Mumbai terror group exploits refugee crisis
Pakistan comes under fire for failure to shut 'charity'
GETTY IMAGES
Young Pakistanis who have fled the fighting in the Swat Valley at a refugee camp in Mardan, where Jamaat-ud-Dawa operates
An Islamist charity accused of links to the militant fundamentalists blamed for the Mumbai terror attacks has resurfaced at the centre of the aid effort to help hundreds of thousands of refugees fleeing Pakistan's war on the Taliban.
Six months after Pakistan, under international pressure, outlawed the charity said to be a front for the militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), The Independent has discovered that scores of volunteers from the charity are openly working to ferry refugees from the edge of the conflict zone to emergency camps and hospitals. They are also providing food, water and first aid.
Despite a government undertaking that it had cracked down on Jamaat-ud-Dawa – described as the charitable arm of LeT – and pledged that it would not allow it to operate under a different name, volunteers say they are providing crucial services in an area where the government's resources are stretched.
Yesterday morning, in a tent that had been erected on a traffic island in the centre of the city of Mardan, where thousands of refugees are being taken, the volunteers were operating under the name Falah-e-Insaniat Foundation (Humanitarian Welfare Foundation). In addition to the foundation's logo, the volunteers' tent was hung with black and white flags carrying the symbol of Jamaat, a curved scimitar. "The foundation used to work under the name Jamaat-ud-Dawa," said one of the volunteers, Jafar Khan. "We are operating emergency camps near the conflict zone where we are giving first aid, water, juices and food. We have 12 ambulances. We are taking people to the [refugee] camps and to the hospitals. Our supplies are coming from Punjab."
Asked about the charity's motivations, another man, Dr Fazl-e-Azim said: "This is a humanitarian organisation. We help everybody, Muslims, Christians..."
Last night, with President Asif Ali Zardari in London, the government came under fire for failing to close down the charity. The former interior minister, Aftab Sherpao, said: "They don't focus on anything. Banning Jamaat was just eye-wash. They just wanted the world to believe they were doing something." The government failed to respond to queries.
Few in Pakistan will be surprised by the revelation that Jamaat is assisting in the relief effort as a flood of refugees pour from the Swat Valley and surrounding areas as the Pakistan military intensifies an operation to "eliminate" thousands of Taliban fighters that have seized control of districts just 60 miles from Islamabad. For years the charity's volunteers have been present in the wake of natural disasters across the region.
During the 2005 earthquake in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, volunteers from the charity provided aid to some of the hundreds of people affected by the disaster.
Yet after last November's attacks on Mumbai that left 160 people dead, the government moved against the charity, shutting down its offices and arresting a number of its senior leaders. The government acted after a chorus of international condemnation and repeated allegations that Jamaat was operating as a front for LeT. The UN described it as a terror organisation. A senior Jamaat leader, Hafeez Mohammed Saeed, remains under house arrest in Lahore.
The foundation and Jamaat appear inextricably linked. Volunteers readily said the organisations were one and the same. Asked to provide a contact detail for the foundation's head office in Lahore, they gave a number that was answered by an official who described himself as a spokesman for Jamaat. The spokesman, Yahya Mujahid, said: "We work in close co-ordination with the foundation but are not the same."
What is certainly clear is the impact the supposedly banned charity is having in the relief operation, in which the resources of the local authorities are strained. At Mardan's district hospital – where a Jamaat ambulance was parked outside the emergency wing – one doctor said three foundations linked to the charity were helping the relief efforts. Adnan Jamshed added: "Their ambulances are arriving all the time."
Another medic at the emergency desk, Dr Aziz Khan, said: "There is a chronic shortage of staff, we don't have sufficient beds."
The apparent re-emergence of Jamaat will raise alarm about its capacity to use its charitable work among civilians as a recruiting sergeant for the Jihadist cause. It will also revive the anxieties of those who questioned the willingness of Pakistan's government to seriously tackle militants blamed for the Mumbai attacks. "I am not surprised by [the emergence of a front group]. Jamaat has been playing a very active role in the relief operation," said Bahakutumbi Raman, an Indian security analyst.
Christine Fair, a Washington-based expert on LeT, said: "I had heard reports that Jamaat had changed its name. I'd also heard that even before it was shut down, its money had already been moved. Of course, it's Jamaat's strategy to continue cultivating public support."
LeT has traditionally enjoyed intimate links with Pakistan's ISI intelligence agency. In the late 1980s, the group was backed by the army during conflicts in Indian-administered Kashmir. In 2002 the group was banned by the former president Pervez Musharraf but its leadership continued its activities under the cover of Jamaat.
Jamaat-ud-Dawa The jihad masquerade
* The history of Jamaat-ud-Dawa is intertwined with that of Lashkar-e-Taiba, the militant organisation that Indian investigators blame for the Mumbai terrorist attacks last November. The relationship is described as being similar to the links between the IRA and its political wing Sinn Fein. One disillusioned former member of Jamaat-ud-Dawa told The Independent last year: "Though they [Jamaat-ud-Dawa] don't engage in jihad themselves, they encourage people to move towards it."
* Jamaat-ud-Dawa is said to have been founded in 1985 by Hafeez Mohammed Saeed, the same man who founded Lashkar-e-Taiba, which was branded a terrorist organisation in 2002 by the Pakistani government. Since then, Jamaat-ud-Dawa claims to have distanced itself from the banned group, saying it is only engaged in welfare work – but suspicions of a different agenda remain, and the US State Department listed Jamaat-ud-Dawa itself as a terrorist organisation and blocked its assets in 2006.
* After the Mumbai attacks, Pakistan vowed to clamp down on Jamaat-ud-Dawa. But the charity still enjoys influence under a new name, Falah-e-Insaniat. It runs schools and clinics in the Muridke district of Lahore. Where there is a vacuum in public provision, it plays a role, for example after the 2005 Kashmir earthquake it says it built 5,000 homes and 39 schools. With its financial status secured by landholdings, it will take vigorous action by the Pakistani government to ensure its demise.
The sign that gave it away
Parked outside Mardan's district hospital, an ambulance raised The Independent's suspicions that Jamaat were back. The tell-tale sign on the vehicle is the curved scimitar, the group's symbol in its distinctive black and white colours. When questioned about the ambulance, hospital doctors freely admitted that foundations linked to Jamaat were helping relief efforts.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
Charities are mainly self serving organistaions, 500 million dollars is the running cost of UN Aid; simply put ....if UN AID has a budegt of 501 million dollars, then 500 million is used for administarion and 1 million is actually distribued as "real " charitable projects.
And how come you blame Muslim charities? This is just Muslims being able to help others in need, without begging western people for help, as the corrupt Pakistani govt is doing.
Whatever the state of the economy in Pakistan; these families are never found to be "wanting".
Why is it OK to hang Saddam, while we are chearleading the Pakistani slaughter? Why is it Ok for US/NATO to bomb indiscrimately in markets, villages and weddings while when others do it we call them terrorists?
With this hypocritical attitude, how can we ever expect to have peace?
What is the difference between FIF and USAID? Aren't they both the other face of a Janus-faced murder machine?
No one is cheerleading the slaughter of innocent civilians (or where is your evidence?) But, in case you hadn't noticed, the government of Pakistan is engaged in a brutal struggle against a horde of medieval, homophobic, misogynistic psychopaths who seem to take delight in mounting acid or gas attacks against young girls (hardly the courageous act of "real" men, is it - despite their rugged beards). They also appear keen to ban medical treatment and education for women and are intent on trying to return the country to the darkness of the Middle Ages. Clearly these unholy warriors do not have the support of the population (based on the last election figures) and therefore are justifiably labelled "terrorists" or "insurgents".
However, the sad truth appears to be that Muslims like yourself are utterly indifferent to the suffering of their own peoples and brethren if this is inflicted by fellow believers, rather than the West. Which, given the fact that the greatest threat to Muslim lives comes from...yes, other Muslims (see Iraq and the bestial savagery, including the use of electric power drills, with which the Shiites and Sunnis have cheerfully slaughtered each other), augurs ill for the future. A little introspection wouldn't go amiss.
see
www.thereligionofpeace.com
for some evidence. All the EVIDENCE you will need is listed right there.
www.thereligionofpeace.com
So now anyone donating to charity or any legitimate charity will potentially be stopped from doing the genuinely charitablr work they're doing in the area.
The these war mongeriing muppets are so concerned about the influence of Jamaat-ud-dawa then they should stop their drone bombings and slaughter or innocent people. It's imple.
Seriously though, I don't know whether to feel sorry for you personally or just blame the education system for producing someone capable of spouting such paranoid, delusional nonsense. And whilst I hate to encumber your bigotry and ignorance with something known as facts, have you ermm.. any evidence?
when pressure is applied from the shadows, all areas of media have to align themselves to the official thinking.
"when pressure is applied from the shadows, all areas of media have to align themselves to the official thinking."
Have we now relocated to Iran or any other Islamic country you wish to name?
"Similarly neither Fisk nor Alibhai-Brown wrote this article so they have nothing do with this"
Hey! we agree on something. So this conspiracy obtains where exactly in the Independent? Among a select cabal of journalists recruited, I assume, by those lurking in the "shadows"? The plot thickens.
Alas, despite feeding me with ever more dastardly tales of subtefuge and conspiracy, you have yet to offer one single thread of evidence. But judging from the way you frame your arguments I suspect you are still convinced that Mossad/CIA/MI6/Donald Duck planned and executed 9/11. Why am I bothering? Why indeed.
Time to do a cuba (Is THIS CUBA or CURB) on Pakistan And blockade it before more lives that are Innocent are lost in the name of their religion.
Let us examine the fact before we jump to conclusions.
When there is an outcry in the Hindu temples, we find later that the Muslims had or the Christian had planted the cow, the holy animal of the Hindu,
Next day we hear the Pig head, the detest animal by the Muslims, is left on the doors of the mosques. Who is doing these? No ne knows. I admit that this time it is possible that Pakistan may have had a hand in the bombing; I have not spoken to Manmohan Sigh as he was with Bush. However, as soon we get the confirmations we ask the Pakistan politicians who sate these are not from Pakistan but Afghanistan. Who is telling truth only Allah knows? So in the mean time keep on giving the money to Pakistan to fight who they want to and we keep watching, we will one day have the right position to point the finger, if there is one left, to say who did it. I disapprove any harsh cut off to the Pakis in these hard times as the poor will suffer and those taking graft will too.
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla
Get off the pot , Pak as a nation does not accept its dead soldiers killed in its own proxy war as in kargil war and even now until they were presented with dna that lone survivor of the rampage in mumbai was their own ... How do you expect them to accept anything else. Where did allah come into this argument? You see you use god name to hide from everything try look beyond it .. Pak people and pak govt are backers of unholy terrrorism of killing who in their eyes are worthless because they are non muslims .Learn to deal with it rationally. Blockade the country and let them starve to death.
I hope you are aware that being non muslim in pakistan these days means you have to pay tax to the muslims !
Dont need your thanks, we need your brain cells.
Done It is 230,000 pesos. By installments of 30 years. Still mine is worth that much. How much is others in the graves?
Have you read this? Just asking? It is very good.
"I've got spinal muscular atrophy type III affecting my nerves and muscles. I walk badly indoors and need a wheelchair outside, and perhaps sometimes inside too,"
Disabled-friendly property: 'Estate agents don't get it'
Do they want this?
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w
Jihadists seek to impose sharia law across the world. It is reported that they siphon money from wherever they can. From legitimate aid, as in Gaza and Indonesia, from bogus charities and from online gaming.
To clarify my situation is the face of assumptions and accusations made against me on this thread, I give to charities, but not to support muslims. This is because of the way money is used, at least some of it. Over £100 million of aid was allegedly channelled to jihadists from the tsunami appeal.