World

Rain (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Suspicions grow that attack was 'inside job'

Conspiracy theories fuelled by security lapses as hunt for gunmen continues

By Omar Waraich in Lahore

Members of the Pakistan hockey team leave flowers at the site of the terrorist attack in Lahore yesterday

EPA

Members of the Pakistan hockey team leave flowers at the site of the terrorist attack in Lahore yesterday

Dramatic footage showing the alleged perpetrators of Tuesday's audacious attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team making their getaway was released by a Pakistani news channel last night.

The grainy images, captured by four CCTV cameras minutes after the ambush, show the gunmen strolling calmly through the back streets of Liberty Market just before 9am. In one sequence, three of the men walk down a narrow, deserted street, carrying heavy bags and with weapons slung over their shoulders. They then mount a waiting motorcycle and speed away.

Yesterday, police released "wanted" posters bearing sketches of the suspects. Up to 14 masked gunmen took part in the attack on the Sri Lankan team's tour bus at the Liberty Square roundabout in the heart of Lahore. They opened fire on the bus, killing a driver and six police officers escorting the Sri Lankans. Six players and two assistant coaches were wounded.

President Asif Ali Zardari has vowed the attackers will be caught and punished "with iron hands", but as detectives searched for clues to the whereabouts of the fugitives, the Lahore police commissioner Khusro Pervez confessed there had been "major security lapses". There was also confusion yesterday as officials made contradictory claims about the arrests so far. Mr Pervez said "some suspects" had been detained but that was denied by another senior officer.

Meanwhile, the Punjab government offered a 10 million rupee (£88,000) reward for information leading to the gunmen. The Foreign Minister, Shah Mehmood Qureshi, said officials were pursuing "important leads" and the government had "constituted a special team of investigators".

Opposition MPs and many in the Pakistani media have seized on the government's floundering and accused it of glaring intelligence failures. The Sri Lankan team agreed to tour Pakistan after being assured they would receive security equal to that given to the President. Instead, the authorities failed to take crucial measures to protect the squad. Their bus was accompanied by only two police vans, when it should have been boxed in on all four sides. Only the windscreen was bullet-proofed, and the driver was using the same vehicle and following the same route from the team's hotel to the cricket ground for the third day in a row. No attempt was made to block traffic or line the route with police.

"There was no outer cordon," Mr Pervez admitted. "When they were escorted, the [police] vehicles used were not the appropriate vehicles."

The numerous failings fuelled speculation that the attack might have been, at least in part, an "inside job". In previous terror attacks in Pakistan, the perpetrators appeared to have considerable intelligence about their targets. Car bombers have struck at army and anti-terror police headquarters in the past two years without the slightest hindrance.

The commando-style raid in Liberty Square drew comparisons with last November's attacks in Mumbai, India, which were blamed on the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba group and other jihadist organisations which were deployed as proxies by the army to fight in Indian-administered Kashmir.

The government has so far declined to acknowledge the possibility that Pakistani militants might have been involved. Rehman Malik, the chief interior ministry adviser, has claimed "a foreign hand" lay behind the attack on the cricketers – which has been widely interpreted as pointing the finger at neighbouring India.

Some Pakistani newspapers have suggested that the Indian intelligence service was involved, while others have urged Pakistani leaders to shed their differences and unite in a common effort to tame rising militancy and terrorism. "Politicians need to wake up, bury the hatchet in the national good and rout the real enemy," said an editorial in the English-language daily, Dawn. In Lahore yesterday, a stream of mourners gathered at the scene of the attack to lay flowers near a sign saluting the bravery of a slain traffic police officer, Tanveer Iqbal.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Very sad
[info]testing_times wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 01:56 am (UTC)
Speculation about 'inside jobs' with regard to terrorist acts worldwide will always abound. It will always be difficult, if not impossible, to mount a viable argument, if not produce convincing evidence, in favour. Depsite vagaries & supsicions, one thing is for sure: as long as there are scumbags (misled perhaps & usually young, hate-filled, irrational, angst-ridden, hot-headed murderous, torturing swine) who are prepared, indeed eager, to carry out acts of barbarity against defenceless individuals (who are not respectfully viewed as equal human beings) - the level of terrorism, & warfare generally, will not abate (conceivably indefinitely). Very sad.
Re: Very sad
[info]tommytcg wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 08:18 am (UTC)
`Speculation about 'inside jobs' with regard to terrorist acts worldwide will always abound.` Do you also include here the story about the Arab in a cave in Afghan who shut down the half trillion dollar US air defenses with his laptop?
Re: Very sad
[info]dostoyevsky01 wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 09:19 am (UTC)
...and strangely, notwithstanding that he can organise the greatest terrorist atrocity of all time on his laptop in his batcave, he could never afford to be a half decent DV camera to record himself glorifying in his actions, preferring in stead some kind of early 80's VHS camera. The quality of the so-called Osama videos is strangely bad!
Re: Very sad
[info]goosegreece wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 12:27 pm (UTC)
Probably used the same camera as was used for the `moon landings`. A lot of people believed that rubbish also.
Barbarians from the West
[info]rabbi_wanker wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 11:46 pm (UTC)
"... as long as there are scumbags (misled perhaps & usually young, hate-filled, irrational, angst-ridden, hot-headed murderous, torturing swine) who are prepared, indeed eager, to carry out acts of barbarity against defenceless individuals (who are not respectfully viewed as equal human beings) - the level of terrorism, & warfare generally, will not abate ..."
That's a good description of the misguided, amoral, and poorly-educated savages who serve in the UK and US militaries. Innocent civilians of the world: hide your children, your life savings, and your nation's resources. The Brits and the Yanks are coming to steal your liberty and ruin your lives! It's not that you did anything wrong; you simply have something they want.
Re: Barbarians from the West
[info]edmund03 wrote:
Friday, 6 March 2009 at 07:46 am (UTC)
As opposed, of course to the Sunni and Shiite Muslims in Iraq, who in response to a foreign invasion decide to slaughter each other on a scale and in manner which still defy belief. Perhaps you could explain why in the face of a common enemy, these groups decided to drill holes in each other's womenfolk and children, plant bombs in crowded markets and school playgrounds and torture with an enthusiam which can only be described as sociopathic. Even Iraqis have been forced to admit that the overwhelming majority of its citizens have been murderd and mutilated by their own countrymen and women. Strange way to prove that Islam is a religion of peace.
Re: Barbarians from the West
[info]testing_times wrote:
Friday, 6 March 2009 at 09:15 am (UTC)
Whom Jupiter would destroy he first drives mad... That they are mad, 'tis true; 'tis true 'tis pity; And pity 'tis 'tis true... Though this be madness, yet there is method in 't... He that giveth the order doth have his finger on the trigger & his hand on the knife.

Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.
- Friedrich Nietzsche

Religion and peace... mutually exclusive?
Re: Barbarians from the West
[info]edmund03 wrote:
Friday, 6 March 2009 at 02:00 pm (UTC)
Not sure browing through the web to garner anonymous quotations will shed any more light on the subject. Call me old fashioned, Islamophobic or even racist, but this a rather oblique attempt to exonerate those bearded psychopaths in Iraq from their systematic butchery of innocents - in far greater numbers than the invading US and UK armies - rather misses the point. Or is your overtly racist argument that Iraqis are genetically predisposed to torturing their compatriots with power-drills?
Re: Barbarians from the West
[info]testing_times wrote:
Saturday, 7 March 2009 at 01:29 am (UTC)
Edmund03, I find your 2nd comment a little perplexing. I wonder if you mistake me for rabbi_wanker? It so happens that I am in agreement with much of what you say, particularly in your 1st comment (although I'm certainly neither Islamophobic or racist). I think you may have hold of the wrong end of the stick; I'm simply playing devil's advocate. It takes two to tango.
[info]davidgriff wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 02:41 am (UTC)
Zadari and Sharif and his henchmen are fighting like ferrets in a sack whilst the country burns. Where is the voice of the people against this latest atrocity. They were quick to rise up against the publication of facile Danish cartoons, which a majority of the agitators had not even seen or read. The slence now is deafening!
I read friedman's article in the NYT too
[info]siddistani wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 06:03 am (UTC)
But to quote "muslim silence" here would be pretty stupid, because Pakistan has reacted with tremendous outrage and grief. Whether the Independent covers it or not is another matter. And it would also be naive to compare danish cartoons with this attack. Of course people will grieve, their own have been killed. What we would expect is grief after attacks like those in Mumbai, grief and condemnation after beheadings in tribal Pakistan. In THESE cases, the condemnation has been very limited, and that is regrettable.
The demise of Pakistani cricket, however, is a total tragedy, one that is recognised by the average Pakistani.
More bame, more conspiracy theories. "WE" would never do that...
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 06:46 am (UTC)
...would we? Oh yes. Lots of people still believe (though they are too cowardly to say anymore which is good) that the USA would go to war in Iraq to steal 2.5 m/bd ($45 bn per annum) of oil production.

Its true, such profound mental dysfunction, impervious to any amount of evidence to the contrary (every country EXCEPT the USA is cintracting up Iraq oil right now at the invitation od observably sovereign and free Iraqis), is the very root of these problems.

Its endemic in Pakistan as we can all see. Its endemic here as well, as most of you dear readers are paart of.

Why has humanity suddenly collectively started to believe in these fantasys in such numbers?

As for Pakistan, its all internal. Pakistani's need to wake up quick or many will die at each others hands. Maybe cricket will tug more heartstrings than the pile of Pakistani human misery already behind them and still happening in SWAT and the tribal areas? Insane? Yes. Makes you want to methphorically slap them round the face like some hysterical nun on a Airplane movie doesnt it?
Enough navel gazing
[info]edmund03 wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 07:03 am (UTC)
Before Pakistan indulges in yet another bout of pointless self-flagellation, it is worth pointing out that the West - Obama, Brown and the EU - is at fault for this latest atrocity; or this, at least, is the tenor of the Muslim response in the media.
Pakistani security service supports the terrorists
[info]wormery wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 08:20 am (UTC)
The Pakistan security service has a track record of inside jobs. Daniel Perl trusted them, and they delivered him to terrorists and murderers who beheaded him. Half the police and security service in Pakistan is ON THE ENEMY'S SIDE - and they work for islamist terrorists and are paid by them too - so they should NEVER be trusted.

The person who gave the Sri Lankan team the OK to go to this corrupt terrorist-supporting hellhole is an idiot and should be sacked at the very least.

Muslims always blame the 'zionists' (ie joooooz) and the 'west' whenever muslims get up to their bloody tricks.So there's be no protests in the UK or elsewhere about islamic terrorists - which rather gives the impression that muslims support these mursering muslims. And where are muslim protests about Darfur - muslims killing and raping muslims? Eh? Oh yeah, march and shout about cartoons and books being published and support the terrorists in gaza ( a hellhole created by arab states on purpose to use as a stick with which to beat Israel). But what about muslim atrocities? Against muslims too! Muslims really are FULL OF IT. Problem is, we have a lot of muslims in the UK who support terrorists too. What a mess multiculturalism and massimmigration has created...
Re: Pakistani security service supports the terrorists
[info]copycat7 wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 11:53 am (UTC)
.....Said the BNP
Re: Pakistani security service supports the terrorists
[info]wormery wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 12:29 pm (UTC)
I wonder if you realis what a prat you sound like accusing anyone who identifies and analyses the situation in a way you don't like os being 'BNP'. Ironically, of course, the nearest thing we have to fascsim in the Uk is ISLAM and all those muslims who tacitly support the 'ummah' and jihad. Your mates in other words - the left loves a fascist with brown skin and funny clothes eh...Pathetic.


You sound like you're a 15 year old pasycho retard with an inferiority complex - all leftie shouting and no intelligence or substance.

By the way, I was also called racist and BNP in the 90s when I CORRECTLY predicted the 9/11 attacks - the people who accused me have gone very quiet now.

Grow up sonny. But good luck with your GCSEs anyway.
Re: Pakistani security service supports the terrorists
[info]joe_london wrote:
Friday, 6 March 2009 at 03:54 am (UTC)
Accused of being a member of the BNP for your analysis? You're right, that isn't deserved; it's much like accusing someone of anti-semitism after an analysis which doesn't put Israel in a good light.

I'm with you on this one wormery, even if I do have reservations about some of your argument.
ROUND UP THE COWARDS
[info]getgordon wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 09:14 am (UTC)
The sold called security that left the visiting sportsmen to their own fate
should be rounded up and charged with cowardice.
Police
[info]gollymolly44 wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 11:14 am (UTC)
The question we should be asking is how many of the Muslim policemen and security men would be prepared to fight and kill the Muslim attackers in order to protect non-Muslim people on the bus? Muslims blowing each other to pieces with bombs is one thing (and quite common), but killing fellow Muslims to save non-Muslims might be somewhat different. For instance, how would a Muslim policeman who killed a fellow Muslim in these circumstances be treated at the mosque next Friday?
Re: Police
[info]manplant wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 11:33 am (UTC)
And how many Jews would be preppared to kill other Jews to stand up for human rights and the rule of law. Since you interpret your religion to mean that Jews come first and to hell with anyone else, you have no leg to stand on. Another crude attempt by Jews to try to stoke up hatred between the West and Muslims. You are not as clever as you think!
6 Muslim policemen died, killed by so called 'Islamic' terrorists (hired murderers) working for the Pakistani secret service. They are as much a victim as anyone else. This secret service is trained by the CIA and partly financed by the USA, a country that Jews have much influence and control over. Indirectly, you are responsible.
Re: Police
[info]gollymolly44 wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 11:44 am (UTC)
I'm not superstitious. I think all religions peddle nonsense. And I still think my questions have relevance, particularly the last one.
Re: Police
[info]manplant wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 12:04 pm (UTC)
Pakistani society is generally racist and that applies to people from other parts of their own country / different tribes as well. Islamic extremists are busy killing fellow Shia Muslims living in Pakistan as a result of their intolerence. Some of this is due to Saudi extremist ideology (Wahabism) that has been fostered and harboured in Saudi Arabia by the ruling Royal family (installed in power by Britain). That is the ideology that influences Bin Laden and the Taliban.
The problem is culture, not religion. According to the Islamic religion, murder is murder, no matter what race, sex or religion the victim is. The punishment is death or a lesser sentence depending on the wishes of the victim's family.
To answer your question, a large portion of Pakistani society does not approve of the terrosits. If they had their way they would be linched. However, when these people are protected by elememnts of the security services, what can they do? The problem is that these security services have gone rogue and turned into self serving gangsters. That is what happens when dictators are installed and backed by foreign powers, such as General Zia and Musharraf. The judiciary is silenced using the 'security' excuse and the rule of law is destroyed.
Re: Police
[info]gollymolly44 wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 02:01 pm (UTC)
Isn't "culture" largely influenced by religion? And in the case of Islamic countries, perhaps almost entirely. I cannot help but conclude from empirical evidence that the main problem with these non-democratic, Islamic countries is their religion. Of course, if they think they don't have problems then they are free to carry on as is, but it's a bit pointless blaming everybody else if the problems are really within themselves. After all, isn't everything that happens the Will of Allah?
Re: Police
[info]manplant wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 02:39 pm (UTC)
Culture and religion both have an influence on how people conduct themselves. However, the biggest factor is the individual and he/she decides how to interpret their religion according to what is fair or self interest. Self interest almost always plays a part in the decision making process as you would find very few people that act without regard for themselves and their personal situation. For example, it may be easy to tempt a particular poor person to murder someone or act religious for money. However, another poor person may not be tempted. The same can be said for someone who is rich. They may be greedy enough to harm others for money / personal gain.
If it is religion you are talking about, then empirical evidence will show that countries that are Christian have the worst record when it comes to 'body count', ie the number of people murdered in wars etc. Even in Communist Russia, where religion was discouraged, Stalin and his accomplices (Christian, Jewish and Muslims) managed to kill millions of people.
When it comes to 'democracy', do you really think the US and UK are trully Democratic?
Countries with largely Islamic populations seldom have Islamic governments. The dictatorships are often from the military for example presidents Assad (senior)and Mubarak or from ruling families that like to think of themselves as royalty, based on European examples. Anyhow, even if they did have Islamic governments they would probably be corrupt and murderous as theological regimes often are. I wouldn't trust clregy from any religion to run a country as they are probably some of the nastiest set of people that you can find.
If you look at events labeled as 'Islamic terror', aside from a few nutters, the majority is caused by intelligence services working for dictatorships that are suppressing their indigenous populations. These dictatorships are protected (not always overtly) by so called Democracies using arms, expertise, intelligence and sometimes financial aid.
I think your empirical data is wrong. Maybe you can explain it?
Re: Police
[info]manplant wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 02:49 pm (UTC)
Just on this 'Will of Allah' stuff, that is nonsence. Everyone has the ability to make their own decisions, and you will be judged on them. You can choose to murder or not etc. Do you know about the 'Divine Right', the excuse that monarchies used to use (King Charles I) to rule? More of the same nonsence!
Re: Police
[info]gollymolly44 wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 03:33 pm (UTC)
My empirical data suggests that if I lived in most western countries I would have a real vote, as would my daughters. But if I lived in a country where the majority follow Islam then, with a very few exceptions, I wouldn't have a vote (and my daughters certainly wouldn't). How does one explain that? Coincidence?
You can disparage the sorts of democracy we have in the West, as I do (how can a country with an unelected monarch be a true democracy?) but the fact remains that by any standard the West is more Democratic than the Muslim countries - which is probably one of the reasons why so many Muslims want to live in the West but not vice-versa.
As for the "Will of Allah" nonsense, it seems to me that one of the tenets of Islam is that Allah controls everything - except, of course, the existence of Israel and anything else that Muslims don't like. How convenient.
Incidentally, we grew out of our "Divine Right" period - maybe it's time Islam moved on also.
Re: Police
[info]manplant wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 04:15 pm (UTC)
Eastern Europe, China, South America? Plenty of examples of countries with Christian populations that don't have or only recently have had democracy. Even in Democracies such as Brazil, the police are encouraged to kill street children.

You are basically saying that because a country has a Muslim population then that population will choose a dictatorship that will stifle religious thought, murder, pillage and rape its own people?
If the people didn't elect this dictatorship, but have had it imposed on them by external powers in some regional power game outside their control, then surely they are not responsible.

If people in the West have elected governments which install and protect dictatorships with all that implies for the benefit of a few politicians and large corporations, then surely they are in someway responsible?

I resent that my government backs murderous regimes. I don't see any benefit.

Where do you get your information about the tenets of Islam? It's like saying that Chritian teaching is all about an eye for an eye and adulterers should be stoned just because it mentions it in the bible. All you are doing is taking a small part of a very large text and focusing on it. How can you make a judgement if you don't study the whole text?

When analysing you empirical evidence, you have chosen to use a small time frame from which to collect your data. It wasn't so long ago that only the landed gentry had a vote and a farm labourer lived to an average age of 23. Women only recieved the vote in the UK in the early 20th century and they had to set themselves on fire in order to achieve that. Do you sense that the country is getting more or less democratic? Are our freedoms increasing? Just as there is a past, there is a future and if you ignore the past and fail to learn any lessons you cannot influence your future.

By the way, how much debt have your daughters been saddled with after the latest bout of economic plunder by politicians and their partners that you and your daughters helped elect with your real votes?



[info]emsdeen wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 11:49 am (UTC)
It can be home grown,anti govt and anti western.The attack was aimed at Srilankan sportsman but it
could have been anybody else and the message was to stop govt effort to diverting public attention from what's happening inside Pakistan right now.It could have been Indian cricketers that was targeted
if India chose to play.So it's not about the players,it's about the country situation which India took very
seriously and avoided.Srilanka didn't expect this in Pakistan.Domestic politcs,Afgan and Indian pressure, American activities inside Pakistan, all have made some kind of contribution towards this happening.
Pakistani establishment
[info]dismayed88 wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 10:39 pm (UTC)
happy 007 you are right about the sympathies of management with the Islamista but this not due to religion matter of the fact is that management is only running after the money and the people you have mentioned got plenty of dollars they recieved from european countries during Afhgan occupatin by Russia and now from the drugs grown and manufacture there by the courtsey of President Hamid Karzai again well supported by the West.
So do not blame the religion these people have no religion. The entire scenario has been developed with the help of the West when they supported military dictators in Pakistan why dont you ask your governments and agencies who are responsible for the entire mess in Pakistan.
When these mercinaries were fighting Russians they got tons of aid and money from the entire west today you are shedding crocodile tears and cursing a religion please make your facts right Bin Laden and CIA work in a well coordinated way. They share common business interests in the oil industry. Learn the facts before you start making comments
[info]happpy007 wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 11:54 am (UTC)
It is definately an inside job. There was strong local support for the terrorists. The so called "security" provided to the Sri Lankan players vanished at the appropriate time. Also not one single terrorist was captured or killed. When will the world wake up to the fact that most members of the Pakistani establishment sympathise with the Al Qaeda, Taliban , LeT and other enemies of humanity whose only agenda is to take innocent lives and impose their skewed interpretation of Islam onto others.
chickens egg
[info]emsdeen wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 12:04 pm (UTC)
It can be home grown,anti govt and anti western.The attack was aimed at Srilankan sportsman but it
could have been anybody else and the message was to stop govt effort to diverting public attention from what's happening inside Pakistan right now.It could have been Indian cricketers that was targeted
if India chose to play.So it's not about the players,it's about the country situation which India took very
seriously and avoided.Srilanka didn't expect this in Pakistan.Domestic politcs,Afgan and Indian pressure, American activities inside Pakistan, all have made some kind of contribution towards this happening.
New Domino Theory
[info]mafou wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 02:01 pm (UTC)
I reckon Pakistan is in line to do a 'Vietnam'; plenty of input from the West in terms of troops/money, but a useless, corrupt Government, a splintered military (the ISI is a right mess) and a very well funded and supported 'rebel' group (thanks Saudi) which has much sympathy with the rural masses and those outside the main urban cores. Nice sentiments from our politicians but not much to actually change the situation. Iran. Now Pakistan. Who is next ? A nice central asian republic ? The spread of militant islam. Great one for our kids.
9/11
[info]scousekraut wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 04:42 pm (UTC)
Does the Independent have any genuine investigative researchers capable or willing of investigating 9/11?
Re: 9/11
[info]wormery wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 05:50 pm (UTC)
What's to investigate - we know muslim nutters did it. Oh but you're probably one of those nutters who blames the joooooz for doing it - seemingly unaware that that conspiracy lie was started by a jew-hating muslim extreminist group within hours of the planes hitting the twintowers. Sucker. No need for any investigation - though we could investigate why left wing authorities funded muslim terrorists out of council funds for years in the UK of course...
9/11/Iraq War Mossad Inside Job
[info]rabbi_wanker wrote:
Friday, 6 March 2009 at 12:36 am (UTC)
Nothing wrong with the joooz, wormy. After all, the joooz are Gods Chosen People(TM), right?

Now the racist, fascist, evil state of Isreal -- that's another story. The world would be a LOT better off without Israel.
Re: 9/11
[info]sendependa wrote:
Friday, 6 March 2009 at 05:03 pm (UTC)
The 9/11 whitewash is an open secret. It's generally known amongst current affairs journalists and politicians. The 9/11 Commission Report was a pack of lies and evasions. There's masses of good analysis on this by scientists, architects. ex-CIA etc etc. There are films and videos giving the evidence, and it's all to be found via the Internet.

Yet it seems no-one can speak out. Journalists for some reason seem to be muted. There's a massive story here. Why isn't the film 'ZERO: An investigation into 9/11' shown on mainstream television in the UK as it has been in some countries? Why isn't The Independent telling us what its journalists know or can easily find out? Why can they talk about an 'inside job' only when it's the other guys, and not when it's the West?

I know that journalists are more and more becoming mere churnalists, but if The Independent had told us about the 9/11 lies, and that Osama bin Laden was not wanted by the FBI for 9/11, and that the cases for war against both Afghanistan and Iraq had been fabricated, then over a million lives could well have been saved.
Inside Job
[info]truthneverdie wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 07:37 pm (UTC)
It is definitely an inside job plaaned by Sri Lankan and Pakistani intelligence agent. Pakistan and joined in hand in the genocide of tamils in Sri Lanka. The genocide in Sri Lanka is now get the attention of international community and they wants to redirect this attention from that to another side in favour of them. The Sri Lankan Government immediately accused LTTE and strongly denied any involvement by Pakistan. They didn't even accuse al-queda. Sri Lanka, Pakistan, India, China and many other countries directly or indirectly help Sri Lanka in the genocide of tamils. It is simple to understand that there is no chance for LTTE to do this and escape to Mullaitivu jungles. So, it is definitely an inside work between Sri Lanka and Pakistan.
attack on sri lankan cricket team in Palistan
[info]dismayed88 wrote:
Thursday, 5 March 2009 at 10:24 pm (UTC)
The report by Omar Waraich indicates many realities in the Pakistani administration failures and the attack on the team is one of them. Recently a high profile political leader was murdered in cold blood on the streets of Pakistan and the events that followed the assasination of Benazir Bhutto (that all the evidence was washed up within minutes of the incident) and to astonishment of the people of Pakistan the other people who died in that incident no post mortems were carried out while the person responsible for the security of Benazir is now the chief of security of entire country. People ask the question if Rehman Malik (interior Minister) could not defend one leader on what grounds he has been made incharge of the security of the entire country.

Secondly the way the asssains were allowed to run away under the protection of the agencies (evident from video footage) clearly indicates the involvement of an "inner hand", there is another interesting coincidence that the car recovered from the scene comes from Karachi and the vehicle used to bomb the office of FIA in the past also came from the same city while the leader of that city is enjoying life in London and has many cases of murders registered against him in Pakistan.
Another factor of great importance is the on going political crisi between the two major political parties created by the decision of the supreme court and escalated by the immedite actions taken by Asif Zardari who has done many agreements with Nawaz Sharif and never owned any one while the former president Pervez Musharraf who is remebered by people of Pakistan as the most draconian person in the history of the country is once again appearing on the forefront which indicates that there has been no real change since his resignation from the office. In current political situation political analysts are correctly predicting another unlawful rule in the country.

People of Pakistan are at the end of their tether on the current situation and there are all possibilities if the political tensions are not defused immediately then the situation could go to point of no return and country could face a civil war.
False Flag Terror
[info]truthteller911 wrote:
Friday, 6 March 2009 at 12:29 am (UTC)
My deepest sympathy to all those directly effected. That said, the horror of events in Pakistan is no excuse to rush to hasty judgement. I've heard no convincing evidence whatsoever that this outrage was carried out by Muslims - mad, bad, or otherwise. Likewise, evidence that 9/11 was carried out by Muslims was, quite simply, rubbish. A crappy, easily faked Ossama "confession" vid, Mohammed Atta's passport surviving the fireball & fluttering, conveniently intact to the sidewalk, evidence of foreknowledge by recipients of Odigo SMS's, "suicide hikackers" turning up alive & well many months later (identity theft), the suitability of "Flight Termination System" technology (as produced by Pentagon Comptroller Rabbi Dov Zakheim's former company) for remotely flying pilotless planes, controlled demolition of 3 massively solid buildings... I could go on. Cui buono? Who benefitted from that 911 attrocity, this most recent Pakistani one, & all the other terrible inhuman outrages in between? It was certainly not Muslims! Who was it that got CAUGHT RED-HANDED smuggling guns (Glock 9mm pistols), ammo, grenades, explosives, etc into the Mexican Congress Building just one month after 9/11. It was Israelis! Mossad to be precise. They were arrested, questioned briefly, then, after pressure from their embassy, released without charge. The term "Inside Job" is misleading. False Flag Terror is, I believe a more apt description for the bastardly we continue to witness. The MainStreamMedia CANNOT BE TRUSTED to tell us the Truth. Get used to it.
Inside Job
[info]bilejones wrote:
Friday, 6 March 2009 at 03:38 pm (UTC)
Just about all "terrorist" attacks are inside jobs by the goons of the spy organizations. From the Baader-Meinhof/ red army faction attacks onward.
Mayhems are insde jobs
[info]sirajul wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 07:19 am (UTC)
Mayhems are planned, financed, resourced and ordered to be carried out for political power. Insider are crucial for such actions, and it is likely that outsiders are also involved.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date