World

Partly Sunny with Showers 8° London Hi 11°C / Lo 7°C

History made as Chirac is told to stand trial

Former head of state accused of embezzling taxpayers' money to put political allies in non-existent posts

By Genevieve Roberts in Paris

Jacques Chirac has been accused by one French newspaper of handing out fictitious jobs 'like baguettes at a bakery'

REUTERS

Jacques Chirac has been accused by one French newspaper of handing out fictitious jobs 'like baguettes at a bakery'

Jacques Chirac, the former French president, was ordered to stand trial for alleged corruption while he was mayor of Paris. He is accused of embezzling taxpayers' money to pay more than 20 political cronies for posts that turned out to be non-existent. Mr Chirac now becomes the first former head of state in French history to be put on trial.

In an unprecedented move, an investigating magistrate ruled he should answer charges in court of using the city payroll to fund "ghost workers" who were, in reality working to promote his right-wing political party or in some cases doing nothing at all.

Mr Chirac, who has been under investigation for the past decade for allegedly abusing his position as mayor, enjoyed immunity from prosecution from 1995 to 2007 in his role as head of state. The left-wing daily newspaper Libération accused Mr Chirac, who was mayor of Paris from 1977 to 1995, of distributing fictitious jobs "like baguettes at the bakery".

A spokesperson for Mr Chirac said yesterday that he was "calm" and "determined to prove" his innocence. Investigating magistrate Judge Xavière Simeoni threw out charges of forgery of government documents but Mr Chirac, along with nine former aides, still faces charges relating to the alleged fake jobs.

Investigators looked at 481 supposedly sham contracts and the judge laid charges relating to 21 of them.

The scandal will further undermine French trust in politicians, coming just weeks after the Clearstream trial which tarnished France's political elite by pitting Dominique de Villepin, the former prime minister, against President Nicolas Sarkozy.

Dominique Paille, spokesman for the Union for a Popular Movement, the ruling centre-right party created by Mr Chirac, said: "Jacques Chirac is a personality whom the French love very much. It's a shame that, at the end of his personal career, he be put on trial." Mr Paille told Radio France Info: "It is doubtless a painful test for a president, and not necessarily very good for France's image."

While Mr Chirac, now 76, has been accused of a series of corruption allegations during his career, this is the first time legal action has been taken against him, and his popularity has risen since he left office in 2007. This month he was named France's most popular politician, with a 76 per cent approval rating, according to an Ifop poll for Paris-Match magazine.

This compares with 44 per cent for President Sarkozy, suggesting that many French voters look nostalgically on his traditional approach to public life.

Since leaving office he has devoted his time to launching a charitable foundation and writing his memoirs, the first volume of which will be published next month.

The inquiry intohis running of the Paris town hall opened in 1999, after magistrates received a complaint alleging widespread misuse of public funds, illegal party financing and destruction of evidence.

This did not prevent him from winning a second term in office in 2002. That year, his former chief of staff was placed under formal investigation amid allegations that fake contracts signed by Mr Chirac and his successor as mayor, Jean Tibéri, cost the city €4.5m. After stepping down in 2007, Mr Chirac was placed under formal investigation on several counts.

State prosecutors could appeal against the investigating magistrate's decision, forcing the Paris Appeal Court to make a final ruling on whether to try Mr Chirac.

Benefits system: Cronyism at the top

Jacques Chirac's spell as Mayor of Paris was a very good time to be sleeping with, married to, or simply well connected with somebody on an inside track with his Rassemblement pour la République (Gaullist) party. During the period from 1982 and 1996 nearly 700 people benefited from the largesse of the City Hall.

Among those who ended up on the municipal payroll were a mountaineer, a professional cyclist, a fencing star and the daughters, wives and nieces of several leading French politicians. The city funded these positions through an elaborate web of illicit kickbacks worth millions of euros from developers, building contractors and other big businesses.

Some 21 allegedly fraudulent job contracts have come back to haunt the popular former leader, making Mr Chirac potentially, the first ex-French head of state in modern times to endure the humiliation of having to defend himself in court.

But this is not the first case linking Mr Chirac to allegations of cronyism and sleaze. Alain Juppé (left), a former Prime Minister was convicted in 2004 for corruption during his time as a mayoral deputy to Mr Chirac. He was given a suspended jail term but many think Juppé shouldered the blame for his boss.

Dominique de Villepin (below), another former Prime Minister who served during Chirac's time in the Elysée, is awaiting a verdict on charges of trying to smear Nicolas Sarkozy in the so-called Clearstream scandal. Mr Chirac was accused by lawyers in court of ordering Villepin to frame the President.

There was a ghost in the room too during the conviction this week of the former interior minister Charles Pasqua, in the so-called Angolagate arms trade scandal. Pasqua claims the man who knew all about the deals was ... Jacques Chirac.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Haaa Chirac!!
[info]demofriendly wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 07:43 am (UTC)
The Europe of unaccountable elites must stop
.
join us
.
http://europeanpp.wordpress.com/
.
Any old iron?
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 08:25 am (UTC)
Right....so thinking back it was this man that said he would always veto any UN resolution authorising military action against Saddam Hussein's Iraq when his state oil company / slush fund was the holder of an immensely lucrative Production Sharing Contract for Iraq's oil, favourable to France to the point of being odius and quite the opposite of the deals being done today which are very favourable to Iraq.

The suggestion that the French UN veto was sold is of couurse, how does it go again, oh yes, unthinkable.

Saddam Hussein of course thought that military action would not occur and he would win his game of bluffing his WMD strength. Perhaps he would not have thought this had a resolution been passed and thus the entire affair may have been avoided. Who knows.

As for domestically, Chirac is very popular.

In the UK we find our MP's have maximised their small in the scheme of things expenses claims and we hate them unconditionally for it.

In France the President, Interior Minister, Prime Minister(s) and others are mired in multi million dollar corruption and arms dealing in breach of UN embargoes (handy old UN, increased the French profit margin) and people like them for it.

Which is more dysfunctional? Tough call.



[info]freedon4sale wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 04:19 pm (UTC)
what is new?all of them are the same.from top to bottom,fish is rotten from its head,the only reason for non Arbian leaders being not " accused of Corruption is that they never leave their position until they die.
Western law allow to question them...accept T.Blair.?
why?
we should see later.
freedom is not for sale, but it must be paid for. not by you though it seems
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 04:49 pm (UTC)
Tony Blair was not corrupt, he just made a decision that some disagree with, others don't, to act in Iraq. I have not heard any corruption accusations against him, until your post actually. What are these allegations? Or were you just making a general point with an individual name, a name of someone who no one will mind you making any assertion about?

it is NOT all the same, it is at least of different orders of magnitude.

France is the global Bagpuss, loved unconditionally, no matter what they do, we remain.... positive!

UK is the global Dobby Bad Dobby. Dobby hurt Dobby.

I find it all rather pathetic and as I said above, cannot decide who is more dysfunctional. What a fine pair we are eh?
Re: freedom is not for sale, but it must be paid for. not by you though it seems
[info]freedon4sale wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 08:40 pm (UTC)
T.Blair got a house worth a millions,if he and his wife work for another 30 years in the same sallary he will never dream of having it.
T.Blair sold his country to the bankers to privatize the institution in UK for example NHS,call it Foundation hospital,tax paying for it,banks use it for "renting",NHS paying interest only,the future generation will never pay the capital;this is only one example,he got the money ; protected from being questioned in Iraq war lies,keep him out of the country,keep his income secure,he may sell west bank and Jerusalem as he did to Britain.
if anyone did same same to this country,he will be persecuted.....but he may be reworded to be head of Europe.
Re: freedom is not for sale, but it must be paid for. not by you though it seems
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 08:56 pm (UTC)
Yes, successful. I see no corruption. Cherie is a top silk and one the leading women in her profession. Do you hate that people will pay to hear him talk? LOL

But compared to Chirac? Now THAT is corruption. And of course its all the French politicians. Did you see how they broke the UN arms embargo in the Angolan civil war? How many dead there then? And for what? Commercial gain for France in the hateful FrancAfrique policy of real 21st century colonialism. Um Bongo!

Still, hating Blair is so much more, well, shallow really.

you call this successful?freedommonge?
[info]freedon4sale wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 09:38 pm (UTC)
T.Blair got a house worth a millions,if he and his wife work for another 30 years in the same sallary he will never dream of having it.
T.Blair sold his country to the bankers to privatize the institution in UK for example NHS,call it Foundation hospital,tax paying for it,banks use it for "renting",NHS paying interest only,the future generation will never pay the capital;this is only one example,he got the money ; protected from being questioned in Iraq war lies,keep him out of the country,keep his income secure,he may sell west bank and Jerusalem as he did to Britain.
if anyone did same same to this country,he will be persecuted.....but he may be reworded
Re: you call this successful?freedommonge?
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 09:41 am (UTC)
As a top silk Cherie Blair likely was earning in the region of half a million a year. That alone would seem sufficient to buy a house worth millions.

How do you think Blair "got the money" from his NHS, banking and other policy choices then? Surely to accuse theft you have to show some proof? or at least a plausible chain of events. merely observing some policies you don't like is not enough to show that said policies resulted in personal financial gain for Mr Blair.

I suspect you have no idea how Mr Blair is supposed to have enriched himself.

I suspect you merely hate him and would be happy to pick up any accusation so long as it allowed you to condemn him.

I think that this is sadly the level of a good deal of debate. What is "wrong" with our country again?
Re: you call this successful?freedommonge?
[info]freedon4sale wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 10:44 am (UTC)
life is now full of misnomers.
"Israeli "wall" will become a "security barrier" or a "fence", a pro-Western Arab dictator a "strongman" and "occupied" Israeli territory will become "disputed";Blair is successful for "bribing" his wife make deal with buying and selling house in london,he is sacked left the country without investigation.
Pr.Diana lost her life for criticism,David Kelly is the same.
murderers and corrupted.
Re: you call this successful?freedommonge?
[info]freedon4sale wrote:
Saturday, 28 November 2009 at 10:38 pm (UTC)
MP Gerald Kaufman (Jew/ Labour House of Lords)has created a stir likening the Israeli attacks on Gaza with the actions of the Nazis in World War Two.
Please check the following link http://news..bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7833726.stm
Also slide show in Arabic but could be understood (diffrent between Hamas & Fateh)
""When Christians and Jews refused to convert, the armies of Islam took to war to force conversions. Forced conversions have no validity, and have the opposite effect of creating hatred for the converter in the hearts and minds of those forced. ""
THIS IS TOTAL MISLEADING IN THE HISTORY OF ISLAM,MUSLIMS SAVED BOTH JEWS AND CHRIACINS,IN SPAIN AND IN THE WORLD, OTTOMAN EMPYER AND KALKIFA OMAER,
Jews were expelled from Arab lands for Arabs? hatred of Jews.?

History, in fact, paints Arabs as liberators of Jewish communities in Jerusalem (638), Spain (711), Palestine (1186), and Germany (1940s). The discovery of the Cairo ?Geniza?, a treasure trove of documents found in the 11th century Cairo Synagogue, prove that Jewish communities were an integral part of Islamic culture. After WW I, it were Zionist leaders and Zionist agents and British officials who created fear among Jewish communities living Arab countries ? to relocate them into British mandated Palestine as part of Zionist strategy to increase the Jewish population in Palestine.
Blair grandmother is a jew.
Re: freedom is not for sale, but it must be paid for. not by you though it seems
[info]freedon4sale wrote:
Thursday, 5 November 2009 at 04:37 pm (UTC)
you may like this:
n expert on European history at Tel Aviv University
, Dr Sand drew on extensive historical and archaeological research to support not only this claim but several more ? all equally controversial.

In addition, he argues that the Jews were never exiled from the Holy Land, that most of today?s Jews have no historical connection to the land called Israel and that the only political solution to the country?s conflict with the Palestinians is to abolish the Jewish state.

Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date