World

Partly Sunny with Showers 14° London Hi 16°C / Lo 8°C

Karzai rules out sacking corrupt Afghan ministers

President promises to tackle criminality during second term – as he takes office flanked by drug-trafficking and war crimes suspects

By Kim Sengupta in Kabul

Hamid Karzai, with one of his vice-presidents, Karim Khalili, left, addresses the media in Kabul yesterday

REUTERS

Hamid Karzai, with one of his vice-presidents, Karim Khalili, left, addresses the media in Kabul yesterday

Hamid Karzai began his new presidency yesterday with a pledge to reach out to opponents and tackle the corrosive corruption which has deeply tainted his government and led to widespread international condemnation. But he appeared to rule out sacking ministers and officials accused of corruption and did not say how he would tackle the systemic malpractice and criminality which has undermined governance during his tenure.

The US and other Western countries are demanding root and branch reforms and a major drive against corruption in return for additional troops and vast amounts of money.

Mr Karzai, making his victory speech, was flanked by his two running mates, Marshal Muhammed Qasim, accused of drug trafficking by American officials, and Karim Khalili, who was accused in a recent human rights report of war crimes.

Asked whether he was prepared to boot out public figures who have abused the law Mr Karzai responded: "These problems cannot be solved by changing high-ranking officials." He acknowledged, however, that Afghanistan has a "bad name" for corruption and pledged: "We will do our best through all possible means to eliminate that dark stain from our clothes."

Mr Karzai was anointed President on Monday afternoon by an election commission he had appointed which also cancelled a second round of voting due next weekend. The run-off, with rival Abdullah Abdullah, was ordered after Mr Karzai was stripped of a million of his votes from the first round for massive ballot stuffing.

Dr Abdullah, who dropped out of the run-off at the weekend, was last night said to be considering whether to challenge Mr Karzai's reappointment in the supreme court. His supporters had been pressing for an interim government with new elections to be held in the spring.

There is little chance of the court overturning the decision and there is no appetite for the electoral process to continue either among the majority of Afghans or the international community. The US and its allies will thus have to keep propping up a ruler they have repeatedly and publicly criticised.

Barack Obama, who is deciding whether to send up to 40,000 more troops to Afghanistan, phoned Mr Karzai to congratulate him on retaining power, but stressed that he must take a tougher stance against corruption and promote better government. In response to reassurances from Mr Karzai, the US President responded that the "proof is not going to be in words. It's going to be in deeds".

President Obama said he wanted the Afghan President "to move boldly and forcefully forward and take advantage of the international community's interest in his country to initiate reforms internally. That has to be one of our highest priorities." Gordon Brown meanwhile said: "What we want to see is a corruption-free government, an inclusive government."

Mr Karzai pledged to work for all Afghans. "No one will see themselves distanced in this process. All of us will be included as part of Afghanistan's government." He also urged insurgent fighters to re-enter civic society, saying: "We call on our Taliban brothers to come home and embrace their land."

But the Taliban issued a statement mocking the outcome and claiming their own victory in stopping the second round of voting. "What is astonishing is two weeks ago they were arguing that the puppet president Hamid Karzai was involved in electoral fraud... but now he is elected as President based on those same fraudulent votes, Washington and London immediately send their congratulations."

In the streets of Kabul, many people said they wanted to leave the past behind. "If the corrupt officials who have been sucking our blood for long years are dismissed and punished publicly, we will hope for a better future, otherwise the next five years will go in vain," said a shopkeeper, Ghafoor Ahmadi.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

afghanistan, plus ca change
[info]redcliffe62 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 12:44 am (UTC)
remind me again, this was something to do with democracy right?
150 years ago the brits failed up the khyber pass and the situation is no better today, or any of the interim period.
How-to-keep-long-distance-love-alive
[info]yuqinyuan wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 12:47 am (UTC)
How-to-keep-long-distance-love-alive




How to Make a Long Distance Relationship Work

? Do things together. Defy the distance.

? Communicate in some way every day

? Avoid the temptation to be controlling

? Talk about your future together

? Remember: Things will get better with time

? Visit often

? Be positive



Top 7 Common Myths About Affairs




5 Tips In Ideal Relationship




Some Facts About Cheating




Outercourse Game For Lovemaking




Some Facts About Cheating




Karzai deserves the Talibans
[info]violetsmart wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 01:24 am (UTC)
Up until now, keeping myself well informed by many sources, I thought NATO and the USA should remain in Afghanistan to try to attenuate terrorist attacks against the West. I have no illusions about democracy in Afghanistan. It doesn't thrive in tribal societies.

Now, Karzai's latest has changed my mind.

Fact is, if the Talibans took over Kabul and beheaded Karzai and cronies, these would richly deserve their fate.

I feel sorry for the poor women of Afghanistan, though.
The President's telephone call
[info]peteq8 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 05:15 am (UTC)
Barack Obama telephoned Karzai to congratulate him???????? Am I reading this correctly???

Now let me get this straight. The corrupt Mayor of Kabul wins a fraudulent election by stuffing ballot boxes. He then gets confirmed by the election commission that he appointed because Dr. Abdullah refuses to participate in the charade. And the President of the USA telephones Karzai to congratulate him. Hahahahahahahahaha.

Congratulate him for what? Being corrupt, being despotic, being a puppet, being a weasel? This gets better and better.

And when it comes to reining in corruption and the war criminals, what if the Mayor tells Obama to Foxtrot-Oscar like the Israelis recently did over the settlements. What will Obama say? "Well, OK then Hamid, I guess I could do that. As long as we're still friends."

Democracy. Free speech. Hahahahahahahahahahaha.
Power Tends to ????????????
[info]kisakhani wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 06:19 am (UTC)
Karzai begins his second term standing on a string held by those ministers accused of corruption at one end and the US Administration at the other. He has no problem with WashingtonDC's end, his fear is from the end held by
those ministers?
[info]ebbi581 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 09:18 am (UTC)
karzai would never sack any of his gang simply they are all in it . corrupt minister??? they are all corrupt to the core and mr karzai is no exception , he is a part of the same system.
AFGHANISTAN & CORRUPTION
[info]eurobritish wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 02:27 pm (UTC)
Why are we staying there and supporting this corrupt regime, supplying troops to be killed and money for those in government to steel. Isn't it time for use to give Hamid Karzai an ultimatum about cleaning up his act (say six months), or we withdraw our troops and support and utilize them by protecting our country more directly.
Enough is enough
[info]mark1928 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 04:17 pm (UTC)
Karzai is part of the problem, not the solution. He could be cheerleading for the Taliban he is so corrupt and ineffective. Where are the billions of dollars of aid? In the pockets of him and his cronies.

We would be better to ally ourselves with the Taliban against Karzai and the bloody warlords.
Re: Enough is enough
[info]lkdamo wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 06:39 pm (UTC)
Nonsense! I know ,you know better than that.

The only way that could work is if the Taliban joined NATO, to fight Karzai.
It's the only way NATO would buy that one.
:)
????????????????????????
[info]geo32 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 04:43 pm (UTC)
Just remind me again who or what are we fighting for in Afghanistan?

Should it not be the corrupt government we should be bringing down?
Wonder;....
[info]tnrthoma wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 07:29 pm (UTC)
Then why do US & others help Afghanistan???????

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date