World

7° London Hi 11°C / Lo 7°C

Rout of the soft left: Europe veers right to beat recession

Angry voters stayed home in record numbers but did not flock to extremists

By John Lichfield and Vanessa Mock

Dutch Parliamentarian Geert Wilders, holds up the "Heroes of Conscience" award presented to him by the American Freedom Alliance

AP

Dutch Parliamentarian Geert Wilders, holds up the "Heroes of Conscience" award presented to him by the American Freedom Alliance

It may be difficult to say who "won" the European elections, but it is clear who lost. From France to Poland – and spectacularly in Britain – politicians of the moderate left were shunned or humiliated by the few voters who bothered to cast their ballots.

In a time of recession – and especially one caused by the exuberance and immoderate greed of markets – centre-left arguments might have been expected to thrive. Instead, centre-left parties of government were routed in Britain and soundly defeated in Portugal and narrowly beaten in Spain. Centre-left opposition parties were rejected in Italy and Poland and crushed in France. In Germany, where the main centre-right and centre-left parties share power, voters rejected the Social Democrats and gave a comfortable victory to Chancellor Angela Merkel's Christian Democrats.

The principal exceptions to the rout of the moderate left were the good results for social democratic parties in Denmark, Sweden, Greece and Slovakia.

Elsewhere, some of the votes that might normally have gone to moderate left-wing parties migrated to the extremes of left and right. But, despite predictions of a Euro-festival of the far out, it was a mixed election for nationalists and populists. Extreme and racist parties did well in Britain, Hungary, the Netherlands and Austria, but the once powerful National Front lost half its seats in France and the most xenophobic Flemish nationalist party had its worst election in decades in Belgium.

Early analysis of the miserly turnout – just over 43 per cent across the EU – suggests centre-left parties have one possible alibi. It was the working and lower middle classes who most shunned the polling booths. So the elections were hopelessly skewed towards the comfortable and the well-off.

This may explain the apparent paradox of the results in France. President Nicolas Sarkozy is struggling in the opinion polls but his centre-right party, the Union pour un Mouvement Populaire (UMP) scored a comfortable victory on Sunday with 28 per cent of the vote and 29 out of the 72 seats.

A delighted President Sarkozy claimed an endorsement for his programme of reform but, arguably, the result was not all that convincing.

On the face of it, the power balance in the European Parliament will not be radically altered when the new MEPs convene next week. The centre-right European People's Party group will still be in the majority followed by the Socialists and Liberal groups. Yet the cosy tradition of consensus politics between the two main groups has been shaken by losses for the Socialists group and the arrivals from dozens of new parties that will not fit into the mainstream blocs.

The total of "others" – mostly extremist nationalists who do not fit into groups – will rise from 30 to 90. The big unknown is how, for example, Jobbik, an openly anti-Semitic Hungarian party and a ragtag bunch of others will club together. Rules for political groups require at least 25 members drawn from a minimum of seven EU member states, and being part of a group is important in terms of power, as it entitles members to funding, offices, and, crucially, the right to vote in committees which are the nerve-centre of the parliament.

"There might be tectonic shifts, but it is very hard to predict what kind of parties will emerge", said Jacki Davis, of the European Policy Centre think tank. "We like to portray all these groups as 'nasties' but they all have very clear and distinctive agendas."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

"Beating recession" or beating up on immigrants?
[info]findempire wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 08:16 am (UTC)
We've seen this film before, Europe scapegoating minorities and turning fascist when the economic going gets tough. Today's Jews are the Muslims. Today's fascists get their cue once again from the Yanks, with their global war on Muslims, just as Hitler did when Henry Ford taught him all about the global Jewish conspiracy by introducing him to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (and later made billions selling trucks both to the Nazi war machine and the US).

Albert Camus in his novel The Plague compared fascism to plague rats, whose numbers may decrease to the point where they no longer spread the black death but who are forever present under our feet in the sewers, ready to surge forth again. Instead of being ever-vigilant against a relapse into its old fascist ways, Europe has fallen hook line and sinker for Yank anti-Muslim propaganda, Bliar's Nulabour most of all. The UKIP and BNP fascists who top the charts today are sacrificing goats to Beelzebub for sending them Tony Bliar and Nulabour, with their retarded and insane Gordonomics and incessant fake terror scares that have turned Britain into a festering rat-pit or poverty, xenophobia, and Islamophobia.
Re: "Beating recession" or beating up on immigrants?
[info]melsykes wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 08:54 am (UTC)
But it's the rats reaping all the benefits from the UKs soft system that rewards the lazy so long as they continue to churn out children.
Re: "Rats"
[info]findempire wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 12:05 pm (UTC)

The film Der ewige Jude opened on November 29th, 1940 throughout the German Reich.


In one famous scene, swarms of rats scurry through cellars and sewers, the shots are intercut with images of Jews emigrating from Palestine to to all corners of the world. The overlaid text conveyed the message:

"Where rats turn up, they spread diseases and carry extermination into the land. They are cunning, cowardly and cruel, they travel in large packs, exactly the way the Jews infect the races of the world."


One of the many posters for Der Ewige Jude.

Remarkable how little the scapegoat stereotypes change, eh? You could easily change the text on that last poster to something like: "The Invasion of Islamofascism - Your Neighbors the Muslim Terrorists."
Re: "Beating recession" or beating up on immigrants?
[info]rex123 wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 04:59 pm (UTC)
Jews never were a threat to Europe - their religion was never trying to force others to become Judaists - it is actually very difficult to become Judaist even if you would chose to become one (allthough it is possible). They were always too little in numbers to dominate in Europe by force - so there was never reason to be afraid of them...Both mentioned aspects are different with muslims - they want to empose their rules on everybody and to control not only your dress code, but family life, law, politics, behavior etc.... and they are so numerous in the world that they will be able to do it given current immigration trend will continue...As you see situation is different....And then, who is saying we should hate muslims? Personally I respect them a lot - their religion was established by the God (albeit not for Europe which was allready Christian and politically secular by the time Mohammed was born.)...In contrast to Christianity or Budhism for ex. , Islam is not just religion - it is INSEPARABLE complex of faith, political regime, law system (sharia), family law, buisiness law etc...Muslims do what Quaran demands and so we should not blame them - we should blame politicians who invite them to Europe in increasing numbers, thus effectivelly destroying the ballance of Christian (permitting secularusm) and Muslim (needed for other psycho types of people and so excluding securarism) lands in this world...Again - Islam is good where it belongs and US is rightfully hated by muslims for interference in muslim lands of Asia, but please, do not make Europe the battlefield, stop muslim immigration to Europe now!
to be against muslim immigration is NOT to hate muslims and it is NOT racist
[info]rex123 wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 10:43 am (UTC)
"...Extreme and racist parties did well in Britain, Hungary, the Netherlands and Austria, but the once powerful National Front lost half its seats in France and the most xenophobic Flemish nationalist party had its worst election in decades in Belgium..." - artickle--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------racist? all those mentioned?...Interesting substitution of notions - to be racist means to be against that or another nationality (or race) - nationality that is smth. we can not change in ourselves - some of us are Germans, others Chineese, others Brits, some white, others black etc...so naturally to be racist is evil - it means to hate for nothing or to be hated ....Still why do people substitute notions and call racist those who for example oppose that or another religious concept or ideology - if to follow such a logics then call anti-communists racist, smbdy is against N.Korean "chuchhe" ideology - racist, against canibalism - racist etc.etc....No way...To call those parties who are against muslim immigration as racist - is to slander! More to that - many people who are against muslim immigration to secular Europe think that it is OK for Islam to florish in non-secular countries of Asia (for example I think Islam is the word of God for those who need strickt rules to follow in Asia - and so I don't consider myself anti-muslim, albeit I am against muslim influx to Europe where historically and confessionally Christianity (also by the word of God) provided for another type of faith which permits secularism (and so more freedom of choice) - for which existance the God has his own considerations and intentions - mixture will result in conflicts which will be more and more violent with the growth of muslim population here...Deep in my heart I admire muslim devotion to the God and think that we as Christians should respect them for such and even to be the same strong in our faith (albeit not violent)...but it is those atheistic politicians who think that religion is just a folk tradition which may be used as a maskarade costume 2 times a year on holidays, who take decigion on immigration matters and so think they will be able to integrate in SECULAR state believers whoes aim is to impose their religion on every aspect of life (as well as to dominate over other confessions)...I want readers of Independent to know - you are swindled - to be against muslim immigration is NOT to hate muslims and it is NOT to be racist (well, Bosnians and Albanians are muslim but they belong to the same race as Europeans - Bosnians even to the same group of nationalities to which my nationality belongs - so there is NO any national or race aspect involved in protesting against muslim immigration - it is a matter of political choice, the same as protesting against new taxes, or against war etc...)... I want everybody (and muslims as well) to know that it is further influx of muslims to Europe which arouse protests - not their faith (which I consider to be established by the God) is hated (it should be respected), not their life in Europe is endangered (those who already here should feel secure) - but it is FURTHER INFLUX of muslims to Europe and danger that they will become dominating majority here in the lands chosen by God to be Christian (and by politicians to be secular) - that is what aggrevates situation...
[info]mykleboon wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 11:39 am (UTC)
When times are tough, most people believe that they should tighten their belts - and they expect their governments to do the same. The last thing that they want is the politics of tax and spend - or borrow and spend, or print and spend. So, I am not at all surprised that the "prudent" centre right parties have done well whereas the "spendthrift" centre left ones have not.

This has nothing to do with whether or not spending one's way out of a recession or not is sensible. Its simply that most ordinary people think that it is not!
Is this the moderate, 'soft left' you refer to?
[info]collin_brown wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 12:58 pm (UTC)
This video exposes the Tory and Labour funded 'lefty' nut cases who attack British democracy and identity like an angry, hungry mob of flesh eating political-zombies. How very civilised.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNEIprfXXqU

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date