World

Partly Sunny with Showers 10° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Putin pens his first work: How to fire people

PM offers glimpse into Kremlin power plays

By Shaun Walker in Moscow

As well as a writer, Vladimir Putin is also a judo expert, painter and singer

AP

As well as a writer, Vladimir Putin is also a judo expert, painter and singer

In the past year he's been painting pictures, singing songs, and demonstrating his expert judo moves. This week Russia's Prime Minister Vladimir Putin will complete a clean sweep of the artistic disciplines after turning his hand to writing. Mr Putin's first ever column for a Russian media outlet will be published on Friday, entitled "Why it's hard to fire people".

But while the previous efforts, along with his skiing, tiger-shooting and bare-chested fishing expeditions, have been propaganda for personal abilities, the article seems to have a more serious point. Written for a niche monthly magazine, Russian Pioneer, it reads as the first admission by Mr Putin of the scale of infighting that raged in the Kremlin during his eight years as president.

"Conflicts within a team, especially within a big team, always arise," writes Mr Putin, in extracts leaked to a Russian news agency. "This happens every minute, every second – simply because between people there are always clashes of interest."

Most analysts believe that during Mr Putin's presidency, a vicious battle was fought for power and influence between liberals and hardliners within and around the Kremlin. This continues today as the relatively liberal President Dmitry Medvedev and his close associates appear to be fighting off challenges from a hardline group of conservative former KGB officers. Mr Putin is sometimes lumped in with the latter group, but many analysts suggest that he actually played a delicate balancing act to stop the two groups from descending into all-out war.

The scuffles are rarely aired in public and Mr Putin himself has not made direct reference to them before. But now he seems to confirm the most radical of interpretations. "I can say honestly that while I was president, if I hadn't interfered in certain situations, in Russia there would long ago ceased to have been a government."

The magazine's editor Andrei Kolesnikov said he had not had to make any corrections as the article was written in excellent Russian, albeit with Mr Putin's famous idiosyncratic expressions in abundance.

For any corporate hotshots looking for tips on how to get rid of underachieving employees in times of economic crisis, the article lays out the "Putin method" of firing, which – on paper at least – sounds surprisingly humane. "Sometimes from outside it seems like someone should simply be swept aside with a broom," writes Mr Putin. "But I can assure you that it's not always like this. You should never bad-mouth someone behind their back, and it's impermissible to fire somebody and toss them aside just because somebody has told you something bad about them."

Mr Putin also claims that he always gives people the right to fight their corner. "In contrast to previous, Soviet rulers, I always do it personally. I usually call the person into my office, look them in the eye, and say: 'There are concrete complaints. If you think this isn't true, then please, you can fight against it; argue your case'."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]yurism wrote:
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 at 07:35 am (UTC)
Most analysts believe that during Mr Putin's presidency, a vicious battle was fought for power and influence between liberals and hardliners within and around the Kremlin. This continues today

How tedious all these regular references to anonymous "analysts", "experts" and "observers" in order to substantiate a narrative of wishful thinking!
Most analysts believe
[info]melsykes wrote:
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 at 08:46 am (UTC)
Yes, I agree completely. These analysts are never named and are lead to 'believe' rather than state some real facts. We could 'believe' that Putin wore his favourite hiking shoes while fishing, but unless there are some names and solid facts, then it's not much to go on.

As Putin himself says: "There are concrete complaints. If you think this isn't true, then please, you can fight against it; argue your case."

Well, unless concrete facts about his peace keeping position within the Kremlin can be presented, open speculation is rather flimsey.

Concrete facts:
[info]minosk wrote:
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 at 05:19 pm (UTC)
1) The are multiple interest groups in Russian government fighting each other all the time.
I has been this way 100yrs ago and still is. This is a common public knowledge.
2) The Kremlin policies have been exceptionally stable internally as well as externally for the last 10 yrs. Considering Russian history of abrupt changes throughout the 20th century this is NOT normal in russia
3) It is public knowledge Putin had pretty much _no_real_influence_ when he came to power in 1999.
4) One can not achieve that kind of exponential influnce growth unless remaining acceptable ALL major factions.
5) Putin was so far not publicly attacked by ANY major faction. Not even in 1999 when his real power was all but nominal. Had he been part of any faction at the time, the other ones will attack him by default. This has been demonstrated countless time during Yeltsin when compromitation of PM's or President was a common political tactic.
6) It is safe to say all major factions decided not to attack Putin by _choice_. No politician is clean enough to be immune to compromitation, not to mention compromitting materials can be easily fabricated as needed by professional organizations.
Re: Concrete facts:
[info]rex123 wrote:
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 at 06:44 pm (UTC)
minosk - I would partly disagree.Living here in Russia I have some more information. Putin is fiercly attacked by Kasparov's "Drugaya Rossia".Also and ofcource he is permanently attacked by Communists who have 15% in the Parlament. Zuganov (chairman of Communist Party) critisise him in civilised manner, but their radiostation oppenly slander and accusing him (Putin) in betrayal of people and selling out the country to oligarhs - sometimes I think that their radiostation is revolting also against communist party leadership as well as against Putin.I would also mention Yabloko party which is still represented in regional councils (after loosing all their seats in Parlament in 2003) and "Soyuz Pravih Sil" with Nemtsov as one of its prominent leaders (now siding with Kasparov) which lost almost all representation both on national and regional levels in 2007 - both mentioned parties are in uncompromised opposition to both Putin and Medvedev...I understand that you are speaking about Parlament and regional authorities while mentioning factions? - because within the Government (administration) open critisism towerds the head of Government is impossible even in the West - imagine the Secretary of State critisising the President in USA? - absurdity...
Re: Concrete facts:
[info]rex123 wrote:
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 at 07:15 pm (UTC)
kuma - Stupidity of your comment reminds me communist propaganda of Soviet times. I think I know what you would be those times in USSR if you were born there those times...
Re: Concrete facts:
[info]minosk wrote:
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 at 08:47 pm (UTC)
I do not consider Kasparov nor Zjuganov's comunists a real power. Certainly not now nor since the low 90-ies.
In mys opinion the important period to understanding of Putin's rise is 1998-2001. After that he had enough momentum, it was no longer a question who shall be the guy (formally) on top.
Being born in (no former) communist country, and watching envents in the East europe region unfold for the last 20 yrs, I can safely say you are not even scratching the surface of Kremlin power games.
The Putin method to fire someone
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 at 06:16 pm (UTC)
1. Put a bullet in their head
2. Dump the body in the river
3. Make sure everyone knows what happened so no one gives you any further dissent
Re: The Putin method to fire someone
[info]rex123 wrote:
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 at 07:38 pm (UTC)
kuma - Stupidity of your comment reminds me communist propaganda of Soviet times. I think I know what you would be those times in USSR if you were born there those times...
Re: The Putin method to fire someone
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 12:11 am (UTC)
Not that stupid, Putin's critics tend to have a habit of dying under suspicious circumstances.
Re: The Putin method to fire someone
[info]rex123 wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 09:27 am (UTC)
kuma - Ofcourse, no me nor you may have any proves of wether Putin was personally involved in that...But by analising all those deaths I tend to believe he never ordered his critics to be killed. All those cases you mean (Politkovskaya, Litvinenko poisoning, several journalists) - all those deaths were absolutelly of no use for Putin. More to that, those people were not focusing their activity on critisising Putin (there are a lot of more strict critics of him now in Russia) - they critisised corrupted authorities (mainly in southern regions around Chechnya), or local mafia bosses, or their "comrades" in military service or law enforcement structures which (this kind of critisism togeather with info leaks) were considered betrayal by their own ex-colleages...The results we know...Absolutelly the same was happening in Italy in 1970-s when mafia was killing one jornalist after another, one investigator after another, one prosecutor after another...And in Italy there was no Islamist factor, nor civil war and separatist moovements...So you even don't understand all the complexity of situation in Russia...Politkovskaya's case in my opinion may be considered as a war casualty because her main opponents were in Chechnya where there was still shooting going on - the fact she was killed in Moscow in this situation may be considered important only by a very naive person... I actually am not a Putin's fan, I even didn't vote for him, but I (as well as many people here in Russia) am absolutelly sure that by his "power rhetorics" and strengthening law enforcement structures he keeps communists and Zhirinovsky's fashists out of political buisiness in Russia...Some people in the West think that liberalisation and democratisation will bring Western style democracy here, but I think that destabilisation of power will bring Communists back to Kremlin (and this time with a very strong nationalist tint ala Zhirinovsky and co.)...So don't be quick to blame Putin - he at least keeps nukes under control (shall I elaborate this topic as well? - hardly)...
[info]l_barker wrote:
Friday, 29 May 2009 at 09:30 pm (UTC)
Dutin is very popular in Russia.

Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date