World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 9° London Hi 14°C / Lo 10°C

The dark savagery of the Taliban years returns

When in 2001 the West welcomed the fall of the Islamist regime, few predicted that less than a decade later the ferocity would return

By Kim Sengupta in Kabul

An Afghan woman begs for alms while sitting with her son on a side road in Kabul

ap

An Afghan woman begs for alms while sitting with her son on a side road in Kabul

The opening night of a new restaurant, and the place is buzzing. The music is a mixture of rock and pop and there is no shortage of alcohol. A normal city scene, except the city is Kabul, and some of those at the party at the Martini are UN staff about to be evacuated out of the country because of the rapidly deteriorating security situation.

Out in the real Afghanistan, away from the bars and clubs, there is paralysing political crisis and extreme violence. Elections which were meant to be a showcase for how much democracy has taken root instead revealed a system rotten to the core.

Meanwhile, the war continues. In a space of 24 hours a renegade Afghan policeman slaughters five British soldiers, three US soldiers are blown up, and a Nato air strike kills a dozen people, the locals insisting they were innocent civilians.

Very few of us would have imagined when we came here in 2001, as the Taliban fell, that eight years on this country would be the centre of international focus, with the West struggling to cope with a ferocious and rejuvenated Islamist insurgency.

Afghanistan then was a nation devastated by 30 years of strife and brutality. The infrastructure was shattered, there was little power or water and commercial activity was limited to a few food shops and stores selling carpets and curios to the foreigners – the military, diplomats and the media – who had begun to arrive. There was, however, a lot of hope. The Taliban had fled, the private armies of the warlords were due to be disbanded and Hamid Karzai seemed the right man to unify the country and heal sectarian wounds. The Afghan diaspora was returning home, some of them among the best and the brightest, to rebuild the nation.

Women were emerging from the shadows after decades of oppressive segregation. One could drive to Kandahar, the spiritual home of the Islamists, on roads which were bone- crunching but relatively safe, to see females of all ages throwing off the veil. But there were already moves taking place that would have catastrophic consequences. Osama bin Laden and a hardcore of his fighters were allowed to escape from Tora Bora. Pakistan's secret police, the ISI, gave them sanctuary across the border, as they were to do to Mullah Omar, the one-eyed Taliban leader, and his followers. The Americans, instead of curbing the power of the warlords, turned them into allies. They, in turn, kept their forces and used Nato to eliminate tribal rivals by denouncing them as insurgents.

Kabul was the wild east at the time, attracting all kinds of fortune hunters and mercenaries. Afghanistan was left to such men, and their Afghan counterparts, and the international focus moved on. Into this vacuum came back the Taliban, trained and armed by their Pakistani ISI masters. I returned to Afghanistan in 2003 to find that attacks had begun on Afghan and foreign forces, thousands of refugees who had returned from Pakistan and Iran were still in their camps living in appalling conditions, and the one commercial activity prospering was bribery.

Major British involvement began in 2006 when the Helmand deployment began with the then defence secretary John Reid hoping that "not a shot would be fired in anger".

I accompanied a redoubtable British officer, Lt-Col Henry Worsley, to several shuras – local gatherings – around Helmand with minimal security measures. The complaints were the same, it was about the lack of development, of jobs. "What happened to all the promises made by the US and Britain?" they asked.

There were, however, few signs then of an insurgency. The main concern of British troops at the time was the poppy eradication programme. That summer British troops, against the wishes of General Sir David Richards, the British officer commanding Nato forces, went charging off to fight the Taliban in outlying areas. The insurgency had begun and its flames spread rapidly. Helmand was the focus of media attention and in half dozen visits one could see the futility of fighting a campaign with inadequate resources. In operation after operation, territory taken by British troops, often at cost of lives and limbs, had to be abandoned because of lack of boots on the ground.

Afghanistan was slipping back to its dark past. The precious freedom gained for women was being clawed back. Of five women I interviewed after the fall of the Taliban, three were murdered and the fourth Zarghuna Kakar, then MP for Kandahar, had to flee after the Taliban killed her husband and injured her daughter in an ambush.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

The Taliban will be hated by the people
[info]david_fta wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:05 am (UTC)
Only a genuine popular insurgency can achieve lasting regime change; imposition of 'democracy' from outside always fails.

Robert McNamara recognised the pointlessness of the Vietnam War as early as 1965, or so he said to Errol Morris; the Bushies must have likewise known that they were creating another Vietnam for whoever won the US Presidential election in 2000.

So long as Wa'habism is preached and children brainwashed into being 'freedom' suicide-bombers, the only hope for the women of Afghanistan is to flee that benighted land.

The sooner we stop using oil, the sooner we stop needing the Saudis, and the sooner it is that petrodollars stop funding suicide bombers, and everybody wins.
Re: The Taliban will be hated by the people
[info]andre_t wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 09:16 am (UTC)
The root of this mess is Western meddling (The Great Game with the Soviet Union) and Saudi Arabia
When asked....
[info]lkdamo wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 05:31 am (UTC)
"What happened to all the promises made by the US and Britain?"

I told him.
Well you need to talk to the lawyers about that.
Pitch-black present calling the past dark
[info]find_empire wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 06:11 am (UTC)
No comment, Malalai Joya says it all:
Malalai Joya, a 31-year-old activist and politician, was once called “the bravest woman in Afghanistan” by the BBC. During the Taliban years, she defied her country’s rulers by running underground girls’ schools.

The Afghan government is “a group of warlords, criminals, who [waged the] civil war in Afghanistan from ’92 to ’96. They are photocopies of Taliban, but with suit and tie, talking about democracy.”

. . . women’s situations are as bad as they ever were, and it’s getting worse. “It is as catastrophic as it was under the domination of Taliban,” she says.

Joya says - and I agree - that the Afghan people face three enemies: foreign occupation, foreign-backed warlords, and the Taliban. She says an immediate NATO retreat would remove two of these, which would be a considerable improvement.
Our lads
[info]oomigoolies wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 08:29 am (UTC)

It's Remembrance Sunday. I shall remember our soldiers, alive and dead. They died recently and are dying still in a country where they hoped to remove the source of evil that is the Taliban, and the source of evil that is the opium industry. They have failed, not because they aren't brave, or led by outstanding officers, but because a just war must be fought with proper equipment and supplies, proper weaponry and proper logistics. In these respects the British government has totally let the forces down, replacing deeds with mealy-mouthed inaction and unkept promises of jam tomorrow. Our boys have died in vain, as vainly as those of WWI. Bring the rest home.

It's Remembrance Sunday.

I shall remember our soldiers, alive and dead.
Re: Our lads
[info]hotdangdiggidy wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 10:45 am (UTC)
There's no such thing as a 'just' war. People like you continue to promote this ridiculous ideology without any hint of irony. You say you shall remember our soldiers alive & dead & yet have no qualms in sending them off to the death traps that are Afghanistan, Iraq, Kosovo, Northern Ireland or the Falklands. The best way to remember is to bring all soldiers home from abroad & for the government to declare there will never be another war as promised to the soldiers of WW1.
Re: Our lads
[info]oomigoolies wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 09:03 pm (UTC)
You tosser.

You are seriously smugly sitting there and saying that WWII was not a just war? You Nazi piece of dirt.

You're so obviously a BNP member that I have placed you on my "banned for reasons of health" list.

Shove orf.
Re: Our lads
[info]find_empire wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 09:13 pm (UTC)
You dumb fuck the Taliban eradicated opium production and the Yanks brought the narco-warlords back to Afghanistan. Ignorant numbnuts like you are what nulab and neocon scum rely on to sell their wars.
Re: Our lads
[info]oomigoolies wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 09:24 pm (UTC)
Hello Charlie Chan.

No, the Taliban suddenly found that the opium trade brought them urgently needed funds and changed philosophy overnight.

You really need to get your facts checked and learn some manners, little man.
Return of She?
[info]kisakhani wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 08:35 am (UTC)
In case the Taliban succeed in returning to power? There will be a different structure of administration than what was before 2001. Mullah Umar if he survives the ensuing power struggle that would take place between the younger radicals and the older generation. He will disassociate himself from Al Qaida and other extremists and not
impose those harsh laws that gave his regime a horrific name both in Afghanistan and abroad. The West must stop
croaking about their values and how its being destroyed by Taliban. When in fact they since Woodstock have been
themselves destroying their own values. When Taliban were in power there was division in the Oligarchy; those are the elements who now live quietly in various cities and have considerable influence in their regions. Western officials in Kabul have been making half hearted attempts to recruit them? As long as Karzai is made to walk the streets of Kabul in his new clothes stitched by Obama the Taliban will merrily laugh and point their finger at?
Re: Return of She?
[info]ussoo wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 05:51 pm (UTC)
Afghanistan of the Taliban was more safe than the American's Afghanistan.It's Reality. America is responcible for the thosands of casualities, Which have been taking place in Afghanistan.
Re: Return of She?
[info]kisakhani wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 06:16 am (UTC)
The Taliban of Afghanistan and the Taliban of Pakistan are
two different groups, with different aims.The former wants
all alien troops to leave and let Afghans decide themselve
what type of government they want.They are not influenced
by any other source.Whereas the latter based in Pakistan were formed and trained by RAW(Research&AnalysisWing of India's Intelligence Services).During the present operations taking place against them enough evidence has been aquired to jab finger at RAW.The fact is that Taliban
in Afghanistan if returned to power will not impose their
rigid dogma, as they have realized that the situation now is very different from what it was in the 90s.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date