Rout of the soft left: Europe veers right to beat recession
Angry voters stayed home in record numbers but did not flock to extremists
AP
Dutch Parliamentarian Geert Wilders, holds up the "Heroes of Conscience" award presented to him by the American Freedom Alliance
It may be difficult to say who "won" the European elections, but it is clear who lost. From France to Poland – and spectacularly in Britain – politicians of the moderate left were shunned or humiliated by the few voters who bothered to cast their ballots.
In a time of recession – and especially one caused by the exuberance and immoderate greed of markets – centre-left arguments might have been expected to thrive. Instead, centre-left parties of government were routed in Britain and soundly defeated in Portugal and narrowly beaten in Spain. Centre-left opposition parties were rejected in Italy and Poland and crushed in France. In Germany, where the main centre-right and centre-left parties share power, voters rejected the Social Democrats and gave a comfortable victory to Chancellor Angela Merkel's Christian Democrats.
The principal exceptions to the rout of the moderate left were the good results for social democratic parties in Denmark, Sweden, Greece and Slovakia.
Elsewhere, some of the votes that might normally have gone to moderate left-wing parties migrated to the extremes of left and right. But, despite predictions of a Euro-festival of the far out, it was a mixed election for nationalists and populists. Extreme and racist parties did well in Britain, Hungary, the Netherlands and Austria, but the once powerful National Front lost half its seats in France and the most xenophobic Flemish nationalist party had its worst election in decades in Belgium.
Early analysis of the miserly turnout – just over 43 per cent across the EU – suggests centre-left parties have one possible alibi. It was the working and lower middle classes who most shunned the polling booths. So the elections were hopelessly skewed towards the comfortable and the well-off.
This may explain the apparent paradox of the results in France. President Nicolas Sarkozy is struggling in the opinion polls but his centre-right party, the Union pour un Mouvement Populaire (UMP) scored a comfortable victory on Sunday with 28 per cent of the vote and 29 out of the 72 seats.
A delighted President Sarkozy claimed an endorsement for his programme of reform but, arguably, the result was not all that convincing.
On the face of it, the power balance in the European Parliament will not be radically altered when the new MEPs convene next week. The centre-right European People's Party group will still be in the majority followed by the Socialists and Liberal groups. Yet the cosy tradition of consensus politics between the two main groups has been shaken by losses for the Socialists group and the arrivals from dozens of new parties that will not fit into the mainstream blocs.
The total of "others" – mostly extremist nationalists who do not fit into groups – will rise from 30 to 90. The big unknown is how, for example, Jobbik, an openly anti-Semitic Hungarian party and a ragtag bunch of others will club together. Rules for political groups require at least 25 members drawn from a minimum of seven EU member states, and being part of a group is important in terms of power, as it entitles members to funding, offices, and, crucially, the right to vote in committees which are the nerve-centre of the parliament.
"There might be tectonic shifts, but it is very hard to predict what kind of parties will emerge", said Jacki Davis, of the European Policy Centre think tank. "We like to portray all these groups as 'nasties' but they all have very clear and distinctive agendas."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
Albert Camus in his novel The Plague compared fascism to plague rats, whose numbers may decrease to the point where they no longer spread the black death but who are forever present under our feet in the sewers, ready to surge forth again. Instead of being ever-vigilant against a relapse into its old fascist ways, Europe has fallen hook line and sinker for Yank anti-Muslim propaganda, Bliar's Nulabour most of all. The UKIP and BNP fascists who top the charts today are sacrificing goats to Beelzebub for sending them Tony Bliar and Nulabour, with their retarded and insane Gordonomics and incessant fake terror scares that have turned Britain into a festering rat-pit or poverty, xenophobia, and Islamophobia.
The film Der ewige Jude opened on November 29th, 1940 throughout the German Reich.
In one famous scene, swarms of rats scurry through cellars and sewers, the shots are intercut with images of Jews emigrating from Palestine to to all corners of the world. The overlaid text conveyed the message:
"Where rats turn up, they spread diseases and carry extermination into the land. They are cunning, cowardly and cruel, they travel in large packs, exactly the way the Jews infect the races of the world."
One of the many posters for Der Ewige Jude.
Remarkable how little the scapegoat stereotypes change, eh? You could easily change the text on that last poster to something like: "The Invasion of Islamofascism - Your Neighbors the Muslim Terrorists."
This has nothing to do with whether or not spending one's way out of a recession or not is sensible. Its simply that most ordinary people think that it is not!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNEIprfX