World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 9° London Hi 14°C / Lo 10°C

'140 killed and hundreds injured' in China riot

Reuters

A shattered windscreen falls off as demonstrators rock a bus in Urumqi

Reuters

A shattered windscreen falls off as demonstrators rock a bus in Urumqi

At least 140 people have been killed in rioting in the capital of China's northwestern region of Xinjiang, with the government blaming exiled separatists for the Muslim area's worst case of unrest in years.

Hundreds of rioters have been arrested, the official Xinhua news agency reported, after rock-throwing Uighurs took to the streets of the regional capital yesterday, some burning and smashing vehicles and confronting ranks of anti-riot police.

The unrest underscores the volatile ethnic tensions that have accompanied China's growing economic and political stake in its western frontiers.

But independent analysts said the trouble in the resource-rich region was unlikely to have a major impact on China's economy because of the remoteness of the area and limited access.

Beijing's image as a responsible power, though, may take a hit.

"In terms of China's domestic economy, it is in a remote place and it does not have a big impact on things generally unless there is some evidence, of which there is none, that the government is in some meaningful way losing control," said Arthur Kroeber, Managing Director of Dragonomics, a research and advisory firm in Beijing.

A senior Chinese government official said the unrest was the work of extremist forces abroad, signalling a security crackdown in the strategic region near Pakistan and central Asia.

Residents in the Xinjiang's regional capital Urumqi were unable to access the Internet on Monday, several said. "The city is basically under martial law," Yang Jin, a dried fruit merchant, said by telephone.

Chinese state television showed rioters throwing rocks at police and overturning a police car, and smoke billowing from burning vehicles.

Li Zhi, the Communist Party boss of Urumqi told a news conference that the death toll from the rioting had risen to 140, the semi-official China News Agency said. Xinhua said 816 people were injured and hospitalised.

Police rounded up "several hundred" who participated in the violence, including more than 10 key players who fanned unrest, Xinhua said, and are searching for 90 others.

"For whoever was behind the riot, or for whatever intentions they had in masterminding the bloodshed, one thing is clear: under no circumstances should slaughters be brooked, violence allowed or national security challenged," according to a Xinhua commentary.

The riot in Urumqi, a city of 2.3 million residents 3,270 km (2,050 miles) west of Beijing, followed a protest against government handling of a June clash between Han Chinese and Uighur factory workers in southern China, where two Uighurs died in Shaoguan.

The China Daily put the number of protesters at 300 to 500 while the exiled Uyghur American Association had it as high as 3,000.

An unnamed Chinese official said the "unrest was masterminded by the World Uyghur Congress led by Rebiya Kadeer", according to Xinhua. "This was a crime of violence that was pre-meditated and organised," said the report.

Rebiya Kadeer is a Uighur businesswoman now in exile in the United States after years in jail, and accused of separatist activities. She did not answer calls for comment.

But exiled Uighur groups adamantly rejected the Chinese government claim of a plot. They said the riot was an outpouring of pent-up anger over government policies and Han Chinese dominance of economic opportunities.

"They're blaming us as a way to distract the Uighurs' attention from the discrimination and oppression that sparked this protest," said Dilxat Raxit, a spokesman for the World Uyghur Congress in exile in Sweden.

Xinjiang is the doorway to China's trade and energy ties with central Asia, and is itself rich in gas, minerals and farm produce. But many Uighurs say they see little of that wealth.

"In Xinjiang one of the major sources of discontent is that there is still a major gap economically between Han and Uighurs," said Barry Sautman, a specialist on China's ethnic politics at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

Almost half of Xinjiang's 20 million people are Uighurs. The population of Urumqi is mostly Han Chinese, and the city is under tight police security even in normal times.

"I personally saw several Han people being stabbed. Many people on buses were scared witless," Zhang Wanxin, a Urumqi resident, said by telephone.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Well done 'Indie.'
[info]adullamite wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 06:52 am (UTC)
This is the first report I have read of this riot..
I suppose a hundred or so Chinese dying means little to us here in the UK.
Just a few foreigners dying in a riot!
Well done for informing us of the world rather than ignoring this.
The Chinese political system is corrupt to the core and the many variations of peoples there suffer badly.
Totalitarian oppression comes naturally to them!
Monsters
[info]atomoregio wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 07:05 am (UTC)
the wounded and bloodied civilians lying on the street are most Han people,
not injured by the police, but beaten and had their throats cut by the Uyghur animals.

did their Allha give them that order?
Re: Monsters
[info]corporeal4now wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 08:19 am (UTC)

Where did you get your info from?
Can you post some reliable links to support your claim that these injures are not from the police?
It might also help if you explain what is gra
If this was Iran
[info]lkdamo wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 07:47 am (UTC)
Why is the British Government not complaining, oh ye because they do business there, silly me.
Funny how money gets in the way of the British moral high ground.
Why is the BBC not sending satellites to tell the truth to the people of china, like they are doing in Iran?
Is it because they don't want to interfere with the internal dealings of China, because killing people in China is okay, it's just Iran that it's not acceptable in.

Re: If this was Iran
[info]andygb wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 08:03 am (UTC)
Quite right, a typical example of double standards. I doubt that we will hear any condemnation from the US either, because China is not part of the "Axis of evil". We live in a World where the worst excesses by large and powerful states - US, Russia and China, go unpunished, but any minor transgression by somebody outside the "club", is met by condemnation and UN sanctions.
Re: If this was Iran
[info]barneyson wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 08:03 am (UTC)
But Ikdamo the Chinese government doesn't like other countries interferring in its internal affairs. So it welcomes silence from the Uk - it's a double-edged sword for Beijing. Anyway this was an ethnic riot so why should the UK government say anything - it wasn't a march for democracy, it was a riot clearly ignited by feelings of inequality. That's an internal problem. The UK cannot say anything.
Re: If this was Iran
[info]atticus1900 wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 11:01 am (UTC)
The BBC is banned from reporting to a Chinese audience. No transmissions would be seen.
Re: If this was Iran
[info]kira_sama09 wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 12:32 pm (UTC)
who said that it is not acceptable in Iran??? DID YOU ALL FORGET ABOUT THE IRAQ-IRAN WAR??? the West supported a war against Iran and had a hand in killing thousands of Iranians! did you all forget that?
the reason BBC is not reporting this is because it is a bias media. i think it should be clear to the world by now. anyway, they are not complaining because probably these people are Muslims, also by having the West to care about them there will be no political or economical gains as a result!
somehow when a Muslim is killed or mascaraed these days no one cares!! probably its discrimination by your Western media!!! this bias allows such acts to perpetuate!
yes, the last 27 Iranians were Muslims too, but their lives are not important tot he West because it is serving the Western propaganda against their regime, hence, protecting Israel, during the Iraq-Iran war Iranian lives were not that important my friend
it is also interesting how the West keeps criticizing and punishing other regimes when they fail to look and account themselves. there are over 1.5 million Iraqis murdered in a war that was based on lies.
so yes, may be the English do not oppress their own people, but they have murdered and colonized hundreds of countries around the world. they continue to wedge war in the 21st century based on colonial agendas! if you are so appalled by what is happening its great to start back home before tthe West accuse others of oppression.
keep questioning your main stream media...look for truth elsewhere and do something to stop your government from killing innocent people around the world.
why oh why???
[info]evalisa1 wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 08:08 am (UTC)
I am affected by this incident. I have lived in China for 7 years, and surely whatever news bad or good will surely alarm me. When is China going to learn?? They want to show that they are No.1 in the world when it comes to technology, finance etc. yet...they are still backward when it comes to people's freedom and expression..this what you expect if people are severely oppressed- riot in gigantic proportions. China! Wake up to the signs of the times!!!
Re: why oh why???
[info]independentale wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 08:53 am (UTC)
Does China really want to show that they are No. 1 in the world?I do not think so. It's your assumption.
Do not judge others just by your point of view and do not think you are the God to save Chinese.
China riot
[info]baron777 wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 08:50 am (UTC)
no statement yet from the usual suspects?.may be obama will sit this one out with north korea on the edge
Most deaths are of Han origin... (please get your facts straight, posters)
[info]carl_eric wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 09:30 am (UTC)
For those who think this case is a case of the state against the people, can you please go read the information from different sources BEFORE criticizing China. Most of the deaths and wounded are of Han origin, read the unbiased report here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jul/06/china-riots-uighur-xinjiang. Furthermore, as you will have noticed most of the news reports comes from Chinese news outlets, none of the western news outlets knew of this violence, it would have passed unnoticed otherwise...

Re: Most deaths are of Han origin... (please get your facts straight, posters)
[info]barneyson wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 09:52 am (UTC)
Most of those who died were probably Han Chinese - you are right - but with such little concrete info coming out it's hard to guess the true figures and the identities (and racial groupings) of those killed. Most news will come from Chinese sources of course (Western journalists in China may find it hard to enter Xinjiang for a period as they can be barred from areas at the flick of a switch - see Tibet last year, and this year). This means we will probably be reliant on Xinhua for news - which is not good news as Xinhua repeats the government line that this would have been a splittist riot organised by terrorists. The riot would not ultimately have gone unreported without Xinhua reporting on it however - there are foreigners in Urumqi who would have made mention of this and of course the world is seeing a growing army of citizen-journalists who cover events, especially with video and digital photographs. The fact that so many Han Chinese may have died will be ample reason for Beijing to tread softly here - to go in and crush all resistance to its rule will create those very things it fears: more organised solidarity among those who want to split East Turkestan from China and draw new recruits to its ranks, while fanning the flames of anti-Han Chinese resentment among discontented Uighurs. My sympathies go to the families of anyone killed, but China needs to be very careful in how it deals with this - but the CCP has a long history of using violence and oppression to silence dissent. I am not optimistic.
[info]nomadicnomad wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 10:42 am (UTC)
Whats the common denominator?

Muslims of course.
[info]gocrazyinasia wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 11:07 am (UTC)
this is the protest of discriminated people, silent, and suffering more then 40 years under the Han rulers. of course they can accept the rule of Chinese law and legislation, but if they dont have the chance for equal rights, education, etc. why should they follow these orders?
Black people were discriminated the same in USA in the history. if China is a power and a Han people see themselves as modern & with culture then they must allow the development of their minoritties.
Inequality
[info]atticus1900 wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 11:09 am (UTC)
I have lived in China and seen the oppression of Uighurs first hand. While working for VSO, I was prevented from teaching the poorest ethnic minorities in favour of teaching Han children.

The Uighurs are second class citizens, and are excluded from many of the financial benefits China is experiencing. Xinjiang, like Tibet, is being modernised (often against the wishes of locals), but the benefits are going to econmic migrants from the Eastern coastal areas. The local cultures are being sanitised so as to be non-threatening to the government.

Rioting is wrong, but I can understand their anguish.
Re: Inequality
[info]gocrazyinasia wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 11:22 am (UTC)
everybody who has a good understanding of China & travel experience to Xinjiang can confirm the second class situation. even the bad jobs in factories, oil & gas fields are for Han chinese. Why? because they are experienced workers? no, they are simply re-located from Central China, attracted by a very simple thing: better income than in Gansu, Hunan, or Sichuan.
For your understanding: we are talking about 100 US$ or so monthly salary.
The minorities in China are not welcomed as equal partners in modern china, in Yunan you can visit the Zoo or a minority village.
Re: Inequality
[info]dumbganda wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 11:39 am (UTC)
This is Stalinism at its worse spilled over to China. The Urhur are an ancient race, as old as the Han Chinese. They were friendly traders who were allies of the Han, yes the very Han Dynasty in the campaigns against the Huns. They were not muslims then and are probably no more Islamic now than they were over 2000 years ago. This ethnic unrest is quite unnecessary and reflects poorly on the present Chinese government.
Central Asia Will Soon Be in Flames
[info]ambricourt wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 02:08 pm (UTC)
Ambricourt

This Reuters report is merely preliminary - a hint, a warning, of things to come.

Subversives, trained by the U.S.-U.K.-Israel power-bloc, advance from the borders of Afghanistan and Pakistan into Central Asia. After they have started the small fires of local rebellion (as in Iran), cries for UN/NATO intervention will be heard.

The media, including the sold-out BBC, will invent some justification. What will it be this time? Islamic rights? Ethnic freedom? Uighur automony?

The UN/NATO and their many offshoots are organizations looking for work, mostly destructive, in a time of global economic depression.

Is the war against China, like the war against Iran, about to become more public?

So that the corporations of the "free world" can plunder the resources of other, previously peaceful regions.
Re: Central Asia Will Soon Be in Flames
[info]topolcats wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 02:25 pm (UTC)
I think you are accurate in your assessment. This is the work of special services USA or CIA. In this article, the claimed mastermind is " An unnamed Chinese official said the "unrest was masterminded by the World Uyghur Congress led by Rebiya Kadeer", according to Xinhua-who lives in the USA. " this is probably accurate and certainly with the help and tacit approval of the CIA IN the USA. China must be vigilant in in defense when dealing with the USA for it covets the destruction of china in its racist xenophobic concept of exceptionalism , meaning there no greater nation than America and we should rule the world-Forever. China must act now and with decisive action no matter the cost and nullify American plans to destroy it.
Re: Central Asia Will Soon Be in Flames
[info]topolcats wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 02:28 pm (UTC)
I think you are accurate in your assessment. This is the work of special services USA or CIA. In this article, the claimed mastermind is " An unnamed Chinese official said the "unrest was masterminded by the World Uyghur Congress led by Rebiya Kadeer", according to Xinhua-who lives in the USA. " this is probably accurate and certainly with the help and tacit approval of the CIA IN the USA. China must be vigilant in its defense when dealing with the USA ,for it covets the destruction of China in its racist xenophobic concept of exceptionalism , meaning there no greater nation than America and we should rule the world-Forever. China must act now and with decisive action no matter the cost and nullify American plans to destroy it.
Resentment
[info]sparkozy wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 06:26 pm (UTC)
I lived in China for many years and spent a month travelling around Xinjiang province about 15 years ago. Urumqi, the provincial capital where the riots occurred, is largely just another Chinese city with it's grey communist architecture and lots of Han Chinese. Back then, elsewhere there were hardly any Han, except very few policemen on hardship postings. In Kashgar, which the call the "cradle of Uygur separatism", if you see a Han Chinese, you see a very nervous-looking person. But the government is trying to flood the region with Han to dilute the Uygur minority, the same as they have done in Tibet. And of course the big roads and infrastructure projects Beijing thinks ''modernises'' the region for the locals misses the point. That's not what they want because they benefit only after the Han get the bigger, initial benefits, if they're lucky. So resentment builds.
140 killed and hundreds injured' in China riot
[info]marky_ace wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 10:52 pm (UTC)
Strange how this is not getting the sort of coverage that Iran got recently, just proves that the globalist system we are in is truly evil and democracy is just a sham.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date