Russia finally admits to its hidden heroin epidemic
Surge in abuse blamed on West's failings in Afghanistan, but addicts go untreated
Alamy
Drug use in Russia is at epidemic level, but the Eurasian Harm Reduction Network say users are being arrested rather than reformed
At a playground just off the busy Prospekt Mira thoroughfare in central Moscow, there aren't any children playing on the swings. The slide is covered in dirty snow, the sandpit is strewn with empty vodka bottles and, on close inspection, a few used syringes. Mothers whisper to each other that the playground is the home of narkomany – drug addicts – and wheel their pushchairs swiftly past.
It's just one small sign of a vast hidden epidemic of heroin use that Russian officials and civil society groups say threatens the very existence of the nation. "It's a threat to our national security, our society, and our civilisation itself," said Viktor Ivanov, Russia's top drugs official, at a meeting with reporters recently. He estimated that there are more than two million drug addicts in Russia, which amounts to one addict for every 50 Russians of working age, a level that is up to eight times higher than in EU countries.
Most of these people are addicted to heroin which transits from Afghanistan, through central Asia, and across the long and porous border from Kazakhstan into Russia. There are people addicted to heroin across Russia's 11 time-zones, and the country's anti-drugs body says that Russia now uses more heroin than any other country in the world.
Mr Ivanov, a former KGB operative and a close associate of the Prime Minister, Vladimir Putin, said the foreign occupation of Afghanistan and the "war on terror" were the main factors behind Russia's drugs epidemic, and compared Russia's drug problem to the situation in China in the 19th century, when British traders brought opium to China and vast swathes of the population became addicted.
Mr Ivanov will travel to Vienna today, where he will address a special UN session on drugs and call for increased international co-operation on finding solutions for Afghanistan. He will also demand that Russia be included in the decision-making process on Afghanistan –which he described as the "shame of the international community" – and said that Russia was in favour of simply spraying Afghan poppy fields with pesticides to kill the crops.
"Ninety per cent of those who are addicted to drugs in Russia use Afghan drugs," said Mr Ivanov. "It's a simple equation – if there are no poppies, there is no drugs traffic. Thank goodness politicians in the West are beginning to admit the whole war on terror was ill-judged. We've heard Barack Obama and David Miliband come out and say that it was a mistake. The level of Afghan drugs production now is 44 times higher than it was in 2001."
Both government and public health officials agree that the epidemic of heroin addiction in Russia has reached terrifying proportions that could in the long run prove devastating. But while the government hints that the Western intervention in Afghanistan is the root cause of Russia's drugs woes, its critics claim that Russian government policy on drugs is responsible for worsening the epidemic.
"The Russian strategy is to stifle serious debate about the problem and demonise drug users," said Dasha Ocheret, of the Eurasian Harm Reduction Network in Moscow. "The goal is not to help people suffering with addiction but to identify them, and then punish them. No country in the world has ever been able to deal with its drug problems in this way."
Any addict who seeks medical help for his or her addiction is immediately put on the state "narcological register". This information is available to police, who can have the drug user arrested and put in prison, and causes huge problems for people if they kick their habit and want to reintegrate into society.
A report by Human Rights Watch claimed that Russian policy decisions on treating drug users were outdated and "deliberately ignore the best available medical evidence and recommendations".
Substitution therapy using methadone is banned in Russia, and needle and syringe exchange points are regarded as highly controversial. "Task number one for any drug user is to hide away from everyone," said Ms Ocheret. "They worry that if they go to get clean needles and syringes they will be arrested and sent to prison."
This in turn drives other devastating epidemics in the country, such as hepatitis C and HIV/Aids. Russia has one of the fastest-growing HIV epidemics in the world, with more than one million people thought to be HIV positive in the country. Ten years ago, the epidemic was mainly spread within the drug-using community, but now more than half of new cases are sexually transmitted, as the disease spreads across the population at large.
Whatever the reasons behind the epidemic of drug use, there is one thing on which everyone is agreed. More than 30,000 people die from drug use every year, and in a sparsely populated country with a shrinking population, it's a statistic that the country cannot afford.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
I know this is a fantasy, utopian scenario and that making pure heroin available to current users would stop tragic deaths, but I think users really need to get off drugs to lead a full and happy life.
Oh, really? Maybe, because there are good reasons for doing so? Record crop of heroin poppies hits anti-drug effort in Afghanistan.
"...even though 90 per cent of the heroin sold on British streets comes from Afghanistan." - at least, it's quite fair since the British do nothing about it.
To answer andyoc's question, if heroin, cocaine and meth users could get their fixes out of their pocket money and didn't end up living in sewage tunnels then the answer is no, I would not mind there being as many users as alcohol and tobacco users. I'll tell you more, I'm father to a six year-old boy and, since I have no guarantee that he does not end up hooked to something nasty, if he did I'd rather he did so in decent conditions. Another answer for the same money: a heroin user shooting himself next to me is causing me no harm, while a smoker is tarring up my lungs.
And gazing away from our own navel, let's not forget all the people who are living lives of misery and violence in the countries of origin of these drugs: have a look at what is happening in Mexico, what has happened and still happens in Colombia... If we think we have problems with drugs, we should look South and think again.
Short of building a giant wall across the Kazakhstan border there is no way to prevent people going into Kazakhstan and smuggling heroine back into Russia.
Thus, Russia is not a normal country - so comparing it to wetern european democracies is absurd. Better to compare it to China actually. The mentality is utterly different from ours, which most people cannot grasp (perhaps they would is Russians were black or looked very different).
There are places in Russia where couples choose not to have kids because they'll only end up on drugs or dead or in prison (eg Rostov). I have also visited Russia under communism and after, so have seen with my own eyes what the place is like.
Best Regards from Moscow
??? ?????? ????????, ? ??? ??????? ????? ??? ????? - ? 1984?. ?? ??? ?? ???? ?????? ?? ?????
??????? ??????? ? ???????? ?????? ???????, ???????????? ???????.
? ?????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????, ??????? ??, ????????? wormery, ?? ???????????? ????? ?????????? ????????, ?? ??????? ??????? ??? ?? ????. ???????, ??? ??????? ?????? ????????????, ?????? ?????? ???????????? - knuckles sandwich ?????? ?????? ?? ?????? ? ?????????? ????? :)
Indeed, after the end of the soviet union it was expected that Russia would embrace Free market trade with the rest of the world and, thus, would bring itself in line with western Europe. However, the Friedmanite policies of the IMF and WTO would actually de-stabilize the country even more, causing poverty to go through the roof, the exact OPPOSITE of what the IMF was built for.
Corruption is the common answer amongst western neo-liberals, however, when you consider the implementation of complete free market liberalism in Chile, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Poland, South Africa and even now Iraq, what are your excuses for THESE countries?
Quite simply, The free market Capitalism that Yeltsin implemented in the country with the help of Chicago School economists such as Jeffery sachs, AGAINST the will of the parliament*, is what caused the rise of the oligarchs in Russia. instead of giant multinationals buying up Russian companies, as they did in Asia, at bargain prices, formers soviet leaders, Yeltsins administration and even his family, were allowed to make KILLER profits.
And of course what happens to the general population, they get thrown into mass poverty. with out money they starve, thus, what solutions are there;
Suicide
Drug abuse (Alcohol is a drug BTW)
Sex trade
Crime
if only you knew how it felt, having 5 children to feed with no money, no home, no nothing. EVERYONE is on the brink of starvation, EVERYONE is suffering in pain, then along comes man wearing fancy suits. This man offers to pay 1000 for your 6 year old daughter, no questions asked.
either you sell your 6 year old, or the whole family dies, what would you pick?
THIS is the option that THOUSANDS face in countries that have swallowed neo-liberalism. But why not the UK or US you ask, we not only gave birth to this policy, but we aid enforing this onto the rest of the world, yet we do fine, why is that?
BECAUSE WE DO NOT IMPLEMENT THE POLICIES AT HOME.
If the U.S.A. and Russia were to buy the opium crop direct from the growers, and either destroy it or produce the heroin themselves they will save the world trillions of dollars, roubles, euros etc, etc.
So easy - if only they had the vision. yours Grandad.
1) There isn't a giant plantation in Afganistan that produces opium, it's made by millions of small farmers who live all over Afganistan. Just finding them all would take years.
2) Most sellers won't sell to the USA or Russia because they can make more money selling it illegally or they are being forced to grow it by the Taliban (those who disobey suffer rape and murder).
In short the problems are finding the opium and convincing people to sell it to you. Both of which cannot be solved easily or quickly.
to the_kegs: it is not Russia's fault that heroin producction increased 44 times (read the article!!) since the US and UK invaded Afganistan. Its the fault of the occupation forces and their governments who are turning a blind eye to the massive production of heroin in a country they control.
Fairly predictable that Russians yet again fail to understand how free-market capitalism works. Instead, they tread about with no real domestic policy for addressing the problem and instead just blame everyone else for it. They should just put the wall back up and stay behind it...
The war lords won't have a cash crop with which to pay their troops. They will come across the fields to kill the occupiers. They will die in the fields. The Taliban won't have a cash crop to fund their movement so they, too will attack the dug in Americans, and die in the fields. Al Qaeda won't have the cash to carry on, from smuggling heroin into Russia, Europe, and across the sea to Columbia for repackaging by the Columbian cartels for export to the Mexican cartels, and distribution in America.
The Russian addicts will almost have to go cold turkey, though the poppy also grows in Iran.
By purchasing the whole opium crop, we eliminate the war lords, the Taliban,and al Qaeda. At least they will be starved out. This is especially true of the terrorist networks.
Michaelslevinson dot commie
I believe everyone has a buy price and can be turned to corruption if the price is right, you cant search every van, plane, boat, and person to stop drugs coming into a country.
first; humans have always used mind-altering substances and always will.
second: because these substances can be very addictive, people will do a lot of stupid things to get their hands on them. this willingness of the user creates a great demand for the substance. as we all know, high demand and low supply drives prices very high.
third: making drug use illegal does two things; it makes the supply even shorter (thus driving the cost even higher) and it criminalizes the act of making, buying, selling, and transporting these substances. this may discourage some people but the problem is that since since the commerce of illegal substances creates a slippery slope.
once a person operates outside and opposed to the law the threshold for committing other crimes is lowered. add to this mix the fact that addictive illegal substances fetch a very very high price and we can understand how someone who is already engaging in criminal activity will resort to extreme violence. according to El Universal, Mexico's death toll on the war raging between rival narco-traffickers and the government topped 5612 in 2008. an astonishing number.
the second consequence of criminalizing the drug trade is that the drugs are unreliable. they are cut with substances that are much more harmful than the drugs themselves, and the potency of the drugs vary wildly.
clearly, making addictive substances illegal is not the answer. the consequences that doing so are much worse than allowing people to use these substances in a controlled way.
though drug use is in general undesirable, this is really just a moral point of view. we need to take a pragmatic point of view to solve this increasingly dire problem.
there are a lot of positive consequences to legalizing these substances. in switzerland, when they provided supervised clinics where heroin addicts could get clean syringes, pure heroin, and a place in which to take the drug, addiction dropped dramatically. the drug trade vanished so no one was pushing the drugs on the streets. the act of taking the drug became akin to going to see the doctor so it became totally unappealing to new users. who would go to a clinic to talk to a teacher / nurse / and social worker (they supervise the clinics) to do drugs?
if we as a society are unwilling to provide free drugs then at least we would know that the drugs were pure and potency is the same regardless of the supplier, that the purveyors would not be criminals, and on top of that we would create a new source of revenue by taxing these substances.
though there will of course be problems inherent to this, these problems pale in comparison to the rampant corruption, murder, and unfortunate overdoses that plague criminalization.
I had to live there for a year and it was the most miserable depressing year of my life. Thank god I got out before the whole place slid down the toilet once and for all like the giant turd that it is.
What is really awful is that the place could work really well - it's so vast with so many resources - but only if you removed the Russians and replaced them, or at least their managers and leaders, with civilised people like the British.
Russia really is Chavistan. I hope it gets nuked asap. The only shame if that happens is that there'll still be lots of Russian pigs in Londonigrad who survive. Hitler really did have a point y'know...
For those who may doubt it, time for action is now! Addressing the challenges highlighted requires leadership, a review of archaic legislation, regional coorperation and putting in place specifiv multifaceted programmes to address the different aspects of the heroin problem.