Smoke dope and save the state of California, dude
Activists fund TV ads that claim legalising drug could solve financial crisis
It has been touted as a successful treatment for everything from insomnia and depression to Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. Now supporters of legalised marijuana are making perhaps their most extravagant claim yet: that the drug can solve California's spiralling financial crisis.
A series of television ads was launched yesterday supporting a bill by Democratic assemblyman Tom Ammiano that would regulate and tax the sale of marijuana in the Golden State, where Arnold Schwarzenegger's administration is in a $26bn (£15.9bn) black hole.
The 30-second film features an "actual marijuana user". She is a retired, 58-year-old civil servant called Nadine Herndon, shown in front of her family portraits at home in Sacramento County, where she began using the drug after suffering a series of strokes three years ago.
"Huge cuts to police, schools and healthcare are inevitable, due to California's budget crisis. Even our state parks could be closed," she says. "But the Governor and legislature are ignoring millions of Californians who want to pay taxes. We're marijuana users. Instead of being treated like criminals for using a substance safer than alcohol, we want to pay our fair share."
The move could attract widespread support in a state where some regions never quite emerged from the Summer of Love. Medical marijuana use was introduced in California by a majority vote in a 1996 referendum, and Mr Ammiano's bill calling for legalisation was put before the legislature in February.
Highlighting the financial benefits of legalisation represents a canny tactic. California has for years been unable to raise as much tax as it spends, and its coffers finally ran dry last week, meaning the government is now paying bills with IOU notes. On Monday Mr Schwarzenegger's administration suffered the indignity of having its credit rating downgraded to BBB.
Tens of thousands of public servants have been sacked due to the crisis, and most others are being forced to take two unpaid days' leave each month. Ms Herndon's advert, which was launched by the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), claims that taxing marijuana could pay the salaries of 20,000 teachers.
That figure is based on a calculation by Betty Yee, the head of the California tax collection board, who has said that $1bn per year would be raised via a $50-per-ounce fee charged to retailers, plus an additional $400m through sales tax. But marijuana advocates say actual income could be much higher.
"All these figures are approximations. We are dealing with a commodity that has been illegal for decades," said Bruce Mirken of the MPP. "It isn't traded on the commodities market, and we have no way of knowing how much is consumed. Everything is confused because at present we have this illusion of illegality."
Lawyers would also be likely to benefit from any attempt to legalise the drug. Though marijuana is supposedly available to any Californian who can find a doctor willing, for a small fee, to sign a piece of paper claiming they suffer from a condition such as insomnia or "anxiety", it remains verboten under federal law.
Many dispensaries were warily tolerated by federal authorities under the Bush regime, and Barack Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder has said the new administration will tolerate medical marijuana so long as it follows State law. But the White House has not outlined its position on full legalisation, raising the spectre of a test lawsuit.
Culturally, the drug can also be highly divisive: away from major cities such as Los Angeles and San Francisco, and some northern regions where hippy culture remains commonplace, local authorities in many small towns are less than tolerant towards users. A record 74,000 people were prosecuted for possession in 2007, the last year for which figures are available.
The reluctance of some conservative classes to embrace legalised marijuana prompted several television stations, including KTLA and KABC, to drop Ms Herndon's advertisement last night, apparently fearing it might offend viewers. The MPP accused them of "stifling open debate".
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
I'm suggesting that all drugs are made legal and are then regulated and are sold by authorised resellers over the counter, and that a portion of the price is tax.
This will bring this huge black market into the open and under the tax umbrella, while simultaneously reducing crime, reducing prices to consumers, increasing quality, and flushing out all those drug dealers/benefit cheats currently sponging off everyone else.
It will destroy the monopolies in that market and thus increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the economy as a whole.
[pasted from http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/therepor
i believe this fairly harmless plant must be reintroduced in to the environment everywhere, its not gonna solve Californias financial problem, but actually why should a plant which has been needlessly outlawed for generations be reintroduced for pure financial gain, its the sort of insidious hypocritical bullshit we have all tolerated for too long.
Today i face prison for lighting up a spliff, but maybe soon because the hypocrites need my money i can buy it from them!!?
For the sake of each human who has been imprisoned because if this unjustified law i say no to putting the weed into the power of the state, just set it free back in to nature.....
when all this revenue leaves the hands of the people on the street what will they do for money? what crime will they turn next? probably a crime far more threatening than dealing in dope..
Penalty for supplying drugs outside of the Government system would be life imprisonment.
Grow your own, hypocrite problem solved, acidpen. And being ridiculous and extrapolating the thought .... if everyone grows their own is there no money market manipulation/temptation to abuse for personal exclusive profit supporting corrupt institutions.
Also, unlike home brew alcohol, you get whatever quality you are prepared to put the effort in to produce. Why buy when home grown is as good or better, and you know what it is and whats been used to grow it.
The only problem I can see with legalisation is drug driving (and similar like machinery use, flying etc) and how to test incapacity. Apart from that it seems to me that all we will get by legalising is people gardening and staying at home being peaceful. Sounds awful doesn't it, compared to everyone going out, many getting drunk and a significant few behaving badly. There may be some tax opportunities but thats not the reason to do it. Ending the criminal money printing press is.
Would there be more or less violence on the streets if marijuana was legalised? The answer is painfully obvious...
There would be one big danger though.... People might actually start having thoughts of their own - and that prospect is quite frightening to any government...
As well as creating new revenue streams by the direct taxation of currently illegal drugs, legalisation would also create new supply related industry - ie dutch style coffee shops to retail cannabis - which would see a string of new business start ups.
Of more importance many thirdworld countries like afghanistan, columbia, lebanon, thailand, peru, and mexico to name but some of the worst victims of the War on Drugs policy, will have a legal cash crop that can be used to bring up the standard of living in these countries
The level of murder and destruction inflicted on these countries - for literally growing plants - poppies, cannabis, and coco is not only obscene - but totally indefensible
America proved prohibition does not work when it criminalised alcohol. The current War on Drugs has resulted in exactly the same result, but on a global scale, with far greater devastation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdONwv51