Bush: bail-out is to preserve free market
Tuesday, 14 October 2008
REUTERS/Hyungwon Kang
The US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announces today that the Treasury Department will take equity stakes in potentially thousands of banks totaling about $250 billion
George Bush today confirmed a $250 billion plan by the US government to buy shares directly in the nation's leading banks.
The President said the drastic steps were "not intended to take over the free market but to preserve it."
Nine major banks will participate initally including all of the country's largest institutions. Some of the big banks had to be pressured to participate in the program by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who wanted healthy institutions that did not necessarily need capital from the government to go first as a way of removing any stigma that might be associated with banks getting bailouts.
Bush, in brief remarks in the Rose Garden of the White House, said the government will initially buy stocks in nine major US banks.
"These efforts are designed to directly benefit the American people by stabilizing the financial system and helping the economy recover," he said.
Paulson, at a news conference a short time later, said: "We regret having to take these actions. Today's actions are not what we ever wanted to do — but today's actions are what we must do to restore confidence to our financial system."
The Federal Reserve, meanwhile, announced Tuesday that it will begin buying massive amounts of short-term debt on 27 October — its latest effort to break through a credit clog. The Fed is invoking Depression-era emergency powers to buy commercial paper — a crucial short-term funding that many companies rely on to pay their workers and buy supplies. Last week the Fed said it intended to take the action but didn't specify when.
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke welcomed all the new steps and said he believes they will help ease problems plaguing financial markets and threatening the economy. However, he also made clear that policymakers would continue to take actions as needed to battle the crisis.
"Our strategy will continue to evolve and be refined as we adapt to new developments and the inevitable set backs," he said. "But we will not stand down until we have achieved our goals of repairing and reforming our financial system and thereby restoring prosperity to our economy."
"The needs of our economy require that our financial institutions not take this new capital to hoard it, but to deploy it," Paulson said, meaning that they will use the money to bolster lending to each other and to their customers.
"Government owning a stake in any private US company is objectionable to most Americans — me included," Paulson added. "Yet the alternative of leaving businesses and consumers without access to financing is totally unacceptable."
Said Bernanke: "We will not stand down until we have achieved our goals of repairing and reforming our financial system and thereby restoring prosperity to our economy."
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

Comments
21 Comments
Douglas [15.10.08, 04:20 GMT] ... your comment is well constructed. Your one-line definitions of fascism & crude capitalism are correct, but not your definition for Communism.
You write: "In communism they rob the rich and give to the poor but this is the opposite."
Plse consider this correction: "In communism, 'they' rob anyone with wealth or land, with the proceeds expropriated to the elite, who call themselves "The State."
Any open-minded study of history leads one to inevitably conclude that all our "left-wing theories" have been authored, or greatly influenced, by a parasitic tribe; members of whom have long controlled international banking & the financial systems in the West.
If you think about it, this pattern of expropriation (legalized larceny) from the majority population (considered sheep or cattle) is a logical survival strategy for a minority who seek dominance because they believe they have been "Chosen by God."
Fault the Talmudic ideology not the people!
Posted by Errol Flynn | 15.10.08, 07:40 GMT
What's up Brian, I understand your concern about the media, but why stop at Orwell. Noam Chomsky has a superb book out called "Manufacturing Consent" and I think that it will give you a vast understanding of the real dishonesty of the US media. How is it in the UK by the way?
I had the same thought as Mark when i first heard about this, why is no one is bailing me out of my student loans? Never happen.
An interesting thought, the banks made bad loans and then foreclosed assets and now they are getting paid back through this redistribution of wealth and they get to keep the "toxic assets."
"Toxic assets" in most cases means people's homes, by the way.
This has nothing to do with communism or captitalism to me, it seems like fascism. In communism they rob the rich and give to the poor but this is the opposite. Captitalism robs from the poor but usually does so economically, in fascism they do it by a state run economy.
Posted by Douglas | 15.10.08, 04:20 GMT
"You may call it democratic capitalism or whatever,
In fact this kind of direct intervention, promoting enterprises based on their productivity and loyalty to the system, control of transferring banks assets and monopolising Market in order to guaranty its existence, etc has been well known for long time.
This system has technically named as COMMUNISM! " (Posted by mack)
It may be a bit closer to the Corporatist system that Mussolini pioneered an early version of in Italy; close tie-ups between government, finance and industry, all run profitably in the interests of a small elite, with civil liberties under attack, the right of protest restricted, and ordinary people getting badly screwed.
Communism was slightly different. For one thing, it did not acknowledge the profit motive, which was one reason for its ultimate downfall.
Posted by John Davies | 14.10.08, 23:39 GMT
Mr Bush,
You may call it democratic capitalism or whatever,
In fact this kind of direct intervention, promoting enterprises based on their productivity and loyalty to the system, control of transferring banks assets and monopolising Market in order to guaranty its existence, etc has been well known for long time.
This system has technically named as COMMUNISM!
Posted by mack | 14.10.08, 23:26 GMT
Caligula wishes to preserve the "free" market? What is free about having to pay interest on money made from thin air, in order to enrich a criminal banking/political cabal? Free? Do they really think we are all that stupid?
Shake yourselves free from the straightjacket of delusions and false trust you have been obliged to wear for most of your life!
Look out for new "great terror plots" to take your attention away from the nefarious scheming of the "elite" fraudsters plotting to come out on top. They plan to abondon ship just before the credit-based system & fiat currency economy they created for us (we the "sheep") finally implodes.
Read this (long but illuminating) article if you want to try and ride the surf and thus avoid getting sucked under by the under-tow of the tsunami heading our way:
http: //theinternationalforecaster.com/ International_Forecaster_Weekly/The_Bailout_Wont_Work_and_the_System_Will_Implode
Posted by Errol Flynn | 14.10.08, 20:42 GMT
bail out was to preserve the free market???
bush the idiot has said and done really crazy things but this one is a gem. the financial system on brink of bankruptcy had to be bailed out by the taxpayers in socialist fashion but he still calls it a free market.
there was a time when the politicians had a tiny bit of intelligence but now its getting ridiculous but the irony is that we keep putting them in the office for another term.
amazing!!!!
Posted by ebbi | 14.10.08, 20:11 GMT
Message from Georgie, Henry and Benny: state bailouts financed by taxpayers are necessary to support the so-called 'free market', otherwise all the wealthy merchant bankers would starve!
Posted by Paul | 14.10.08, 18:54 GMT
What a strange fate! The heirs of the Reagan-Tatcher doctrine must save the financial markets from themselves.
This bail-out plan is a watershed moment of the recent financial and political history.
The theory that you can shred regulation and prosperity will trickle down is thrown away.
Posted by Giovanni | 14.10.08, 18:34 GMT
Trouble is, neither the US nor the UK (nor anywhere else, really) is a truly free market. They're all just different strengths and flavours of planned economies.
Ecomonies are complex adaptive systems and work from the bottom up. Putting artificial top-down constraints on them is like playing whack-a-mole.
It doesn't work. It won't work. It CAN'T work.
Posted by Jon McCulloch | 14.10.08, 17:18 GMT
There is something fundamentally wrong with the federal government buying ownership in the largest banks. It is one step closer to the eye of the government into the dealings of the people, and how they choose to use their money.
The government is positioning itself to take advantage of the failing economy to embark on an unprecedented path to observe and control the population. What's next, a chip for one and all to buy or sell? Buyers beware, and start your underground planning now.
Posted by Keitan.com | 14.10.08, 17:00 GMT
21 Comments