World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 9° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Afghanistan: Slipping out of control

US to send in 17,000 extra troops as Karzai loses grip

By Kim Sengupta

The 'surge', with the extra US forces in Afghanistan expected to rise to 30,000, was required to 'stabilise a deteriorating situation' said Barack Obama

AFP/GETTY IMAGES

The 'surge', with the extra US forces in Afghanistan expected to rise to 30,000, was required to 'stabilise a deteriorating situation' said Barack Obama

A grim picture of spiralling violence and a disintegrating society has emerged in Afghanistan in a confidential Nato report, just as Barack Obama vowed to send 17,000 extra American troops to the country in an attempt to stem a tide of insurgency.

Direct attacks on the increasingly precarious Afghan government more than doubled last year, while there was a 50 per cent increase in kidnappings and assassinations. Fatalities among Western forces, including British, went up by 35 per cent while the civilian death toll climbed by 46 per cent, more than the UN had estimated. Violent attacks were up by a third and roadside bombings, the most lethal source of Western casualties, by a quarter. There was also a 67 per cent rise in attacks on aircraft from the ground, a source of concern to Nato which depends hugely on air power in the conflict.

The document, prepared by the Pentagon on behalf of the US-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) in Afghanistan and seen by The Independent, also reveal how swathes of the country have slipped out of the control of President Hamid Karzai’s government. According to a poll taken towards the end of last year, a third of the population stated that the Taliban had more influence in their locality.

The growing unpopularity of Mr Karzai, along with accusations of corruption against figures associated with his government, has led the new US administration to repeatedly warn the Afghan President he will lose Washington’s support in the coming national elections unless there are drastic changes. The military “surge”, say US officials, must be accompanied by significant improvement in governance with Mr Obama describing the Karzai government of being “detached” from what was going on in his own country.

Mr Obama acknowledged that the reinforcements, with the total numbers of extra forces expected to rise to 30,000, had been sent because “urgent and swift action” was required “to stabilise a deteriorating situation … in which the Taliban is resurgent in Afghanistan and al-Qa’ida threatens America from its safe haven along the Pakistani border.”

Mr Karzai was informed of the new deployments in a telephone call on Tuesday. The Afghan leader had complained publicly at the weekend that he had not heard from the US leader since the inauguration almost a month ago.

The new US administration had indicated that it was prepared to talk to Iran about the Afghan situation and yesterday, Italy, which assumes the presidency of the G8 this year, said that Tehran would be invited to participate in a summit on Afghanistan. The Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said: “We want to consider how to involve Iran, not whether to involve Iran.”

Nato has accused the Iranian regime of allowing weapons to be smuggled into Afghanistan while drugs go in the other direction, with some of the profits pumped back in to funding the insurgency. The UN’s International Narcotics Control Board said in its annual report that due to overproduction of opium there has been a rise in the production of cannabis in Afghanistan. Many provinces which had been declared by the Afghan government and Nato to be free of poppy cultivation have switched to cannabis. The report stated: “The lack of security in Afghanistan has severely hampered government efforts to eradicate illicit opium poppy; a total of 78 persons involved in the eradication efforts lost their lives in 2008, a six-fold increase over the previous year. The increase in illicit cultivation of cannabis in Afghanistan is also a worrying development.”

Meanwhile, eight years after “liberation” and the fall of the Taliban, many Afghan people still lack basic amenities. Across the country 38 per cent of the population did not have access to medical facilities with the figure rising to 44 per cent in rural areas.

The Taliban has also carried out a violent campaign against education for children in many parts of the country, claiming it was being used for Western indoctrination, and targeting girls’ schools in particular as being against Islam. The Nato report states that “access to schools for both girls and boys varies across the country and is tightly linked to security. Degree of access to girls’ schools is also an ethno-geographic factor”.

Whereas 74 per cent of Uzbek, 73 per cent of Tajik and 72 per cent of Hazara girls are in a position to receive an education, it falls to 44 per cent among the Pashtuns and, in the conservative deep south of the country, in provinces like Helmand where British troops are based, no more than 24 per cent attend schools.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]voodoojedizin wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 12:28 am (UTC)
Exactly why are we killing and murdering people in Afghanistan?

Ex President Bush used these people as an excuse for the 9/11 attacks saying that they receive their training their. Which is bogus, the training they received to fly the planes into the trade towers, came from right there in the United States. That's where they learned to fly.

And let's not forget that most of the terrorists were from Saudi Arabia, where they also have extreme religious fanatics, but we aren't bombing of them. We're not killing their women and children.

Before 9/11 the United States was trying to make a pipe line deal with the Taliban. We didn't see them as evil then. In fact there is a film and many photos of Taliban leaders at a party with congressional members. It's interesting that when the United States realize the Taliban was not going to make a pipeline deal with us, they suddenly become terrorists.

Explain why we are murdering and killing these people?
come, come now...
[info]tommytcg wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 08:48 am (UTC)
voodoojedezin, do you still believe that an Arab in a cave in Afghan. shut down the half trillion dollar US air defenses with his laptop? Or that his incompetents, one of whom could not solo a Cessna 172 with 600 hours in his log book, could plan descents, without continuous radar talk-down guidance for height and location, so as to arrive at the correct height and location, (at max speed, on their first flight in 180 ton airliners), to be ready for the final turn. Or that these incompetencts could, at that stage, then calculate the correct angle of bank to apply, still at full speed, so as to roll out of their final turns, and be lined up to strike the said buildigs? Do you also still believe that these incompetents had the psychic(?) power to free fall three buildings, including unstruck WTC7, to put the 180 ton Boeing through a ten foot hole at the Penta, or to disappear another one in a bomb crater in Shanlksville? I dunno why people keep regurgitating this Govt. conspiracy theory that few believe.
Re: come, come now...
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 05:35 pm (UTC)
they are ill
according to plan
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 12:55 am (UTC)
'A grim picture of spiralling violence and a disintegrating society'.

It all seems to be going according to plan then. I'm sure the weapons manufaturers absolutely love it and hope to keep the confilct going for another 7 years.... maybe even for another 60 years, like the Palestine 'problem'.

The only real question for America and NATO is: 'Who is going to finance this insanity beyond 2009, now that most western economies are collapsing?
Why are killing Afgans?
[info]ftgt wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 01:20 am (UTC)
Why are we in Afganistan? So that girls can have an education? So that we can improve medical facilities, (more desperately needed given the indescriminate bombing of remote villages by the US and her allies one would imagine)and to install a strong central corruption free (puppet) government that comands control a respect accross Afganistan (that's never ever going to happen as anyone with a basic grasp of Afgan history and culture would know). Is this really all about???

Are these things something we really should be fighting a war of occupation for? Because, funnily enough, more and more often it's these aspects of Afganistan are being mentioned as part and parcel of the reason we're killing people over there. The ridiculous claim that we're fighting terrorism over there is just that, ridiculous. We're creating terrorism over there, state sponsored terrorism by US and UK forces as our troops engage in their bombing and shooting sprees, and US and UK state generated terrorism, as more and more Afgans reject and react to our killing activites over there.

The basic facts are we shouldn't be there, our presence is quite rightly being resisted by the Afgan people, and the consequence is a spiralling upwards of deaths, mainly innocent, but also some involving military personnel. The war is unwinnable for many many reasons, one of them being it's morally wrong for the West to be waging war against the Afgan people in the first place.

GORDON BROWN NEEDS TO SHOW BRAVE MORAL LEADERSHIP AND PULL OUR TROOPS OUT NOW. There is no national interest at stake, and although it will undoubtedly upset the USA and Obama, it is the morally right thing to do. Go on Gordon, you can do it!
Re: Why are killing Afgans?
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 05:39 pm (UTC)
except that the afghan people say in poll after poll that they do not want the Taliban and want to be defended from them.

which leaves from your narrative..... nothing

did you "think" the same about Iraqis? Not able to be free and united? Did you call in Iraq for withdrawal like ytou do today in Afghanistan knowing it would lead to civil war and trhen enslavement under an Iraqi strongman, Taliban or Iranian "puppet"

Why are we fighting in Afghnaistan? because people have a right to be free. In the autumn Afghans will vote. For that we fight.
The NATO document is front page of Wikileaks for the past week
[info]cypherpunks wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 01:54 am (UTC)
It's great this material was covered, but would have been nice for the independent to state that the document was released by Wikileaks, or, at the very least "available now at Wikileaks.".

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Wikileaks_slams_arrest_and_releases_Afghan_death_data_for_2008

February 16, 2009

WIKILEAKS PRESS RELEASE

For Immediate Release.

Wikileaks releases NATO report on civilian deaths

A confidential NATO report from January reveals that civilian deaths from the war in Afghanistan have increased by 46% over the past year.

The 12 page report was authenticated and released in full today by Wikileaks.
ISAF Security Summary 2008
ISAF Security Summary 2008

The report shows a dramatic escalation of the war and civil disorder. Coalition deaths increased by 35%, assassinations and kidnappings by 50% and attacks on the Kabul based Government of Hamid Karzai also more than doubled, rising a massive 119%.

The report highlights huge increases on attacks aimed at Coalition forces, including a 27 % increase in IED attacks, a 40%. rise in rifle and rocket fire and an increase in surface to air fire of 67%.

According to the report, outside of the capital Kabul only one in two families had access to even the most basic health care, and only one in two children had access to a school....
Afghanistan
[info]lloydhart wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 02:34 am (UTC)
All empires go somewhere to die. it seems America chose Iraq and Afghanistan. I suppose the British will be finished off there as well.

Lloyd Hart
Re: Afghanistan
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 05:41 pm (UTC)
on deaths door yourself lloydhart?

Iraq is a young free nation. Despite you it seems. Watch it succeed and try and work out how to dig yourself out of your recreationalk hole.

I see Alawi said he bore no grudge to Germany and France as they came sniffing for oil now their is no danger of any cost in doing so. Yeah, no grudge I bet.
Why not more coordination & regime change
[info]raz111 wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 04:25 am (UTC)
Undeniably, Afghanistan has slipped out of control for two reasons: One. lack of coordination among the intenrational players, and two the corrupt Afghan regime that has been prying on its people for the last eight years. Daily million of dollars are being siphoned illegaly into the pockets of crooks that have penetrated into the system. Unfortunately, those having access to procurements openly charge their illegal commissions on each project they award to the corrupt construction firms. Provincial Reconstruction Teams of different countries stationed at provinces have been penetrated by corrupt individuals who make huge money out of the projects being awarded to the construction firms.

Astonishingly those openly bribing ordinary citizens enjoy full impunity. As an example, Ministry of Finance, which has now turned into a private venture, whose regular employees salary range from $100 to $400 a month drive in high value cars that cost $15,000-20,000 and stay in luxurious flats that cost more than $100,000. To the surprise of many, the cars obtained through illegal means are being parked at the parking lot of ministry to the very well notice of the big bosses, who despite not asking for the source of money, congratulate them for having these costly vehicles.

The Office of Adminsitrative Affairs, which is the right arm of the President Karzai, has plunged into corruption. This office is occupied by national consultants who have been making huge amounts through illegal means. They have established a network of crooks who charge commissions on different deals ranging from procurement to recruitment to transfer. Most national consultants and regular employees have acquired flats at the costly areas of the city as Macrorayan and Golding Housing by names of their next of kin in order to avoid future investigation on the source of money.

The above are just some examples. The President is well aware of widespread corruption but has not done anything significant to curb it. Therefore, if he is imposed again on Afghans, it will be a disaster.


understanding limitations
[info]nadiyaaamer wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 05:25 am (UTC)
man has the inherent issue with ominion and afghanistan, iraq, vitnam, and now Pakistan are examples of america interfering with everyones values and lives.if they could step back and let the world be they would be better off.But how would they understand this complex yet simple fact for they have never fought any of their wars on their own land.They live in a beautiful land with all the facilities they want while they rip apart other countries.
Vietnam 2 - Here we go!
[info]aidrenegade wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 07:06 am (UTC)
I was always an unwinnable war. The more the west tries to win it, the worse it will get. We might not like how life is led there. It doesn't give the west the right to force our way on them. I do have great respect for all the frontline military involved as they are just doing their job as dictated by other people.
Afghanistan
[info]barneyson wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 09:01 am (UTC)
Of course NATO should pull out. What will happen to the Afghan people after they have been left to the mercy of the Taliban is unfortunately the destiny of the country. You cannot fight against destiny, you can only delay it, as NATO have discovered. But you can be 100% guaranteed the last thing either the government of Pakistan or China (or numerous other nations) wants is the Taliban back in control in Kabul and projecting their medievil mindset across the land and across borders. But such is destiny....
Re: Afghanistan
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 05:46 pm (UTC)
what is your destiny barneyson?

Any morality in there at all?

The TAliban CAN be beaten. 90% of Afghans, when free and feeling safe to say so, hate and despise them. That is the truth. But today the reality is that insufficient troops and support from evryone but mostly Europeans has created the situation where moany are afraid to criticise the Taliban.

Soon according to you we will hear non Afghan voices. What on earth are you arguing for? The Afghans are a race. Humans like you and me. what is your destiny barneyson?
America's war in A-Pak
[info]rufusd2 wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 09:46 am (UTC)
The Americans did not invade Afghanistan and force their NATO allies to accompany them on a mission of emancipation of the Afghan people. They did so as a retaliation for what took place on 9/11. Therefore all this talk about children not being able able to go to school and women not being able to leave their homes etc. is merely a Western afterthought.

The reality is that the invasion of Afhanistan has only stirred up a hornet's nest for which, more than the West, the countries of that region, including India, will be paying a heavy price in the not so distant future.

Now some sections of the Indian mainstream media are asking the Indian government to apply apple sauce to the American envoy for the region, Mr. Richard Holbrooke, in order to allow some sort of military role for Indians. Already, the Taliban are the de jure rulers of nearly half of Pakistan including FATA and the NWFP

The Indian government would be well advised to take a leaf from France and the UK and encourage its
lawmakers to begin back channel talks with the Taliban instead of embroiling the whole country in an asymmetrical warfare which will without individual truncate individual freedoms of which Indians are rightly proud.

Most Afghans were quite content with their way of life until first the Russians and now the Americans invaded their country. Whether Osama bin Laden is still holed up in that area or whether that is just a phantom a la Hussein's WMDs is still a matter of conjecture. In the meanwhile the innocents of Af-Pak have to live in misery for something they had nothing to do with.






Not our fight
[info]mondaysmanchild wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 04:58 pm (UTC)
I'm disappointed the President Obama is continuing this campaign in Afghanistan. There is no proof that Bin Laden was the mastermind of 9-11. Al-Qaida is really an idea, a movement, not an actual organization. You can kill the dreamer, but you can't kill the dream. So this so-called "war on terror" is bound to fail. Who is a terrorist? It depends on who is doing the defining. To the Afghan people the US and its allies are the terrorists because they are the ones who invaded their country and rained weapons of mass destruction on them. Have you had your bunker buster today?
deja vu
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 05:31 pm (UTC)
In 2006 in Iraq it was slipping out of control.

At the time people had a choice. Proclaim defeat and abandin Iraqis to likely civil war, do nothing to help but constantly slate the USA by telling shallow lies that they were stealing oil or colonising Iraq (almost exclusively a European habit), or pitching in and facing down the insurgent.

As we saw most so called "civilised" people chose the middle option, the cowards option.

As we saw the US and UK and a handful of others stood almost alone and faced dowen the insurgents and emancipated Iraqis who now, for better or worse, are free and masters of their own destiny's

I wonder whta civlised people will choose in Afghanistan today. Sadly I expect many to declare (not in a racist way you understand) how Afghans cannot be free so we cannot help. Lets see. Can Europe stand up? Obama was always going to be "tricky", theres no simple (not racist you understand) excuse of GWB any more is there. How you must miss him!
Oops
[info]chrisasmith wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 05:50 pm (UTC)
Don't worry chaps, NATO's new policy of drug interdiction is sure to get the locals onside.
Re: Oops
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 07:39 pm (UTC)
why not offer the Afghans a European CAP. Then they could grow what tradionally they have, the regions food. Ooops, forgot, Euros will and can do nothing
Our brave boys
[info]edotoole wrote:
Friday, 20 February 2009 at 12:11 am (UTC)
Hold on. We've only been there seven or eight years. Why concentrate on all the bad news. Why not boast about all our achievements instead? After all, imposing democracy on an unwilling nation is not exactly a piece of cake.
Think how our brave boys must be feeling after all that killing Afghans and ordering their villages bombed. Now with more American troops even more bombings and killing will occur, emphasising that we mean business. They'll soon see sense. Well maybe not soon but sometime in the next 50 or 60 years. Our brave boys need to know that doing their job is well worth every dead and maimed British soldier.
Heaven forbid if they ever realise it's all for nothing.
Re: Our brave boys
[info]jfkc wrote:
Friday, 20 February 2009 at 02:25 am (UTC)
On 11th September 2001, our ally lost nearly three thousand people in a single day with six thousand injured. More than sixty of the dead were actually British. They subsequently went in Afghanistan to pursue their enemy and they asked for help from all her NATO allies. Britain honoured their alliance and paid a terrible price for it. These are facts, as Rafael Benitez would have said. Honoring an alliance is an obligation and there is no shame in doing that. So please don't say it's all for nothing.
Never ending WAR
[info]abcde12544 wrote:
Friday, 20 February 2009 at 03:57 am (UTC)
Only a fool will try to win against afghans. Eighter US has to drop an Atomic weapon on Afghanistan, othere then that, this war will never be won.

US has to be smarter then this. All the borders around afghanistan is surraunded by countries that doesnt like US very much. WAKE UP AMERICA, YOU ARE BEING SET-UP IN AFGHANISTAN!

AFGHANS ARE CLOSE TO A HATRICK AGAINST THE THIRD SUPERPOWER AS WELL
[info]nanajee420 wrote:
Friday, 20 February 2009 at 04:49 pm (UTC)
"NOTORIOUS" for their indomitable resistence to foreign occupation, Afghans, for the last seven years, have been confronting their enemy with considerable valor. They have successfully disposed of two superpowers of the time: the "Great" Britain and the late USSR. And if sanity is not allowed to prevail (all indications are that it will not be allowed), the Afghans, with the blessings of Allah Almighty, will score a HATRICK against the third superpower as well, the massive and formidable military mght of the West and USA notwithstanding. It is pleasing to observe that the husband of Hillary and former US President, Bill Clinton has done a good job to remind the Muslim Barry Soetoro but now Christian Barack Obama of the same "well in advance". It is still to be seen whether Obama pays any attention to his straightforward advice.

Saifullah Jan, Cairo
[info]franchise999 wrote:
Friday, 24 April 2009 at 09:09 am (UTC)
Great article - the Internet is such a great medium and resource and I thank you for taking the time out to write, it is always a pleasure to read.

Matthew Anderson franchise performance and franchise information services
[info]dancy_grey wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 09:06 pm (UTC)
I think that this was pointless from the beginning. George Bush started this to follow in his fathers footsteps. He made America invade and kill thousands on what ground? On the ground that they THOUGHT that they might have nuclear weapons. We have been fighting for so long that it is ridiculous, where are these nuclear weapons? We are hypocrits if we promote peace in Africa but wage war in the Arab world. Why would these people listen to random foreigners in the first place? If you watch the BBC, you will see how when they talk to the locals, they feel more secure with the Taliban than the West's forces. I think we should leave it, it is a waste of time and money. The governement decide to take notice of this, but still only contribute to the rest of the world during G8 summits and before red nose day. People are struggling to pay for their buy to let re mortgages
and yet the people who are meant to take care of us are spending OUR money to clean out their moats. I feel we need to shake up the cabinet and get out of Afganistan and leave them to develop justice on their own.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date