World

Rain (AM and PM) 7° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Australia gets the hump – and reaches for the gun to settle its camel question

Brought to the country as beasts of burden in 1840, today there are one million camels eating the outback

By Roger Maynard in Sydney

Roaming populations can eat up to 80 per cent of vegetation in an area, depriving indigenous wildlife of food and permanently damaging the landscape

ALAMY

Roaming populations can eat up to 80 per cent of vegetation in an area, depriving indigenous wildlife of food and permanently damaging the landscape

There are more than a million of them and they pose one of the greatest social and environmental challenges to Australia's outback.

They munch their way through desert vegetation, further denuding this arid nation's heartland and threatening its sensitive ecosystem. They damage Aboriginal communities in their search for water, fracturing pipes and knocking air conditioning units off walls. And their population is more than doubling every eight to nine years.

The camel – which was introduced to Australia in 1840 to help transport heavy goods to the remote interior of the country – has now become one of its greatest pests. Dealing with the alarming population growth of one-humped Camelus dromedarius has been vexing governments, conservation bodies and scientists for years.

Now the federal government is to set aside nearly £10m to address the problem, which will almost certainly be solved at the barrel of a gun.

One option being considered is a mass aerial shoot – which experts regard as the most effective and humane method of culling the animals.

But killing camels is not quick or cheap, with costs of a cull estimated at around £50 an animal. And even if a cull removed 80,000 camels a year, it would do no more than match their birth rate.

The Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre at Alice Springs, in the centre of the country, is masterminding how the federal funding will be spent. Its research general manager, Professor Murray McGregor, says previous efforts to deal with camel numbers have been hindered by the enormous scale of the problem.

In the outback, the animals leave a trail of destruction which costs property owners and Aboriginal communities nearly £7m a year, and much more in unmeasured social and environmental costs. "They'll eat anything up to 80 per cent of the plants available," Mr McGregor told The Sydney Morning Herald. This deprives indigenous desert animals of a food source, and indigenous people of a source of plants for traditional medicine and bush food.

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett describes the government's latest move as "the most significant commitment to tackle feral camels since they were introduced".

The landmark initiative will be spread over four years, with the money divided between Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia and the Northern Territory, where the camel population occupies a massive 3.3 million square kilometres of land.

But the federal government's strategy may not be the only answer.

On the sidelines of the great dromedary debate are those with commercial interests – the shooters and butchers who are also keen to get their hands on Australia's expanding camel population.

Some claim the market could be worth as much as £500m a year, but its success would depend on Aboriginal authorities allowing access to their sacred lands. With the use of mobile abattoirs, the processing of camel meat could create hundreds of jobs for indigenous people in areas where there is little or no work.

But while live camel exports have been successful on a small scale in the past, the industry has enjoyed only modest success in selling camel meat to domestic and overseas markets.

Pet food companies and leather makers have been good customers. However camel meat has never been a hit as a source of food for people – though it is not for lack of trying. Senior public servants in Canberra were served camel burgers at a barbecue last year, as part of a campaign to promote camel meat to consumers.

While Australians have developed a taste for kangaroo, emu and crocodile meat, camel has never made it onto the menu. Yet for the health conscious, it meets all the right criteria – lean, low in fat and with little cholesterol.

Specialist restaurants describe it as gamey in flavour, and a little tougher than beef. Despite the best efforts of the bushtucker industry, camel meat is rarely found on supermarket shelves or the nation's dinner plates. As a foodstuff, the ship of the desert has been cast adrift.

Counting the cost of camels

Camels were first imported to Australia in 1840 from the Canary Islands, and over the next half-century some 12,000 followed.

Most of them came from India and Palestine and were used as pack and riding animals by early outback pioneers. Under the care of Afghans, Camelus dromedarius made a major contribution to the early development of Australia's dry interior.

They helped with the construction of roads and railways and the Afghans, who were nicknamed "pilots of the desert", acted as guides for several major expeditions.

Twenty- four camels were hired for the ill-fated Burke and Wills expedition across the country's arid interior in l861.

While camels were still being worked as recently as the 1950s, they were largely replaced by trains and motor vehicles by the 1920s.

Redundant and allowed to run wild, they thrived and multiplied in their desert habitat and half a century later, Australia is counting the cost.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Mass camel slaughter
[info]honestytruth wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 01:43 am (UTC)
Every time Australia faces an issue with an animal the first action they take is to label the animal a 'pest'. This convenient labelling paves the way for people to then treat the animals any which way with disregard for their welfare and wellbeing.

Granted there may be merit in the claim that camels cause damage to the environment, but I certainly do not have confidence in the claims that they cause great damage. The majority of moans and groans come not surprisingly from the farming sector who believe they are the be all and end all so deserve to keep what nature delievers in the way of food and water to themselves.

Our exploitation of the camel by bringing them to Australia to use has caused the problem and now it seems the only way forward the Australian Govt can accept is to mass slaughter the poor creatures who's only crime is to try to survive.

Wild camels need special care, they are flighty creatures needing experienced handlers. We dont have that experience nor the transport skills...this country is afterall redneck heaven. Wouldbe cowboys with nothing between the ears except a penchant for cruelty roam the outback and are just the sort to be used in any activity involving camels.

Australia's stupidity throws light again on our inability and refusal to deal with animals in a humane and welfare acceptable manner. It is clear to me that is we cannot use the animal to 'entertain' us, eat it, live export it, wear it, or use it for companionship then slaughter it we must. No mention of finding a solution in conjunction with animal welfare groups ... nah just mass slaughter the poor buggers.

Re: Mass camel slaughter
[info]fidens1 wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 03:21 pm (UTC)
A pest is an organism which has characteristics that are regarded by humans as injurious or unwanted so I think it's pretty fair for Aussies to call animals they "face an issue with" a pest.

"Wild camels need special care, they are flighty creatures needing experienced handlers." WTF? If they are wild, I wouldn't expect them to have handlers. If they have handlers, they are no longer wild although they may be angry and untrained.

I'm not sure you are aware of the meaning of Redneck or Heaven. I suggest you look them up and compare what you read to a generalisation about Australians and the Australia. I'm sure you'll find they differ quite considerably.
are Aussies as sweet as a Kiwi Pavlova dessert?
[info]brazil2009 wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 09:53 pm (UTC)
are camels and giraffes related? If the answer to that is yes , can the Aussies pretend they, that is the camels, are giraffes and forget about the whole damn thing? They would not hurt a giraffe nor a fly, would they?
Camel slaughter in Australia
[info]nicky02 wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 04:27 am (UTC)
This is the typical Australian response to an introduced animal now regarded as a 'pest'. Once placed in that category, any means of 'culling (i.e. mass slaughter) is acceptable, no matter how cruel. If there is any possibility of commercialisation, so much the better,

Australia's delicate eco-systems have sustained more damage through the greed of farmers running sheep in cattle than anything else. Wild pigs, another species introduced into Australia, are mercilessly brutalised, particularly by amateur 'hunters' who train dogs to rip the animals to pieces.

Aerial culling is no solution, as the NSW found in the Guy Fawkes National Park back in 2000, when a mass cull of 'brumbies' (wild horses) was undertaken. Hundreds of horses were left maimed, crippled and bleeding to death. It is virtually impossible to get a 'clean' shot at a moving target from a moving platform (such as a helicopter).

Since these animals were introduced into Australia and allowed to breed to this proportion, it behoves Australia to treat the animals humanely.
Put shrimp on barbie, mate...
[info]5presteps wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 05:27 am (UTC)
How about selling them to Arabs? In couple of months they are going go sacrifice sheep, camel, ox, in religious fest. Australia has a bad reputation of first introducing foreign animals and then mass slaughtering them. Roos, rabbits, brumbies, cane toads, you name it. Public?s money is wasted as government grands on these bloody silly politics.
Invasive Alien Species
[info]ironspiderzero wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 06:59 am (UTC)
As a species which isn't native to Australia, but which is nicely adapted for the climate, camels are a potential 'pest'. Any species, be it flora or fauna, which can out-compete native species and overwhelm an ecosystem, especially a fairly fragile one, needs to be controlled. Unfortunately, with regard to the camels, the Australians have woken up to this issue too late for any control option to be easy. So a cull and conversion to bushtucker does seem to be a valid response. And though I don't doubt the farmers do have a vested interest in ridding the outback of wild camels, even a brief perusal of the various problems afflicting Australiaw would indicate that measures need to be taken on a whole range of environmental issues.

Camels aren't an Australian native; they are not an endangered species across any of their range countries. Unless some method of contraception can be introduced to the various herds scattered across the outback, a humane cull would seem to be the only real option.
Food Crisis
[info]yshawkat wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 06:59 am (UTC)
With most of the world still reeling from the food crisis of a year ago, a financial meltdown that is yet to show its true extent, eradicating a staple ingredient to many a people's diet across the Arab world and Africa seems to be a short sighted decision at best. I was at a camel market here in Cairo recently thronged with thousands of camels from Libya, Sudan and Somalia, hundreds of them changing hands in a day being sold on for their meat.

Granted globalisiation does have its ills, though if the Australian government weren't so blinkered, it would recognise the wealth on its hands rather than the loss and help alleviate a local as well as a global crisis.
Re: Food Crisis
[info]andy108 wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 07:32 am (UTC)
There is no shortage of food.Just a shortage of justice.
There's your answer
[info]othr wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 08:33 am (UTC)
>>Under the care of Afghans, Camelus dromedarius made a major contribution to the early development of Australia's dry interior.<<

Well that's the answer - ship a load of them out to Afghanistan !! Flood their poppy fields with camels.
Australia gets the hump ? and reaches for the gun to settle its camel question
[info]famulla wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 09:00 am (UTC)
The Chinese eat turtles?especially softshell and snapper species?and use the animals' parts in traditional medicines that are said to boost everything from the immune system to sexual prowess. Camsl do not help us at all. They are ugley. They give water when we need But then we carry bottlkes and pipes so we do not need them They eat crows and cabbages and we need too. So take the easy GUNS are good in USA and here.
Well The Malthusian are right.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
I thought it was only the Arabs who had camels?
[info]djangovsartana wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 10:09 am (UTC)
Why is it then that only the Arabs are mocked and called camels since Kangaroos also have camels in their country?
Re: I thought it was only the Arabs who had camels?
[info]tarquintt wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 10:48 pm (UTC)
From what I've seen of camels they don't seem the easiest to farm - have you ever seen one in the outback? they run around at speed for miles - they are game animals, like the roos - so you have to go out and shoot them in the wild, which won't yield the same output - which is why we farm slow, controllable things like sheep and cattle

You can domesticate a camel - but you can't pack it in a pen and then slaughter hundreds in one go
[info]vinceg wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 10:53 am (UTC)
We know camels can be domesticated and in dry countries are a much more appropriate beast than the cow. I mean cattle and sheep are not native to Australia either but are seen as the backbone of agriculture in that country. Why not add camels to that list? Camel meat is good (I have eaten it many times) and camel milk too is rich and nutritious. Why not utilise the resource productively by rounding them up onto ranches and using them as a source of milk, meat and leather? I hear that Aussie camels are the most disease free in the world and have indeed been exported to the Middle East in the past, so another export opportunity here as well. Need a bit more positive thinking here it seems to me.
African Desert Nomads
[info]corporeal_v001 wrote:
Monday, 27 July 2009 at 12:04 pm (UTC)

Give them to the nomads. Camels are ideal transport for African desert people and they value and care for their animals very well.

Obviously someone will have to pay for capture and transport. But atleast they will go to a loving home and not just run over or shot by Australians as sport.
camel culling
[info]pritz8 wrote:
Wednesday, 29 July 2009 at 11:15 am (UTC)
Aerial shooting has been proven to cause animals unnecessary suffering, this is not a satisfactory solution !!! I don't support this action.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date