World

Partly Sunny with Showers 14° London Hi 16°C / Lo 8°C

McChrystal seeks to keep UK troops 'out of harm's way'

General aims to foil Taliban plan to make Afghanistan a British election issue

By Ray Whitaker and Jane Merrick

General McChrystal plans to keep UK troops behind the frontline

getty images

General McChrystal plans to keep UK troops behind the frontline

Barack Obama's top general in Afghanistan is considering a radical realignment of Britain's role in the country amid fears that the Taliban will target UK troops in the run-up to next May's general election.

General Stanley McChrystal, Nato commander in Kabul, believes Britain's continued involvement would be politically more palatable at home if its 9,000 soldiers were moved out of "harm's way" from the frontline in Helmand.

Senior defence strategists fear that the death toll of British soldiers, currently 230, could be as high as 400 by the time of the election in six months, as Taliban fighters try to exploit UK public concerns about the war.

The McChrystal plan would be welcomed by those arguing for a phased withdrawal in the face of rising British casualties. But it could be seen as a humiliating downgrading of Britain's status. A senior military source said: "Given the risks of a UK strategic withdrawal prompted by the high casualty rate over the summer, McChrystal feels the need to keep Britain 'in the fight' by withdrawing British forces from harm's way, by firstly pulling them back into a smaller area of operations commensurate with their resources; and secondly by transferring them to a 'capacity-building' rather than a 'frontline mission'."

Gordon Brown on Friday said British troops would stay in Afghanistan, but insisted that they could not be expected to risk their lives if President Hamid Karzai did not stamp out corruption after his clouded second-term victory. For the first time, the Prime Minister raised the prospect of the mission's failure, saying the UK and US would "succeed or fail together".

President Obama is considering General McChrystal's request for 40,000 more US troops, in addition to the 20,000 deployed earlier this year. A total of 68,000 US troops are now in Afghanistan.

Crucial to General McChrystal's thinking is that the US needs Britain to remain in Afghanistan to maintain the political alliance more than for military reasons, sources said. It was vital to keep Britain "in" or the alliance would crumble, and the McChrystal plan could limit British casualties.

A source familiar with General McChrystal's thinking said: "The Taliban knows that the British are the most vulnerable and susceptible to media and public criticism back home, and want to make the UK's presence an issue in next year's election. For this reason they are targeting British soldiers. Some strategists fear there could be as many as 400 British deaths by the time of the election."

Britain has been over-extended in Helmand, and its 9,000 soldiers have already been reinforced by 4,000 US troops. However, to a degree General McChrystal's hands may be tied, and he may be unable to send reinforcements to Helmand unless Washington meets his request for 40,000 troops in full.

A British military expert said: "Everyone is waiting to see how President Karzai responds to British and US demands that he stamps out corruption, gets rid of the warlords and works for national unity. If he doesn't, he could present several countries with the exit strategy they have been seeking. A key principle of counter-insurgency is that you are working in support of a legitimate government, and we haven't got that [in Afghanistan]."

In a speech to the Fabian Society in London, Foreign Secretary David Miliband emphasised the need for "soft power" alongside military might in Afghanistan. He said the ability of the West to advocate "soft diplomacy" was "more fragile because our values are contested and doubted, so we have to rebuild support for them and our ability to represent them".

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

In your dreams
[info]walterwall wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 06:34 am (UTC)
Since the Americans use the British troops to do the jobs that they don't want to, namely the dangerous fighting, rather than simply dropping bombs on people from a safe distance, the chances of this happening are slim.
Weasel words that disgrace and display the old arrogance of juvenile ignorance
[info]amanfrommars wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 07:03 am (UTC)
"In a speech to the Fabian Society in London, Foreign Secretary David Miliband emphasised the need for "soft power" alongside military might in Afghanistan. He said the ability of the West to advocate "soft diplomacy" was "more fragile because our values are contested and doubted, so we have to rebuild support for them and our ability to represent them"."

It is the lack of values and blind support of national and global domination with subservience to and dependence on capital need and greed, [simple remote alien and foreign control via the printing and subjective distribution of paper currency] as has been so clearly highlighted at the very heart of the delusional democracy model, with its pretentious official and adversarially impotent and ignored opposition, that needs to be rebuilt in an altogether different Phorm rather than being spread further afield delivering itself as a terminal cancer which enslaves Humanity to International Monetary Funding.

Such perverse and subverting values are rightly and legitimately to be contested and doubted at all times by Free Man and Woman. Or would you care to disagree and display why it should be so.

RSVP .... UKGBNI Government. We as Independent People are Minded to Know if you Condone and Approve of such as is the Virtual Slavery of Mankind and Nations to the ConCurrency of the Printing Press and Quantitatively Easy Funding Streams Dedicated and Dictated to by .... Whims of Unelected Being and Unilateral Subjective Activation.
Re: Weasel words that disgrace and display the old arrogance of juvenile ignorance
[info]gregory_sallust wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 02:31 pm (UTC)
Nu-Liebour double speak. This creature is supposed to be intelligent......God help us.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date