World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 10° London Hi 14°C / Lo 7°C

Thai taboo: what happens when the king has gone?

The country is gripped by concern about the royal succession – but nobody dares talk about it. Andrew Buncombe and Peter Popham report

King Bhumibol in 2007, after a previous health crisis

GETTY

King Bhumibol in 2007, after a previous health crisis

He has led an extraordinary life. From his birth in Massachusetts, to the near-death moment at 21 when he crashed his Fiat Toppolino into the back of a braking truck on a road in Switzerland, to his mastering the jazz saxophone, he has the CV of an American or European prodigy. But all his achievements are overshadowed by the accident of his royal birth.

It is as King Bhumibol Adulyadej, avatar of the God Vishnu and much else besides, that he lies, aged 81, in Bangkok's Siriraj Hospital while his nation waits and prays. He has been under treatment for two weeks now. Thousands of visitors have stood in line to sign a book wishing him a speedy recovery. Across Thailand, events are being organised in his honour, with prayers read out.

The updates from the palace on the king's health strain to sound upbeat. The most recent said he was responding well to treatment for a slight fever and inflammation of the lungs. But as his hospitalisation draws out ever longer, there is growing anxiety not just for the well-being of the world's longest ruling head of state, but for the future of the country he has reigned over since 1946.

Many in Thailand revere the king, still considered by some to be semi-divine, and some commentators say he has acted as a unifying force in a country that is sometimes lacking social cohesion.

Only last month he voiced concern for the future of Thailand. "I am quite worried that our country is going to ruin because people have done things their own way," he said. "But if people are working together ... the country will prosper." As a constitutional monarch, he has done his best to use the charisma of his title to calm the country through its many crises.

However despite his position and enormous fortune, estimated at between $10bn and $20bn (£6.3bn-£13bn), his political role in Thailand has long been overshadowed by that of ambitious figures in the military.

There is the question of whether his anointed successor, the thrice-married Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn, can live up to his ailing father's serene example. The monarch's long-drawn out hospital stay is breeding a growing sense of panic about the turmoil that could ensue should he die.

Harsh lèse majesté laws have been used so frequently to silence critics – sometimes with prison sentences of up to 15 years – that people are terrified of discussing this situation publicly. "The problems of succession cannot be discussed; they cannot be talked about in the Thai media," said a Bangkok-based analyst who declined to be named. "The issue of the royal succession has deepened the sense of crisis."

Thailand's political woes date from 2006 and most of them concentrate around the name of the man who was briefly owner of Manchester City football club, the telecommunications tycoon and former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra.

Mr Thaksin became prime minister in 2001. Five years later, as fears grew that he was becoming too powerful and ambitious, widespread protests organised by a conservative coalition of army officers, royalists and business interests led to a military coup that resulted in his ouster and exile. When elections were held again in December 2007, an ally of Mr Thaksin was elected but both he, and a subsequent premier also allied to the tycoon, were also forced out – leading to clashes between the red-shirted supporters of Mr Thaksin and yellow-shirted conservatives – ardent monarchists who misleadingly called themselves the People's Alliance for Democracy.

The current prime minister, the Eton-educated Abhisit Vejjajiva, leader of the Democrat Party, was elected last December – Thailand's third premier in as many months. While Mr Abhisit is respected by many, his efforts to revive the economy have been hampered by violent protests and rifts within his six-party coalition. Experts say there appears no easy way out of the crisis that has polarised the country and dented the confidence of investors and tourists.

For although Mr Thaksin fled into exile to avoid a court conviction, neither he nor his red-shirted supporters have ever truly gone away.

Two weeks ago, as the King was taken ill, 20,000 red shirts gathered in the centre of Bangkok to protest on the third anniversary of the coup that forced from power the populist Mr Thaksin – who himself addressed the cheering crowds via a video-link.

This is not the first time that the king's poor health has thrown Thailand into turmoil.

In October 2007 he suffered the symptoms of a minor stroke, and last year was unable to make his traditional annual birthday speech. His daughter, Princess Sirindhorn, said he was weak and suffering from bronchitis and inflammation of the oesophagus. Then too, there were lines of well-wishers queuing at the hospital and commentators talking of the king's crucial position within Thai society.

Despite strenuous denials, not everyone believes the king has remained above politics. Many believe palace advisers were involved in the 2006 anti-Thaksin coup, and last year Queen Sirikit was criticised for attending the funeral of an anti-Thaksin campaigner killed during clashes with police. In the eyes of such critics, the king's death would remove the obstacle blocking Mr Thaksin's return to Thailand.

"Everyone is waiting for the king to die, because they think Thailand will enter a new stage," said Giles Ji Ungpakorn, an academic who fled to Britain after lèse majesté charges were brought against him. "Those red shirts think he is the most powerful man in Thailand and that when he dies there will be a power vacuum." But he added: "I actually think the king is weak politically."

Whether one believes that the king has acted as constitutional glue, or that he has blocked democratic change, many think his death, whenever it comes, will open the floodgates to change. Little wonder there is such anxiety in the kingdom.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Chaos in the Kingdom
[info]sabbaisabbai wrote:
Monday, 5 October 2009 at 06:05 am (UTC)
It's hard but not impossible to get Thai people talking about the King and the monarchy, and when they do they almost universally express disgust for the Crown Prince. If/when he takes over the throne there's no doubt some hell will break lose.
The Future is blue, the future is Mother-Son-Newin.
[info]hermanolobo wrote:
Monday, 5 October 2009 at 12:08 pm (UTC)
The Future is blue, the future is Mother-Son-Newin.

I think this game was being played behind the scenes for some time.

Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis.

Yellow-Red-Blue.

A unified Thailand means a country with only one party, one state,one system.

No questions, no arguments. Obey,conform,consume.

No Yellows or Reds. Just various shades of blue.
NAHMBKK
[info]nahmbkk wrote:
Monday, 5 October 2009 at 01:34 pm (UTC)
I just realize that this article author believe in a word from a running prisoner. he's suffering from his own action. A hungry dog could kill their owner. therefor y can't thaksin. he have nomore to lost.

be wise
Why? Because they would have eaten the snake instead of the bloody apple!
[info]famulla wrote:
Monday, 5 October 2009 at 07:25 pm (UTC)
Monarchy becomes Anarchy , a situation in which there is a total lack of organization or control, the absence of any formal system of government in a society

Anyone who rejects extortion invites harassment and often becomes the victim of human rights ... Tags: anarchy, monarchy, maoist extortion, ethnic division
1 Aug 2009 ... Thus, anarchy is ruling Nepal and to counter this anarchy never seen in Nepal during the reign of Monarchy, Nepali people are forced to
Visit Times Online today, for dynamic news and views, videos, podcasts and blogs, plus your chance to comment
Have you gone by any chance gone to the fish market?
first fish scalar, ? Here sir, this one is from Brail, you know that won the cup gold 2nd, See the eyes shine like David Cameron, Fresh from the Russia, pleas buy this 2 pound for one dozens too, just landed now in UK, Please buy, 3rd, India where the FISH of Goa is famous, That. I have these now but selling like hot cakes not fish.. 4th My wife is pregnant and the doctor says he is responsible, I NEED cash please but these eyes and fins, I sold the flesh and oil.
Here is the test , if you pass then you are fine in the 15 Downing street
By CHRISTINE SIMMONS, Associated Press Writer Christine Simmons, Associated Press Writer ? Sat Oct 3, Subject: A DOZEN QUESTIONS :10:01 pm ET
Q: Why are condoms transparent?
A: So that sperms can at least enjoy the scene even if their entry is Restricted!
Signboard outside a prostitute's house:
Married MEN not allowed. We serve the needy, not the greedy...
New AIDS awareness slogan:
Try different positions with the same woman instead of same position with different women.
Why is $ex like shaving?
Well, because no matter how well you do it today... tomorrow you'll have to do it again...
Q: What will happen if earth rotates 30 times faster?
A: Men will get their salary everyday and women will bleed to death.
Q: Why do 90% gals have left boob bigger than right?
A: Bcoz 90% boys are right handed.
Q: What is the difference between a PANTY & a STAGE CURTAIN?
A: When you pull down the STAGE CURTAIN, the show is over, but when you pull down the PANTY..... it is SHOWTIME!
Q: What is the similarity between a wife and a chewing gum?
A: Both are sweet in the beginning but become tasteless and shapeless later
Advantages of having an affair with a married women.
They give like hell.
They do not yell.
They do not tell.
They do not swell and there is no wedding bell!
My dad told me that if Adam and Eve were Chinese, we would be still in Paradise . Why? Because they would have eaten the snake instead of the bloody apple!
NEWS BULLETIN
Dear Reader
I I I do never asked a king to come to the throne he came like any king or quenn. I reserve my right
[info]famulla wrote:
Tuesday, 6 October 2009 at 01:21 am (UTC)
I love the small business stories on finance and I like them too. I also look at the some one who had had it so I can learn and pass this on.
For example, I just learnt that if I receive a free gift, by mail not ordered by myself from any one, I can keep this and there is no need to send this back.
I can bury this feed this to the dogs, burn this as Hindus do, bury Muslims and others do, anything. Do you want to help me?
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
Thai taboo
[info]sam_deedes wrote:
Wednesday, 7 October 2009 at 05:16 am (UTC)
sabbaisabbai and make good points. If the crown prince takes over, the Thai people will undoubtedly resist any coup in support of the monarchy. Keep an eye on Newin Chidchob, leader of the blues and a very dangerous man.
No Shirt - The US Sees Beyond Colors
[info]4dapeople wrote:
Thursday, 15 October 2009 at 05:12 am (UTC)
Once the monarch's influence into the so-called "Democratic" political system ends, Thailand will have to deal with cleaning up the mess of the current regime and the dirt trails left behind.

From the ridiculous 800 Billion Baht loan scam to the crimes committed by royalists, it is time for a real awakening that the many narrow minded need.

Many of those who feel that the monarchy is a symbol of divinity, please wake up and live reality. Is the country really under the people or is still controlled by the royalist including the current monarchy. Is there really a political system in place? Many believe not.

It was botched and rigged as many of those feeling sympathy for those that want and demand change for the better of the Thais, the suffering. Only those outside of the country do realize what is going on. For we have somewhat protection against lèse majesté laws provided by laws drafted by the people for the people (i. e. the 1st Amendment, a section in the Bill of Rights).

No more fights, no more protests. Get a real Democratic system going where the people decides what system is to be in place. A decision currently being blocked by the royalists and bandwagoneers that are caught in a web of lies and shrouded by misleading influences.

It will be time for changes and no more set-backs.

Many consider the king an idol and perhaps a semi-divine figure. However, his current ailment surely shows that he is no mightier than you or I, a mortal being.

Red shirts, Blue shirts, pink shirts, and polka dots alike...it is time to choose what's best for Thailand and end the old-world thinking. Look forward towards progress and listen to the world outside, Thailand needs changes IMMEDIATELY.
ashley
[info]ashback wrote:
Friday, 16 October 2009 at 06:53 am (UTC)
1 "Thailand's political woes date from 2006" - oh, really, what a superficial remark.

2 "a subsequent premier also allied to the tycoon" was his Brother-in-Law.

3 "Abhisit Vejjajiva, leader of the Democrat Party, was elected last December" - He was not elected. There has been no election in Thailand since December 2007, when Samak was elected. Even a quick google would have shown you this!

4 "While Mr Abhisit is respected by many, his efforts to revive the economy have been hampered by violent protests" - Is he respected by many? Who? Violent protests, possibly manipulated by his government....

5 "although Mr Thaksin fled into exile to avoid a court conviction" - no, he didn't. The coup of 2006 took place when he was at the UN in New York, since when he has not returned to the country.

I am going to stop now. I have to say that I am bitterly disappointed with this article. I can only imagine you have been out of Thailand for some time, and that your concern with Thailand or the nature of what is happening here, is extremely limited. Please make more effort!

Thanks from Bangkok



I'm Thai - Here what I thought!
[info]donlachanai wrote:
Tuesday, 20 October 2009 at 12:03 pm (UTC)
I'm disappointed with this article because it comprises of many prejudices & distorted information. The claim of a running prisoner, Giles Ji Ungpakorn, shouldn't be treated like a trustworthy source! As a Thai person, the claims that "everyone is waiting for the king to die" & "the king has blocked the changed" are such the big lies! I won't deny that the whole nation, 65-million people in Thailand, has different level of respect to the King & monarchy; however, the truth that the King is well respected & praised by most of Thai people as "The Father of Thailand" may clearly indicate what the majority in Thailand thinks about the King.

I do expect that one of the biggest medias in UK like Independent should recheck every source of information before publishing anything, in other words, the responsibility in whatever you do should be taken as a serious consideration.


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date