World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 10° London Hi 11°C / Lo 9°C

Acropolis now! A museum for the Elgin Marbles

The battle to recover the Elgin Marbles has been long and fruitless. Now Greece has built a museum in the hope it will one day house them.

By Claire Soares in Athens

That Greece can look after the marbles properly is no longer in doubt, thanks to the new Acropolis Museum.

ALAMY

That Greece can look after the marbles properly is no longer in doubt, thanks to the new Acropolis Museum.

From a distance, you could almost mistake it for a designer multi-storey car park. The grey concrete and angular lines are certainly a contrast to the classical marble edifice in whose shadow it stands. Yet the Parthenon seems to look down on the architectural upstart not with disapproval but pride, affection, and most of all hope. Hope that the new offspring can finally bring the ancestral treasures home.

These are heavy expectations for a museum to bear. But the Acropolis Museum was, quite literally, built to shoulder them. Unlike any other museum in the world, it was designed to house something it didn't own. We're talking of course about those infamous marbles that were hacked from the Parthenon by Lord Elgin at the start of the 119th century and that now reside in Bloomsbury in the British Museum. Greece wants them back and having failed to make headway with verbal arguments, it is trying visual ones.

The centrepiece is the museum's roof-top glass gallery. This final floor has been twisted round (rather like the top layer of a Rubik's cube) so that it is in perfect alignment with the Parthenon. The Athens marbles depicting Olympian gods, heroes and animals, have been arranged in the round, replicating the exact layout and dimensions of the original frieze. And glancing out through the floor-to-ceiling windows to the north, you get a real sense of what the whole ensemble must have looked like up on the Acropolis hill back in the fifth century BC.

Contrast this with the London set-up. In the windowless Duveen Gallery, the marbles hang on two walls with the observer sandwiched in between and the flow of the frieze interrupted by heavy doors. What the British Museum does have is quantity – an estimated 60 per cent of the surviving marbles to the Acropolis Museum's 40 per cent. The London exhibits provide copious commentary on this division, from a separate pamphlet detailing the ownership row to detailed captioning for individual portions of the frieze. "A groom wearing a cloak pinned on one shoulder steadies the horse," the explainer for North Frieze XXVII, 72 reads, "The lower part of this figure, together with the foot soldier and driver of the next chariot, is in Athens".

The Acropolis Museum addresses the same issue in a more visceral way, hanging the honey-coloured Greek marbles alongside stark white plaster copies of the British Museum sections. The Greek government of 1840 had to pay to have these copies made, a quarter of a century after the British parliament authorised purchasing the originals from a bankrupt Lord Elgin. Now they are being used to make the case for reunification in the €130m (£110m) museum. This is architecture as argument. Although just in case anyone has missed its message, Greek Culture Minister Antonio Samaras is on hand to hammer it home. "For 200 years, the Parthenon Marbles have been amputated, now they must be reunited. The Parthenon frieze speaks through its totality; this voice should be heard not be silenced," Mr Samaras told guests at a special preview. "This museum is creating huge momentum, a global crescendo. We are winning the fight."

That may be wishful thinking on his part. Admittedly, tempers have cooled since the days when British Museum officials branded attempts to remove the marbles "cultural fascism", comparing them to Hitler's book burning. But it is hard to see any concrete hope today. The British Museum is only sending the deputy chairman of its board of trustees to the official opening. It hardly spells rapprochement. Permanent repatriation is universally acknowledged as a non-starter, and the idea of a temporary loan is a minefield. "In principle, trustees are always happy to consider any loan request, but the borrowing institution would have to recognise our legal ownership," explained the spokeswoman for the British Museum, Hannah Boulton.

That is something the Greek government has repeatedly refused to do; it would legitimise "the deeds of the infamous annihilators", according to Mr Samaras. Some of his museum guides might need a spot more training on this point. "The plaster casts are of the marbles that belong to the British Museum," one guide told his group of invited guests last night, drawing gasps all round. "I mean located," he hastily corrected himself.

At night the interplay of the reflections of marbles and the Parthenon is simply spectacular, and the yearning to see the originals in their entirety overwhelming. But visitors are also (perhaps unintentionally) reminded that British involvement in the saga might not have been entirely dastardly. In amongst the marble and plaster cast montage are gaping expanses of blank wall. They represent the sections of the frieze that no longer survive at all, and some would argue that Lord Elgin in fact saved art that would have otherwise been destroyed. Similarly some of the metopes not taken down from the Parthenon until the 1990s show considerable erosion, often attributed to the high levels of pollution in Athens.

That Greece can look after the marbles properly is no longer in doubt, thanks to the new Acropolis Museum. The primary argument advanced by the British Museum is that keeping the Elgin Marbles in London allows them to be "part of a world museum, where they can be connected to other ancient civilisations".

The idea of a global art is one that resonates with Mary Beard, professor of classics at Cambridge University. "We have a global culture and there's a way in which the division and spread of a monument is a herald to internationalism."

Yet she is swift to add that she understands the Greek pain just as readily. "Imagine the English being told that from now on they could only watch Shakespeare, whose plays incidentally also constitute a global work of art, in Japanese."

You have to feel slightly sorry for Bernard Tschumi, the Swiss architect whose achievement risks being overshadowed by the marbles row. That a new home for the Acropolis treasures is actually finished is not to be skated over. It has been more than 30 years in the planning – that's twice as long as it took the ancient Greeks to build the Parthenon in the first place.

Mr Tschumi won the competition in 2001, and has had to contend with 104 court cases, political infighting, the risk of earthquakes, not to mention the pressure of working in full view of arguably the most influential building in Western civilisation. "I like a challenge," he quips.

He plumped for the same approach as Pei did with the pyramid at the Louvre – an uber-modern building that dialogues with the old. You see this most clearly in his handling of the archaeological remains discovered under the foundations. The museum balances over the excavation site on an irregular forest of concrete columns, a harmonious sharing of the available space between the old and new.

"When you have perfection from the past, how can you imitate it?" Mr Tschumi says. "You have to arrive at another sort of perfection for the 21st century." But what about Bloomsbury's share of the marbles? "I am convinced the marbles will come back," he says. "Until then, the tension and desire are part of the work."

The Elgin Marbles: A troubled history

*Thomas Bruce, 7th Earl of Elgin, pictured below, was the British ambassador to the Ottoman Empire at a time when it included Greece. An art lover, he initially wanted to document the Parthenon, but – with his staff – ended up removing half of the remnants of the building's sculptures.

*Even once he managed to get the pieces out of Athens, his troubles weren't over – many tons were lost overboard and had to be rescued from the sea.

*In 1816 the British government bought the marbles from Elgin – who by then was deeply in debt – for £35,000, and they were given to the British Museum.

*His actions were ridiculed by Lord Byron in his poem "Childe Harold's Pilgrimage".

Should the Elgin Marbles be returned to Greece?

Yes

Paul Cartledge

What a difference a day makes. Until yesterday the New Acropolis Museum of Athens had been a closed book to all but a few interested scholars and politicians. But now the first of what will become a flood of variously motivated global visitors were privileged (as I was) to experience the interior as well as the much more problematic exterior of the New Acropolis Museum.

It is designed to remind the world that the Parthenon – both as thing and as idea – cannot begin to be properly understood except in the context of the mighty rock on which it was constructed, and of the vast number of other artefacts, which it also brilliantly displays.

Speaking both museologically, and spiritually, those of us who believe alleged titles to legal ownership to be not just beside the point but wilfully designed to obscure the point, and the true humane goal to be the reunification of all the extant Parthenon Marbles (not only those in the British Museum) in close association with the Acropolis rock, cannot but be hugely cheered by yesterday's inaugural event, a genuine "Athens Spring" (the modern Greek word for which season means literally "opening").

Paul Cartledge is the A G Leventis professor of Greek culture at Cambridge

No

Dorothy King

In 1801 the Acropolis was an Ottoman fortress, its temples turned first into Christian churches, then mosques. The Parthenon itself had been blown up during the last Crusade in 1697, its columns shattered, and most of the sculptures that once decorated it thrown to the ground. The Greeks identified "Greekness" with membership of the Orthodox Church rather than the legacy of Pericles – they were ignoring their ancient ruins, when they were not chopping up the marble remains and burning them in kilns to produce lime. Lord Elgin came along only planning to study the Parthenon sculptures, but when he was presented with the opportunity of saving them, he leapt at the chance. Had Elgin left the Elgin Marbles on the Acropolis, more of the Parthenon sculptures would have been destroyed, as they were decade after decade even following Greek independence. Had Elgin not brought them back to London they would no longer exist.

Modern Greeks like to claim that the Parthenon sculptures are part of Greek heritage. In fact, they are part of the world's heritage, too important to be owned by anyone – and the sculptures can currently be appreciated in half a dozen museums around the world.

Dorothy King is an archaeologist and author of The Elgin Marbles

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

the acropolis museum
[info]ianos1 wrote:
Monday, 22 June 2009 at 10:56 pm (UTC)
The museum, which cost $200 million and sits near the base of the Acropolis with a direct view of the Parthenon, is one of the highest-profile cultural projects undertaken in Europe in this decade.
the new york times
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/20/arts/design/20acropolis.html?_r=1&scp=5&sq=the%20new%20acropolis%20museum&st=cse
Elgin Marbles and New Acropolis Museum
[info]elaine_decoulos wrote:
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 at 01:50 am (UTC)
Greece deserve praise for this amazing achievement. The history of the Ottoman occupation is painful enough without the loss of a significant portion of the Parthenon. Greece is still emerging from it and is given little credit from the international community over how they coped with being occupied for some 400 years while holding onto their Christianity, as evidenced by Dorothy King's comments.

The part of the Parthenon in The British Museum belongs to Greece and is part of her heritage. Even if Lord Elgin helped save it, that is not an argument to now claim Greece's heritage belongs to the world. Greece has contributed so much to the world for a small country and others are always trying to claim her culture, values and heritage as their own. It is time her status is restored.
Responding to Mrs. King
[info]sfr33 wrote:
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 at 09:40 am (UTC)
Mrs. Dorothy King is making a valid point that indeed the marbles are part of the world's heritage. Noone can argue against the signficance of the rock in human history. However, her argument to keep the marbles in the British Museum is at least preposterous if not outright offensive:
"In fact, they are part of the world's heritage, too important to be owned by anyone - and the sculptures can currently be appreciated in half a dozen museums around the world."

In response, here's an alternative: Why not return the marbles to Greece, in order for them to be appreciated as a full exhibit in its original location and make stark white plaster copies for the half dozen museums around the world, thus ensuring that visitors in these museums can keep appreciating them?

Just food for thought, for Mrs. King and anyone else who still tediously argue for the marbles to remain at the British Museum.
Elgin Marbles
[info]dntais wrote:
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 at 10:58 am (UTC)
They are not teh Elgin Marbles, Elgin did not sculpture them!< Fedias and Iktinos did!!!!! They are the Parthenon Marbles, and yet they were violently dettached from the Parthenon itself.

It is time for them to come back to their home town and proudly lay next to the other originals in a great new museum.

As for the part of world culture and british museum (!) well, guys, its from teh times of colonialism whne with guns, English empire , could obtain just about everything, just like the crusaders did in 1204 when invaded the Byzantine empire and moved just about everything precious in Venice, Rome and etc.

British museum houses, world STOLEN antiquities. Time to make up for that to the world.

Please never call them Elgin marbles, you speak about history you respect as you say, call them with their real name, Parthenon Marbles, so that the world can draw conclusions of what really happened.

Dionysios Ntais
marbles. what marbles?
[info]powderblue8 wrote:
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 at 09:55 pm (UTC)
send the stonehenge rocks in exchange!
it might not be as graceful but its something!
please allow taking parts of monuments as souvenirs
[info]massaira wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 04:48 pm (UTC)
The same imperialist mambo-jambo arguments all over again!Maybe modern Britain should finally distance herself from this line of thought. Such loud arguments about being protectors of cultures (of others), maybe what sits uncomfortably is that Elgin's work WAS part of the destruction of the monument and there are testimonies of members of his own team to this. Let alone unethical, his actions were unlawful because the Sultan's firman did NOT allow him to bring down pieces from the monument, this was done by skewed interpretation of the orders and heavy bribery. Anyone with some common sense knows the reasons why the british museum will never return the sculptures.So don't bother stooping so low in your arguments. What I would like to know, if all is ok with Elgin, can I please be allowed to chip off some stone from Stonehedge as a souvenir? I'm sure it will be better protected in my private collection!
THE PARTHENON MARBLES!
[info]panagiotis_ts wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 05:27 pm (UTC)
Dear editors and Mrs Claire Soares,
It is vital to rewrite in this article the term Elgin Marbles to the correct one THE PARTHENON MARBLES. Also in the British Museum which i recently visited NOWHERE can anyone find the term elgin marbles but the correct one Marbles of Athens and Parthenon. Everything belongs to its creator or to its place. Lord Elgin stolen the Greek Marbles of Parthenon after taking the permission of the Ottomans (Greece those days was under slavery). For our today's democracy and culture we have to recognize the great offer of the Greek civilization to the whole world. It is an impropriety for the Great glory of the British people some few - actually a minority- to propagandize against Greeks fair demand to take back their cultural heritage. Of course Parthenon and its marbles belong to the global culture this is obvious. But we cannot use the idea of nationalism in order to justify a theft and an inequity against Greece. Think Mrs Soares what would happened to national civilization if for example one nation had the opportunity to steal the Egyptian Pyramides or Colloseum of Rome put them in a museum and then refuse to return it back bacause of the "Globalization''.
At least i m sure that soon the British Government will finally accept to fulfil the right Greek demand of the return! According to Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/poll/2009/jun/24/elgin-marbles the 94% of the British people wants the return of the Parthenon Marbles to Greece. England is and always was a democratic country and i m sure that the Olympic Games of 2012 is a good opportunity for your country to correct the false to the history and return them back.
Yours sincerely,
Panagiotis A. Tsolakidis p.tsolakidis@gmail.com
pointless argument
[info]epitelous wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 03:07 am (UTC)
"bring the ancestral treasures home"
Since the author from the beginning of the text admits that we are talking about the "ancestral treasures", the rest of her argument is totally pointless. I'm sorry, but I wont waste my time reading the whole of the text.

Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date