World

5° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Mumbai terror group exploits refugee crisis

Pakistan comes under fire for failure to shut 'charity'

By Andrew Buncombe and Omar Waraich in Mardan, Pakistan

Young Pakistanis who have fled the fighting in the Swat Valley at a refugee camp in Mardan, where Jamaat-ud-Dawa operates

GETTY IMAGES

Young Pakistanis who have fled the fighting in the Swat Valley at a refugee camp in Mardan, where Jamaat-ud-Dawa operates

An Islamist charity accused of links to the militant fundamentalists blamed for the Mumbai terror attacks has resurfaced at the centre of the aid effort to help hundreds of thousands of refugees fleeing Pakistan's war on the Taliban.

Six months after Pakistan, under international pressure, outlawed the charity said to be a front for the militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), The Independent has discovered that scores of volunteers from the charity are openly working to ferry refugees from the edge of the conflict zone to emergency camps and hospitals. They are also providing food, water and first aid.

Despite a government undertaking that it had cracked down on Jamaat-ud-Dawa – described as the charitable arm of LeT – and pledged that it would not allow it to operate under a different name, volunteers say they are providing crucial services in an area where the government's resources are stretched.

Yesterday morning, in a tent that had been erected on a traffic island in the centre of the city of Mardan, where thousands of refugees are being taken, the volunteers were operating under the name Falah-e-Insaniat Foundation (Humanitarian Welfare Foundation). In addition to the foundation's logo, the volunteers' tent was hung with black and white flags carrying the symbol of Jamaat, a curved scimitar. "The foundation used to work under the name Jamaat-ud-Dawa," said one of the volunteers, Jafar Khan. "We are operating emergency camps near the conflict zone where we are giving first aid, water, juices and food. We have 12 ambulances. We are taking people to the [refugee] camps and to the hospitals. Our supplies are coming from Punjab."

Asked about the charity's motivations, another man, Dr Fazl-e-Azim said: "This is a humanitarian organisation. We help everybody, Muslims, Christians..."

Last night, with President Asif Ali Zardari in London, the government came under fire for failing to close down the charity. The former interior minister, Aftab Sherpao, said: "They don't focus on anything. Banning Jamaat was just eye-wash. They just wanted the world to believe they were doing something." The government failed to respond to queries.

Few in Pakistan will be surprised by the revelation that Jamaat is assisting in the relief effort as a flood of refugees pour from the Swat Valley and surrounding areas as the Pakistan military intensifies an operation to "eliminate" thousands of Taliban fighters that have seized control of districts just 60 miles from Islamabad. For years the charity's volunteers have been present in the wake of natural disasters across the region.

During the 2005 earthquake in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, volunteers from the charity provided aid to some of the hundreds of people affected by the disaster.

Yet after last November's attacks on Mumbai that left 160 people dead, the government moved against the charity, shutting down its offices and arresting a number of its senior leaders. The government acted after a chorus of international condemnation and repeated allegations that Jamaat was operating as a front for LeT. The UN described it as a terror organisation. A senior Jamaat leader, Hafeez Mohammed Saeed, remains under house arrest in Lahore.

The foundation and Jamaat appear inextricably linked. Volunteers readily said the organisations were one and the same. Asked to provide a contact detail for the foundation's head office in Lahore, they gave a number that was answered by an official who described himself as a spokesman for Jamaat. The spokesman, Yahya Mujahid, said: "We work in close co-ordination with the foundation but are not the same."

What is certainly clear is the impact the supposedly banned charity is having in the relief operation, in which the resources of the local authorities are strained. At Mardan's district hospital – where a Jamaat ambulance was parked outside the emergency wing – one doctor said three foundations linked to the charity were helping the relief efforts. Adnan Jamshed added: "Their ambulances are arriving all the time."

Another medic at the emergency desk, Dr Aziz Khan, said: "There is a chronic shortage of staff, we don't have sufficient beds."

The apparent re-emergence of Jamaat will raise alarm about its capacity to use its charitable work among civilians as a recruiting sergeant for the Jihadist cause. It will also revive the anxieties of those who questioned the willingness of Pakistan's government to seriously tackle militants blamed for the Mumbai attacks. "I am not surprised by [the emergence of a front group]. Jamaat has been playing a very active role in the relief operation," said Bahakutumbi Raman, an Indian security analyst.

Christine Fair, a Washington-based expert on LeT, said: "I had heard reports that Jamaat had changed its name. I'd also heard that even before it was shut down, its money had already been moved. Of course, it's Jamaat's strategy to continue cultivating public support."

LeT has traditionally enjoyed intimate links with Pakistan's ISI intelligence agency. In the late 1980s, the group was backed by the army during conflicts in Indian-administered Kashmir. In 2002 the group was banned by the former president Pervez Musharraf but its leadership continued its activities under the cover of Jamaat.

Jamaat-ud-Dawa The jihad masquerade

* The history of Jamaat-ud-Dawa is intertwined with that of Lashkar-e-Taiba, the militant organisation that Indian investigators blame for the Mumbai terrorist attacks last November. The relationship is described as being similar to the links between the IRA and its political wing Sinn Fein. One disillusioned former member of Jamaat-ud-Dawa told The Independent last year: "Though they [Jamaat-ud-Dawa] don't engage in jihad themselves, they encourage people to move towards it."

* Jamaat-ud-Dawa is said to have been founded in 1985 by Hafeez Mohammed Saeed, the same man who founded Lashkar-e-Taiba, which was branded a terrorist organisation in 2002 by the Pakistani government. Since then, Jamaat-ud-Dawa claims to have distanced itself from the banned group, saying it is only engaged in welfare work – but suspicions of a different agenda remain, and the US State Department listed Jamaat-ud-Dawa itself as a terrorist organisation and blocked its assets in 2006.

* After the Mumbai attacks, Pakistan vowed to clamp down on Jamaat-ud-Dawa. But the charity still enjoys influence under a new name, Falah-e-Insaniat. It runs schools and clinics in the Muridke district of Lahore. Where there is a vacuum in public provision, it plays a role, for example after the 2005 Kashmir earthquake it says it built 5,000 homes and 39 schools. With its financial status secured by landholdings, it will take vigorous action by the Pakistani government to ensure its demise.

The sign that gave it away

Parked outside Mardan's district hospital, an ambulance raised The Independent's suspicions that Jamaat were back. The tell-tale sign on the vehicle is the curved scimitar, the group's symbol in its distinctive black and white colours. When questioned about the ambulance, hospital doctors freely admitted that foundations linked to Jamaat were helping relief efforts.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Donations to Muslim charities leads to funding jihad
[info]stephengash wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 12:25 am (UTC)
One day the West will wake up. How many millions went into jihadists' coffers after the tsunami appeal? Now this. Every charity appeal associated with Muslim support means funds being siphoned to jihadists.
Re: Donations to Muslim charities leads to funding jihad
[info]jadoonadil wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 12:48 am (UTC)
What nonsense. These groups don't get any aid from the western countries or the government. I bet you have never spent a penny on someone in need. It is the fault of pakistan's dysfunctional and inept government that made no arrangements for the displaced people even though it had been planing this operaton for a while, allowing such charities to build support.
Re: Donations to Muslim charities leads to funding jihad
[info]huudugi wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 10:57 am (UTC)
You have been brainwashed to think like this its not your fault. the more inept the pak govt is seen the more money they get. so chill out.
Re: Donations to Muslim charities leads to funding jihad
[info]human_voice wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 05:16 am (UTC)
What a nasty and outrageous assertion linking the Tsunami appeals to Jihad without any actual evidence. This is the same kind of inhumane statement that BBC DG Mark Thompson made following the refusal to broadcast the Gaza Appeal. You obviously have no compassion for anyone but yourself.
Re: Donations to Muslim charities leads to funding jihad
[info]huudugi wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 09:30 am (UTC)
why you asking for compassion when it ok to kill anyone else who does not agree with Islam religion comes from this part of the world. Are you just babies crying now? Serves you right. I hope more bombs falls into this piece of garbage country. Needs cleaning up fast
Re: Donations to Muslim charities leads to funding jihad
[info]human_voice wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 05:04 pm (UTC)
Why not answer my question rather than ranting away? What is the link between Tsunami appeals and Jihad?
90% of Charity Collections is used up in Administration Costs.
[info]drug_baron wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 05:27 am (UTC)
Lets face it Charities are a con; they are mainly self serving and it is used to pay for the overheads, usually 90% of collections are used to pay for administration, staff salaries, hotel and travel for aid workers, advertising, bank charges, registration fees, and of course bribes. Less than 10% is on those in need.

Charities are mainly self serving organistaions, 500 million dollars is the running cost of UN Aid; simply put ....if UN AID has a budegt of 501 million dollars, then 500 million is used for administarion and 1 million is actually distribued as "real " charitable projects.
Re: 90% of Charity Collections is used up in Administration Costs.
[info]a_al_amin wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 09:24 am (UTC)
Well said point.

And how come you blame Muslim charities? This is just Muslims being able to help others in need, without begging western people for help, as the corrupt Pakistani govt is doing.
The Bhutto Mafia Clan
[info]drug_baron wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 05:55 am (UTC)
The various Mafia families running Pakistan including the Bhutto Mafia; work in mysterious ways.

Whatever the state of the economy in Pakistan; these families are never found to be "wanting".
THESE TERRORIST ISLAMIST GROUP IS GOING TO BRAINWASH THE REFUGEES!
[info]nooraza wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 06:54 am (UTC)
What is wrong with the Pakistani Govt? First they made a criminal deal with the Taleban/Al-qaeda (believe me, these two are linked!), then they let an Islamist terrorist group to deal with the refugees! Sickening hypocrisy and deceit! We wonder where this terrorist group is getting all the money from? Such masive wealth to fund their work must either comes from the Pakistani Govt itself, or Al-Qaeda funders or Iranian Mullah's regime funder! UN & NATO, do something!
FIF
[info]drycomment wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 07:44 am (UTC)
The 'government' of Pakistan is obviously more corrupt than anything else! 1.5 million of it's own people displaced, thousands dead in indiscriminate bombing ... isn't this why Saddam was hanged?
Why is it OK to hang Saddam, while we are chearleading the Pakistani slaughter? Why is it Ok for US/NATO to bomb indiscrimately in markets, villages and weddings while when others do it we call them terrorists?
With this hypocritical attitude, how can we ever expect to have peace?
What is the difference between FIF and USAID? Aren't they both the other face of a Janus-faced murder machine?
Pakistani slaughter
[info]edmund03 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 08:24 am (UTC)
"Why is it OK to hang Saddam, while we are chearleading the Pakistani slaughter?"
No one is cheerleading the slaughter of innocent civilians (or where is your evidence?) But, in case you hadn't noticed, the government of Pakistan is engaged in a brutal struggle against a horde of medieval, homophobic, misogynistic psychopaths who seem to take delight in mounting acid or gas attacks against young girls (hardly the courageous act of "real" men, is it - despite their rugged beards). They also appear keen to ban medical treatment and education for women and are intent on trying to return the country to the darkness of the Middle Ages. Clearly these unholy warriors do not have the support of the population (based on the last election figures) and therefore are justifiably labelled "terrorists" or "insurgents".
However, the sad truth appears to be that Muslims like yourself are utterly indifferent to the suffering of their own peoples and brethren if this is inflicted by fellow believers, rather than the West. Which, given the fact that the greatest threat to Muslim lives comes from...yes, other Muslims (see Iraq and the bestial savagery, including the use of electric power drills, with which the Shiites and Sunnis have cheerfully slaughtered each other), augurs ill for the future. A little introspection wouldn't go amiss.
Re: Pakistani slaughter
[info]richardm30 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 09:19 am (UTC)
ABSOLUTELY right Edmund03! The US and EUROPE NEVER bomb "indiscriminately". drycomment should get his facts right - but then again facts don't seem to matter to this lot.
ARE CHARITY AND ISLAM MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE???
[info]richardm30 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 08:52 am (UTC)
There seems to be a growing and incontrovertible body of evidence that shows that Islamists misuse charitable money to further their own diseased agenda - to murder, to maim and to subvert women and democracy itself. How could ANYONE, in their right mind, give money to ANY Islamic charity given this evidence? To do so would be to betray the innocent victims of Islam. Let's all raise public consciousness on this issue! Just when you think Islam has reached its maximum level of depravity (like gassing children) - along comes little pieces of information to prove you wrong.
Re: ARE CHARITY AND ISLAM MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE???
[info]joshuacohen2003 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 09:14 am (UTC)
Evidence? what evidence? most of this islamic groups are secretly funded by western intelligence services anyway. is there no one with even half a brain on this site?
Re: ARE CHARITY AND ISLAM MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE???
[info]richardm30 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 09:23 am (UTC)
You must have had your head up your arse for the past three years!

see

www.thereligionofpeace.com

for some evidence. All the EVIDENCE you will need is listed right there.
Re: ARE CHARITY AND ISLAM MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE???
[info]richardm30 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 09:29 am (UTC)
All the evidence you need can be found at:

www.thereligionofpeace.com
Re: ARE CHARITY AND ISLAM MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE???
[info]gusto4 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 04:02 pm (UTC)
I totally agree with you. But the arrogance of the West is to only attack those that does not submit to them. These organizations are funded by the West. Most of the money comes from the West. Years ago we called them "Freedom Fighters" now we are calling them terrorist.
Propagandist mouthpice for the Neo-Cons
[info]joshuacohen2003 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 09:13 am (UTC)
This is nothing by propaganda by the Independent to support the case for war on behalf of the Western Governments.
So now anyone donating to charity or any legitimate charity will potentially be stopped from doing the genuinely charitablr work they're doing in the area.

The these war mongeriing muppets are so concerned about the influence of Jamaat-ud-dawa then they should stop their drone bombings and slaughter or innocent people. It's imple.
Re: Propagandist mouthpice for the Neo-Cons
[info]huudugi wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 09:27 am (UTC)
Bomb these camps Now
Re: Propagandist mouthpiEce for the Neo-Cons
[info]edmund03 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 10:03 am (UTC)
So let me get this right: You are seriously contending that The Independent, whose corps of correspondents and commentators include such vituperative critics of Israel and the US/UK as Robert Fisk and Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, is part of a conspiracy, led by Western governments (some/all of them?), to step up the war against terror in Pakistan/Afghanistan? Does this web of consummate evil extend to this newspaper's sports pages as well? I've often suspected as such - given the biased and negative coverage devoted to my team Arsenal.
Seriously though, I don't know whether to feel sorry for you personally or just blame the education system for producing someone capable of spouting such paranoid, delusional nonsense. And whilst I hate to encumber your bigotry and ignorance with something known as facts, have you ermm.. any evidence?
Re: Propagandist mouthpiEce for the Neo-Cons
[info]joshuacohen2003 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 11:12 am (UTC)
so now the independent is an infallible newspaper and can do no wrong? similary neither Fisk nor Alibhai-brown wrote this artcile so they have nothing do with this. additionally Alihbai-brown isn't even a muslim. She's ismaili married to a christian.
when pressure is applied from the shadows, all areas of media have to align themselves to the official thinking.
Re: Propagandist mouthpiEce for the Neo-Cons
[info]edmund03 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 11:45 am (UTC)
WRONG Ms Alibhai-Brown is a practicing Muslim, albeit a critical one. Not sure what relevance her marriage to a Christian carries though; Or does that - in your book of horrors - exclude her from membership of the human race, along with the rest of us Kafirs.
"when pressure is applied from the shadows, all areas of media have to align themselves to the official thinking."
Have we now relocated to Iran or any other Islamic country you wish to name?
"Similarly neither Fisk nor Alibhai-Brown wrote this article so they have nothing do with this"
Hey! we agree on something. So this conspiracy obtains where exactly in the Independent? Among a select cabal of journalists recruited, I assume, by those lurking in the "shadows"? The plot thickens.
Alas, despite feeding me with ever more dastardly tales of subtefuge and conspiracy, you have yet to offer one single thread of evidence. But judging from the way you frame your arguments I suspect you are still convinced that Mossad/CIA/MI6/Donald Duck planned and executed 9/11. Why am I bothering? Why indeed.
Re: Propagandist mouthpice for the Neo-Cons
[info]gusto4 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 04:07 pm (UTC)
Yes, you are right. But, notice that the Independent is NOT complaining about the lack of services by the Pakistani government. This lack of BASIC needs and supplies by the government allows "terrorist" groups to establish themselves has legitimate social and humanitarian help groups. Didn't we the West learned our lessons from Hamas and Hezbollah?
Blockade Pakistan Now
[info]huudugi wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 09:26 am (UTC)
Time to do a cuba on Pakistan And blockade it before more Innocent lives are lost in the name of their religion.
I have not spoken to Manmohan Sigh as he was with Bush.
[info]famulla wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 11:29 am (UTC)
Exclusive: Mumbai terror group exploits refugee crisis
Time to do a cuba (Is THIS CUBA or CURB) on Pakistan And blockade it before more lives that are Innocent are lost in the name of their religion.
Let us examine the fact before we jump to conclusions.
When there is an outcry in the Hindu temples, we find later that the Muslims had or the Christian had planted the cow, the holy animal of the Hindu,
Next day we hear the Pig head, the detest animal by the Muslims, is left on the doors of the mosques. Who is doing these? No ne knows. I admit that this time it is possible that Pakistan may have had a hand in the bombing; I have not spoken to Manmohan Sigh as he was with Bush. However, as soon we get the confirmations we ask the Pakistan politicians who sate these are not from Pakistan but Afghanistan. Who is telling truth only Allah knows? So in the mean time keep on giving the money to Pakistan to fight who they want to and we keep watching, we will one day have the right position to point the finger, if there is one left, to say who did it. I disapprove any harsh cut off to the Pakis in these hard times as the poor will suffer and those taking graft will too.
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla
Re: I have not spoken to Manmohan Sigh as he was with Bush.
[info]huudugi wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 08:48 pm (UTC)
@FAMULLA
Get off the pot , Pak as a nation does not accept its dead soldiers killed in its own proxy war as in kargil war and even now until they were presented with dna that lone survivor of the rampage in mumbai was their own ... How do you expect them to accept anything else. Where did allah come into this argument? You see you use god name to hide from everything try look beyond it .. Pak people and pak govt are backers of unholy terrrorism of killing who in their eyes are worthless because they are non muslims .Learn to deal with it rationally. Blockade the country and let them starve to death.

I hope you are aware that being non muslim in pakistan these days means you have to pay tax to the muslims !

Dont need your thanks, we need your brain cells.
Re: I have not spoken to Manmohan Sigh as he was with Bush.
[info]famulla wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 10:32 pm (UTC)
Don?t need your thanks, we need your brain cells.
Done It is 230,000 pesos. By installments of 30 years. Still mine is worth that much. How much is others in the graves?
Have you read this? Just asking? It is very good.
"I've got spinal muscular atrophy type III affecting my nerves and muscles. I walk badly indoors and need a wheelchair outside, and perhaps sometimes inside too,"
Disabled-friendly property: 'Estate agents don't get it'
Do they want this?
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla
Money went to jihadists
[info]stephengash wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 11:47 am (UTC)
I don't know if I can link to another paper. However

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article756104.ece

Jihadists seek to impose sharia law across the world. It is reported that they siphon money from wherever they can. From legitimate aid, as in Gaza and Indonesia, from bogus charities and from online gaming.

To clarify my situation is the face of assumptions and accusations made against me on this thread, I give to charities, but not to support muslims. This is because of the way money is used, at least some of it. Over £100 million of aid was allegedly channelled to jihadists from the tsunami appeal.
Mumbai terror group exploit
[info]gusto4 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 03:56 pm (UTC)
Those of us in the West can complain all we want about these "terror groups", but the reality is that the corrupt regimes that WE support does NOT provide the humanitarian and social needs of the people so these "terror groups" take advantage of the people needs and then use it has aa recruiting tool. They have learned these tactics from the WEST. So why are WE alarmed. Why we love to think that these people are just uneducated and will not find ways to get around whatever WE spew at them. It is our arrogance that is defeating us in that part of the world.
Bloody terrorist muslims!
[info]copycat7 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 05:14 pm (UTC)
Bloody terrorist muslims, Now they are being caught being charitable red handed!. Outrageous!. We should take them to court and charge them with "acts in the name of humanity"!
Mumbai treeor group?
[info]maheshmb wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 05:43 pm (UTC)
The headline says Mumbai terror group and on further reading one gets to understand that the group is LET. How on earth is LET a Mumbai terror group? Is it based in Mumbai? Is it even based in India?

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date