World

Rain (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Pope says condoms won't solve Aids

Associated Press

Pope Benedict XVI said on his way to Africa today that condoms were not the answer in the continent's fight against HIV, his first explicit statement on an issue that has divided even clergy working with Aids patients.

Benedict had never directly addressed condom use. He has said that the Roman Catholic Church is in the forefront of the battle against Aids. The Vatican encourages sexual abstinence to fight the spread of the disease.

"You can't resolve it with the distribution of condoms," the Pope told reporters aboard the Alitalia plane headed to Yaounde, Cameroon, where he will begin a seven-day pilgrimage on the continent. "On the contrary, it increases the problem."

Some priests and nuns working with those living with HIV/Aids question the church's opposition to condoms amid the pandemic ravaging Africa.

Benedict's first papal trip to Africa will take him to Cameroon and Angola. Africa is the fastest-growing region for the Roman Catholic Church, though it competes with Islam and evangelical churches.

The Pope also said today that he intends to make an appeal for "international solidarity" for Africa in the face of the global economic downturn.

He said that while the church does not propose specific economic solutions, it can give "spiritual and moral" suggestions.

Describing the current crisis as the consequence of "a deficit of ethics in economic structures," the Pope said: "It is here that the church can make a contribution."

On the plane, Benedict also dismissed the notion that he was facing increasing opposition and isolation within the church, particularly after an outreach to ultraconservatives that led to his lifting the excommunication of a Holocaust-denying bishop.

"The myth of my solitude makes me laugh," the Pope said, adding that he can count on a network of friends and aides whom he sees every day.

In a letter to Catholic bishops released last week, the Pope made an unusual public acknowledgment of Vatican mistakes and turmoil in his church over the rehabilitation of Bishop Richard Williamson.

While acknowledging mistakes were made in handling the affair, Benedict said he was saddened that he was criticised "with open hostility" even by those who should have known better.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Solve AIDS?
[info]wormery wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 02:07 pm (UTC)
How can one 'solve AIDS'? It's not a cross word y'know. 'Solve the problem of AIDS' or 'cure AIDS' perhaps. Your English is as sloppy as the pope's morality - he and the muslims etc just want to outbreed the competition, whcih is why the world is so overcrowded and mankind is doomed.
Nobbing!
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 02:28 pm (UTC)
Leaving morals aside, Condoms just won't work in Africa. They love their sex and plenty of it. They also like it 'raw', so condoms aren't on the menu.
Cross words indeed
[info]cpencil wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 02:46 pm (UTC)
Wormery dear thing, it's neither crossword nor fair game to sling accusations of poor English while demeaning the Pope's and Muslims' morality when one's own house isn't in order I'd say. Bravo though for trying to educate the writer with such pertinent and intelligent points.
Re: Cross words indeed
[info]wormery wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 05:51 pm (UTC)
cpencil old boy, one is merely pointing our bad English - most people can't y'know, because their English is poor too, but to those of us whose trade is based on words, these things matter. So they don't to a chav like you. Fine.

Any argument to put forward there to counter mine that all religions are in competition to outbreed each other? Or too busy bitching about other posters. Not very moral that eh? And I am certainly ore moral than any religious nut I know. My house is in order thanks - I hope you keep the secure unit where you live in order too. If you can't, ask a nurse.

By the way, the unsayable is: black people have a biology that makes them more susceptable to HIV. As black people are more likely to get heart disease and strokes and diabetes. As the average IQ of black people is 70 where for whites it's 100. Humans are 99.5 per cent the same - there's a massive 0.5 per cent difference. We must accept this.

Anyway, in terms of over-population AIDS in Africa could be seen as a good thing. Their populations have quadrupled in the last 40 years, so this gives balanced. I'd rather the wildlife survived rather than the people actually. I hope they all go sterile from some new as yet unnamed disease. Then humanity may just survive the 21st century...
Re: Cross words indeed
[info]cpencil wrote:
Wednesday, 18 March 2009 at 08:29 am (UTC)
wormery, I do have a tendency to haul people up on their poor command of English when they make a point of mistaking their own risible use of it as somehow better than a person employed to employ it, to wit: you write like an imbecile, both in content and style. Thankfully I have better things to do than correct your nonsense: clearly the whoops and spasms that trade as opinion in your understanding of the world bring on the twitches when you're allowed near a keyboard.

I don't think it's unsayable to write that black people have a greater susceptibility to AIDS, given that (in my understanding) some studies into a gene variation affording greater protection against malaria also show a decrease in protection against AIDS.

I do take issue with your unreferenced sweeping statement of racial differences in IQ though. I'm obviously not a member of the same library as you, and would dearly appreciate a link to some proof.

And finally, your wishing the wildlife survive over people, I'll put that down to a whoopspasm keyboard twitch and leave you to boil in your froth.
Finally someone said it!
[info]howsuperfluous wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 03:31 pm (UTC)
AIDs cannot be 'solved', 'cured' or regulated with the use of contraception. Evidently as within most countries the surest way to not contract sexually transmitted diseases is to not have sex; it's a pity that abstinence is not seen as an option globally, or it is at least not something promoted within our society. The world would be a safer, healthier place if people would learn to exercise self control, as we clearly should be capable of doing as humans.

I'm glad that the Pope had the sense to say that contraception is not the answer, condoms are not fool proof - there is a lot that is capable of going wrong with them, it is not a solution. Evidently an education is what these people need.

If condoms were working in Africa as a prevention strategy, we would know by now.
Re: Finally someone said it!
[info]jonny_socialist wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 03:44 pm (UTC)
Your name (howsuperfluous) could really refer to your comment. Onl prudes and idiots encourage abstinance. Its a ridiculous and childish notion. Condoms DO work if people have access to them and their isnt "A lot" which can go wrong with them. They are about 97% affective. Pretty good odds Id say.
Promiscuity - Spread the disease
[info]hanif001 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 06:22 pm (UTC)
Promiscuity is the main cause of this problem - over the last 30 years its moved up to a new level due to various factors. In the UK, the average 40 year old male has slept with 13 women. This figure is probably higher in various parts of Africa. These are habits which help the spread of this disease. Condoms would help, but promiscuity is the problem.
Sweeet Jesus!!
[info]jonny_socialist wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 03:37 pm (UTC)
Is the Pope really as out of touch and stupid as he seems? Every time he opens his mouth he appears to put his foot in it. Promoting abstinancesows a fundamental misunderstanding of human nature. More complete lunacy from the kiddie fiddling death cult.
Re: Sweeet Jesus!!
[info]sara_sense wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 04:20 pm (UTC)
Well said.
Re: Sweeet Jesus!!
[info]rayamiles wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 09:21 pm (UTC)
Yep right on the money and you have put it a little more succinctly than i would have.
[info]roryzoology wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 03:54 pm (UTC)
how this stupid cenial old man can denounce a solution to preventing the spread of HIV due to his stupid religion is sickening. condoms are an option and need to be more widely available but the fact is this should be attempted, not denounced by a stupid old man whom is believed by some unfortunate people, solely due to his stupid religious ideology.

Any option to preventing the spread of HIV needs to be tried, condoms may not be the answer, but the pope should shut up and allow medical experts to develop strategies to make condoms more readily available, so that more people have the chance of not getting HIV and dying of AIDS.
If a Mullah said this kind of medieval crapola
[info]neil_mcgowan wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 06:36 pm (UTC)
they'd be launching the ICBMs by now.

The Iranian President denies the holocaust - and we're ready to bomb him. Williamson denies the holocaust - and this arsehole Pope Ratzinger restores him as a Bishop!!
Re: If a Mullah said this kind of medieval crapola
[info]findempire wrote:
Wednesday, 18 March 2009 at 08:25 am (UTC)
Nazi Ratzi should be beatified as the patron saint of child-molesters, Holocaust deniers, and AIDS. Who needs Satan when you have a pope like Ratzi?
A Nazi in sheep's clothing
[info]needforreform wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 06:43 pm (UTC)
This man goes on to sadden all right-thinking people. He continues to reign as pope. However, as the article well indicates, he is increasingly isolated. I simply do not understand why the normal, secular British press continue to give him so much prominence. It is ridiculous because the great majority of people in Britain do not regard this Benedict man as holding any authority over their lives nor of those around them. This ongoing appearance of articles - 'the pope this.....' 'the pope that....'. Like the majority of readers, I prefer not to have all this regularly foisted on me. Poor African people. As if they haven't one endless burden of hunger, strife, disease and sorrow without having to listen to this fascist in denial tell them what's good for them.

Read & think properly before you mouth off.
[info]ab12 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 07:01 pm (UTC)
"Pope Benedict XVI said on his way to Africa today that condoms were not the answer in the continent's fight against HIV, his first explicit statement on an issue that has divided even clergy working with Aids patients.
Benedict had never directly addressed condom use. He has said that the Roman Catholic Church is in the forefront of the battle against Aids. The Vatican encourages sexual abstinence to fight the spread of the disease."
Re-read this carefully and slowly you knobs.. there's nothing there which says he thinks condoms shouldn't be used nor that the ONLY way to "solve" or "cure", whichever you prefer, AIDS is through abstinence. It's a very simple point which is being made: condoms ALONE are not a solution and a little less promiscuity would go a long way.
Re: Read & think properly before you mouth off.
[info]violetsmart wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 11:53 pm (UTC)
Read even more carefully, ab12, please.

""You can't resolve it with the distribution of condoms," the Pope told reporters aboard the Alitalia plane headed to Yaounde, Cameroon, where he will begin a seven-day pilgrimage on the continent. "On the contrary, it increases the problem.""

The distribution of condoms increases the problem? Practicable birth control is out of the question? The doctors and mother of a 9-year old who was raped by her stepfather and became pregnant with twins were excommunicated when they had her abort to save her life?

Face it, the Catholic Church doesn't know what the heck to do regarding the issue of sex. Never has.

But then, how could it, insisting on a clergy that cannot marry? Until it blew up in the Vatican's face in the 90s--it carefully hid the plague of pedophile priests preying on the young entrusted to their care.

Enough with the hypocrisy and stupid pronouncements that only make reasonable people furious!
Re: Read & think properly before you mouth off.
[info]rayamiles wrote:
Wednesday, 18 March 2009 at 10:13 am (UTC)
Sorry who is the knob here :-

The pope said :- "On the contrary, it increases the problem."

My intrepation of this comment is that he thinks condoms should not be used, i would like to know how you read this in any other way.

Perhaps you should re-read the article VERY slowly........
Does anyone need any more evidence that this pope is incompetent?
[info]ydef wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 10:50 pm (UTC)
I mean seriously, from his comments and actions he appears as a doddering, senile, out of touch, reactionary crypto-nazi. His statements continue to reek of ignorance and division, like this one. Of course condoms don't cure AIDS, no one is disputing that Mr Pope. Condoms, however, have been shown to MITIGATE the spread of AIDS and I wonder if it ever occurs to you that your regal statements like condoms only increase the problem should be backed up by empirical evidence? Or is that something you just take on faith after a conversation with your god your holiness?

Considering the Catholic church has publicized their position that evolution does not contradict with their religious doctrines, and the depth of some of the great Catholic minds in areas like philosophy, by the likes of such giants as Thomas Aquinas, you would think that their 'intelligentsia' of today not be as reactionary as it appears to be. When are they going to come to terms with the reality that the impuse to procreate is one if not the the strongest impulse of our species, as it is any species, and that their policies of anti-birth control and preaching the false solution of sexual abstinence is an ignorant and dangerous position when Catholicism is the dominant religion in Africa where the AIDS epidemic is out of control. Your own damn clergy can't even keep their pledge of lifelong abstinence, so how can you expect it of common folk? These Catholic clergy are a self righteous, stubborn bunch but they do seem to come around when all evidence to the contrary threatens to marginalize their power and influence. Many abused wives died over the clergy's stubborn refusal to grant divorce before they changes their policy. How many people have to die of AIDS before they do the same? Not under the rule of this doddering German sheeple.
How stupid can one man be?
[info]condi1836 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 10:59 pm (UTC)
The pope must realize he is a world leader and must act responsibly. Are the warring tribes of Africa who use rape as one of their weapons and spread disease actually going to listen to an abstinence lecture. Is the man lost in medieval times?
pope suggests that condoms won't solve aids
[info]chimaoge1 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 March 2009 at 11:22 pm (UTC)
As an African what I cannot get is all this crazy pope-bashing my western extremely prejudiced western lefties. If a couple ignore the pope's preaching about sexual abstinence before marriage or no extra-marital affairs when married and go ahead to have promiscous sexual life style, they are also likely not to listen to the pope's call for them not to use condom. I grew up in Nigeria and as religious as we are, people still do their own thing in spite of whatever their religious leader say. If people followed what religious leaders like the pope say all the time, then corruption, crime, rape and AIDS would not exist in many african nations.

To summarize : It is unlikely that an african who disobeyed papal prouncement on fornication and adultery will turn around and refuse to use freely available condoms just because the pope said so.



Pope: "Condoms won't solve AIDS"
[info]simon_gardner wrote:
Wednesday, 18 March 2009 at 10:44 am (UTC)
One of the worst religious crimes committed inter alia against the poor of Africa and South America has been the catholic condom ban and consequent AIDS increase.

The catholic church is a top-down autocracy. Indeed it prides itself on this fact. The pope's word is officially final and absolute. He is the arbiter of everything in the Catholic church and thus responsible personally for its policies - all of them.

To be a good catholic, you have to believe in the absolute and complete authority of the church and in particular the pope personally. This has been laid down in published church laws that are a matter of public record. This is in contrast (say) to the CofE.

The direct consequence of the last pope's and the church's policy banning physical barrier contraception for its adherents in the 2nd and 3rd worlds is (it is reliably estimated) some 2 million extra deaths through AIDS during the last pope's rule.

This pope continues the needless slaughter.

[Interestingly, when I very recently tried to make this very point on the blog of Tom Harris MP (Labour) he censored it on the grounds that it was "factually wrong" (it's accurate) and "simply too offensive." This was at http://www.tomharris.org.uk/2009/03/11/complaints-the-latest-alternative-to-debate/. There is instead discussion here2 and at - Tom Harris MP (UK) - religious censorship on his blog .]
cpencil, mind your language
[info]osir wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 08:14 pm (UTC)
cpencil! I just happen to read your comments, next time you write about africans think twice and be sure of what you say. Black or white all love sex, its unfortunate that AIds is a poor mans disease. in europe you are lucky that those who are suffering from this disease have drugs and condoms for free. my dear, you comment like a racist, am sure you are no good to this society. African need to stop being dependent on Europe who produce sub-standard goods and drugs for them. Africans are not animals, OK.

Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date