China eases rules on one child policy
Friday 01 April 2011
Latest in Asia
Related articles
On Facebook
From the blogs
Disclosure: We’d never even been to a club when we made our first single
For most of us, reaching eighteen years of age opens up a new world for exploration, spontaneity and...
Top of the posts: Drunken rants, the Western Fail and misogyny pushers
The most read blogs this week, as determined by stats.
Sepp Blatter: Penalty shoot-outs must remain, they’re football’s great leveller
As England supporters, we should scorn at any such deciding factor within football. On so many occas...
Why do some men consider the street as a female meat market?
Pronouncements on sexual inequality in the UK are normally met with an eye roll by my generation. As...
China has relaxed its controversial one-child policy, resulting in fewer fines for couples who decided to have two or more children, the municipal commission of population and family planning said yesterday.
For some time, there has been widespread speculation that the Chinese government has been planning to relax the policy, largely because the ageing population is putting pressure on the already rudimentary and under-funded state pension system.
The law, which carries a heavy fine for those with second children, has also led to a worrying difference in the ratio of young males to females. Some fear that the workforce on which China's burgeoning economic rise has been built could soon start to deplete.
Yesterday's changes are small, but with widespread feelings that the fines are unjust, as well as the economic concerns about the policy, many in China hope that the rule will eventually be abolished. As with so many areas of the population policy, one of the greatest experiments in social engineering mankind has seen, the proposals are complicated. Under the new plan, Beijing couples made up of two only children will be fined only if the mother is younger than 28 and the second child is born within four years the first. In the past, such couples had to pay a fine of 20 per cent of their annual income.
But couples where one partner has a sibling – or both partners do – will still be discouraged from having a second child and have to pay a fine. National rules differ, depending on the region.
Despite the changes, many are unhappy that the rules exist at all. "Fines on couples who have a second child, even if they are paid by fewer people, remain legally unjust," Yang Zhizhu, a former law professor in Beijing, told China Daily. Mr Yang sued local family planning authorities in January for having a second child and is refusing to pay a fine of 240,642 yuan (£22,787).
Under the One-Child Policy, imposed in 1979 as a way of reining in population growth already running at dangerously high levels in the world's most populous nation, most families were limited to one child. Mu Guangzong, a professor of population research at Peking University, said that the relaxed rules in Beijing marked an improvement, but were not enough to help correct China's population imbalances and raise fertility rates.
The average fertility rate in China is between 1.4 and 1.8 per child-bearing woman, but should be maintained at 2.1 to ensure the replacement of the population. Professor Mu called for a relaxation of the family planning policy throughout China and for every couple to be allowed to have two children.
Increasingly, in areas where the government has rolled the legislation back on an experimental basis, such as the financial centre of Shanghai, the problem is not too many children, but too few. Wealthier Chinese, for example, have often had more than one child and simply paid the fine, content to deal with longer-term ramifications of having a child in violation of the policy themselves.
The National Population and Family Planning Commission reckons that some 400 million births have been prevented by the policy. Whenever voices in the West complain about the One-Child Policy, Chinese population experts urge them to think of the global ramifications of 1.7 billion Chinese, instead of 1.3 billion.
- 1 Mark Zuckerberg saved $111m by selling Facebook shares before stock slumped
- 2 Brazil rocked by abortion for 9-year-old rape victim
- 3 News in pictures
- 4 Tory chief Warsi failed to declare rent income from flat
- 5 In pictures: The bewildering face of China
- 6 Osborne to face questions over links to Murdoch
- 7 Facebook: The shares shenanigans
- 8 Is Ridley Scott the most macho man in movies?
- 9 Günter Grass attacks Merkel for Athens policy
- 10 Exclusive dispatch: Assad blamed for massacre of the innocents
- 1 Mark Zuckerberg saved $111m by selling Facebook shares before stock slumped
- 2 Brazil rocked by abortion for 9-year-old rape victim
- 3 Fat? Really? Olympic hope laughs off official’s jibe – but others aren’t amused
- 4 Is Ridley Scott the most macho man in movies?
- 5 Postgraduate students are being used as 'slave labour'
- 6 'Hello mum, this is going to be hard for you to read ...'
- 7 African monkey meat that could be behind the next HIV
- 8 Exclusive dispatch: Assad blamed for massacre of the innocents
- 9 Coke reveals its secret: It may need to carry a cancer warning
- 10 French in uproar over oral sex anti-smoking posters
Experience the Heineken Hub
Get free wi-fi and exclusive i content while you enjoy a tasty pint of Heineken at participating pubs.
Can you imagine a career in teaching?
Be inspired to teach - let real teachers show you how rewarding the job can be.
Playing a game-changing role during the Games
Cisco is providing the solutions for London 2012's complex IT needs.
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
The secret life of the red carpet
Up and away – how '7 Up' went global



Comments