World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Hero of the Hudson: immaculate, unruffled, with a sharp uniform

How pilot's astonishing calm gave doomed flight a happy ending

By David Usborne in New york

A passer by surveys the partly submerged US Airways Airbus A320 in the Hudson river yesterday

GETTY IMAGES

A passer by surveys the partly submerged US Airways Airbus A320 in the Hudson river yesterday

Captain Chesley Sullenberger had next to no time to make his choices after both the engines on his Airbus 320 aircraft failed at 3,200ft, the skyline of Manhattan just below him.

The former air force pilot and veteran of US Airways was hailed as the Hero of the Hudson yesterday – for good reason. He did everything right.

The full story of what happened to Flight 1549 from New York's La Guardia airport to Charlotte, North Carolina, on Thursday may not be known for weeks. Yesterday, National Transport Safety Board investigators began preparing to lift the plane's fuselage from the Hudson, near Battery Park and hoped to remove it in one piece today.

Sonar equipment was being used to look for the engines which came off and fell to the river bed. Investigators also began interviewing Captain Sullenberger, his co-pilot and his crew.

That it was Captain Sullenberger at the controls made what could have been the city's worst tragedy since 9/11 into a story of miracles, ending with all 155 passengers and crew back on land.

Known as "Sully" among his friends, the pilot was so experienced in matters of aviation safety he had even served as chief safety investigator for the Airline Pilots Association. In California, he has his own safety consulting firm. And better still, he knew how to glide.

Captain Sullenberger's wife, Lorrie, said her husband was a "pilot's pilot" who "loves the art of the airplane". She had been stunned to hear what had happened. "When [Sully] called me, he said, 'There's been an accident.' At first I thought it was something minor, but then he told me the circumstances and my body started shaking and I rushed to get our daughters out of school."

Aircraft like the Airbus 320 are not designed for gliding. Yet, Captain Sullenberger took the plane from high above the Bronx to the spot in the river where he ditched close to 48th Street in Manhattan, missing the George Washington Bridge by less than 900ft, and all without an ounce of thrust from the plane's crippled engines. He ruled out landing at La Guardia or Teterboro Airport in New Jersey or trying to find open space in New York City, and told his passengers to "brace for impact".

In 50 years of jet aviation, no pilot has landed a fully-loaded aircraft on water without fatalities. This was the cockpit crew's greatest achievement. It meant extending the wings and tail slats and slowing the plane to as low a speed as possible – 115-140mph – without stalling. Two things were crucial: creating a cushion of air between the water and the plane and keeping the equipment perfectly level.

Dealing with the first real emergency of his career – he joined what was then USAir in 1980 after retiring from flying F-4s for the air force – Captain Sullenberger remembered something else from his Airbus training. He hit the ditch button, which closes the holes in the fuselage so water cannot get in. It was designed to keep the plane afloat, assuming it remained intact on impact.

And intact the plane remained. That is why loss of life was averted. The speed of rescuers in tourist, ferry and coastguard boats who converged on the plane within minutes also helped.

"That's an odd-looking boat," a captain of one of the first ferries on the scene, Vince Lombardi, recalled telling his mate after spotting the fuselage just after its splashdown. The mate replied with the obvious: that's no boat. Presenting certificates of appreciation to several rescue leaders yesterday, Michael Bloomberg, New York's Mayor, spoke for many in the city when he expressed his amazement that the worst had been averted on one of the coldest days of the winter.

"This is the story of heroes, something straight out of the movies," he said. "But if it had been a movie people probably wouldn't have believed it was true."

Because he must co-operate with federal investigators, Captain Sullenberger was nowhere to be seen. However, rescue crews and police officers spoke of his incredible calm as he unbuckled to oversee the evacuation from his floating plane and walked the length of it twice to make sure all had been evacuated before escaping himself.

"He looked absolutely immaculate," the rescuer said. "He looked like David Niven in an airplane uniform. He looked unruffled. His uniform was sharp. You could see him walking down the aisles making sure everybody got out."

"If it wasn't for him, I wouldn't be here today," one of the passengers, Mary Berkwits of North Carolina, said.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Qualifications for a "Hero"
[info]chris_gourley wrote:
Saturday, 17 January 2009 at 04:52 am (UTC)
Although Captain Sullenberger was a competent fully trained pilot operating an aircraft he was expected to handle both in a routine operation and in the event of an emergency he was tested in a situation few had faced before him. Whether it was training or basic instinct that brought the aircraft to rest in the Hudson it is without doubt the word hero should apply as the outcome was a direct result to his inputs into the controls of the aircraft in preventing the typical break up on contact with the water not to mention the fact of having a load of luck ragarding the wings not coming apart when the engines and suspected pylons were detached as a result of the massive forces applied to the fuselage.
"Well Done Skipper"
Ageist society?
[info]jenwin2 wrote:
Saturday, 17 January 2009 at 05:13 am (UTC)
Hopefully, we shall all now bow our heads to experience. In a society that focuses on youth, it is a chilling and wonderful reminder of how 'elders' in our community should be recognised for the gifts of knowledge and life they bring to the rest of us. What a hero and a remarkable story for a city that has suffered such tragedy - I hope it helps the great city and its people heal.
Fly-by-wire probably helped Captain Sullenberger
[info]ottorino wrote:
Saturday, 17 January 2009 at 05:59 am (UTC)
The A320 was the first Fly-by-wire commercial airliner. This means that the pilot signals his intentions to a computer which interprets them into movements of the flight surfaces (rudder, elevator etc.).

Those who worked on its flight software spent literally years going through every scenario, including this one, to work out what was the best thinbg to do. That would have included ensuring that the aircraft was always within its 'flight envelope' if possible, and adjusting the software accordingly.

Not wishing to take anything away from Captain Sullenberger's achievement, I hope and believe that his task was made easier and safer by the unstinting eforts of the Airbus designers 25 years ago. When the dust has settled it will be interesting to see what the investigation report has to say on the matter.

Truly A miracle
[info]charlymin wrote:
Saturday, 17 January 2009 at 07:56 am (UTC)
Captain Sullenberger and his crew really perform a Miracle the way this man acted was remarkable God must have been looking over his shoulder he deserves the Highest honour American can award him
Re: Truly A miracle
[info]alldaykidda wrote:
Saturday, 17 January 2009 at 06:29 pm (UTC)
Why on Earth do people have to say "God was looking over his shoulder" when someone achieves something incredible like this, as if their imaginary friend in the sky had something to do with it? If He did, He's one selective diety, or maybe he just takes Tuesdays off, as he wasn't looking over many shoulders in the same city back in September 2001. Face it, the skill and training of this human being saved these people, nothing else. Well done Captain.
All aeroplanes glide
[info]pete_boyd wrote:
Saturday, 17 January 2009 at 08:05 am (UTC)
"Aircraft like the Airbus 320 are not designed for gliding."
And yet the head of Airbus (or someone like that) was interviewed on Radio 4 on friday saying just the opposite, that by their nature all aeroplanes glide (obviously an exception are some stealth fighter bombers that are inherently unstable).

Pete Boyd
Indeed, all winged aircraft glide
[info]ottorino wrote:
Saturday, 17 January 2009 at 08:37 am (UTC)
With respect to journalists, they often report things they really don't understand at all and tend to repeat what's told to them by standbyer and expert alike. It is said that if a journalist quotes a number, the only thing you can be certain of, is that it is wrong!

Of course all winged aircraft glide, that's what the wings are there for - to provide lift, otherwise they would be flying bricks. The difference between gliders and powered aircraft is thet the glide ratios are significantly different. The glide ratio is the distance that flying object moves forward for a given drop in altitude.

A good glider will glide 50 miles in still air for a one mile (5280ft) loss of altitude, so this is a ratio of 50. The airbus A320 has a glide ratio around 17, if I remember correctly. The space shuttle is dreadful at about 5.
RE: Hero or Not
[info]jennhw91 wrote:
Saturday, 17 January 2009 at 12:03 pm (UTC)
It was an amazing thing that the pilot did but I also wonder at times did he do it on purpose to bask in the glory of being a hero. Who knows only time will tell. It just seems to have gone to smoothly if you ask me and to land in the Hudson river with the full knowledge that boat taxi's would come to the rescue it just seems to perfect to me. Just me two cents.
Re: Hero or Not
[info]docbrosk wrote:
Saturday, 17 January 2009 at 02:10 pm (UTC)
What utter drivel -- "two cents" is more than jennhw91 likely has between his/her/its ears. Perhaps next he/she/it will assert that the whole thing was a plot cooked up in advance? Amazing how the birds could be programmed to do such things. Clearly a soon-to-be-history Bush administration wannabe speechwriter....And if this gets me banned by LiveJournal, so be it.
Re: Hero or Not
[info]alldaykidda wrote:
Saturday, 17 January 2009 at 06:33 pm (UTC)
Oh you absolute fool. Do you really "wonder at times" about this theory that the pilot risked his and the lives of all on board on the offchance of being a hero? Really? Where do you go to do this wondering? Do you have to press mute on the TV so the Jeremy Kyle show doesn't distract you? Maybe you could stop scratching your backside and then sniffing your fingers long enough to realise how ridiculous your thoughts sound while they are in your head, let alone when you commit them to a national newspaper's website. Only time will tell.
Reality Check
[info]chrisflynn1885 wrote:
Sunday, 18 January 2009 at 03:30 am (UTC)
I Immediately began to cry when i read this story. Tears of enjoyment for the lives that were saved and all the people who would have been affected if there was a different outcome. I also gave my wife and kids an extremely long hug and told them how much i loved them. Thank God for Captain "Sully".

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date