Q&A: Resolving the US shutdown
Nikhil Kumar is The Independent's New York correspondent. He was formerly assistant editor on the foreign desk and has also done a variety of jobs on the city desk, where he wrote about markets, commodities and other business and economics topics.
Thursday 03 October 2013
Resolving the shutdown is important, for the longer it drags on, the greater the risk to the US economy, which remains weak. A drawn-out squabble over a stopgap budget would hit consumer spending, for example, as the furloughed federal workers tighten their belts. But in the short term, attention is turning to the debt ceiling because the federal government will hit its Congressionally mandated borrowing limit no later than 17 October.
Q. Why is the debt ceiling so critical?
Simply put, the US government spends more money than it has. To bridge the gap, it borrows money from the markets. It must also keep servicing its debts and does this by borrowing (it is also important to remember that the government’s spending commitments have already been authorised by Congress). The problem is that the amount it can borrow is capped by Congress. Legally, this “ceiling” cannot be raised by the President. So, when the government nears the ceiling, it has go back to Congress to ask for a higher limit. If Congress fails to raise the limit in time – in the current scenario, by 17 October – the US Treasury could be forced to default, a disastrous outcome that could have serious and sudden economic consequences. World markets would face collapse and the global financial system, vast swathes of which remain in post-crisis repair mode, would be dealt a hefty blow.
Q. Why is Congress dragging its feet?
The answer can be summed up in two words: House Republicans. The opposition party in the US controls the House of Representatives, and many within its ranks want to force the President and his Democratic colleagues to accept changes or a delay in his signature health reforms before they pass a stopgap budget. Fears are rising that they will also hold the full faith and credit of the US hostage until the President gives in.
Q. Are the Republicans united on blocking the stopgap budget?
Not entirely. According to reports from Capitol Hill, there are at least 19 Republicans who would vote for a stopgap budget without altering Obamacare. If they were backed in such a move by the Democratic minority in the House, the bill would clear. As it has already been approved by the Senate, it could then go to the President’s desk.
Q. That sounds sensible. So why aren’t they doing that?
The speaker of the House, Republican John Boehner, runs the risk of an internal revolt against his leadership if he allows such a “clean” bill to come on to the floor. He knows that most of his House Republican colleagues, and particularly right-wing Tea Party supporters, do not back funding the government without winning concessions from Mr Obama. He is therefore not allowing a straightforward stopgap budget to come to a vote.
Q. What now?
Mindful of the risks associated with a default, the Democrats would like the Republicans to agree to raising the debt ceiling immediately. On the stopgap budget, they would like the Republicans to fund the government temporarily while other issues are discussed. Thus far, the Republicans have shown little sign of going down this road. But if the shutdown continues, the Democrats and the President are likely to focus on a quick solution to the debt ceiling issue while negotiating questions over government funding.
- 1 The truth about 'girl things': Three cheers for Heather Watson's honesty
- 2 Man who held up 'hire me' sign at Waterloo station returns a year later with 'I'm hiring' sign
- 4 Tennis fan suing Australian Open organisers for 'failing to shade spectators' during Murray match
- 5 Men behaving badly: Urinating while standing, 'manspreading' and the gendering of selfishness
Man who held up 'hire me' sign at Waterloo station returns a year later with 'I'm hiring' sign
Saudi preacher who 'raped and tortured' his five -year-old daughter to death is released after paying 'blood money'
Rob Lowe hits out at White House decision not to meet Israeli leader
Iraq invasion 2003: The bloody warnings six wise men gave to Tony Blair as he prepared to launch poorly planned campaign
Winston Churchill: From accusations of anti-Semitism to the blunt refusal that led to the deaths of millions
British Muslim leaders outraged after Eric Pickles says followers of Islam should 'prove their identity'
UK terror fears: My jihadist son returned from Syria mentally scarred – now he is being ignored
Nigel Farage: NHS might have to be replaced by private health insurance
Billy Crystal: 'Stop shoving gay sex scenes in my face'
'We would evict Queen from Buckingham Palace and allocate her council house,' say Greens
French court convicts three over homophobic tweets, in case hailed as a 'significant victory' by LGBT rights campaigners
Excellent Salary : Austen Lloyd: OXFORD - REGIONAL FIRM - An excellent opportu...
Super Package: Austen Lloyd: BRISTOL - SENIOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE - An outstan...
£15000 - £50000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Fantastic opportunities are ava...
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: A Compute Engineer is required to join a globa...