American rift with Karzai worsens over 'drug-dealer' ally
US envoy's row with Afghan president tests fraying relationship further
The United States may refuse a visa to Hamid Karzai's running mate in the election because of his alleged links with the drug trade.
Muhammed Fahim, due to become vice-president if Mr Karzai wins, has been accused by the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of being involved in opium trafficking. American officials say this could make it legally impossible to let him enter the US.
The controversy over Mr Fahim, defence minister in Mr Karzai's last government, is yet another sign of rising tension between Washington and the incumbent president.
The Independent revealed this week how Richard Holbrooke, the American envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, clashed with Mr Karzai over his choice of electoral allies, such as Mr Fahim and the warlord Abdul Rashid Dostum. He also claimed the president's team had engaged in ballot fraud.
Mr Karzai is said to have walked out of the meeting after 20 minutes after Mr Holbrooke suggested that a second round of voting would be necessary to alleviate public scepticism over the probity of the election. The US envoy subsequently spent three hours in talks with the rival presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah.
The growing antagonism between Mr Karzai and the West is mutual. The Afghan President is said to have been deeply unhappy at the "patronising" tone taken by Mr Holbrooke and is said to be preparing himself for a lecture by a senior British politician who is due in the country. A supporter of Mr Karzai, who has flown over from America to help with the campaign, said: "It could be useful, perhaps he can tell Afghan MPs how to maximise their expenses."
There is also a future confrontation in the making with Britain after the election over the Helmand governor, Gulab Mangal, who is backed by London. Mr Karzai had in the past planned to replace him with Sher Mohammed Akhunzadi, a former holder of the post, who has been accused of corruption and human rights abuses.
The UK has so far managed to protect Mr Mangal. But another governor favoured by Britain, Engineer Daoud, was removed by the Afghan president who is said to want to reward Mr Akhunzada for delivering votes in Helmand. Similarly, Mr Karzai needs the support of Mr Fahim and General Dostum, with their northern power bases, to counter Dr Abdullah, who is of Tajik and Pashtun descent, and is dependant on voters in the north of the country.
Barack Obama has stated that General Dostum should be investigated for his part in the deaths of thousands of Taliban prisoners after the 2001 war. However, it is the position of Mr Fahim which poses the biggest problem for the United States.
The former Northern Alliance commander was intimately involved with the CIA in the campaign against the Taliban, and became defence minister when Mr Karzai came to power. But reports began to circulate that he was using his position in his capacity as an opium poppy trafficker and the State Department at one point warned the Pentagon that it may be illegal to channel military aid through him. However, the warning was ignored and Mr Fahim continued to meet senior US officials such as the then Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Lt-Gen Karl Eckenberry in charge of military assistance to the new Afghan army.
However the Obama administration has deliberately taken a tougher stance towards Mr Karzai compared to that adopted by the White House under George W Bush. The new US position makes little secret of its displeasure at the Afghan leader surrounding himself with figures with tainted reputations including his brother, Walid, who is accused of being involved in the drug trade.
One US official said: "It was difficult enough with Fahim being defence minister, but it would be even more problematic if and when he becomes vice-president. We'll have a situation of American soldiers fighting, and dying, for a country whose second most powerful man is a narco-suspect. There are government reports accusing him of trafficking. How can you let such a man into the States? He can end up facing charges."
Supporters of Mr Karzai insist that the allegations against Mr Fahim and Walid Karzai are politically motivated. They also complain that Western officials and the media have concentrated on malpractices by the Karzai camp in the election when there has been widespread voting fraud in the northern region by Dr Abdullah's team.
This was backed by another candidate, Ramzan Bashardost, who commented: "Let us not kid ourselves, Abdullah Abdullah's people were also involved in illegal activities, it just happened in a different part of the country."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
Karzai will not be President then
mightyal wrote:
Saturday, 29 August 2009 at 04:07 am (UTC)
YOU JEST SIR..
read Kim Sengupta in Kabul
>> But reports began to circulate that he was using his position in his capacity as an opium poppy trafficker. The State Department at one point warned the Pentagon that it may be illegal to channel military aid through him.>> The United States may refuse a visa to Hamid Karzai's running mate in the election, because of his alleged links with the drug trade Let us wait and see BUT read the cartoon Karzai has fingers and toes in votes 20 of them. WHO NEEDS MOST DOPE ? USA? If not the SOUTH THIS IS THE PLACE CHEAP VIA EU?
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla
The real question is whether an imposition of western style 'democracy' is approriate for the tribal areas, and perhaps as the perceptive Paddy Ashdown pointed out, space in the system should be made for substantial tribal entities - i.e. local autonomy...rather than trying to make real an Afghanistan that has never really existed as a nation state entity. I.e, in effect give the Pashtun soverignty, and downplay the power of the Afghanistan state....and somehow hope that the Pashtun will let go of playing at and trying to win the nation state game...i.e. trying to take over Afghanistan or Pakistan, especially in this Taliban format. The Taliban trip is not indigenous to the Pashtun by the way, and what would be the best outcome would be for the described senario to happen, and conncurrently for 'real Pashtun' to re manifest.
I would suggest its the Afghan MPs who could show the British a thing or two about expenses and corruption,I have worked in Afghanistan on and off since 2003,for a total of three years in the North and South of the country.People are still desperatly poor,the only thing that has improved is education in some parts of the North.
Frankly Afghan so called politicians should be ashamed of themselves they are a disgrace to their country ! Corruption,thieving,drug dealing is all endemic.Meantime young men from Britain America and Canada are being killed while the likes of Karzai and Fahim deposit money into bank accounts in Dubai.
I would suggest Mr Karzais friend will return back to America with his bungs and bakhanders,none of it from the 30 billion pound Heroin industry of course,meantime the Afghans have a couple more years before the exit plan kicks in.Mr Karzais deep pockets should be completely full by then !!
Apparently corruption is rife just as it is in nearly all third world countries. If there is really no credible non-corrupt force to take sides with, just what exactly are we doing there? The cost seems to be slightly disproportionate to the costs of 9/11 both in human and economic terms. If we applied the same logic, we could start wars in God knows how many countries in the world.
The Yanks have always chosen their allies from gutter trash - like Noriega of Panama - and have invariably feigned shock and surprise when they turned out to be just that. The Taliban were Yank allies until 2001, lest we forget.