World

Rain (AM and PM) 6° London Hi 10°C / Lo 6°C

Pakistan faces biggest human flood since 1947

Half a million people are being displaced by Pakistan's military operations against the Taliban

By Andrew Buncombe

Refugees queue for food at a camp in northern Pakistan

ap

Refugees queue for food at a camp in northern Pakistan

Her name was Sahin and in a matter of hours her world had been broken. As fighting raged in their hometown of Mingora – fighter jets screaming overhead and mortar fire pounding – she and her husband tried to escape with their 10 children. Amid the chaos, her husband was killed by an artillery shell. There was hardly time to bury him in the courtyard of a neighbour's house before Sahin was forced to think of the children and of somehow leading them to safety by herself. They walked for "hours and hours" before, in a neighbouring town, they found a bus. That bus brought them to a camp for the displaced, a place for the beleaguered, for those with nowhere else to go.

Now huddled with her six girls and four sons – three of whom are disabled – Sahin, in her early 50s, can barely think of the future. "Even if the conflict stops we cannot go back as the house has been destroyed," she said. Her family has barely more than the clothes they were wearing when they fled.

Across a 50-mile swathe of north-west Pakistan, countless stories similar to Sahin's could be told. Pakistan's military has mounted what appears to be a major operation against Taliban fighters who have seized control of several districts little more than 60 miles from the capital, Islamabad. "This is not a normal war. This is a guerilla war," Pakistan's prime minister, Yusuf Raza Gilani said yesterday. "This is our own war. This is war for the survival of the country." The army said 55 militants were killed in clashes around Swat yesterday.

Aid groups have warned of a human tide of up to 500,000 people fleeing their homes. The UN said an estimated 200,000 have fled the Swat valley and its main town, Mingora, in the past few days alone, while another 300,000 are poised to flee if they get the chance. This would create a total of one million people forced from their homes by fighting in the past 12 months. It represents the biggest internal displacement of people in Pakistan since independence more than 60 years ago.

"People are in shock. In some cases their homes have been destroyed by mortar shells. They are wondering when they'll be able to go back. Others say they will not be able to go back," said Antonia Paradela, an official with Unicef who interviewed Sahin and other refugees in the Sheikh Shehzad refugee camp near Mardan, a city in the south of the Swat valley. "This is the place where the families are coming. They are tired, sweaty, dusty. There are whole families crying because they have lost someone. But there is also a sense of relief to be out of the danger."

Under mounting international pressure, the government of Asif Ali Zardari and Pakistan’s military launched this week’s operation to drive the Taliban from the former tourist destination of Swat after a controversial, three-month ceasefire with the militants fell apart. After a previous military effort failed to dislodge the militants who had extended their violent influence throughout the valley over a two year period, the government in February signed a peace deal which included an agreement to establish Sharia courts in Swat and some neighboring areas.

The Taliban, however, failed to meet its end of the agreement and lay down its arms. Indeed, emboldened by the government's acquiescence, the militants then spread from Swat into the neighbouring and strategically important Buner valley. The army is also battling to drive the Taliban from Buner and nearby Lower Dir.

While journalists are, in effect, prevented from reaching the war zone, the military's operation – which involves more than 5,000 troops pitched against an estimated 5,000 Taliban fighters – appears unexpectedly firm, and officials said that 140 militants had already been killed in the past two days. Some observers had wondered whether the army, trained and prepared to fight a conventional war against India, had the will or the capability to take on a well-trained guerrilla enemy.

There was also speculation whether, in the week that Barack Obama outlined his new "Af-Pak" strategy to Mr Zardari and the Afghan leader, Hamid Karzai, in Washington, there may have been a reluctance to fight what could have been seen as another battle in America's war. The Obama administration's policy of using missiles fired from unmanned drones at suspected militant targets and the subsequent civilian "collateral damage" this causes is hugely unpopular in Pakistan.

Yet this time, several things appear different. From the start, the battle for Swat has been pitched as a battle for the future of the Pakistan – and one that has been directed by the Pakistani authorities rather than Americans. In a televised address on Thursday as the military operation was formally announced, the Prime Minister, Yousaf Gilani, said: "In order to restore honour and dignity of the country, the armed forces have been called in to eliminate militants and terrorists. We will eliminate those who have tried to destroy the peace of the country."

The seemingly widespread support for this operation, as opposed to Washington's drone strikes, appears based in large part on growing public dismay with the Taliban. With the Taliban having embarked on a policy of burning girls' schools and beheading their opponents, only to be "rewarded" with a deal that saw Sharia law enacted, the Pakistani public is growing more anxious as the militants' threat has increased rather than reduced.

Those involved in brokering the ceasefire say the Taliban have now exposed their true colours and must be dealt with by force. "What the people know is that we tried everything possible. The Taliban had their own agenda and that has become clear to people," said Bushra Gohar, the vice-president of the Awami National Party, which heads the regional government in the North West Frontier Province (NWFP). "We hope this will be a clearly targeted operation that will go after the training camps and the leadership."

Analysts say the operation to drive the militants from Swat and then hold the ground to allow the return of a civilian administration could take months. With the militants having established themselves across Swat's mountainous terrain over the past two years, even if the military succeeds in forcing them from Mingora and other towns, the Taliban could retreat to smaller adjacent valleys and strike back with bomb attacks on convoys, checkpoints and military camps. It is also likely that the militants could increase suicide strikes on targets outside Swat to act as a diversion.

Some commentators have speculated that in such circumstances, an inconclusive but bloody campaign with a large number of civilian casualties would undermine public support for the operation. The army says it is determined to succeed. "The army is now engaged in a full-scale operation to eliminate the militants, miscreants and anti-state elements from Swat," said the army's spokesman, Major General Athar Abbas. "They are on the run and trying to block the exodus of civilians from the area."

As a result, hundreds of thousands more people like Sahin are likely to be rushing desperately out of Swat and towards the refugee camps at the southern end of the valley in the coming days. At the moment, only a tiny fraction of the displaced are being housed in the camps – the majority being able to stay with relatives or in rented rooms – but in the coming weeks that could change.

Sahin, her children and some other members of her family have nowhere else to go. Five months ago, when an earlier spike in violence drove them from Swat, they were able to stay with relatives in Peshawar. This time, that option was not available to them, she said. For now the family must sit amid the tents of the camp at Sheikh Shehzad, waiting and wondering.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Children of Pakistan destined for Brothals financed by Politicians
[info]drug_baron wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 05:13 am (UTC)
Sadly the pimps and the human trafikkers will be moving in on the refugees along with various "aid agencies" looking to abduct beautiful young girls and boys to refill the brothels around the world that are funded and financed by the political elite from thrid world dictatorships.

Behind the empty words of the morally corrupt politicians all over the world; lays a snare of vice and evil that is so repugnant that only the stone-hearted will not vomit.
Re: Children of Pakistan destined for Brothals financed by Politicians
[info]badalandabad wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 08:35 am (UTC)
Who cares? Zardari is raking in millions (his usual 10% or is it 20% now?) in the process of securing arms for this operation along with his cronies in the government. I am sure Nawaz Sharif will mobilise his businesses to get his share in other procurement process towards their operation. This would make sure the future of the families of the ruling elite will be looked after. Their children would be sent to the best schools overseas and their future will be a safe and sound one. The elite themselves would be protected in their sprawling bungalows in the suburbs of Karachi and Lahore and take off to their usual holidays abroad (its too hot at this time of the year you see!). Great. Now who wants to worry about these poor souls in the SWAT valley? Let them rot in hell. As long as we and our children are safe and happy, everything is fine with the world.
War on your own people is not a good idea!
[info]lewis_northants wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 05:26 am (UTC)
This tactic will not work. To force a million proud people with a fighting tradition from their homes will result in tens of thousands of new recruits for the Taliban. The Pakistan Army will not be able hold the territory taken. Expect the failed government to be removed in accordance with the old Pakistan tradition, military coup.




Collateral damage vs civilian casualites
[info]schweigen2009 wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 05:48 am (UTC)
When civilians are reported killed by US or Pakistani strikes, it is called "collateral damage".
When civilians are reported killed in Sri Lanka, it is called "civilian casualites" worth being investigated for war crimes!

BTW, paragraph 6 is a mess. Does anyone do any proof reading here? The author seems to have been in a mighty hurry:


Under mounting international pressure, the government of Asif Ali Zardari and Pakistan's military launched the Swat, formerly a tourist destination, after a controversial, three-month ceasefire with the militants fell apart. After an earlier military effort failed to dislodge the fighters who had extended their violent influence operation to drive the Taliban from Swat, formerly a tourist destination, after a controversial, three-month ceasefire with the militants fell apart. After an earlier military effort failed to dislodge the fighters who hadthroughout the valley over a two-year period, the government in February signed a peace deal which included an agreement to establish Sharia courts in Swat and some neighbouring areas.
[info]drug_baron wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 06:01 am (UTC)
Pakistani politicians like all others around the world are full of pimps, trafikkers, conmen, turncoats, smugglers.

The current predicament comes as no surprise; the difference between Pakistani politicians and others around the world; is that they don't stop sucking the blood of the cash cow until it is dry; where as others aound the world move onto other cash cows in order to let them all at least live another day.
Stop the lies! The Pak army is massacring its own people.
[info]findempire wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 06:54 am (UTC)
The wurlitzer media would have you believe that the Pak army that has unleashed a sudden rain of bombs, rockets, and shells on the Swat valley is somehow conducting an orderly, bloodless evacuation of 1 million civilians. The wurlitzer media tells you this while at the same time admitting that it has no idea what's really going on because the Pak army won't let it report from the war zone (and maybe also because it doesn't want to uncover any embarrassing facts). The wurlitzer media wants you to look the other way while the Pak army kills 'em all and lets Allah sort them out.

The Swat Valley is a free fire zone. Civilians are caught by the army's curfew, knowing they will be killed if they try to escape the bombs falling on their homes. 1 million people have been made refugees in their own country, starving in makeshift camps after seeing their towns and villages blasted to pieces. Where's the outrage now? Why isn't Mia Farrow throwing another anorexic fit? Where are all the hypocrites trying to save the Tamil or PKK terrorists?

Pakistan fury at civilians dead, homes razed


Pakistan, Chota Lahore

"I want to pick up a gun and fight the Taliban and the army," says shocked Said Quraysh, shaking with rage as he erects a tent in a camp for civilians fleeing Pakistan's fighting.

Cooked food was sitting in the cattle farmer's kitchen when intense shelling began in the village in northwest Buner district, where the Pakistan military is trying to drive out encroaching hardline Taliban insurgents.

As he heard neighbouring homes crumble under bombs, Quraysh decided the only way to keep his family safe was to flee, leaving his meal untouched.

"The attacks were not targeted, civilians were hit," says the wizened 55-year-old, sporting a white beard and exhausted by the journey from his village to the government-run camp in neighbouring Swabi district.

The government has said it is bracing to cope with half a million people displaced by the fighting, and aid agencies fear a humanitarian crisis.

Those made homeless are shocked, confused and tearful -- but much of their fury is reserved for the army.

"We are angry... We left out of fear for our lives, that the government bombardment will kill us, our children, our mothers, sisters, our relatives," says Amir Zada, a 35-year-old teacher, crouching in his fly-infested tent.

"We are not against the operation, but we are against the destruction of our property, our homes, our children -- they are innocent."

Like many of the refugees, Zari wanted the military to drive out Taliban fighters trying to impose their repressive brand of Islam on swathes of Pakistan, but she was sickened by what she saw.

"When we were leaving we saw a lot of vehicles being bombed. The bodies were lying there. We saw the body parts lying on the roadside. I think there could have been 100 people, even children," she told AFP.

"My principal was killed, his car was bombed and two people were killed," says school clerk Muhammad Gul. He said the shelling started without warning. "Six houses were targeted in my street."
A New Bangladesh is being made
[info]drug_baron wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 07:41 am (UTC)
Obviously corrupt senior Army Officers have taken the bait; and sold out to the highest bidder with promises of "treasure chests" and hotels in Dubai.

The obvious agenda is to alienate the people of Swat so that they demand an independent homeland; and another homeland for Baluchastan will soon be next until of course the Princdeom of Sindh remains for King Zardari and the Bhutto Clan to rule for ever.

The creation of Bangladesh was the master piece of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto when he induced the army to humiliate itself in the then East Pakistan; now it is for his son-in-law, none ther than President Asif Ali Zardari to take on the baton and further fragmentize Pakistan until it is left with a part that he can call his own kingdom and rule as an absolute monarch.
Re: A New Bangladesh is being made
[info]sharifl wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 07:56 am (UTC)
I respect your views, but do not mix facts with fiction. At the time of break up of East Pakistan, there was military dictatorship and ZA Bhutto took power after Pakistan had split. Te problem with Pakistan is that most Pakistanis love to bash civilian elected leaders than dictators. You can put the blame on Zardari, but it all started when another dictator was running the show. I say, we can a different opinion, but facts cannot be amended to prove your point. Now there are rumors that Zardari takes takes 10% of all the deals made abroad. Some Pakis are saying that he killed his wife to become powerful. Obviously the only good leaders the country had were dictators. The country has steeped low enough, no need to add fire, particularly with lies.
Re: A New Bangladesh is being made
[info]drug_baron wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 08:14 am (UTC)
Facts are when Field Marshall Ayub Khan was in power as a miltary dictator.................Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was the foreign minister.

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto single handedly engineered the East Pakistan crisis; when there was an election Mujeeb Ur Rehman's party won the majority vote and Bhutto refused to accept Mujeeb Ur Rehman as the Leader of the then united Pakistan.

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto offered Mujeeb presidency of East Pakistan whilst he himself would lead West Pakistan, when Mujeeb refused to accept he was forced into jail and the rest is history.

Zulfikar showed his true colours as the illegitable bastard son of a Sindi whore and corrupt landowner, and so have his offspring, their politcal agenda is always to loot.

Check your political history my friend.

This is not about Taliban, Islam or good governance; it is about greed and more greed and selling out one's own people for monetary gain. Prostitutes and their offspring will always sell to the highest bidder.
Re: A New Bangladesh is being made
[info]sharifl wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 09:13 am (UTC)
Reading your views, I feel I was wrong to reply to your post. But refrain from calling me a friend. I do not make friends with likes of you who use the words like whores and bastards. Pakistanis elected leaders have to be respected and unless a court can prove their guilt should not be used with names you chose. Nawaz Sharif and Mushharaff kept Zardari in jail for years and yet nothing was proved. In your justice system of sharia, you accuse somebody and make a quick hanging. No wonder,. Muslim countries are all in a mess and those living there, although hate the infidel west, are thronging to enter by hook or crook. may be Saudi Arabia or Iran would be the right place for those who want quick justice. I will not bother to reply anymore.
Re: A New Bangladesh is being made
[info]drug_baron wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 09:36 am (UTC)
Facts are facts.

Who was Zulfikar Ali Bhutto's mother ?..................a Sindhi Hindu; was she not; and from where did she hail ? What was her relationship with his father ?

Willie Brandt; a previous leader of Germany openly declared that he did not know who his father was and his mother was at one time on the "game", none he less he contributed significantly to Germany's development; unlike your saint "Bhutto".

The truth behind engineered myths are often difficult to accept; especially from those who enjoy sipping "red or white" wine on the terraces of their foreign palaces funded by the blood of the down troden poor of Pakistan.

Money buys you anything in Pakistan; as long as you have enough to meet the demand !

Why are the fuedal landlord gang rapists of the poor widow Mukhtiar Mai still roaming the country as free men; like dogs searching for their next victim ; were they not convicted by a court ?...........I rest my case !
Re: A New Bangladesh is being made
[info]moha21 wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 09:03 pm (UTC)

I didn't know that in Pakistan the thief is called president.
I Blame the Yanks
[info]edmund03 wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 07:56 am (UTC)
What I find so reassuring is the avalanche of mails from horrified Muslims at the violence and hardship being visited on their fellow Muslims by well... other Muslims. Doubtless these concerned citizens will be organising marches in London to protest against the excesses of the Taliban and their homophobic, misogynic bigotry and arbitrary atrocities. Doubless they must be anxious to demonstrate their belief in human rights and the dignity of all human beings. Alternatively they may do what most Islamic nations do in times of trouble: Blame the Yanks and simply refuse to accept any responsibility for the deep-seated problems at the heart of their own societies.
Unless that is we are being asked to assume that when young girl is blinded by the acid thrown into her eyes by a brave Taliban warrior this act is less heinous because it is committed by a fellow Muslim?
Re: I Blame the Yanks
[info]drug_baron wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 08:18 am (UTC)
The organised marches and the polls showing that 80% of Britain were against the invasion of Iraq, did not stop Tony being a poodle.

So what will marches in London do ??
Balkanization of Pakistan
[info]floppsiefrog wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 08:38 am (UTC)
This is change you can believe in now that Dick Holbrooke, of Kosovo fame, has managed to persuade Pakistan's corrupt ruling elite to declare war on its huddled masses, host to the crucible of world terrorism (a few fanatical nutcases with pop guns). Of course, the real US objective is to eventually secure the province of Baluchistan to stitch up existing gas pipeline agreements and impose total control over the exploitation and use of energy resources throughout the Middle East and Central Asia. These guys are really out to control the entire world one way or another.
We want Osama Bin Laden. Do you have him? No. Who have you got? Million people on the run. Is that t
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 10:53 am (UTC)
Pakistan faces biggest human flood since 1947.
Half a million people are being displaced by Pakistan's military operations against the Taliban
Tell me who is responsible for this. English, Americans, Russians. Indians. Chinese, Australians, Jamaicans...
I can only see those who supply the weapon to both. India and Pakistan. Let them fight. We will in the meantime lot the museums and the Royal Jewels. Is that out of range for these exoduses? No. Is it a reality? Close enough. The Afghanistan borders are clobbered, the West of Pakistan is hit and population is displaced. Why. We want Osama Bin Laden. Do you have him? No. Who have you got? Million people on the run. Is that the story? Yes.
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla.
Re: We want Osama Bin Laden. Do you have him? No. Who have you got? Million people on the run. Is th
[info]badalandabad wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 11:11 am (UTC)
What is your point?
Re: We want Osama Bin Laden. Do you have him? No. Who have you got? Million people on the run. Is th
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 11:36 am (UTC)
The 1,000,000 are on the run because of rain? mud slide? or killings and army
Shame on Pakistan
[info]inamds1 wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 12:55 pm (UTC)
This is all Pakistan's original sin. starting from 1947. then 1971 and now.
I am is in me.
[info]myst_man wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 05:45 pm (UTC)
What came first the sinner or the sin?
It was ordered'
When you make your bed with The Taliban
[info]xyberia44 wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 06:26 pm (UTC)
You get more than gonorrea, and terrorism, all i can say it is the West who will pay for this futile attempt at cleaning out the Taliban, And we all suffer the weak and greedy, corrupt government of Pakistans failure to Vipe out terrorists Like the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, is just a reflection on how little evolved the greedy pshyche of Extreme Muslims really are. Whilst the Pakistani secret service pumps millions in weapons and financing of extremist groups Inside and Outside Pakistan, the rest of the world suffers Pakistans greatest Export, ie Terrorism.

Someone should just carpet bomb them back to the 6th century, which they so eagerly wants to live in. And let the rest of the World evolve.

Those who make their Bed with the Taliban
[info]jai_paki_land wrote:
Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 07:51 pm (UTC)
As horrific as the Taliban may be they have a mass following amonst the poor in Pakiland which will only increase.

Those who make their bed with the Taliban do so because.

1) Rampant Corruption, and a basic unfairness in society, where the poor man and his family are denied justice or diginity.
2) Landlordism (Feudalism) Unlike India Pakistan did not have land reforms. In India land was taken away from all the big landowners and given to the landless post 1947. The Support for the Taliban comes from the dispossessed and the poor and also from the huge number of landless pesants.

The very poor will welcome the Talebs with open arms the Taliban to them are good honest religious men compared to the Upper Class Goons and thugs who have looted Pakistan.

God help Pakistan already in the frying pan because of your corrupt politicians now about to be thrown into the fire with the coming Taliban rule.

All good men must now come to the aid of Pakistan to ensue its kept free from the horrors of Taliban rule.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date