Rehabilitated: Nobel Prize winner who fell for Hitler
Knut Hamsun was lucky to escape execution for collaborating with the Nazis. Now, almost 60 years after his death, Norway has finally honoured his contribution to literature – and even put his face on a stamp
All this week, Norway is feting a writer who was lucky to escape being shot for his shameless collaboration with the Nazis. Knut Hamsun was either, according to taste, one of the greatest figures in world literature, or a vile old man with a head full of nasty ideas who betrayed his country.
Not many years ago, anyone who went into a Norwegian bookshop and asked for one of Hamsun's books was likely to get a frosty reply from across the counter. And yet he was, to be blunt, the only world-renowned novelist that country has yet produced.
This week, the town of Hamaroey, 200 miles north of the Arctic Circle, where Hamsun grew up, has been celebrating six consecutive "Hamsundagene" (Hamsun Days), with seminars, meetings and exhibitions dedicated to the writer, to mark the 150th anniversary of his birth.
The festivities kicked off on Tuesday, with the formal opening of Norway's first Knut Hamsun museum, by Crown Princess Mette-Marit and the Culture Minister, Trond Giske. There is a musical in preparation, based on his work, and his face will appear for the first time on a Norwegian postage stamp.
Getting the museum to open has taken 15 years of planning and prevarication, because of Hamsun's appalling behaviour in old age. The design, by the American architect Steven Holl, won the Progressive Architecture Award as far back as 1996 but it took until 2007 for the government to allocate the money, as it grappled between its anxiety to remember a fabulous writer, and to forget a traitor.
His case poses an old question about art and morality – whether it is permissible, or even possible, to enjoy the music of Carl Orff, or the poetry of Ezra Pound, or Hamsun's fiction, and overlook the sort of people that they were in life.
Baruch Tenembaum, who founded the International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation, named in honour of a Swedish diplomat who saved thousands of Jews from Nazi death camps during the Second World War, thinks not. He has written to the Norwegian government to say that he was "astonished and concerned" that they should be celebrating a man who collaborated with "one of the most sinister regimes in history".
Mr Tenembaum told Reuters: "We cannot understand how Norwegians can honour someone who was a criminal and was inciting crimes.
"Hamsun was a great writer, so what? What is more important – art or integrity? It is a bit like if someone said that since Hitler was a good painter, why don't we honour him?"
Except, of course, that Hitler was not a good painter, whereas Hamsun was a giant of world literature. What Edvard Grieg was to music, or Henrik Ibsen to drama, or Edvard Munch to art, Hamsun was to literature. The French writer André Gide put him on a par with Dostoevsky, but thought Hamsun was the more subtle. Ernest Hemingway urged F Scott Fitzgerald to study him. To Isaac Bashevis Singer he was the "father of modern literature".
Hamsun's best-known novel, Hunger, first published in 1890, has never been out of print and it is still sold in the UK. It is the fictionalised memoir of a youth driven by an ambition to write who is starving to death in what was then the capital of Norway, Christiana. Utterly wrapped up in himself, and interested in no one else, he is completely alone in a crowded city.
The author had no literary training. But his collaboration with the Nazis cannot be put down to ignorance, or compared with the case of PG Wodehouse, a political innocent who found himself living under Nazi occupation and who later confessed that he had been a complete fool to agree to broadcast on German radio. Hamsun's Nazi sympathies were the natural outcome of prejudices he had harboured for years. He did not like big cities and had mystic ideas about men and people returning to their ancient rural roots, which chimed with Nazi mythology.
He was a life-long admirer of German culture. He backed the Germans in the First World War, supported Norway's fascist movement in the 1930s, and when Norway was under Nazi occupation, he met Hitler and gave Goebbels the Nobel Prize Medal for Literature that he had been awarded in 1920.
Neither did he relent or apologise when the war was over. A week after Hitler committed suicide, Hamsun wrote an obituary praising him as "a warrior for mankind", "a prophet of the gospel of justice for all nations" and "a reformer of the highest sort".
He was arrested in 1945 and it was only the fact that he was then aged 85, and the suspicion that he had gone soft in the head, that protected him from the prospect of joining Norway's wartime prime minister, Vidrun Quisling, in front of a firing squad. Instead, his property was confiscated, he was put under psychiatric observation, and died, disgraced but unrepentant, in 1952, aged 92. The government insists that nothing about this week's celebrations is intended to excuse or obscure Hamsun's ghastly politics. Norway's Foreign Minister, Jonas Gahr Stoere, insisted: "The Hamsun anniversary in no way condones Hamsun's support for the Nazi regime. He received massive condemnation for this after the war and his pro-Nazi activities must continue to be condemned."
There is no attempt to gloss over Hamsun's Nazi sympathies in the events commemorating his anniversary, the minister said. "Democracy and the education of future generations will best be served by being completely frank about these divergent aspects of Hamsun's life."
But Mr Tenembaum retorted: "We can declare a year of commemorations, issue a stamp, write a musical – and then we say we are doing it to educate people about the Nazis."
On the wrong side: Artists who erred
* PG Wodehouse was trapped in occupied France in 1940, travelled to Berlin and made five humorous broadcasts on German radio. It did not cross his mind that he would be considered a traitor. Despite a huge public outcry, he was cleared, and received a knighthood shortly before his death in 1975. But he never returned to the UK.
* Ezra Pound, one of the greatest American poets of the century, met Mussolini in 1933, and spent the war in Italy making hysterical anti-Semitic, pro-fascist broadcasts. Arrested in 1945, he narrowly escaped execution and spent 12 years in a hospital for the criminally insane.
* Carl Orff, composer of the raunchy opera Carmina Burana, lived and prospered in Germany throughout the Third Reich, but lied his way out of trouble by fooling a de-Nazification court into believing that he had joined the White Rose resistance movement.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
Stop whining . . . the state of Israel is reviled by most people today, not because they are Jewish and we are anti semtic in nature (as most pro Isreali's would have the wrold believe), but because it behaves in an appalling manner to its neighbours - reminisicent of Nazi behaviour in fact - See Gaza December 2009.
Israel should (more than anyone else) know better - but it doesnt and your pathetic comments have no link whatsoever to the article above.
Comparing the nazi camps to gaza or to pot pols cambodia are riduculus.Is it relevant that all those who diminish the holocaust are anti Israel?
The readers will decide if there is a basic underlying reason for the praising of this artist.
What do you think Laserdunce could that be the answer?
"True Torah Jews Against Zionism"
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/i
Frankly, I had very mixed feelings when people disrupted the performance by the Jerusalam Quartet at the Edinburgh Festival last year. But then came Gaza.
We all have to make personal choices.
Interestingly, Norway may well have escaped Nazi predations if Churchill hadn't mad it clear that he planned to invade himself, thus forcing Hitler's hand.
Stalin and Lenin can still be openly revered and be used as poster boys (ok, maybe not in Finland). Citing Mao does not invite disapproval. But whenever one approaches the Hitler meme cloud, shields go up. That is an unfortunate conditioned reflex with no supporting thought behind it - a prerequisite for being a member of "polite society" and also a an opening to make one accept various atrocities committed on the international scene. Tar your enemy with the Hitler brush and bombing will be politically acceptable to the populace.
Lenin had to defend the revolution against the white terror, the mad Czar, counter revolutionaries and the "allies" who invaded trying to put a stop to the revolution.
I am also doubt that Mao's name ( whatever it is these days ) is revered.
maybe the reason Hitler's name attracts a little more disgust is the slaughter of millions, many solely because of their ethnic region or religion, and the commencement of an imperialst "total war".
I am astonished that some can suggest being an artiist of some sort can absolve people from any kind of judgment on their obnoxious views.
So, being a good singer, writer, painter , makes your views and actions above reproach ?
Why would anyone allow somepone's ability to write a good story ( lots of those ) blind them
to what they stood for ?
He may not have written anything anti semitic - but supporting them in "real" life is the point .
He was a good writer - so what ?
he was a nazi sympathiser - rot in hell.
At least Norwegians didn't install a cold blooded murderer as their prime minister.
But of course Menachem Begin was Jewish and his victims Gentiles, so I guess the promotion was well deserved.
The International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation wrote: “Men and women like fellow Scandinavian Raoul Wallenberg, the many non-Jewish Norwegians or the heroic resistance movement who smuggled over 1,000 persecuted refugees, are still awaiting recognition on the scale given to this war criminal.”
This year, during Israel’s during the Gaza Campaign Norwegian Finance Minister Kristin Halvorsen participated in an anti-Israeli demonstration where there were shouts of “Death to the Jews.” She did not leave the place.
In October 2007 King Harald V gave the Royal Norwegian Order of St. Olav to Fin Graff, a graphic artist who had drawn a cartoon portraying then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert as a Nazi camp commander. In June 2009 Queen Sonia, who had opened the Hamsun year, visited an Oslo mosque and spoke with the imam who supports suicide bombings against Israelis.
Firstly, Mr. McSmith claims that 'Not many years ago, anyone who went into a Norwegian bookshop and asked for one of Hamsun's books was likely to get a frosty reply from across the counter'. This is nonsense. Hamsun's literary genius has never been questioned. His books have been popular and widely read throughout the post-war era. Several of them have been adapted into successful plays, films and TV-series. A number of biographies have also been published, and fictionalized accounts of the author's life have appeared on TV and in theatres.
Secondly, Hamsun was never in danger of facing a firing squad after the war. And not, as Mr. McSmith claims, because of his age, or because he was thought to be in the first stages of senility. Although a trial would doubtlessly have resulted in a conviction for treason, Hamsun would never have received a death sentence. The support of a famous and admired Nobel laureate was of course of great propaganda value to the Nazis, but Hamsun never killed, tortured or 'denounced' anyone. He repeatedly intervened on behalf of Norwegian patriots arrested by the Germans, sometimes successfully. He loathed Hitler's 'viceroy' in Norway, the brutal Reichskommissar Josef Terboven, and implored Hitler to replace him (without success). Furthermore, whatever reasons Hamsun had for his Nazi sympathies, anti-Semitism was hardly one of them. The few Jewish caracters in his literary works are generally portrayed in a sympathetic light, and his wartime polemic articles generally deal with the danger of Bolshevism.
Still, how can it be that a man who produced some of the most beautiful prose ever written, who showed profound powers of observation and insight into the human mind, - how could such a man fall for the inhuman ideology of National Socialism? This enigma is, perhaps, one of the reasons why new generations continue to be fascinated by Hamsun - his art and his life.
H. Aanes
Norway.