Georgia bows to might of Russia
Monday, 11 August 2008
AFP/Getty Images
Near Beslan, a man throws cigarettes to Russian soldiers on their way to South Ossetia yesterday
Georgia's appeal for a ceasefire seemed to have fallen on deaf ears last night as Russian jets expanded their bombardment, targeting the capital, Tbilisi, for the first time. As the world's diplomats hurried to contain the violence and prevent the conflict engulfing the wider Caucasus region, Russia made clear it no longer considered Georgia's President Mikheil Saakashvili a partner, prompting accusations from his main ally, the United States, that Moscow was resisting peace and wanted regime change.
Georgian Interior Ministry spokesman Temur Yakobashvili said Russian tanks tried to cross from South Ossetia into Georgia-controlled territory but claimed they had been forced to turn back by its forces. The tanks were apparently trying to approach Gori, a city of about 50,000 that sits on Georgia's only significant east-west highway, he said. Thousands of people were said to be fleeing ahead of the Russian advance.
Russia has made no secret of its dislike for Mr Saakashvili, his alliance with Washington, his attempts to join Nato and his oft-repeated pledges to bring two separatist provinces back under Tbilisi's control – a pledge he tried to make good on Thursday by sending troops into South Ossetia.
The Russian Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, condemned the Georgian leader last night, saying: "A man who issued orders to commit war crimes which resulted in thousands of deaths of peaceful civilians cannot be viewed by Russia as a partner."
Underscoring the magnitude of the problem facing Georgia, Moscow-backed separatists in its other breakaway region, Abkhazia, declared they had opened a second front. Maxim Gunjia, the separatists' deputy foreign minister, said his tiny air force was bombing Georgian positions in the contested Kodori Gorge and that about 1,000 troops had also been deployed. "We have started operations because we saw the Georgian attack on South Ossetia and knew Abkhazia would be next," Mr Gunjia said from the Abkhaz capital, Sukhumi, a town of ramshackle beach bars, palm trees and buildings gutted in a 1992-93 war of independence against Tbilisi's forces.
Tbilisi accused Moscow of shipping 4,000 soldiers to the port of Ochamchire in Abkhazia. But Abkhaz officials insisted they were fighting on their own.
Georgia announced that it had pulled its troops out of South Ossetia and Mr Saakashvili said his government had been trying "all day" to contact Russia to discuss a ceasefire. "Georgia expresses its readiness to immediately start negotiations with the Russian Federation on a ceasefire and termination of hostilities," a statement said. Mr Saakashvili said he believed Russia intended to take over his country to secure energy supply routes from central Asia. Russian planes were reported last night to have dropped bombs near a British-operated oil pipeline south of Tbilisi, although it was not damaged.
Russia said it was sceptical of the Georgian claims of a withdrawal. "We must check all that. We don't trust the Georgian side," said Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister, Grigory Karasin. Moscow wants Georgia to rule out using force in future.
Georgia's ceasefire came on a day of claim and counterclaim, but a day when the military might of an angry Russian bear was on full display. As well as the bombing in and around the Georgian capital, including one explosion just metres from the main runway at Tbilisi airport, there were reports of explosions in the western town of Zugdidi. Meanwhile, dozens of Russian tanks and military vehicles headed for the two-mile Roki tunnel, which leads from Russian-held North Ossetia into the separatist South.
Russia's navy also entered the conflict, deploying a flotilla off Georgia's Black Sea coast. There were reports that they would mount a blockade, snuffing out supply lines for weapons, oil and wheat – a charge denied by Moscow. Unconfirmed reports late last night said the Russian war ships had sunk a Georgian vessel.
In the South Ossetian capital, Tskhinvali, the human suffering in the wake of the Georgian attack and Russian counter-attack was horrifyingly evident. Corpses were dotted about the city, burnt-out tanks littered the roads, and every other building showed bomb or mortar damage, with many simply smouldering ruins. Where once 10,000 people had roamed, there was barely a soul. Many residents have fled across the border into North Ossetia, and those left were the walking wounded, some heavily bandaged, others limping along on crutches.
Russian television spoke of a "humanitarian catastrophe" in South Ossetia, with more than 2,000 people dead and thousands homeless. President Dmitry Medvedev – who has largely taken a back seat to the Prime Minister, Vladimir Putin, who sped from Beijing to North Ossetia on Saturday – termed the Georgian action a "genocide" and ordered officials to document the crimes.
A Georgian government source said 130 Georgian civilians and soldiers had been killed and 1,165 wounded, many by Russian bombing inside Georgia. Russia denied attacking civilian targets.
Mr Gunjia said Georgia had sparked a "chain reaction" by attacking South Ossetia. "It's no longer possible to listen to Georgia talk about a peaceful solution in South Ossetia or Abkhazia, or offer us autonomy. Georgia has shown its real face."
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

Comments
146 Comments
Russian people - pacific people, but americans - barbarian. Eurepians!!! We mast be together!!!
Posted by Nikolai | 15.08.08, 10:22 GMT
Random
The Russians have a port in the Black Sea called Novorossisyk and they used it to blockade Georgia. Had Ukraine and georgia joined the EU or the NATO, this port would have lost its efficacy as it could be monitored and interdicted had the need arisen. This woul;d have compromised the Russian ability to move freely.
As it is,the Ukraine told Russia if it's fleet or ships left the Crimean peninsula to blockade Georgia, they would not be permitted to return.
Finally, Russia would also stand compromised n the Sea of Azov which it shares with the Ukraine and the River Don flows into. This would for all intents and purposes would have rendered the Don-Volga canal useless.
georgia doesnt have a chance in hell against Russia. The West will standby and wring their hands over Georgia. The world today is not unipolar it is multipolar and Russia most surely have a part to play in it.
What is most important and needs definiition is NATO and its role.
Posted by Fazal Habib Curmally | 13.08.08, 06:04 GMT
If Kosovo can seccede from Serbia and can be given the status of an independent state why not South Ossetia and Abkhazia?? If Milesovic can be tried in the Hague for crime against humanity and genocide why not Saakashvilli for killing 2000 Ossetians with tank grenades and aerial bombardments???
When Talibans attack USA they are terrorists but when they and Chechen fundamentalists attack Russia they are called freedom fighters!! What a double standard by USA and its stooges!!
People should understand the divide and rule policy of USA and it always backfires.
Posted by Humanist | 12.08.08, 23:55 GMT
Georgia and US have been cooking this tragety for a while. How can you naitvely expect that Russia, with all her remaining millitary might, waiting there "helplessly" to see Kosevo annex? misslie "defence" system building under the nose? Ukrain and Georgia (expected NATO) blocking her strategic Blacksea entance?
Technically , it ia a well-thought out and executed masterpiece reaction by Russia!
Posted by Dr. Wang | 12.08.08, 23:29 GMT
Fazal Habib Curmally, objection to your statement. Russia has access to Black Sea by its own territory, don't you know that?
Besides, hence you appeal to the international conflict. Do you have any idea what's gonna happen then? Do you really think that helping Georgia NATO will directly confront Russia? It is not that post-communist country in decay that you may think it is. It has nukes, strong army and consistent opinion on what's going on in S. Ossetia.
Posted by Random | 12.08.08, 08:06 GMT
The invasion of ossetia was devised by the americans and implemented by Georgia.
The Plan was to wipe out the population of ossetia in 24 hours
New wapons were used for this purpose
The plan backfired, now is payday.
Posted by Jim | 12.08.08, 08:03 GMT
The Russian invasion of Georgia, is a result of the NATO meeting earlier this year when Georgia and Ukraine requested/were asked to join NATO. Had they joined, it would have denied Russia access to the Black Sea. The invasion of South Ossetia gave Russia the best oppurtunity to squash any desire that may have existed about the idea of denying the Russians a Black Sea access.
I believe Russia will hit then hard and replace the Georgian President or curb his desire to look to the West for help. This is smart because the enemy is a neighbour and allies are thousands of miles away.
It is also time for the West to decide what the NATO is about. If it is a military alliance, where are the troops? Where is the West's help for Georgia? Is the West's reaponse to Georgia an extension of the overstretch in Iraq and Afghanistan?
The Georgian episode raises interesting questions that must be looked at and answered.
Posted by Fazal Habib Curmally | 12.08.08, 04:42 GMT
"Tina, can we get back to basics on this? What has Georgia - a signatory to the Statute of the International Criminal Court - done which could warrant enforcement action by the Security Council under Chapter VII?
If nothing, then Russia's assault on Georgia is incurably aggressive in law, for there are no facts on which even the Security Council could lawfully have authorised the use of force. "
Russia was signatory to the cease fire between Georgia/S. Ossetia, and was already in Georgian S. Ossetia as a peacekeeper. When Georgia invaded S. Ossetia, destroying it's capital and killing large #'s of civilians, Russia was justified BY THAT DOCUMENT to intevene to stop Georgia's attack. Georgia signed an agreement including RUSSIA, NOT THE UN, as peace guarantor, thus there's no need for "Security Council action".
If post-fact UN acquiescence to the dominant side legitimizes anything, then there are no more principles... So don't toss them around as if you beleive in them.
Posted by C | 12.08.08, 02:53 GMT
Britain and America, alas, wouldn't have a leg to stand on even in commenting on the Russian intervention in Georgia, let alone taking military action. The Anglo-American invasion of Iraq was a gross violation of the UN Charter, which had nothing whatever to do with the internal security of either of the invading states. The kettle is not in a position to call the frying-pan black. The folly of giving a two-fingered salute to international law, in invading Iraq without a UN mandate, is now coming home to roost.
Posted by Edmund Burke | 12.08.08, 00:03 GMT
Has anybody heard the latest from b...... bush and cheney regarding Russia. War on terror ,who's idea? Let's defeat the terrorists in the white house.
John.
Posted by John | 11.08.08, 23:41 GMT
146 Comments