World

Rain (AM and PM) 8° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Russia finally admits to its hidden heroin epidemic

Surge in abuse blamed on West's failings in Afghanistan, but addicts go untreated

By Shaun Walker in Moscow

Drug use in Russia is at epidemic level, but the Eurasian Harm Reduction Network say users are being arrested rather than reformed

Alamy

Drug use in Russia is at epidemic level, but the Eurasian Harm Reduction Network say users are being arrested rather than reformed

At a playground just off the busy Prospekt Mira thoroughfare in central Moscow, there aren't any children playing on the swings. The slide is covered in dirty snow, the sandpit is strewn with empty vodka bottles and, on close inspection, a few used syringes. Mothers whisper to each other that the playground is the home of narkomany – drug addicts – and wheel their pushchairs swiftly past.

It's just one small sign of a vast hidden epidemic of heroin use that Russian officials and civil society groups say threatens the very existence of the nation. "It's a threat to our national security, our society, and our civilisation itself," said Viktor Ivanov, Russia's top drugs official, at a meeting with reporters recently. He estimated that there are more than two million drug addicts in Russia, which amounts to one addict for every 50 Russians of working age, a level that is up to eight times higher than in EU countries.

Most of these people are addicted to heroin which transits from Afghanistan, through central Asia, and across the long and porous border from Kazakhstan into Russia. There are people addicted to heroin across Russia's 11 time-zones, and the country's anti-drugs body says that Russia now uses more heroin than any other country in the world.

Mr Ivanov, a former KGB operative and a close associate of the Prime Minister, Vladimir Putin, said the foreign occupation of Afghanistan and the "war on terror" were the main factors behind Russia's drugs epidemic, and compared Russia's drug problem to the situation in China in the 19th century, when British traders brought opium to China and vast swathes of the population became addicted.

Mr Ivanov will travel to Vienna today, where he will address a special UN session on drugs and call for increased international co-operation on finding solutions for Afghanistan. He will also demand that Russia be included in the decision-making process on Afghanistan –which he described as the "shame of the international community" – and said that Russia was in favour of simply spraying Afghan poppy fields with pesticides to kill the crops.

"Ninety per cent of those who are addicted to drugs in Russia use Afghan drugs," said Mr Ivanov. "It's a simple equation – if there are no poppies, there is no drugs traffic. Thank goodness politicians in the West are beginning to admit the whole war on terror was ill-judged. We've heard Barack Obama and David Miliband come out and say that it was a mistake. The level of Afghan drugs production now is 44 times higher than it was in 2001."

Both government and public health officials agree that the epidemic of heroin addiction in Russia has reached terrifying proportions that could in the long run prove devastating. But while the government hints that the Western intervention in Afghanistan is the root cause of Russia's drugs woes, its critics claim that Russian government policy on drugs is responsible for worsening the epidemic.

"The Russian strategy is to stifle serious debate about the problem and demonise drug users," said Dasha Ocheret, of the Eurasian Harm Reduction Network in Moscow. "The goal is not to help people suffering with addiction but to identify them, and then punish them. No country in the world has ever been able to deal with its drug problems in this way."

Any addict who seeks medical help for his or her addiction is immediately put on the state "narcological register". This information is available to police, who can have the drug user arrested and put in prison, and causes huge problems for people if they kick their habit and want to reintegrate into society.

A report by Human Rights Watch claimed that Russian policy decisions on treating drug users were outdated and "deliberately ignore the best available medical evidence and recommendations".

Substitution therapy using methadone is banned in Russia, and needle and syringe exchange points are regarded as highly controversial. "Task number one for any drug user is to hide away from everyone," said Ms Ocheret. "They worry that if they go to get clean needles and syringes they will be arrested and sent to prison."

This in turn drives other devastating epidemics in the country, such as hepatitis C and HIV/Aids. Russia has one of the fastest-growing HIV epidemics in the world, with more than one million people thought to be HIV positive in the country. Ten years ago, the epidemic was mainly spread within the drug-using community, but now more than half of new cases are sexually transmitted, as the disease spreads across the population at large.

Whatever the reasons behind the epidemic of drug use, there is one thing on which everyone is agreed. More than 30,000 people die from drug use every year, and in a sparsely populated country with a shrinking population, it's a statistic that the country cannot afford.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Heroin
[info]boboberg wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 01:16 am (UTC)
My brother overdosed on heroin 11 years ago and died and none of us in the family even knew he USED heroin. Heroin is a scourge but trying to eliminate heroin is not the answer, legalization is. If we legalize heroin then the addicts will be buying known dosages of the drug from pharmacies and this will almost totally elininate overdosage deaths which result from not knowing the quantatative strength of the dose. An addict with a steady supply of legal heroin can be integrated into society and even hold down a job. Heroin addicts make excellent workers because they habituate to things including jobs. Once a junkie gets used to a routine he rarely changes his habits. Mark Montgomery boboberg@nyc.rr.com
Re: Heroin
[info]andyoc wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 07:10 am (UTC)
I used to argue for legalisation, but I was an addict in denial myself - would we really like to see as many heroin, cocaine, meth or weed users as alcohol or nicotine users? Addiction to any drug (or action, such as sex or gambling) is a terrible condition, and the individual needs to be given serious therapeutic attention to quit drugs and get over what problems may have driven them to escape life like this. After that, of course, they need suitable jobs and care to maintain a sense of self-respect.
I know this is a fantasy, utopian scenario and that making pure heroin available to current users would stop tragic deaths, but I think users really need to get off drugs to lead a full and happy life.
Re: Heroin
[info]the_kegs wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 10:54 am (UTC)
'Surge in abuse blamed on West's failings in Afghanistan'. What? What about their own failings in Afghanistan? Why are they blaming everyone else?
Re: Heroin
[info]uylenspiegel wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 10:56 pm (UTC)
## Why are they blaming everyone else?

Oh, really? Maybe, because there are good reasons for doing so? Record crop of heroin poppies hits anti-drug effort in Afghanistan.

"...even though 90 per cent of the heroin sold on British streets comes from Afghanistan." - at least, it's quite fair since the British do nothing about it.
Re: Heroin
[info]the_kegs wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 08:40 am (UTC)
I suspect that the Russians in Afghanistan was before your time, you must still be in adolescence! However, you quite obviously have access to a computer, ask your daddy what a search engine is and how to lookl up 'Russian-Afghan war'. Then, please stop dribbling down your shirt, it's embarrassing.
[info]uylenspiegel wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 11:00 am (UTC)
???, ???????. ???? ???????, ??????? :)
Re: Heroin
[info]the_kegs wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 10:56 am (UTC)
A good point and well made. Shame you had to spoil it by using the word 'Junkie'.
Re: Heroin
[info]royb55 wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 11:36 am (UTC)
Well Mr. Biggs, you sound like someone from Hampster Town.
Re: Heroin
[info]thearnitis wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 10:59 pm (UTC)
Wow. It can be said louder, but not clearer. I agree with you totally and absolutely. I do agree with andyoc that addiction is not a desirable state and that it should be avoided or cured but let's face it, there are always going to be addicts to everything, so let's not make them rejects of society on top of their enslavement.

To answer andyoc's question, if heroin, cocaine and meth users could get their fixes out of their pocket money and didn't end up living in sewage tunnels then the answer is no, I would not mind there being as many users as alcohol and tobacco users. I'll tell you more, I'm father to a six year-old boy and, since I have no guarantee that he does not end up hooked to something nasty, if he did I'd rather he did so in decent conditions. Another answer for the same money: a heroin user shooting himself next to me is causing me no harm, while a smoker is tarring up my lungs.

And gazing away from our own navel, let's not forget all the people who are living lives of misery and violence in the countries of origin of these drugs: have a look at what is happening in Mexico, what has happened and still happens in Colombia... If we think we have problems with drugs, we should look South and think again.
Mr Bigs
[info]westhamsterdam wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 09:24 am (UTC)
Surely if you want to get rid of Heroin all you just have to target the Mr. Bigs the people that are responsible for the importation. Surely there are only a few people that are capable of such an exercise. Surely the Police & other law enforcement know who these people are why don't they act? Who makes all the money? Where does all the huge proceeds go? Law enforcement must know these secrets. Why don't they treat traficers like terrorists? It does make you wonder who the real criminals are & whether such a trade supports legitimate businesses.
Re: Mr Bigs
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 01:53 pm (UTC)
All evidence shows that this doesn't work. Whenever a Mr Big is jailed and his organisation is broken up another one takes its place. Smuggling an illegal substance is not difficult if you have an airplane, boat, or large truck and know how to hide what you're smuggling.

Short of building a giant wall across the Kazakhstan border there is no way to prevent people going into Kazakhstan and smuggling heroine back into Russia.
Russia ne normalni
[info]wormery wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 10:38 am (UTC)
Russia is not a normal country. End of. To directly compare it to the UK is absurd.
Re: Russia ne normalni
[info]neil_mcgowan wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 01:26 pm (UTC)
And what's your definition of a "normal country", worm-brain?
Re: Russia ne normalni
[info]wormery wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 01:35 pm (UTC)
What I mean, oh gormless abusive chesse-brained twerp, is that after communism collapsed many people thought Russia could become just another western country, a european democracy - and they blamed all of russia's barbarity on communism which, although a dumb disgusting creed, was very much ruass-flavoured. People saw Russian behaviour and said itb was because of communism. No. It was because of russian culture - which is harsh, barbaric, brutal, callous and as cold as the weather.

Thus, Russia is not a normal country - so comparing it to wetern european democracies is absurd. Better to compare it to China actually. The mentality is utterly different from ours, which most people cannot grasp (perhaps they would is Russians were black or looked very different).

There are places in Russia where couples choose not to have kids because they'll only end up on drugs or dead or in prison (eg Rostov). I have also visited Russia under communism and after, so have seen with my own eyes what the place is like.
Re: Russia ne normalni
[info]neil_mcgowan wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 01:44 pm (UTC)
You visited Russia? What do you want, a medal? You clearly learned nothing, gobshite. BTW your exchanges with the girl yesterday were utterly disgusting - I hope someone busts your gob someday, you gutless w*nker.

Best Regards from Moscow
Re: Russia ne normalni
[info]wormery wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 02:02 pm (UTC)
Please stay in the shithole called Moscow you disgusting Scottish fuuckwitted twat. Don't come back eh... But then you'll like Moscow - it's full of underage whores and drunkards, so you'll feel right at home. Ignorant twat - you know nothing about Russia or the russians. Visit when it was communist did we? No. So you know nothing. I hope they kick the shit out of you, you gobby little shitfaced scumbucket.
Re: Russia ne normalni
[info]neil_mcgowan wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 03:03 pm (UTC)
????? ?? ? ???. ??, ???????, ?????? ?? ?????? ? ???????, ?? ? ???????. ?? ?????? ?????? ???????, ???????? ? ?????? ???????? ?????????? ?????.

??? ?????? ????????, ? ??? ??????? ????? ??? ????? - ? 1984?. ?? ??? ?? ???? ?????? ?? ?????

??????? ??????? ? ???????? ?????? ???????, ???????????? ???????.
Wow!
[info]uylenspiegel wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 11:22 pm (UTC)
?, ????????????, ? ????? ??????????? ??? ?? ??????????? ?????????????? ??????, ??????? ???? ??? ?????????? ??????????? ??????????? ????????? ???? ????????? ?????, ??????? ??? ????? ?????????? ???, ? ??????! ?? ???? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ?????????????! ?? ???? ??????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ???????? ???????????.

? ?????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????, ??????? ??, ????????? wormery, ?? ???????????? ????? ?????????? ????????, ?? ??????? ??????? ??? ?? ????. ???????, ??? ??????? ?????? ????????????, ?????? ?????? ???????????? - knuckles sandwich ?????? ?????? ?? ?????? ? ?????????? ????? :)
Re: Wow!
[info]neil_mcgowan wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 01:06 am (UTC)
???, ????? ?-? ??????? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ??????????? ?? ?????? ???????... ???? knuckles sandwich ????????? ??? ????? ????????????? ???????? ?? ?????????? ????? :))
Re: Wow!
[info]uylenspiegel wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 01:07 pm (UTC)
?? ??????, ????????? ??????? ?? ?? ????? ?????????.. ??? ?? ????? ?? ??????? ?? ????? ??????? ? ??????? ?????? ????? ???????????? ????? ?? ?? ????? ?????, ? ???????????. ? ???????, ????? ?????????? ??????, ????????? ????????? ???? :)
Re: Wow!
[info]neil_mcgowan wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 02:45 pm (UTC)
?????? ?????????? ????? ??????? ?? ? ???????? ????????? ))) ???????, ???????? :))
Re: Russia ne normalni
[info]sativaindica wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 05:02 pm (UTC)
what a lovely, face deep, explanation for the rise in drug abuse and child sex trade, shame it lacks merit.

Indeed, after the end of the soviet union it was expected that Russia would embrace Free market trade with the rest of the world and, thus, would bring itself in line with western Europe. However, the Friedmanite policies of the IMF and WTO would actually de-stabilize the country even more, causing poverty to go through the roof, the exact OPPOSITE of what the IMF was built for.

Corruption is the common answer amongst western neo-liberals, however, when you consider the implementation of complete free market liberalism in Chile, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Poland, South Africa and even now Iraq, what are your excuses for THESE countries?

Quite simply, The free market Capitalism that Yeltsin implemented in the country with the help of Chicago School economists such as Jeffery sachs, AGAINST the will of the parliament*, is what caused the rise of the oligarchs in Russia. instead of giant multinationals buying up Russian companies, as they did in Asia, at bargain prices, formers soviet leaders, Yeltsins administration and even his family, were allowed to make KILLER profits.

And of course what happens to the general population, they get thrown into mass poverty. with out money they starve, thus, what solutions are there;

Suicide
Drug abuse (Alcohol is a drug BTW)
Sex trade
Crime

if only you knew how it felt, having 5 children to feed with no money, no home, no nothing. EVERYONE is on the brink of starvation, EVERYONE is suffering in pain, then along comes man wearing fancy suits. This man offers to pay 1000 for your 6 year old daughter, no questions asked.

either you sell your 6 year old, or the whole family dies, what would you pick?

THIS is the option that THOUSANDS face in countries that have swallowed neo-liberalism. But why not the UK or US you ask, we not only gave birth to this policy, but we aid enforing this onto the rest of the world, yet we do fine, why is that?

BECAUSE WE DO NOT IMPLEMENT THE POLICIES AT HOME.
Heroin
[info]1jeohtf wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 10:47 am (UTC)
Dear Bobo
If the U.S.A. and Russia were to buy the opium crop direct from the growers, and either destroy it or produce the heroin themselves they will save the world trillions of dollars, roubles, euros etc, etc.
So easy - if only they had the vision. yours Grandad.
Re: Heroin
[info]victor38 wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 11:47 am (UTC)
that is the best solution!!!!!
Re: Heroin
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 01:58 pm (UTC)
Unfortunately this idea has several serious problems.

1) There isn't a giant plantation in Afganistan that produces opium, it's made by millions of small farmers who live all over Afganistan. Just finding them all would take years.

2) Most sellers won't sell to the USA or Russia because they can make more money selling it illegally or they are being forced to grow it by the Taliban (those who disobey suffer rape and murder).

In short the problems are finding the opium and convincing people to sell it to you. Both of which cannot be solved easily or quickly.

reply
[info]sophos_neos wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 12:07 pm (UTC)
Reply to wormery: i guess if scotland was the biggest heroine producer in the world then england would be the "special case"

to the_kegs: it is not Russia's fault that heroin producction increased 44 times (read the article!!) since the US and UK invaded Afganistan. Its the fault of the occupation forces and their governments who are turning a blind eye to the massive production of heroin in a country they control.
Re: reply
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 02:00 pm (UTC)
Surely it's the fault of the Russians for chosing to take heroine, rather than the US and UK invaded Afganistan.
Re: reply
[info]joehello wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 06:55 pm (UTC)
This is wrong for two reasons: 1) the US and UK do NOT control Afghanistan. If they did, there would not still be troops fighting there. 2) It is Russia's fault that production icnreased 44 times. The farmers in Afghanistan are growing poppies because it makes them money. They are making money because Russian's are buying. If no one bought it, then it would no longer be profitable and they would then be forced to find another crop for financial sustanance.

Fairly predictable that Russians yet again fail to understand how free-market capitalism works. Instead, they tread about with no real domestic policy for addressing the problem and instead just blame everyone else for it. They should just put the wall back up and stay behind it...
[info]yosita_82 wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 01:01 pm (UTC)
"Russia was in favour of simply spraying Afghan poppy fields with pesticides to kill the crops." Just a tiny detail here is that this would take away all possible income for those who grow the poppy!!This whole article and the statements just show agian how little the Russian state cares about human dignity!Putting drug addicts in jail and criminalising them if they go to a doctor actually seeking help is just making things worse!!But of course its so easy to blame everything on Afghanistan and exogenous processes,rather than thinking of how oneself can reform and change processes!!!

Slvng the drug epidemic
[info]jacklegs wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 04:03 pm (UTC)
The solution is obvious. The military forces in Afghanistan, led by the United States, needs to occupy every opium field and farm, well dug fox holes in every field, making it clear to the growers that we are purchasing their whole crop - for top heroin prices - in raw opium form, which is a great deal for the growers - less work more money!

The war lords won't have a cash crop with which to pay their troops. They will come across the fields to kill the occupiers. They will die in the fields. The Taliban won't have a cash crop to fund their movement so they, too will attack the dug in Americans, and die in the fields. Al Qaeda won't have the cash to carry on, from smuggling heroin into Russia, Europe, and across the sea to Columbia for repackaging by the Columbian cartels for export to the Mexican cartels, and distribution in America.

The Russian addicts will almost have to go cold turkey, though the poppy also grows in Iran.

By purchasing the whole opium crop, we eliminate the war lords, the Taliban,and al Qaeda. At least they will be starved out. This is especially true of the terrorist networks.

Michaelslevinson dot commie
employment through heroin
[info]himherheshe wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 04:10 pm (UTC)
It could be solved with some effort, but tehy dont want it sold, it employs too many people: police lwyers, solicitors, judges, Prison officers, probation officers etc etc, if Heroin or any other drug is completely taken out of any country or the world, so many people will be out of a job; we will be in an even worse situation economically than we are already!
RE: Russia finally admits to its hidden heroin epidemic www.mrwino.co.uk
[info]matboo wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 07:01 pm (UTC)
Billions of pounds of drugs are being grown in these fields, the army destroy the plants, and buildings being used for harvesting them, but they setup more camps in other places, its impossible to stop, its been happening for years and years. Corruption, Money, Drugs, Murder, more Money.

I believe everyone has a buy price and can be turned to corruption if the price is right, you cant search every van, plane, boat, and person to stop drugs coming into a country.
Cold Turkey!
[info]the_kegs wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 09:39 pm (UTC)
No need to put your hands up, those of you going cold stick out like a sore thumb.
cocaine
[info]deeegeee wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 10:09 pm (UTC)
No country in history has succeeded in controling drugs let alone stopping them.The billions(name a currency)spent may just as well have been p####ed up against a wall!Prohibition DOES NOT work.Why?Because there are millions of(Name a currency)to be made.Legalise it,tax it & control it.When the west came out of booze prohibition there wasn't an avalanche of alcholics!Society will adjust & the money thrown up against that wall can be put to better use.
a few notes in favor of decriminalization of addictive substances
[info]nil22 wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 12:15 am (UTC)
i think there are a few important things to keep in mind when considering how to tackle the problem of drugs.
first; humans have always used mind-altering substances and always will.
second: because these substances can be very addictive, people will do a lot of stupid things to get their hands on them. this willingness of the user creates a great demand for the substance. as we all know, high demand and low supply drives prices very high.
third: making drug use illegal does two things; it makes the supply even shorter (thus driving the cost even higher) and it criminalizes the act of making, buying, selling, and transporting these substances. this may discourage some people but the problem is that since since the commerce of illegal substances creates a slippery slope.
once a person operates outside and opposed to the law the threshold for committing other crimes is lowered. add to this mix the fact that addictive illegal substances fetch a very very high price and we can understand how someone who is already engaging in criminal activity will resort to extreme violence. according to El Universal, Mexico's death toll on the war raging between rival narco-traffickers and the government topped 5612 in 2008. an astonishing number.
the second consequence of criminalizing the drug trade is that the drugs are unreliable. they are cut with substances that are much more harmful than the drugs themselves, and the potency of the drugs vary wildly.
clearly, making addictive substances illegal is not the answer. the consequences that doing so are much worse than allowing people to use these substances in a controlled way.
though drug use is in general undesirable, this is really just a moral point of view. we need to take a pragmatic point of view to solve this increasingly dire problem.
there are a lot of positive consequences to legalizing these substances. in switzerland, when they provided supervised clinics where heroin addicts could get clean syringes, pure heroin, and a place in which to take the drug, addiction dropped dramatically. the drug trade vanished so no one was pushing the drugs on the streets. the act of taking the drug became akin to going to see the doctor so it became totally unappealing to new users. who would go to a clinic to talk to a teacher / nurse / and social worker (they supervise the clinics) to do drugs?
if we as a society are unwilling to provide free drugs then at least we would know that the drugs were pure and potency is the same regardless of the supplier, that the purveyors would not be criminals, and on top of that we would create a new source of revenue by taxing these substances.
though there will of course be problems inherent to this, these problems pale in comparison to the rampant corruption, murder, and unfortunate overdoses that plague criminalization.
[info]jabohna wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 07:13 am (UTC)
Russia is simply the worst country in the world - for everything - The people are vile, stinking, cultureless, alcoholic, illiterate, superstitious peasants who spend all their money on fake chinese designer goods in a laughable attempt to look as un-Russian as possible. The population is shrinking at record pace due to drug and alcohol abuse and infertility. Half the youth population is mentally damaged from being sent with no training to be bullied and kill in Chechnya. The infrastructure is a stinking, crumbling communist relic. The food and weather are simply disgusting. The air is toxic, and environmental pollution is sky high.

I had to live there for a year and it was the most miserable depressing year of my life. Thank god I got out before the whole place slid down the toilet once and for all like the giant turd that it is.
[info]uylenspiegel wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 01:27 pm (UTC)
???????? ?? ?????? ??????: ? ?? ?????? ? ?????? ? ?????? ?? ?????? ??????? :)
[info]wormery wrote:
Friday, 13 March 2009 at 12:11 pm (UTC)
Seconded - and there's some quite stiff competition too.

What is really awful is that the place could work really well - it's so vast with so many resources - but only if you removed the Russians and replaced them, or at least their managers and leaders, with civilised people like the British.

Russia really is Chavistan. I hope it gets nuked asap. The only shame if that happens is that there'll still be lots of Russian pigs in Londonigrad who survive. Hitler really did have a point y'know...
Addressing the heroin problem in Central Asia
[info]mwisunji wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 10:16 am (UTC)
All those involved in harm reduction, drug demand reduction and supply reduction in Central Asia would admit that all the issues articulated in the article point to the challenges and experiences not only in Russia but to the Central Asia region and the caucases as well.

For those who may doubt it, time for action is now! Addressing the challenges highlighted requires leadership, a review of archaic legislation, regional coorperation and putting in place specifiv multifaceted programmes to address the different aspects of the heroin problem.


Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date