Under the cover of darkness, Nato troops draw Taliban into their trap

Kim Sengupta joins 'Operation Black Prince' targeting deadly insurgents in Helmand

By Kim Sengupta in Nad-e-Ali, Helmand

A soldier from 1st Battalion the Duke of Lancaster's Regiment preparing to board a Chinook helicopter in Helmand Province as part of Operation Tor Shezada

PA

A soldier from 1st Battalion the Duke of Lancaster's Regiment preparing to board a Chinook helicopter in Helmand Province as part of Operation Tor Shezada

The first wave of air assaults began at 2.38am, the helicopters flying low and fast into the swaying poppy fields surrounding the dark silhouettes of the walled compounds. This was Operation Tor Shezada, designed to clear insurgent fighters who have been carrying out relentless attacks as the fighting season gets underway.

The four Chinooks ferrying in the troops, with Apache gunships providing cover, was part of the attempt to capture Saidabad, the last town held by the Taliban in central Helmand and a base from which they have been operating as they attack British, American and Afghan forces in Nad-e-Ali, Marjah and Helmand.

The mission comes at a time of intense international focus on Afghanistan with controversies ignited by the Wikileaks revelations and David Cameron's charge that Pakistan is continuing to support the Taliban and export terror.

The timing of the operation is critical, coming in the wake of the Kabul conference seen as the "last-chance saloon" for the international community to hammer out a solution to this increasingly bloody and costly war.

Tor Shezada – "Black Prince" in the Dari language – is the beginning of a series of campaigns through which Nato commanders are seeking to inflict a military defeat on the insurgency as politicians in the West clamour for troops to be pulled out and the Afghan President Hamid Karzai edges towards a settlement with the insurgents which is bitterly opposed by the minority non-Pashtun communities in his country.

The operation had begun with US Marines moving up from Marjah and then withdrawing in a feint, to draw out some of the 200 fighters from the well-guarded enclave. This, it was hoped by the Nato commanders, would distract the enemy as the main assault by British troops came from Nad-e-Ali in the north.

Hundreds of troops from Combined Force Nad-e-Ali began the move after a 48-hour delay due to the weather. The Brigade Reconnaissance Force landed next to a cluster of compounds where a group of men could be spotted on the roof. In the event, there was little resistance there or in the surrounding farm buildings they went through.

The area around Saidabad has been on the receiving end of repeated attacks from the Taliban fighters, with soldiers injured at British patrol base Azadi. Lance Corporal Kylie Watson, an army medic, was on duty when two of the casualties were brought in.

She said: "The first time a bullet went through the side of this guy's face and exited on the other side. He suffered some injuries to his jaw but nothing more serious. A little later a guy who was standing on a sangar [watchtower] got shot in the arm." Last night British troops were heading south towards Saidabad. Lieutenant Olly Field, commanding 9 Platoon, 1st Battalion, Duke of Lancaster's Regiment, said: "We have had repeated engagements with the insurgents in this area. It seems this could well be a busy night."

Taliban "chatter" on the radio waves indicated that their fighters were regrouping to launch counter-attacks. Lieutenant Colonel Frazer Lawrence, of the 1st Battalion, Duke of Lancaster's Regiment – who is in charge of the operation – said: "We have a particularly active group of insurgents who have been regularly commuting to carry out attacks in this area. This operation is essential to establish security and we intend to make sure that the insurgents are not able to operate from this area again. It is very much early days, but so far, it is going well." The Taliban may not have been aware of the details of what was coming, but they had prepared for combat by what has become their weapon of choice – roadside bombs positioned along the paths.

The Americans faced repeated ambushes as they made their way north along canals and farmland their intent to kill or capture as many of the enemy as they could.

The Marjah mission, highly publicised beforehand by Nato in an effort to persuade the Taliban to withdraw without a fight, has not gone totally to plan, with the insurgents regrouping to carry out attacks on US forces and beheading civic leaders.

General Stanley McChrystal described the situation as a "running sore" before his sacking by Barack Obama.

The Talib group in Saidabad – a town with a population of 6,000 – has been carrying out attacks in Marjah in an area nicknamed "Crazy Sadie" and "Budalla Qulp" by the Americans.

Eliminating the group's leader is a top priority for the US and British forces.

Nad-e-Ali, sitting on the feeder route to the provincial capital, Lashkar Gah, has seen its share of violence. Local people acknowledge that the security situation has significantly improved and there is ample evidence of an upturn in commercial activity.

The Taliban, however, have not gone away and they appear during the day as well as the night to remind the locals of this fact. Hazibullah Mohammed is a shopkeeper at the town's market which has doubled in size in the last year. "But that also means that Talibs can take money from more [people]," he laughed. "Security is good now and they do not threaten any longer, but some of the men pay because they do not know what is going to happen in the future. You cannot blame them because we do not know how long we shall have this security. People around here do not like the Taliban, but have learned that they will have to live with all the sides."

That is what 80-year-old Adem Ali has been doing for most of his life. "My father used to tell me of when the British were here in the time of the old kings. I remember the Americans came to Helmand 50 years ago and built all these canals and factories. Then they left and the Russians came and all the fighting began. We had the mujahedin and the Taliban. Now the British and the Americans are back, and, if I live long enough, I'll get to see the Russians come back."

Surrounded by piles of shoes he was mending by the roadside, Sayyid Ali said: "We are poor people and we cannot make a lot of noise. I work with shoes and I know that people will always [provide] work for me.

"But I want my children to go to school and the British are building schools. That is good, but what will happen when they go? If they do go we must be sure the Afghan government can protect us."

  • Guest
    You and others who think like you will be remembering 9/11 and using it as an excuse to take all you can from muslim countries for as long as possible. Thieves.
  • Guest
    they are every where, just waiting for the right time
  • Guest
    Time, Times and Half a Time
  • takeoman
    Now where did I come across this strategy before? Ah yes, Vietnam, unfortunately it didn't work,in large part because foreign support for an increasingly corrupt government doesn't win hearts and minds. "You know you never beat us on the battlefield," I told my North Vietnamese Army counterpart,Colonel Tu,during a meeting in Hanoi a week before the fall of Saigon. "That may be so," he replied, "but it is also irrelevant." -An American Colonel
  • You really should start taking your anti-psychotic medications. They aluminum hat your wearing probably isn't keeping out the hidden messages from Venus that are controlling your thoughts. What exactly are the voice in your head telling you?
  • Perhaps the Independent is deleteing your posts because they are the ravings of a lunatic. Now when they delete my posts its because I have spoken the truth.
  • Are intelligence agencies exempt from this prohibition on murdering civilian leaders? Just wondering, not making any accusations.
  • I find the comments by Adem Ali the most enlightening part of the article. I think he represents the vast majority of every person in war ravaged area. They simply want to live their lives with hope of a better future for their children. I imagine his words being echoed throughout history as kings and kingdoms come and go. Maybe someday his hopes can be realised.
  • colin1107
    You say uneducated , i would say un-indoctrinated.

    Thanks , your right thats me.

    I connect dots between events and have a clear perception of why or for what purpose.
    You obviously hide behind deep rooted insecurity and therefore obey and conform for an easy life even at the expense of mass human suffering in the name of war.(its not real ,mate)
    Perfect example-Polish plane crash(event)Polish government dont want USrockets in their country (reason) , then the latest tells of US to install missiles in Poland in 2013 ,part of nuclear sheild(outcome) THEY will do what they want at all cost, even a illiteraet! like me can see this ,i know your left brain had comprehended such an event hadn't it???????????
  • "I note that you have not the slightest interest in the Taliban's very evident war crimes, including the indiscriminate planting of IEDs"

    The Taliban is not my concern, our tax does not pay for them, understand?
    As for IED's or mines as we used to call them, well the Americans still use them so no high horse to get on there.
    If you are not aware of the laws against targeted assassination well I can't do much about that. Will you concede that you are not supposed to kill unarmed people at least?
  • The UN did not exist when Hitler was around. Hello? I didn't know NATO tried to kill Idi that's a new one on me.
  • gram64
    The uneducated and the illiterate we have always with us, as comments sections like that of The Independent show only too well. I suppose it's not surprising that the illiterati take pride in their bombast, and even feel superior.
  • chargertom
    "So no killing people in bed for starters no matter who they are" Hello? Adolph Hitler? Idi Amin?
  • chargertom
    It's illegal to target political leaders, not military leaders....
  • Forlornehope
    If he is 80 now he would have been born in 1930. His grandfather would easily remember the third Afghan war which was in 1919. The British objective for a hundred years was essentially to keep the Russians out and to stop raiding on the frontier with the Punjab. Whenever the Afghans proved too troublesome, trying to annex Peshawar for example, the British invaded. This normally involved an early and embarrassing defeat when they underestimated the opposition but ended with a couple of crushing victories over Afghan armies and Afghanistan remaining quiet for the next 40 years (1839, 1879 and 1919 to be exact). The sensible response to Al Qaeda in Afghanistan would have been to have driven them out and then got out and left the Afghans to it for the next four decades. It always worked in the past. Who was it who said that the only lesson of history is that people never learn from history?
  • colin1107
    Tim , is isnt strange mate,its the police state in total control of everyone's lives due to gutless ,pc masses who cant wait to go out and pay another bill , whilst mass murder unfolds worldwide in the name of war , all this has been planned for a long time . What is coming will be massive in the way of deleting human lives all for the illuminati to control less people, i have always known something was not at all right in the world, people like gram64(the masses) are the reason its been allowed to happen -to much aspartame laced products which imbalance a persons nervous system , thus ruining one's ability to think clear and sharp and call it early when you know a story is a cover story for something more sinister.
  • ozwaldo
    'Eliminating the group's leader, codenamed "Commander Kojak", who has recently returned after training in Pakistan, is a top priority for the US and British forces.' Taliban leaders being trained in Pakistan? Fighting and helping to kill OUR soldiers? So someone explain to me again how it was wrong for Cameron to say Pakistan needs to do more to stop the terrorists inside it's borders.
  • colin1107
    Dont give a damn about english or grammer etc. etc. thats for left brain prisoners like yourself, in my case heart always dominates head -always. Thats why i know who and why controls human life on earth and you cannot wait for x factor to start, your the exact type of brainwashed ,insecure , fodder who believes all they are told on the tv without the heart to question ''is this right''. My quest for why the world is as it is came easy , i hope your quest for a bigger tv is just as swift, try Argos!
  • Forlornehope
    A pretty close parallel would be the attack on Admiral Yamamoto's transport plane by American fighters during WW2. There has never been any suggestion that this was not a legitimate act of war. By contrast, assasinating an enemy leader on neutral territory would clearly be a violation of that nation's neutrality; there is no need to be specific on the most recent example.
  • Perhaps it would have been more correct for your headline to read,

    "Taliban draw Nato troops into their trap"
  • Have you got anything to say about this subject, or is following Jamal around what get's you off
  • gram64
    'Well this is one view' - whose view, exactly?

    There is no law that states you are not allowed to kill an enemy combatant if he's sleeping.

    There is no law that states a country or a coalition of countries at war is not allowed to target an enemy combatant for assassination. Such an assassination would not be 'extrajudicial'. If you are at war, you are allowed to kill your enemy by assassination, mass bombing (say of a troop encampment), artillery fire, sniper fire, etc etc, whether your enemy is lying down, fully awake, half asleep, or, with any luck, fully asleep.

    If countries use unlawful types of munition, or kill innocent civilians by mistake (or deliberately), that's another question. Only then do you stray into the territory of 'war crime'.

    I note that you have not the slightest interest in the Taliban's very evident war crimes, including the indiscriminate planting of IEDs (which kill and maim far more Afghan civilians, many of them children, than they do ISAF troops), and the beheading of civilians (including children) deemed to have cooperated with ISAF and/or the Afghan government.
  • timspooner
    Whilst entertaining Boys Own fare, this article is just full of inconsistencies, starting with the title, "draw Taliban into their trap". Further into the piece, after all the dashing daring do, we read:"The Marjah mission, highly publicised beforehand by Nato in an effort to persuade the Taliban to withdraw without a fight, has not gone totally to plan, with the insurgents regrouping to carry out attacks on US forces and beheading civic leaders." This does not sound like much of a trap. Rather it says that the raid was announced in advance, the Taliban tactically withdrew after murdering a few more "collaborators" and will undoubtedly they will come back when the coast is clear and kill their replacements. This just defies logic to call it a trap. Is this the best brains in the military at work?
  • timspooner
    I agree with you, non-acceptance of comments and deletion are on the rise. Ironically, posting of spam messages is increasing. There are some strange things happening..................
  • Well this is one view .
    "Targeted killing is only lawful when the target is a 'combatant' or 'fighter' or, in the case of a civilian, only for such time as the person 'directly participates in hostilities'."

    So no killing people in bed for starters no matter who they are.

    Regarding kim's statement;
    "Eliminating the group's leader, codenamed "Commander Kojak", who has recently returned after training in Pakistan, is a top priority for the US and British forces."

    Implies they are going to kill him where ever they find him, without a trial.
    Which falls under extrajudicial execution and targeted assassination.

    You see we made these rules to make us different to terrorists and dictators, so if we break them, we are no better. Double standards are our biggest enemy.
  • gram64
    Seems you take even longer to edit your atrocious English than they do to delete your illiterate posts.
  • gram64
    Under what article of what international convention is targeted assassination of any member of an enemy's forces a war crime?
  • rumpledumplin
    "Have to go to China"?? Seems the Chinese are bidding, but there is no "have to" Do you deny that the US knew about the Russian findings? But their initial interest in Afghanistan was gas and oil access.
  • Well show some then. Calling Jamal, Taliban because you don't like his opinions is not an intelligent way to begin an argument in my book. If you have an argument, then spit it out.
  • definesanac
    pakistan is not sending any one to england to kill and if they are doing in afghanistan then whats the difference between you and pakistani both are in foreign land and fighting. Is it ok for british to kill innocent people in name of freedom. you should look your self in mirror and then talk every body is concern about their own interest and dont care about any body else .;.... First british is fighting illegal war.
  • "Eliminating the group's leader, codenamed "Commander Kojak", who has recently returned after training in Pakistan, is a top priority for the US and British forces." Kim I hate to break this to you, but targeted assassination is a war crime. Seen as you are privy to the intention of a war crime, you should consider this fact.
  • '"Black Prince" in the Dari language'

    So Kim tell us why is it in Dari?
    Is it because there are no Pashtuns in the army?
    I have noticed this before, you would think they would use Pashto in Pashtun areas, or would that make the northern alliance people feel uncomfortable.

    Apart from that, are you having fun with the troops Kim?
    Do you feel dirty sometimes writing propoganda, I know I would and I feel for you.
    It must be tough putting your name to articles produced by the army.
    It can't last forever, so when the war is over you might get a chance to be a journalist even.
  • agent0060
    No. But I have some.
  • gerryhiles
    I am not an Afghani (obviously) and what they do in their own country is none of my business, nor the business of Washington, London, the motley bunch called NATO and sundry hangers on to imperialism, such as the perpetual tail-coat riders in Canberra who variously dragged Australians into the Boer War, WW1, WW2 (maybe a bit of an exception), Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and of course Afghanistan.

    Explanation (not just in Australia of course): the inflated egos of politicians, aided and abetted by the gullible masses who actually believed that Iraq was an "existential threat", ditto Afghanistan. Hopeless.

    And I am sick of sycophantic journalists calling the resistance (to foreign invasion) "insurgents".

    Yes you will always get collaborators and Quislings - as in Vichy France - but also many who fight back ... and that is what the Taliban and others are doing.

    It is irrelevant - none of our business - what they do in the course of that.
  • dydor
    You must be in intelligence.
  • remember 9/11!
  • dydor
    Like that would ever happen, eh?
  • Just a bit of correction. Once you have the town, Taliban start attacking and the brave occupying armies pull out. Only to announce few weeks later, another grand operation against Taliban.
  • royshaw
    To David Knowles: You are closing your mind to many truths. One cannot defeat a philosophy with conventional arms. We went to Afghanistan on the basis of lies. The Afghan people do not want us. The Afghan people have never known nor likely actually want democracy. A country gets the government it deserves. We are fighting the Taliban with one and a half hands tied behind our backs. They are at least as intelligent as we are. They are fighting a guerilla war. They are very well funded. They are invisible amongst their own people. Our soldiers are extremely obvious. The administration and local chieftains etc are highly corrupt. They market their heroin to us silly westerners. How much more blood and treasure do you want to waste on a pointless exercise? I could go on and on.
  • 1 - Not the Pakistani government, Pakistani courts set him free because there was no evidence against him. All the Indian big talk of his and ISI's involvement in 26/11 but they didn't bother to provide any evidence. 2 - I can say the same about BSF on the border or Indian Army on LoC since Pakistan accuses RAW of involvement in terrorist activities in Pakistan in the same way as India accuses ISI of terrorist acts in India. How about that ? 3 - There is a freedom struggle going on in Kashmir since this unfortunate state has been occupied by India with the sheer use of force against all the norms, against its own promises and above all, against the wishes of Kashmiris. Any comments ? And do you want me to mention how India have been covertly and overtly sponsoring terrorism in and meddling in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Maldives and of course their favourite Pakistan ?? In my opinion, there is enough reason to verify what Cameroon said is LAUGHABLE.
  • royshaw
    I am often amazed that military plans are aired this way. All the Taliban have to do to find them out is to get on the internet. Talk about telegraphing intentions! Crazy!
  • jianshenjiadian
    nike-alliance c o m ->nike wholesale wholesale jordan sneakers cheap wholesale nike air max,wholesale nike shox r3,shox r4,shox r5,shox cheap wholesale bape shoes nike women's shoes,wholesale adidascheap wholesale prada cheap puma wholesale children shoes nike-alliance,Inc. We are the best online dealer,about all kinds of nike.run retailing and wholesale trade wordwidely for years. Free Shipping And Customs,Super Sale Off Retailing,With 1Week Delivery to your door. nike-alliance c o m gjhgjhj
  • agent0060
    The Taliban perspective.
  • agent0060
    You must be Taliban.
  • agent0060
    I hope you are commenting from Afghanistan. Are you Taliban?
  • It will also not happen as long as the occupiers are there.
  • You can't harass Taliban in their own country so NATO can only be occupier - and thats exactly what they are.
  • Stop talking rubbish. The biggest mineral deal have go to China, why would Americans if they were there for it let the Chinese move in.
  • An I hope the same. I hope boys an girls can go to school. I hope men can cheer on their football team. I hope Women can go to work or choose to stay at home if that what they want. But that will not happen if the Taliban are there.
  • It does not matter if they know or not, they are not match for our military an could not stop use from taking the town anyway. That why we let them know an the media know what we are doing, so they can run or hide an we can secure the town without a fire fight. Obviously if they want one we will win it anyway take the town but that alienate the local population and cause civilian. One we take the town we begin what is starting to become stand precedure, build a wall around the town an then start talking to locals an start reconstruction projects. So basically matter whether they know we are coming or not there nothing they can do stop us.
  • definesanac
    Is Afghanistan is brit state so they are allowed to do what every they want to do killing innocent peoples and abues them in their own country and you expect pakistan to be fare. It was brit and US gone to have war with afghani people not pakistan you an to our neighboure. Cameron is like a cheap Prostitute try to sell her body to indian with cheap comments
  • definesanac
    you peoples are hyprocats what british is doing in afghanistan killing afghan and what you expect from pakistan to allow indian in afghanistan.
  • mp02
    1> Pakistani government has set free hafiz saeed ( Laskhkar-e-toiba terrorist groups leader ) who is responsible for 26/11 mumbai attack which killed 000's of indian citizens 2> Pakistani Border security force , regularly helps terrorists infiltrate in Indian borders by engaging Indian border security force in small firing incidents 3> Pakistan has been providing moral , financial and "weaponary" support to muslims in kashmir and hence sponsoring terrorism in region I haven't even mentioned how Pakistani govt and ISI are covertly supporting extremists in OTHER neighboring countries (read afganistan , bagladesh) for their own gains IMO these enough reason to verify what mr. cameron said is TRUE
  • colin1107
    The independent are deleteing my posts now, a sure sign im on the money ,POLICE STATE is here ,no question about it, ill say again though uk and usa murderers supported by brainwashed morons in uniforms and gutless journalists.(How quick can youi delete this)
  • colin1107
    Brave boys! Murderers you mean, Afghanistan is the afghan peoples country. Here is the ultimate question for you and many others- What threat to you are the people of Afghanistan and moreover how do you support taking another human life ,in the name of what your tv tells you, WAKE UP.
  • jadoonadil
    What are you doing in their country in the first place? and dont give me the bullshit about helping the Afghans. If you cared about them you would never have abandoned them.
  • Seems like a hell of a fuss for a mere 200 insurgents, sounds like the size of your average American football team. I imagine with all that noise and the odd look out they would've knew you were coming.
  • gondorplace
    Is this what the article is trying to cover for? *Nato denies Afghan civilian deaths* Afghan government and Nato officials have disputed each others' accounts of reports that over 50 civilians were killed after being caught up in fighting between foreign forces and the Taliban. The Afghan officials said on Monday that 52 people, many women and children, were killed by a Nato-rocket attack in Sangin, Helmand province, but Nato said an investigation had not yet revealed any civilian casualties. Civilian deaths caused by foreign forces are a major source of friction between Afgan president Hamid Karzai and his Western backers, whose 150,000 troops are engaged in an increasingly bloody war with the Taliban. The United Nations said it was "deeply concerned" at the reports and urged a thorough investigation. "I once again highlight the need for all sides to meet their obligations to protect civilians," said Staffan de Mistura, the UN secretary-general's special representative. The latest reports coincided with the publication on Monday by the whistleblower website Wikileaks of tens of thousands of classified US documents which cast a new light on civilians caught up in what it called "the true nature of this war". A spokesman of the Afghan government said information that 52 civilians had been killed came from the country's intelligence service in the district. Karzai strongly condemned the attack and asked Nato troops to prioritise the protection of civilians in their military campaign, his office said in a statement citing the same casualty figures for the attack. 'No evidence' Isaf, however, insisted that a joint investigation with the Afghan government had so far found no evidence of civilian deaths, while a provincial official suggested local residents could even have made it up. "The villagers took the joint team to a graveyard in Regey village and they claimed that 35 people were buried there, but the graves seemed to be old," said Dawood Ahmadi, a spokesman for the provincial governor, referring to the village where the incident is supposed to have taken place. "The team have not found any evidence to show that the civilians were killed," he said. "They may have been lying but we are there to find out." There are various compensation packages for civilians caught up in the fighting, but Isaf has reported many cases of wrongful claims. An Isaf spokeswoman said the team was still in the area, trying to establish the truth. "We take any civilian casualty very seriously but there was no report of operational activity in Regey," she said. Poor reputation Isaf has a poor reputation among Afghans for investigating similar incidents. In the worst attack of its kind, 140 civilians were killed in May last year in an Isaf air strike on a village in Western Farah province, among them 93 children and 25 women. For days Isaf denied knowledge of the incident, and then suggested those killed were mostly insurgents, before admitting to a much lower casualty figure. Wikileaks described a similar pattern with thousands of unreported civilian deaths in the near nine-year-old war. A report by the Afghanistan Rights Monitor said nearly 1,100 civilians were killed in the first half of this year in Isaf-operations or Taliban attacks. The UN said some 2,400 civilians were killed in conflict-related incidents last year.
  • altthought
    Meanwhile most fighters turn in their sleep and their weapons remain buried in the back garden for use another day.
  • Taking military pressure off gihadists in their home regions is not a good idea. Neither is a Vietnam-style escalation to prop up a corrupt regime. The only answer left is for NATO to be the harasser of the Taliban element, not the occupier of Afghanistan.
  • millsmess88
    Well-written embedded stenographer Kim. I'm sure this will receive the ISAF seal of approval. And such a creative, martial operational code name, "Black Prince". So Shakespearean!
  • rumpledumplin
    "We are fighting them over there so they don't fight us over here.." That and oh, $3 Trillion worth of strategic minerals, gas and oil pipelines (ssssshhhhh...)
  • diggatrigga
    If NATO troops are hoping to lure the Taliban into a trap and draw the Taliban in as our esteemed writer says, then what a great service he is doing all those young troops whose lives will be on the line by detailing the battle plans on here. Hopefully after thousands of people all over the world have read this article...NATO can stil go ahead with their battle strategy as planned and hopefully this writer would have found he's done a lot to still keep it secret!
  • How complicated a country. My hope is that peace can be restored so that the Afgan people can live the life they choose.
  • saintdroog
    We must not allow ourselves to get overexcited. It could still be many more weeks before those wicked Afghans lay down their arms and concede victory to our brave boys.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date