World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Murder sparks demands for 'chemical castration'

France calls for hormone treatment for sexual criminals

By John Lichfield in Paris

Police search the wood where the body of Marie-Christine Hodeau was found

afp

Police search the wood where the body of Marie-Christine Hodeau was found

France is considering the compulsory "chemical castration" of sexual criminals after a woman jogger was murdered in a forest south of Paris by a convicted rapist.

The "voluntary" use of drugs to destroy or limit the libido is already available to male sex offenders in France. The Prime Minister, François Fillon, has now announced that he will consider ways of making the law "more obligatory".

An anguished debate about chemical castration has been raging since the murder of Marie-Christine Hodeau, 42, who was kidnapped while jogging near the forest of Fontainebleau, 30 miles south of Paris, last week. After she was bundled into a car boot, Ms Hodeau called police on her mobile phone and gave them the make and registration of her attacker's vehicle. Her presence of mind failed to save her life but led to her killer's rapid arrest and confession. He took police to woodland where they found Ms Hodeau's body hidden beneath branches.

Manuel da Cruz, 47, had already been sentenced to 11 years in prison for the kidnap and rape of a 13-year- old girl in 2002. He was released in March 2007 and went back to live in the same village as his young victim.

The case has generated an outcry against the French judicial system and pressure for the hardening of a law introduced in 2005 which allows sexual offenders to volunteer for so-called "chemical castration" – the use of anti-hormone treatment to reduce or destroy the sexual appetite. Politicians within President Nicolas Sarkozy's centre-right party said that it was time for France to move towards the compulsory form of chemical castration, which already exists in Germany, Belgium and Denmark.

They were supported by some politicians on the left, including the Socialist former presidential candidate, Ségolène Royal. "Everything which goes in the direction of preventing sexual predators from attacking again must be tried," she said.

Other political figures on both right and left appealed for calm and warned that legislation "driven by headlines" was almost always ill-considered. Benoît Hamon, the spokesman for the Socialists, the main opposition party, said that enforced chemical castration was a "deplorable" and "indecent" idea and probably contrary to international law.

On Thursday, the justice minister, Michèle Alliot-Marie, said that she would propose a draft law by the end of this month to toughen the existing legislation. She said, however, that chemical castration would remain "voluntary".

Mr Fillon has now gone a step further. "We are not ruling out any possibility on any subject," he said. New legislation would be brought forward make chemical castration "more obligatory".

Proponents of chemical castration say that, unlike physical castration, it is reversible and should not be considered a "cruel or unusual" punishment. Hormone-blocking chemicals are used to diminish, or switch off, the libido but the effects last only as long as the treatment.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Execution is better, clean and simple, get rid of the vermin !
[info]human_trafikker wrote:
Sunday, 4 October 2009 at 07:31 am (UTC)
Just behead them like the old days.
Rapists
[info]leonore1935 wrote:
Sunday, 4 October 2009 at 11:17 am (UTC)
I suppose raping and murdering is not considered cruel and unusual!
Sexual predatrors should serve out all their sentence. Why was this man released early and allowed to return to live near his victim after only doing about half his time. It seems the French legal system is
about as mad as ours is. Oh of course we are all in the EU aren't we?
Execution risks errors and is hypocritical
[info]sebmel wrote:
Sunday, 4 October 2009 at 03:33 pm (UTC)
Either life has value or it doesn't. Giving society the right to evaluate everyone's life on a scale that has execution at one end and sainthood at the other is perverse and inherently fascistic.

I favour productive single sex penal colonies on which those whose lax morality permits them to deny other's their liberty are denied their liberty, permanently.

The system would allow time for erroneous convictions to be rescinded and compensated.
Rapists
[info]whitbeg0ld wrote:
Monday, 5 October 2009 at 02:57 pm (UTC)
I think they should have whatever they have CUT OFF !!! if thats not possible then they should spend life in jail or not have a life at all!!
Criminals like these don't deserve rights...
[info]cfl258 wrote:
Wednesday, 7 October 2009 at 03:08 pm (UTC)
Science can now prove many crimes with DNA, so there can be no doubt of the perpetrator. In this case apparently Cruz couldn’t even explain why he did what he did. It seems it is an urge within these men which takes over them, so time in jail is not going to change or 'rehabilitate' them. Woman shouldn't be continuous victims because people feel these criminals have rights. Mandatory chemical castration should be strongly considered, so we can all live in a safer society, and not have to suffer like Ms Hodeau's family will.

Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date