Australians do battle over the prefab huts of Pommy Town
Debate raging over whether homes are eyesores or historical relics
Tuesday 31 March 2009
Latest in Australasia
On Facebook
From the blogs
Roy Hodgson for England: A club of one
To argue against Harry Redknapp for England is akin to arguing in favour of bankers bonuses. While s...
Time for a reality check on the Sri Lankan civil war
Sri Lanka, much like Britain, has side-lined accountability long enough.
Children Of Alcoholics week: One million children may just be the tip of the iceberg
Children Of Alcoholics week starts today. So, what are the aims for Nacoa during this important week...
Review of Being Human: ‘Being Human 1955’
Following on from an episode tinged with tragedy, this week lifted the mood with something lighter.
It was known as Pommy Town, and the bushland-fringed housing estate seemed like paradise to the British migrants who settled there in the 1950s. Home might have been a prefabricated Nissen hut, but it had indoor plumbing, a large backyard and, in many cases, ocean views.
The huts, designed by a British Army engineer as portable accommodation, were only supposed to last a few years. Fifty were built at Belmont North, 90 miles north of Sydney, as affordable housing for the "Ten Pound Poms" who accepted Australia's post-war offer of a cheap passage to a new life. While 17 have been demolished, the rest of the semi-circular tin dwellings still stand, and an argument is raging about their future. Their owners want to knock them down and build more conventional homes. Conservationists want this slice of Australian history preserved.
This month, Lake Macquarie city council rejected a proposal to list the two-storey huts – the largest surviving cluster in Australia – as a conservation area of local significance. However, the New South Wales heritage body is still considering a separate application for them to be listed. Most locals oppose the idea. Charlie Leggatt, 84, a Scottish migrant who was one of the original residents, hopes to bequeath something of value to his children. He has been told his land is worth A$385,000 (£185,000 ) – but less than half that with a Nissen hut that cannot be demolished standing on it. And newcomers who have built modern structures in Pommy Town complain that the huts – situated in an area now regarded as prime real estate – are devaluing their properties.
Vicki Williamson, a local historian, believes they have little heritage value. "They were never meant to be permanent housing," she said. "They're freezing cold in winter and they're stinking hot in summer, and some of them are not even 12 inches off the ground. There's no breeze through them and they're always inundated with ants. So let's just document their history and move on."
But Helen Smith, who grew up in Belmont North, has happy childhood memories. Ms Smith, whose stepfather was a British migrant, said: "Our house was on a hill, with views of the sea, and we had a big backyard with vegetable gardens and chooks [chickens]." She still visits their next-door neighbour, 93-year-old Isobel Richardson, who has occupied her hut for almost 60 years.
The Historic Houses Trust, a conservation body, recently bought one hut and challenged architecture students at the University of Newcastle in New South Wales to redesign it as a contemporary family home. Renovation work is about to start, and the hut will eventually be sold – an example to other residents, the organisation hopes, of the creative potential of these humble structures. Richard Silink, manager of the trust's Endangered Houses Fund, said it supported efforts to have Pommy Town listed. "It's part of our post-war history, and we hope people will recognise that," he said.
The mayor of Lake Macquarie, Greg Piper, disagrees. "It's very nice for us to sit back and say 'Aren't they quaint? Aren't they interesting?' [But] they're not good living accommodation... Generally people aren't out there wanting to just rip them down, but they do want to upgrade them and move on."
The local council has rejected a recommendation by its own staff for the huts to be listed. Only two councillors supported the motion. The rest of the council sided with Kay Fraser, who believed the houses were "not significant at all", and that it was unfair to place restrictions on their owners.
- 1 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 2 Fear for deported Saudi 'ridiculous', says Malaysian home minister
- 3 Eight arrests as Murdoch 'throws staff to the wolves'
- 4 Israel blames Iran for embassy bomb attacks
- 5 Now The Sun tries to call in its favours from Downing Street
- 6 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 7 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 1 Kate Allen: It's time for America to put an end to this shameful scandal
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Chemotherapy is 'safe during pregnancy'
- 4 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 5 Rhodri Marsden: What we like and what we don't like are often closer than you'd think
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 8 Henry does it his way, ending on a high note
- 9 Modern lovers: The 'sexual body warriors' and pioneers transforming 21st-century relationships
- 10 Redknapp hints at same old faces for England
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Day In a Page
Apple admits it has a human rights problem
James Lawton: AVB looks all at sea
Procrastination: Not now – I'm busy
Silent revolution at the Baftas
The diva who had – and lost – it all


Comments