Shell on trial
Oil giant in the dock over 1995 murder of activist who opposed environmental degradation of Niger Delta
Oil giant in the dock over 1995 murder of activist who opposed environmental degradation of Niger Delta
Royal Dutch Shell will revisit one of the darkest periods of its history tomorrow as a potentially groundbreaking court case opens in New York.
The oil giant stands accused of complicity in the 1995 execution of Ken Saro-Wiwa, a Nigerian environmental activist.
The world's boardrooms are watching the case, which is seen as a test of whether transnational companies owned or operating in the US can be held responsible for human rights abuses committed abroad.
A collection of cases brought by torture victims in the oil-rich Niger Delta and by relatives of those killed has been brought together under the umbrella of Wiwa v Shell.
The plaintiffs include Ken Saro-Wiwa's son, Ken Wiwa Jnr, and his brother, Owens Wiwa.
For Shell, which denies any involvement in the environmentalist's killing, ordered by the government of Sani Abacha, the case represents an unwelcome public hearing of grievances that the company has spent time and money trying to make people forget.
Mr Saro-Wiwa was hanged in November 1995 after being convicted by a military tribunal in which he was denied proper legal representation or appeal. Shell subsequently faced a storm of protest and Nigeria was suspended from the Commonwealth. The then British prime minister John Major called the execution "judicial murder".
Tomorrow's proceedings will see the Dutch-based energy giant charged with collaborating with Nigerian authorities in the execution of Mr Saro-Wiwa and eight other members of his ethnic Ogoni group on "trumped-up charges". Shell has vigorously denied any involvement and says it appealed to the Abacha government for clemency on Mr Saro-Wiwa's part.
The suit also alleges that the company consistently conspired with military authorities to violently put down peaceful protests by the Ogoni people, hundreds of thousands of whom Mr Saro-Wiwa had helped to mobilise.
"I have always maintained that Shell was complicit in the conspiracy to silence my father along with thousands of other Ogonis," said his eldest son, Ken Wiwa Jnr.
Nigeria's oil industry has long been the most glaring example of what is called Africa's "resource curse".
While Nigeria is Africa's largest oil producer, the peoples of the river delta where the crude is extracted have seen their homelands turned into a wasteland. The millions of dollars of oil revenue accrued every day have done nothing for the 70 per cent of Nigerians who live on less than $1 a day.
In the Niger Delta, farmlands and fish stocks have been destroyed amid environmental degradation brought on by oil spills, deforestation and the notorious practice of gas flaring, which continues despite being banned.
Ken Saro-Wiwa, an accomplished writer and businessman, had warned that Shell's actions in Nigeria would return to haunt them: "I and my colleagues are not the only ones on trial ... There is no doubt in my mind that the ecological war that the company has waged in the Delta will be called into question sooner than later and the crimes of that war duly punished."
The campaigner's death proved to be a turning point in the Delta and many of his darker predictions have since been borne out.
Oil production in Nigeria is running at half its capacity, the Petroleum Minister Odein Ajumogobia said last week. And the Niger Delta has been transformed into a war zone. The peaceful protests that peaked in 1993 with an estimated 300,000 Ogonis marching against Shell demanding compensation and an end to environmental destruction have been succeeded by armed militias in open revolt.
The demonstrations and sit-ins have given way to kidnappings, bombings, sabotage and armed assaults on oil rigs, pumping stations and multinational targets. The region is overrun with corrupt authorities orchestrating pirate gangs and wholesale oil theft.
As the preliminary hearings begin in New York tomorrow, hundreds of people in the Niger Delta are feared to have been killed in the crossfire during a counter-insurgency which the Nigerian government launched this month.
A joint task force carried out sea and air attacks against targets in the Delta and ground troops were sent in to flush out militants. Amnesty International condemned the operation.
The main militant group in the region is now the Movement for Emancipation of the Niger Delta, and unlike Mr Saro-Wiwa's Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People, its tactics are avowedly violent.
The violence has affected all oil companies but analysts say that Shell's onshore fields have been the worst affected. The oil industry was judged to have fed the violence in the Delta, according to a report that Shell commissioned five years ago.
Shell has been active since 1958 in the Delta, which contains most of Nigeria's energy reserves, estimated at 36 billion barrels of oil and 187 trillion cubic feet of gas.
The plaintiffs in the case allege that, although the Nigerian government tortured and executed the claimants and their relatives, "these abuses were instigated, orchestrated, planned, and facilitated by Shell Nigeria" and that the company "provided money, weapons, and logistical support to the Nigerian military, participated in the fabrication of murder charges, and bribed witnesses to give testimony."
In a statement, Shell said: "Shell in no way encouraged or advocated any act of violence against [the claimants] or their fellow Ogonis. We believe that the evidence will show clearly that Shell was not responsible for these tragic events."
Ethnic groups in the Delta have wanted greater autonomy since before independence from Britain in 1960. The Ogoni campaign was built on perceptions among ethnic minorities that they were being cheated out of oil revenue by a corrupt government dominated by Nigeria's larger ethnic groups.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
His predecessor got fired for lying.
Greed, corruption and lies are everywhere, but especially in the oil industry.
I see nothing of substance here. Let us hear some evidence before we all go into the usual disgusting, self loathing, anti oil, IQ destroying hysteria.
Nigeria's problems seem to me to have nothing to do with Shell and everything to do with their failed political system and frankly appalling Nigerian politicians. I wonder if these politicians are offering up Shell as a sacrifice?
Nigerians should look to Nigerians for the criminals and their saviours. Unless of course yopu are of the (racist) view that somehow Nigerian genetics are not up to self governance of this kind and thus "daddy" figures like Shell must be held accountable (unless they disobey the sovereign power in which case they are colonialist exploiters)
The truth is that international big oil companies do NOT make excess profits, they make volatile profits that are on average no different to other comparable resource extraction industries. But because they have 20+ year projects on a volatile market and need to operate in political systems utterly corrupted by unearned oil wealth, they make a fine foil for any malcontent to spin some hate and suffering self serving nbarrative about how its all the fault of the big nasty rich people.
It is actually. Its all the fault of big nasty rich Nigerian politicans of all colors. Shell, in the abscence of some evidence of which we see none, seems to be guilty of trying to fulfill their contract to produce oil and gas and pay the required royalties to the Nigerian state.
meanwhile, i will look up for the books you suggested. :)
kind wishes
- azlan: azlan.pawan@gmail.com
That's what Shell is being charged with. You should look it up.
http://www.shellguilty.com/learn-more/h
Sure, Nigerian politicians are part of the problem, but Shell cannot escape it's share of the blame.
Recall Prudhoe Bay, and the Texas oil refinery fire.
As for MP's expenses, a good example. Pay peanuts, be outraged at the monkeys you get. Brilliant!
Maybe my general point is that the persuit of the "guilty" is merely a populist way to avoid addressing the issues. Let us hear some issues for a change instead of Moon-Units shallow scare mongering and witch-hunting.
The facts are complex, thats what professional journalism is for IMHO, to explain and educate. Maybe George will give it a go one day?
p.s. Prudhoe Bay and the Texas oil refinery fire were real events, accidents, and a factual analysis of these shows thhat the companies were held to account under the contracts and laws in place at the time. How is this in any way similar to this retrospective Nigerian action? It could be, I dont know until someone explains the facts instaed of telling me the conclusion whilst telling us that its all too fiendishly complex to lay out in full.
The Wiwa family (understandably) want to hold someone to account for the execution of their Father. They cannot nail the real culprits in the Nigerian Polity because of corruption etc. So they are going after Shell by default. Sad!
This is not about getting justice for the death of Ken Saro-Wiwa.
If there is a working legal system in Nigeria, why are they suing in America instead of in Lagos?
I have worked on contract with Shell Operating Companies in the Middle East and I never once found the attitude that you claim for them.
Read (Hidden Hand)book collected by (Loran son of George son of Samuel ben johnass ben Samuel ben Laran)at 1897; shows in British Museum stamped 10/9/1906.where is the evidence that there is forgery ? is wikipedia had the evidence ?.it is mater of opinion guess.
Days from Jesus up til now,how many people know this? ended being killed ?.library had fire,stolen,threat professor,agency deal with this facts.
Zionist called anyone talk about it as antisemitic (even if like me Semitic in origin),racist;isolated..etc; that we hear now.
many were bribed In Britain like Cromwell who maid conspiracy 1647 April July 16.all the Parliament of king Charles were killed 12/11/1647.9/1/1649 court commandment the king no one from Britain accept to be against king, 2/3 were Cromwell solders,"court" cut his head by axe in front whithall in London.since then crises start:1649,1689,attack Ireland,fight between catholic and Protestant.
England make war with Holland 1652 by Cromwell (Lord England).
1654 Cromwell died ,exposed his history with Jews,took his body out of grave to him(Cromwell)on the Guillotine.
King Edward viii was asking :_I wanted to know from where England take the money? he had to leave under-reason being getting marry from America MRS Simpson.
books,wikipeia does not talk about it.
goyim never leaned,including myself.!
Source :http://Skepdic.com/protocol.html
From the skeptic,Dictionary.Henry Ford,2-17-21, whose newspaper, the Dear born Independent, cited the Protocols as evidence of an alleged Jewish threat until at least 1927. said: "The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now."
Read this you will understand why Zion protocol,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,are denying it..!
We're going well on Shell, Shell, Shell
Keep going well, keep going Shell
You can be sure of Hell, Hell, Hell.
see international corruption in west,France in particular.
prim-minster of justice was the same to be minister of fiance,in france.
all about money:USA,Europe,Israel in Gaza Gas producte,B.Gas was ready to take over,but Israel lost the international support,duo to Israel brutilty in killing 500 Childern in Gaza..!
see the futur in :
Exe0-ceo use the short memory for the readers,what Zionist did over 23 days,he try to implant new Palestine to replace Jordan,he wanted to create new Civilian war between Palestinians and Jordanians so Zionist can live longer..this is 50% chance for zionist to survive;as yannon plans.
Ben-Goryoin said the same probability.
In the western country exo-ceo want Western to do the job for Zionist by blackmailing Muslims them create Violence by creating Right wing as in Germany,that is why the Zionist used the Freemasons hidden hand to get red from M.P,to get new way to start right wing,as Racist to justify Future Israel racist...then plans to get Gas easy from Gaza.
yannon Is active in Lebanon ,spy,dismembering between Lebanese people.
Accusing Hezballah killing Harriri.opening rumors fro German newspapers,asking UN to act now against Its leader.then water from lebanon is free once Herzolalah go away.
Zionist crazy psychotic can not live without creating tension around.
The Oil wealth has not all stopped in Russia - large chunks of it have left with the Oilgarchs.
There are quite a few countires where Oil has been used to improve life for the populace - I have worked in some of them. Nigeria is a sui generis case and is untypical even in the developing world (which is a misnomer for huge chunks of it).
If hydro-carbon wealth is nationalised the local population is usually worse off - Libya, Venezuela, Mexico, Russia all seem to me to show that in different ways.
Multinationals don't have nearly as much influence over governments as some people would like to think. If the Nigerian government doesn't like Shell, it can tell them to go away and get someone else to produce the oil - for the same or more money - and that someone else might be a company that you'd like even less than Shell.
The court case in New York ought to be against the Nigerian government, not Shell; but you can't sue a government, and they wouldn't pay up anyway. Shell's imagined "deep pocket" is much more attractive.
The subtle enthno-centrism in many of the other posts here is infuriating. Why people living in the Western world think their own anti-corporate goals are applicable to anyone but them is baffling.
Scapegoating Shell does the people of Nigeria no good - the only people who get decent salaries in this country work for oil companies. Addressing this issue outside of the context of the Chieftancy system (which for many Westerners is seen as sacrosanct because it's "cultural") is impossible. Oil took over from slavery in Nigeria; both are necessarily hegemonic.
This article won't make it to Nigerian newspapers. The outcome will be irrelevant to Nigerians.
It seems that Shell bad habits are still going on... In Ireland they don't get people killed, just beaten up as the poor Willie Corduff learned a few weeks ago during his long running protest against Rossport Shell illegal building.
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/b
Your post is a smear withount foundation in fact. Indeed some Shell Employees have been attacked so the boot is, arguably, on the other foot.
I never heard of any of the people who were executed.
I wonder why?????
Colinru you should get your head out of the sand,read up about Saro wiwa and his struggle and you might change your tune
I don't believe you are at all biased (defending your old employer to the hilt as you etc) ,but I can't prove it....
Given the amount of public ignorance on this case, Shell has definitely benefitted from allowing one of the Niger Delta's greatest civil rights leaders since the Civil War to be silenced. I hope this will encourage more people to understand how unimaginably massive profits are made by these businesses that show a respectable face in the West and a very different one elsewhere.
Shell provided vehicles to the abacha government which were used in brutal reprisals against Ogoni people for peaceful protests. The "mayor" of the region told a British reporter that executives from Shell requested that they take military action against the Ogonis, then later recanted. Sorry, I don't remember the names.
Quite a few witnesses against Saro-Wiwa and others recanted their testimony after the trial and claimed to have been bribed by Shell for their testimony.
Owens Wiwa, the brother of Ken Saro-Wiwa, claimed to have been informed by a Shell executive that Shell could petition the Abacha government to stop the trial of Saro-Wiwa if he would recant all of his statements that environmental crimes had been committed.
Shell could have cleared this up by releasing their documents that show who was paid what by Shell and for what purpose, but they have vociferously declined to do so. BP is the only major oil company to have adopted this "open book" process.
Asking for evidence is good. Assuming that is there is none puzzles me. Why would a court have agreed to hear the case if there was no evidence?
Laptop Battery Laptop Battery Laptop Batteries Laptop Batteries discount laptop battery discount laptop battery notebook battery notebook battery computer battery computer battery replacement laptop battery replacement laptop battery notebook batteries notebook batteries