Alarm in Baltic as Kremlin seizes control of Soviet past
Medvedev bans the 'falsification of history to the detriment of Russia'
KEYSTONE/GETTY IMAGES
Russia wants the Baltic states to remember its version of key historical events such as the 'liberation' of Latvia
In Russia it is not only the future that is unpredictable; often the past is equally in doubt. One minute Leon Trotsky was a hero of the Revolution, the father of the Red Army and a strong contender to succeed Lenin; the next minute he never existed. Until the late 1980s, the 1917 Revolution was the pinnacle of human achievement; suddenly in the 1990s it was seen as an utter failure.
And today again history in the region is turning into an ideological battlefield. When the Red Army poured into the Baltic states at the end of the Second World War, it liberated them from Nazi tyranny – but from the perspective of the subsequent decades of Soviet domination, was it liberation or merely another invasion?
The Russians, of course, have no doubt on the matter: for them it was an heroic national achievement. But for the states which less than two decades ago managed to crawl out from under the Soviet boot, things are not so simple. The Museum of the Occupation of Latvia, an imposing black box of a building in the heart of Riga, tells the story of Latvia's time inside the Soviet Union. The Soviet soldiers, glorified as heroes in Moscow, are portrayed as criminals and occupiers, no better than the Germans they defeated.
But now, slamming shut a stable door through which its former subject states long ago bolted, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has ordered the creation of a body with the Orwellian title of the Commission to Counteract the Falsification of History to the Detriment of Russian Interests. A linked law is also likely to be passed that will outlaw the "rehabilitation of Nazism" on the territory of former Soviet republics.
Pressure to stop their much smaller neighbours telling recent history the way they see it has been building for some time. When authorities in Estonia removed a monument to Soviet soldiers from the centre of Tallinn two years ago, riots between police and ethnic Russian citizens of Estonia ensued, and the Kremlin made furious noises. With its new commission and law, Moscow is upping the stakes. Russia accuses the governments of Estonia and Latvia of glorifying partisan regiments which fought on the side of the Nazis.
In recent years, relations between Latvia and Russia have normalised in many spheres, but the Second World War is still a thorny issue. "The one issue which divides us is our interpretation of history," says Ojars Kalnins, director of the Latvian Institute, a think-tank linked to Latvia's Foreign Ministry. "Russia could demonstrate a lot to the world if it did what Germany did, and apologised for the actions of previous governments."
Apologising, however, is the last thing the Kremlin plans to do, and the new commission and law suggest that Russia is moving in the opposite direction, seeking to glorify the Soviet past and silence critics of Soviet communism.
The commission, say critics inside Russia, smacks of a Soviet attitude to history, and the most worrying aspect to be inferred from its bizarre title is that falsifying history in Russia's interests is quite acceptable.
Last week, a scandal erupted over an article written by a Russian military historian that was posted on the website of the Russian Defence Ministry, blaming Poland for starting the Second World War. The article absolved the Soviet Union from any role in contributing to the start of war, and instead blamed Poland for not acceding to "reasonable" demands from Nazi Germany. The paper was removed after an official complaint from Poland.
A key pillar of Vladimir Putin's eight-year presidency involved exhorting Russians to feel proud of their history, and he once said that foreign countries should never be able to make Russia feel guilty for its Soviet past. The public appears to agree. A recent survey by a leading Russian polling agency showed that 77 per cent of Russians consider the Red Army to have liberated eastern European countries and given them the chance to develop, while only 11 per cent felt that there was an occupation.
"Those trying to turn everything upside down and portray the Nazi liberator states as invaders have to suffer punishment," said Valery Ryazansky, a member of the pro-Kremlin United Russia party and one of the law's sponsors. The Russians remain determined to stem the tide of what they see as anti-Russian propaganda. "Such attempts are becoming more hostile, more evil, and more aggressive," said Mr Medvedev in his online video blog last month. "We must fight for the historical truth."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
Here is the so-called "Latvian Legion" in training:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SfZO87X
Now who do you *think* that looks like? And remember, that clip has been put on YouTube by *Latvians* who see nothing questionable in its content.
Shaun Walker, you really are a disgrace.
Of course Latvians fought for germans against soviets, because latvians had to choose - soviet occupation or germans, who said that after the war latvia will be free country (of course that was a lie, but latvians didn`t know that).
Latvian legion fought for free latvia not nazi latvia. And that is the thing you arrogant and shallow commentator must keep in mind. Please read official history of Latvia written by Latvian historians or Norman Davies Europe, instead of searching for some unacademic video clips in youtube.
It's no surprise to know that some Latvians were pro Nazis.
That doesn't excuse a 40year occupation through the russians. Imagine the USA, which liberated Holland (nice, thanks a lot) would have stayed for another fourty years, prohibited the dutch language and culture and have the country ruled by a regime that was ruled by Washington. Of course the dutch would have regarded it as occupation!
And you know the dutch weren't by large pro Nazis. So if a video turns up that show a few dutch SS men, do you seraskier go and say that the US had only liberated Holland and they otherwise deserved to be surpressed for having had a few men joining the SS?
Leave the Latvians to see history as they perceive it. They must be right because it is the way they feel about it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burning_of
>> Leave the Latvians to see history as they perceive it <<
Holocaust denial is a very unpretty thing. But I guess in your airy-fairy the-russian-must-be-wrong-of-course-darl
Latvian ex-president Vaira Vike Freiberga at the Holocaust forum in Stockholm in year 2000 admitted that Viktors Arajs killed jews and Latvians are very sorry. You cant`s say, that Latvians don`t speak of this history page and don`t regret them.
So can it be called occupation? I would say that Poland's dependency on Russia was the same as Bermudas or Bagamas (before independance) dependancy on Great Britain - My granny's sister merried a Pole in 1930-s while living in West Byellorussia (before it was annexed by USSR in 1939) - so I now have 9 second grade cousins in Poland (who are natural born Poles as you understand) - so I
know exactly what the level of life and social security was there in Poland in 1960-s and 1970-s - much better then in Russia, me and my sisters were even a bit envious and contemplated wether it were possible to moove to Poland (from Russia) - but it was impossible in Soviet times and later in 1980-s situation there deteriorated due to economic problems... So, using this word -"occupation" you mislead
readers of Independent...The same is true about "occupation" of other East European states by Russia.
In 1940-s and begining of 1950-s the regime was harsh and cruel - but the same it was in Russia itself - starting with Khrushchev condemnation of Stalin in 1956 and then through 1960-s, 1970-s and 1980-s - regime was benign, although stupid, dull and burocratic...communism couldn't provide for the same level of life as in the West and it was the matter of permanent envious feelings towards Western counterparts. Russians and East Europeans were equally irritated by Soviet leadership who could not
provide nor for political freedom nor for equal to Western Europe living standards, nor even for opportunities to travel abroad...That's it...But there was no "ocupation" in anyway comparable to what was German ocupation of Poland for example...Yes, after 1945 your life probably would have been better if you had been liberated by USA, but, you would be real miserable under German occupation, no comparison to that dull, stupid but WARM and convinient regime which was imposed on you (and on us, Russians) by Communist leadership of USSR (with the help of considerable part of your and our locals by the way) - ofcourse I mean period after Stalin (no question that Stalinist Soviet Union before 1956 was really horrible place to live and to be dependant on)...So, my dear friends, do not exagerate and stop play victims - nobody pays for it anymore.
This is not me diminishing crimes done by the Nazis and their helpers, but it is not about balancing crimes. Sure, the Nazi crimes were worse than what the Soviets did, but that still leaves Soviet occupation and repression of many peoples in East Europe as what it is. Occupation. An injustice. Be less emotional about it seaskier, and comparative reasoning by you rex123 does not change the feelings of Latvians. Discuss history, don't judge it so vehemently if you haven't experienced it.
It was occupation by an imperial force. Mother Russia left its odious stain and smell right across the whole of Eastern Europe. What you should be asking yourself, is why more isn't made of the war crimes committed by the Georgian mass mudreder Stalin and how Churchill and roosevelt could retain any credibility after selling out Poland and Czechoslovakia to Russis (oh sorry the Soviet Union).
Just to remind you of some key points
The glorious Soviet Union signs a pact with Nazi Germany
A week later Nazi germany invades Poland
Two weeks later peace loving Soviet Union invades the eastern half of Poland
Soviet Union expels 2 million Poles to the gulags for the crime of being Polish
I million of those Poles survive
Soviet Union executes 25,000 Polish officers When their crimes are discovered the Soviets blame the Nazi's
When the Poles rise against the Nazis in warsaw the cowrdly Red Army sits on its collective ass across the other side of the Vistula
Stalin refuses the "Allies" the right to land planes in "liberated" Poland to support the Polish Home Army
After the war thousands of the Polish Home Army who fought the Nazi's while the Soviet Union was licking their boots "disappeared" or were tried in show trials
Mind manipulators with all their spin doctors and paraphernalia of the West can't stand Putin's strength and Russia's coming back from cold.
But of course, those are *facts* that are very unconvenient to explain??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holoca
Facts. Facts. Facts.
Got anything to say about the Latvians fighting in the Wehmacht? Confess - you had no idea about that, and because you've got no idea you deny it ever happened. Or just spout a load of old cobblers about what you think about the soviet union after reading the Daily Mail?!
Frankly you've never been nearer E Europe than Ipswich.
Sorry mate, but your post is just empty bigoted bollox.
"He who controls the past, controls the future; and he who controls the present, controls the past."
This omission gives some gives some quasi credibility to the Russian claim that they forced the Nazis out of Estonia-a liberating force- and ignoring their earlier invasion which was a contemptible attempt tp take over the country.
It is also noteworthy that the majority of Estonians preferred the German occupiers to the Soviet undisciplined hordes.
"occupation" - they should blame their own communists and trade unions (by the way all the different story with Finland which REALLY was in the most barbaric way invaded by USSR in 1939 and parts of it territories were annexed - I think it is only the scornfull fact that Finns later sided with Nazi Germany which makes it reasonable not to give those territories back to them (because current border demarkation was a result of WW2 in which Finland fought on German side)....Now back to Molotov-Ribbentrop pact - this pact was actually analog to Munhen pact of Hitler-Chamberlain - it was an antiwar pact to avoid mutual aggression. Germany invaded Russia in 1941 in breach of this pact actually, the same way as they invaded Poland in breach Of Munhen pact (which permited them to invade Czeckoslovakia only) ...It is another story that there were secret protocols to that pact which stated that in case there would be a war in Poland - Hitler would never occupy West Byelorussia (part of Poland), West Ukraine and Moldova (parts of Romania those days) because those regions were populated mainly not by Poles and Romanians but by Byelorushians and Ukrainians - nations which had their republics within USSR. So there was never any kind of desire to start the war - Stalin was afraid of war those days (USSR was not prepared for it) - so this pact was not to start a war, it was not to invade each other and to exclude the indiginous nations of USSR (which appeared on Polish and Romanian territories as a result of border demarkations in 1920) from Nazi occupation...As for how Stalin behaived on those territories with arrests and deportations is another story, but the Pact itself was not aggressive - it is only anti-Russian press which portray it as agresive - as for the scolars who relly read it and analyse - attitude is different and much more ballanced.......I think also that your last phrase about majority of Estonians is wrong - in 1939 majority voted for incorporation into USSR, later in 1970-s, 1980-s - yes, their mood have changed and they became pro-independance (which Gorbachev reluctantly granted them)...Also your praysing German discipline in contex of nazi occupation is racist - yes the process of murdering millions of Jews, Slavs, Gipses was a procedure exersised by them with exelent discipline, but don't you think that it is horrible and strange of you to praise it here in this context?...
of Russians there - to your information in 290 mln. population of USSR there were 14 mln. communists which constitutes 6% of population - the national content was proportional - 6% of Estonians were members, 6% of Russians, 6% of Ukrainians etc...So? ...So, stop play victims - you (Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians, Russians etc,, al ex-Soviets) are equally resposible for what have been done...If you say 94% were not members - my answer -94% of Russians were not members as well...What do we have as a result? - your hate and your racist attitude...and where are arguments to support your blaming particularly Russians?
Are you saying that we have to be grateful , that russia was also occupied by russians (communists)???
So buddy you look like an idiot or provocateur after righting this sh* Another point is that comparing USSR to Nazi Germany sooner or later you will be paid back. I am sure one day I hire a good team of lawyers to get you and bastards like you to be sentenced for these sh* It seems like an English national character is to blackmail Russian history, right? No problem there is a cure for it.
You, provocateurs, are whipping about Holocaust every year and you bustards hide from your illiterate population that 20 millions of Russians paid their life for your future without Nazis and not the victims of Holocaust did it or your "brave" UK, US soldiers sitting in trenches, waiting when Russians do the job for them.
For these reasons the UK is the least appealing country for every Russian except the Jews called oligarchs who keep their actives in UK banks that is steal money from Russian economy to avoid taxes.
At all good times every provocateur has been shot. Nowadays can be jailed what is not a bad option.
See you buddy.