan 'member' in the country could be - and probably is - held in the back of the Grand Wizard's pick up truck. Powerful imagery should not be confused with actual strength. The article estimates a Klan membership of 6,000 people, which is generous in the exreme. The Klan serves more as a source for cheap and easy sensationalist reporting than anything else.
Incidentally, the article fails to mention that every single 'governor and legislator' with Klan membership during it's heyday was a Democrat, including current longserving blowhard Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia. The party of Obama was the exclusive home of those who would hate Obama.
Extremists
[info]canadastan wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 02:15 pm (UTC)
Muslim terrorists kill more people every day than the KKK has killed in the last 50 years.
Re: Extremists
[info]iconoclast786 wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 03:06 pm (UTC)
So because KKK killed fewer people, they are okay. You must a simpleton you who has failed to see the changing pattern of vile extremism that resulted in same out: suffering of the innocent.

And that begs the question that "Why were the bombers on 911 not American but all the 7/7 bombers home grown?". Whilst the US has tried to address it problems of divisions and appears to have moved on, Europe still struggles with it. Today it is the Muslim extremists, yesterday it was the NF, BNP, Nazis, etc. the common link among these groups being lack of tolerance for others.

For all those pointing out some Democrats as being ex-Klan members, my answer is exactly that, that they are ex-members. America has moved on while Europe struggles to address its equalities. It would be interesting to know what kind of strength the European groups garner and whether their strength is waning or on the rise.
Re: Extremists - [info]rmcbride05 - Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 04:08 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]eltesoroag - Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 07:23 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]canadastan - Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 08:56 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]saraal65 - Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 07:35 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]eltesoroag - Monday, 23 February 2009 at 04:42 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]ganef - Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 12:34 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]celticwelshman - Saturday, 7 November 2009 at 05:47 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]saraal65 - Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 07:32 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]canadastan - Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 08:46 pm (UTC) Expand
iconoclast786 - [info]canadastan - Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 12:14 am (UTC) Expand
Re: iconoclast786 - [info]iconoclast786 - Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 02:58 am (UTC) Expand
Re: iconoclast786 - [info]saraal65 - Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 07:40 am (UTC) Expand
Re: iconoclast786 - [info]ganef - Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 12:37 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: iconoclast786 - [info]rabeea - Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 11:00 am (UTC) Expand
Re: iconoclast786 - [info]canadastan - Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 02:26 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: iconoclast786 - [info]eltesoroag - Monday, 23 February 2009 at 04:58 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]saraal65 - Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 07:28 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]eltesoroag - Monday, 23 February 2009 at 05:06 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]ganef - Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 12:37 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]celticwelshman - Saturday, 7 November 2009 at 05:50 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]celticwelshman - Saturday, 7 November 2009 at 06:22 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]hafeezur - Monday, 23 February 2009 at 04:25 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]eltesoroag - Monday, 23 February 2009 at 05:13 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]smoothop8388 - Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 07:34 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]gerard1904 - Tuesday, 24 March 2009 at 11:02 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]ancientoneuk - Monday, 30 March 2009 at 11:11 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]djangovsartana - Friday, 3 April 2009 at 08:41 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]ahmetk - Friday, 3 April 2009 at 06:17 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]jpaultel - Monday, 6 April 2009 at 01:46 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Extremists - [info]corporeal_v001 - Saturday, 7 November 2009 at 03:27 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]canadastan wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 02:21 pm (UTC)
Let's not forget that the Democrats were the party of the KKK.
You can look it up.
[info]cuffdc wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 03:14 pm (UTC)
Let's not forget that the Democrats were the party of the KKK.
You can look it up.

"were" being the operative word...now it's the Republicans, who used to be the "Party of Lincoln." Reminds me of a Who song....

As for which hate group kills more people every year, I'm not sure "Muslim terrorists" is a proper moniker. After all, the Klan considers itself to be on the vanguard of upholding Christian values, but I don't think too many people would think of them -- despite their self-avowed "Christianity" -- as "Christian terrorists."
(no subject) - [info]canadastan - Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 09:47 pm (UTC) Expand
Republican Party of Lincoln and still is - [info]alheimstead - Thursday, 5 November 2009 at 11:34 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]thersey wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 02:43 pm (UTC)
I find the obsession with American racism that exists in the European press to quite strange. Yes we still have problems with our race relations, but this article describes a few fringe nuts and tries to extrapolate that to describe the entire 300 Million people in the US. The author seems to be begging and hoping for some disaster to occur which will justify his viewpoint on US racism.
[info]cylusys wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 04:47 pm (UTC)
The obsession probably has more to do with deflecting attention away from our own ingrained racism, its not like the UK is in any danger of having a non-white PM in the next ten years or so.
Plus bear in mind that the US has rejected that leftist version of racism known as 'Multiculturalism', which arbitrarily pigeon-holes people based on either their religion or ethnicity, regardless of the true opinion or beliefs of the person involved. Given that the prevailing attitude is that Multiculturalism is not racist in Eur and that rejection of it is, its not too big of a jump to see why Eur hacks (want to) see racism everywhere in the US.
[info]desertann wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 02:59 pm (UTC)
America is a country of over 200 million people. Sure, you can find the outcasts and crazies if you want, but the KKK do not represent American thinking. They are the past and that's where they will remain, no matter how hard you wish to make them pertinent.
[info]contrarian_view wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 04:47 pm (UTC)
In response to opinions regarding the media's disproportionate attention to ostensibly insignificant hate groups, I pose the following:

The issue of contention may be caused / exacerbated by differences in interpretation of TOPIC of media coverage. I believe the subject article of THE INDEPENDENT may be more related to the socio-economic dynamics that drive the attitudes and behavior of individuals in society as it relates to the emergence of revolutionary movements. Viewing the behavior of the KKK through the cold, sterile lens of historical analysis - the group is fundamentally no different than any other 'extremist' group.

A relatively small proportion of the general populous can have a significant impact on the evolution of the society as a whole. Sometimes the impact is considered "good" (civil rights movement as judged by the consensus of contemporary history) or "bad" (Al Queda). [Yes, I understand that one example is a 'group' and the other is a 'movement', but I am attempting to avoid controversy in my drive to make a point]

The media tends to be reactionary, reporting the violent after-effects of social discord and decent, focusing on the "what", "when", and "how"; while often remaining silent on the larger questions of "why" - the latter being a tricky subject to handle due to a misalignment of interests between funding the news agency and fulfilling its charter.

I believe THE INDEPENDENT is making an attempt to highlight the onset of effervescence as opposed to waiting until the pressure cooker explodes, then covering the sensation of the resultant third-degree burns - as is often the case. Whether or not the article wishes to make the KKK relevant may not matter so much as to whether the KKK has the Desire, Capability, Support, and Opportunity to make THEMSELVES relevant. In calamity, there is always Opportunity.
(no subject) - [info]ancientoneuk - Monday, 30 March 2009 at 11:07 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]eddieiscool wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 04:02 pm (UTC)
These pictures demonstrate everything which is wrong in the world...The fact that this "story" is even given space in a newspaper along with reporting the rise of right wing parties in Britain is, to me, giving them free publicity and a form of legitimacy that they really do not deserve.
[info]turk_diddler wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 11:34 am (UTC)
In fairness, try to imagine how many readers of the Indy are one short step away from membership of Combat 18. Not easy is it?
Very poor journalism
[info]rkeefe wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 05:16 pm (UTC)
I have to say, this is particularly lazy and sloppy journalism.

1. Nobody in America takes the Klan seriously anymore, except those looking to make money by scaring people.

2. Cynthia Lynch's murder was simply that: a homocide. It wasn't a "hate crime" as both parties were White, and seriously, the victim was a KKK wannabe... Is the author seriously lamenting the death of an overt "racist"?

3. After summing up this heinous Klan "rampage", Mr. Doyle had to travel 600 miles and more than FORTY years to find another alleged Klan killing? Doesn't sound like much of a track record to me. Is this what passes for journalism in the UK today?

4. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is NOT... I repeat...NOT a legitimate source of information. The SPLC was founded in 1971 by multimillionaire, Morris Dees. It is an entirely self-proclaimed "watchdog" group that has no mandate and is subject to no external review or regulation.

The SPLC uses a never ending fear campaign to frighten donors, many of them elderly, into making ongoing contributions. In its most recently posted tax report, the SPLC states that it took in over $55 million dollars in 2007, spent $7 million on "legal costs" and dumped over $25 million into its "Endowment Fund". This fund now totals over $200 million tax-free dollars. (http://www.splcenter.org/pdf/static/SPLC990_2006.pdf)

Multimillionaire Dees compensates himself more than $320,000 a year from the donation pot, and charges $10,000 in speaking fees, which can easily add up to additional hundreds of thousands of dollars each year. Mark Potok, the SPLC's Public Relations chief, draws $138,000 a year in donor dollars as well, and I don't know what he charges to speak. See pages 10 and 40 of the document linked above.

The SPLC has an undisputed financial interest in exaggerating the number of "hate groups" and "hate crimes. It maintains a 'hate map" that is so grossly bloated with "groups" that often are nothing more than a single individual out in the boondocks or groups like the League of the South that seek to restore the Confederacy. I live in Virginia, the capital of the old South and I don't know of ANYONE who fears the return of the Confederacy. It's a sad joke. What's not as amusing is some of the other groups the SPLC has labeled as "haters". There are publishers, church groups, legitimate immigration reform groups and "radical traditionalist Catholics". No doubt, many of your readers fall into one or more of these catagories.

People and groups arrive on the SPLC's "hate list" solely at the whim of Mr. Dees and that is also how they would be removed from the list, IF, they were allowed to. Mr. Potok maintains the list and sees to it that the numbers grow an average of 4% to 5% a year. Even when he announces publicly that a group is defunct, like the alleged Klan "group" in tiny Winchester, New Hampshire, it remains on the map indefinitely (http://www.religionnewsblog.com/21174).

Literally dozens of groups on the map are not affilliated with any city or town, such as the first 12 of California's 80 alleged groups. That's 15% of the count for that state that only exists in Mr. Potok's imagination. But it pads the figures nicely. See it for yourself.

In closing, Mr. Dees' SPLC is one of the most profitable non-profit organizations in the USA. The Better Business Bureau no longer accredits the SPLC as a responsible charity due to "...a lack of commitment to transparency."
(http://us.bbb.org/WWWRoot/SitePage.aspx?site=113&id=46a6a9cd-5402-454e-9476-e4df22e6f371)

Mr. Dees brags on page 81 of his autobiography, "A Season for Justice" that he made $5,000 dollars representing a violent Klansman in 1962 who was indicted for attacking a group of "Freedom Riders."

The Klan is a joke. More people are murdered in Brixton or East London each year than have been killed by the Klan in the past fifty years combined. Britain has more than enough of its own racial problems without listening to the disreputable press releases of the SPLC. This is very sloppy journalism, at best.
Re: Very poor journalism
[info]tsu_doh_nimh wrote:
Friday, 27 February 2009 at 04:01 pm (UTC)
No. If you want to see what passes for "journalism" in the UK today, you should read some of our finer papers such as the Daily Mail, The Sun, and The Mirror.

Papers such as The Independent, The Guardian, and The Times are desperately fighting the swathe of tabloid crap that most UK newspaper-gobblers eagerly inhale, but it's a losing battle. Alas we British are just as capable of being disappointingly stupid as any other nationality.

Fair's fair, at least this article states repeatedly that the KKK are a mere shadow of their former selves. Perhaps it's less lazy journalism and more lazy reading.
CAN'T BELIEVE IT?
[info]whiteboy231117 wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 05:35 pm (UTC)
You think white people that have been members of the KKK will just go away now that we have a BLACK president. no. be real we all knew they would come back now with all the new raim going around. and personally its not tht bad. We all know tht there are BLACKS who have suceeded but its not our fault tht now they dnt have a job or r in poverty. They are still blaming WHITE people for it.
Re: CAN'T BELIEVE IT?
[info]eltesoroag wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 07:30 pm (UTC)
Stay focused whiteboy231117,
Remember, this is a ridiculous article written by a European journalist try to impress a European audience. These aren't Americans, black, white, or the politically correct crowd trying to cause problems. They are Europeans.
Re: CAN'T BELIEVE IT? - [info]ncentertainer - Monday, 23 February 2009 at 01:17 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: CAN'T BELIEVE IT? - [info]tsu_doh_nimh - Friday, 27 February 2009 at 04:07 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: CAN'T BELIEVE IT? - [info]ncentertainer - Monday, 23 February 2009 at 01:23 pm (UTC) Expand
Diversion
[info]scousekraut wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 06:36 pm (UTC)
The KKK are an unpleasant lot but I doubt that they have much influence over what happens in Washington DC. Here it is the Israeli Lobby, The CFR and Wall Street. And Obama is just their latest plaything.

They financed his incredibly expensive campaign and his "advisors" are all old faces who represent the old power structure. The clever "marketing campaign" that they organised with Obama as the figurehead was designed to give the people what they wanted. Hence the pathetically corny "Change" slogan.

It is already very clear that there is going to be only superficial change and that the new government will continue the old policies of persuing more wars in Euro/Asia, protecting and financing Israel and continuing the economic and financial destruction of America from within.
Re: Diversion
[info]ycmgh wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 08:08 pm (UTC)
Absolutely well put. And it is in this climate that crackpots may thrive.
Re: Diversion - [info]smoothop8388 - Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 06:48 am (UTC) Expand
UNMASKED???
[info]eltesoroag wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 07:08 pm (UTC)
To the author;

The title of your article is both unfounded and slanderious. Frankly Mr. Doyle it sounds like you are hoping America fails ethically and morally, as well as politically. Perhaps this is to fullfill some need of yours to gloat or something.

And as far as your last quote from Mr. Barrett "Many people look at the flag of the Republic of New Africa that was hoisted over the White House as an act of war" that was just plain assanine Mr. Doyle. This man is a racist, clearly not very intelligent, and he's wrong both morally and intellectually. And yet you end your ridiciolus article with his quote insinuating some degree of credibility?

I recommend you spend more of your energy on exposing the gradual Islamic takeover of Europe as opposed to trying to give strength to an tired old, low browed ideology like the KKK.
Re: UNMASKED???
[info]saraal65 wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 09:28 pm (UTC)
Muslims and Europeans get along fine, it's the Israelis and the crazy hate mongering Zionsits that are at root of any unrest and all the evil that is found..If it's financial improperiety..u can bet Zionists will be behind it..if it's the porn industry and all the rubbish that comes out of Hollywood, it is again Zionists..racist ideology and evil intentions..a blight on the world, that's Zionism in a nutshell.
Re: UNMASKED??? - [info]ganef - Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 12:31 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: UNMASKED??? - [info]rabeea - Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 11:08 am (UTC) Expand
Re: UNMASKED??? - [info]ganef - Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 12:17 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: UNMASKED??? - [info]neil_mcgowan - Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 10:18 pm (UTC) Expand
re: lynchings & torture
[info]europat7 wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 07:15 pm (UTC)
'Arendt noted that the result of torture, whether or not it stops short of literal death, is "the murder of the moral person."'

A quote from Diane McWhorter's recent essay in USA Today, comparing the activities of the KKK to Abu Ghraib.

http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2009/02/dont-punt-on-to.html?csp=34
This is silly
[info]squarebird wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 07:46 pm (UTC)
This is not journalism .. this is like entering a Tolkien society in London and extrapolating the silliness found within to the entire country. I think the Brits are really grasping at straws to find something they can feel superior about.

Bob in Alabama
Re: This is silly
[info]canadastan wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 09:38 pm (UTC)
Good point.
Odd isn't it that the only peaceful period in European history is after WWII when the USA was there to act as policeman.
Without them the hate and bigotry of the Europeans just keeps boiling over.

So why is it they try to act superior?
Re: This is silly - [info]nicodemus5 - Sunday, 29 March 2009 at 11:07 pm (UTC) Expand
The 'Kinder, Gentler' Klan
[info]khaled_bizri wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 08:45 pm (UTC)
Amazing how racism is found to be 'kinder' and 'gentler' than what it is and was. Amazing how journalism contributes mightily to the values and culture of modern Western society, in supporting wars, in advocating violence and in re-branding a terrorist organizations as 'kind' and 'gentle.'

Not the best photographs under the sun would wipe out the crimes the Nazis committed, or the Israelis carried out, or indeed, the KKK practiced for decades against fellow human beings. The art of Mr. Karen is a despicable use of the medium - and the material. It should be viewed as a distortion of essential human values.

I wonder what is next? Kind and gentle poems by Himmler? Riveting prose by Olmert, or a modern Cross sculpture burning by a gentle and kind KKK lyncher?

Hate crimes are rising in the US?
[info]canadastan wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 09:03 pm (UTC)
According to who?
The great backlash the media bloviates about like Pavlov's dog after 9/11 and every other terrorist attacks is a fiction.
You can look that up.
Actually, you should look that up shouldn't you?
Being a journalist and all, isn't that part of the deal?
Try something called 'google'.
What was that whole Second world War thingy?
[info]canadastan wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 09:22 pm (UTC)
Something to do with the racism and hate boiling in Europe boiling over once again?
Seems the only time Europe has been peaceful is when those hate filled KKK marching, racist, hillbilly, big Mac eating, slope foreheaded, mouth breathing hick Yanks from the colonies have been there to stop it.
So how are Europeans so superior to those horrible Yanks?

The only peaceful time in Europe's history comes courtesy of the Yanks, and the European history of genocides and racism and class warfare is hundreds of times as bad as theirs, so it might be time to shut the old pie hole and look in the mirror.
Or look out the window and see the antisemitism and racism from the muslims and the plain old Europeans that is everywhere.
I worked in Central Asia with Euros and Australians and Yanks, and the people that treated the locals the worst were the Europeans.
Their sense of being upper class and being better than the locals was appalling.
There were a few incidents of hard boiled old miners telling the Europeans that the locals were doing the same job they were so they were entitled to the same respect and benefits and quality of food that the expats got.

So about that mirror......?
Re: What was that whole Second world War thingy?
[info]il_767 wrote:
Monday, 23 February 2009 at 03:57 pm (UTC)
"I worked in Central Asia with Euros and Australians and Yanks, and the people that treated the locals the worst were the Europeans."

That has also been my experience on assignments all over the world.
Re: What was that whole Second world War thingy? - [info]smoothop8388 - Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 07:17 am (UTC) Expand
Trouble brewing
[info]coxside wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 10:03 pm (UTC)
Times of economic turmoil are fertile recruitment for hate groups.

The most important thing for President Obama to do now is to make American society more equitable. However, he will have a tough time fighting the vested interest groups on Capitol Hill...
Re: Trouble brewing
[info]canadastan wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 11:49 pm (UTC)
Hate groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda etc?

They are real and they kill real people. And they do it every day.
When was the last time the Klan murdered anyone?

If we are going to fight racism and violence and intolerance, by all means let's fight it.
But digging up the past and trying to ignore the present atrocities by the muslims isn't helping anyone except the muslim terrorists.
Re: Trouble brewing - [info]saraal65 - Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 09:35 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Trouble brewing - [info]ganef - Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 12:39 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Trouble brewing - [info]hafeezur - Monday, 23 February 2009 at 04:46 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Trouble brewing - [info]smoothop8388 - Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 07:31 am (UTC) Expand
Nobody will buy this rubbish story.
[info]collin_brown wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 10:21 pm (UTC)
You are far too late Mr Doyle. The LIE has been exposed. There is no point trying to juxtapose the BNP alongside the KKK.

Meltdown by Joe Priestly blows all the bullshit away. See for yourself.

http://bnp.org.uk/category/columnists/joe-priestley/
KKK/Bigotry in the US
[info]weedermann wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 11:05 pm (UTC)
HOW and WHY is anyone surprised--except perhaps a white man--that despite appearances, the inner sentiment of racial inequality among those over 40 remains much as it has always been since the earliest days of European establishment in the New World? Socio-economically speaking, which racial group and gender has been supreme and unchallenged for more than 400 years here? White men.

Affirmative Action and the Civil Rights statutes of the 60s are essentially bones tossed to the rest of us. Prior to the 1960s, it wasn't possible for non-white men or any women to be firefighters, police, paramedics or hold high political office. Even in 2009, how many people of color are there in the House? I hear there is just ONE black man in the whole Senate.

People of color and women still earn less than white men, but we all have the same expenses. The "At Will" employment policy supersedes the Civil Rights statutes and what's left of Affirmative Action. Employers may hire (or not hire) whoever they wish without explanation and they may take away a job with no warning or explanation. In the entertainment industry, production is upfront; they say outright that for employment, more than 7 out of every 10 jobs will go to a white person.

White men have never needed special legislature for the freedom to go, be, and do as one wished in the US and certainly don't in 2009. White men have always entered by the front door, lived wherever they wished, gained employment everywhere and were paid fair money for their efforts. If any of this does not happen to one white man, it was solely because another white man stands in the way. Never ultimately anyone else. So I wonder--WHAT is the point of a formal "white supremacist" movement when at no time has the white man NOT been the supreme policy-makers.
[info]indyreader4991 wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 11:25 pm (UTC)
I was not under any illusion that following the election of president Obama racism was a thing of the past, Of Course not. I did find this to be a chilling reminder that these racist, small minded thugs still exsist. I am saddened to be reading this. That these horrific crimes still occur and the culprits seem to face no reprisals.the economy is in turmoil. surely we need to seek solutions and not seek extremist groups to scapegoat. The election of president Obama seemed to show a milestone for the American people.American people owe it to themselves to eradicate these extremists And concentrate on real issues. The KKK and other related extreme right-wing groups themselves need to realise that they are the minority (thankfully) and I conclude with a plea to the independent. To cease to devote another column to these bigots.




[info]canadastan wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 11:44 pm (UTC)
What horrific crimes are you talking about?
Please give me real proof that real crimes are being committed by the KKK.
Seems the vast majority of this comes from some overheated 'journalists' imagination.
canadastan your comment-- - [info]123pen_pen - Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 04:17 pm (UTC) Expand
clan
[info]deeegeee wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 11:51 pm (UTC)
Pity about the children,it's not their fault.They appear in-bred,obese and many show signs of fetal alcahol syndrom.Nature has a way of disposing of her deformaties.
Re: clan
[info]canadastan wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 09:54 pm (UTC)
Speaking of inbreeding......

Google 'muslim inbreeding'.
Odd how all those arranged marriages of 8 year olds to middle aged cousins and uncles has polluted the ol' gene pool.

"She went on to quote the report she commissioned in say that that the Pakistani community accounted for 30 per cent of all births with recessive disorders, despite representing 3.4 per cent of the birth rate nationwide and that 55 per cent of British Pakistanis are married to first cousins, resulting in an increasing rate of genetic defects and high rates of infant mortality."
Re: clan - [info]hafeezur - Monday, 23 February 2009 at 05:06 am (UTC) Expand
Re: clan - [info]canadastan - Friday, 27 February 2009 at 03:17 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: clan - [info]eltesoroag - Monday, 23 February 2009 at 05:33 am (UTC) Expand
Re: clan - [info]jahrigsby - Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 06:58 pm (UTC) Expand
Why not unmask Hezbollah and Hamas and those who march with them?
[info]canadastan wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 12:00 am (UTC)
They kill far more people than the Klan ever did and they openly preach hate and racism.
And the media gives them tongue baths and brings up some worn out old racist group from the past to make them feel brave and heroic.
I'll tell you what would be heroic; any of these pathetic jokes of journalists actually standing up to the real danger of the muslims terrorist groups.
Any sap can write about the KKK.
Writing about the muslim terrorists can get you killed.
Re: Why not unmask Hezbollah and Hamas and those who march with them?
[info]eltesoroag wrote:
Monday, 23 February 2009 at 05:34 am (UTC)
Amen canadastan
Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date