World

Partly Sunny with Showers 10° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Sins of the fathers still haunting Catholic Church

Tomorrow the social earthquake unloosed within the Republic of Ireland in the early 1990s reaches its crescendo when newspapers, television and radio south of the border will be dominated by the first findings of the Government's 3,000-page, five-volume investigation into child abuse by up to 500 priests.

Associated with it is another inquiry limited to the Catholic archdiocese of Dublin, where more than 100 priests stand accused of sexually interfering with children in their care over the two generations between 1940 and 2006.

Today's liberated Irish on the verge of middle age, particularly those in Dublin city and county, have little idea of the Ireland within which their parents grew up; and the Free State of which their grandparents used to speak was not a country they ever could recognise.

Now they are told that, behind that pious cloud of incense, there lurked an evil which at first they did not believe, involving, as it did, the terrorising of destitute, orphaned youngsters by those who had them in their care.

But this was only the outward evidence of an institution collapsing beneath the weight of its own unchecked supremacy; for it is an inveterate law of history, from the days of the Caesars, that — in the words of Acton — power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Lord Acton, in fact, was writing to Mandell Creighton, Victorian Bishop of London. The current agony at Westminster, quite in keeping, involves an administration grown careless of the privileges of government to which it has had access for too long. In Eire, as it was in the 1950s, the Catholic bishops effectively were its rulers.

It was the Archbishop of Dublin, John Charles McQuaid, who was the ultimate arbiter of public policy.

When the most notorious collision occurred, in 1951, between a young and inexperienced health minister, Noel Browne, a revealing detail was that, when the bishops took exception to his plans for a free health service, their procedure was not to wait on Dr Browne in his office in the Dublin Custom House to express their views, normal practice in a parliamentary democracy, but to summon him at 24 hours' notice to meet them at the Archbishop's residence.

In the climate of the time, there was no question of his not going. It was well known that the Taoiseach, John Costello, did the Archbishop's bidding in everything. Dr Browne had worked in London hospitals (where his own tuberculosis had been arrested and cured) and his scheme was heavily influenced by the new British NHS of 1948.

But when he had lunch with Archbishop John D'Alton at Armagh and inquired about how it would work in Northern Ireland and why his own scheme was being blocked, the future Cardinal advised, in royal idiom: “We are prepared neither to apologise nor to explain.” Remember, this was to a cabinet minister.

A price was to be paid for the hubris of the bishops, even if the extent of their arrogance, in the pre-television age, was largely concealed from the people. When rumours of brutal physical punishments in a Christian Brothers' industrial school reached the Evening Herald in Dublin at this time, a former editor has recorded how one of the Brothers burst into the office to demand that the manager withhold the report of a court case involving the Artane School.

Before he got an answer, he pushed open the editorial door to tell the staff that the manager had ordered the case to be spiked, ie, dumped.

The dam burst in 1992 when Annie Murphy contacted the Irish Times to disclose that, as his housekeeper, she had had a long affair with Eamon Casey, the Bishop of Galway, to whom she had borne a son. Casey was no ordinary bishop.

He was popular, often on TV, had been MC for Pope John Paul's Irish visit in 1979 and was chosen as number one in a volume of interviews with ‘Irish leaders' — O'Reilly, Smurfit, Gay Byrne — published in 1987. Some old hands at the Irish Times, interestingly, asked to be taken off the Casey story.

But it was established that diocesan funds had been used for Annie and her son.

Since then, the Church has had to learn how to survive on the defensive. There is widespread indifference. Mass attendances have slumped.

So have priestly vocations. Countless convents have closed. The young brazenly follow a secularist agenda. Deprived of its ancient priestly cement, the social fabric in bad spots disintegrates, riven by gang warfare, drug dependence and booze.

Yet Church influence, if more covert, is still powerful in high places.

Bertie Ahern moved smartly to protect the Church's assets in 2006 when he agreed to cap its contribution to the compensation being claimed by the thousands of victims of clerical abuse at €128m.

This is less than 10 per cent of the expected total cost, a bill which the taxpayer must eventually pick up. Tomorrow the tortured story takes another lurch towards that day.

Taken from the Belfast Telegraph

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

AND SO THEY SHOULD!
[info]richardm30 wrote:
Wednesday, 20 May 2009 at 12:33 pm (UTC)
The crimes of the Catholic Church are truly repugnant. What is almost as repellant is the fact that the Catholic Church thinks it has the right to lecture US about morality. How could old celibate men in frocks know ANYTHING about the realities of sexuality. Even now, in 2009, the Catholic Church (and many Anglican evangelical ones too) preach Hate again gay people - even as they themselves sodomize children. This is a morality that disgusts me. The Pope with his medieval attitudes towards sexuality continues to do damage to society by demonizing the gay community and by hampering scientific research. But, I guess, only religion could foster such bile and Hate - so Richard Dawkins seems to have been right all along!
Gays cannot multiply. Does the Vatican know this?
[info]famulla wrote:
Wednesday, 20 May 2009 at 01:39 pm (UTC)
The Pope with his medieval attitudes towards sexuality continues to do damage to society by demonizing the gay community and by hampering scientific research. Gays cannot multiply. Does the Vatican know this?
Read this it is the income that matters. The big is better is what I know. Now that may be for a car, a house, the plane, or the nuke. The breasts are something the women are proud of. They love them as this the men?s attraction. Men always see the big ones or the doorknobs type. The one has a disadvantage of more clothes and expensive. The other uses less cloth but that does not mean it is cheap as the material may differ.
I have no idea what he big ones and the small ones preference however I know one thing. The big ones come in the papers the small ones do not. The ones that are big are paid. The others suffer in envy.
Where is the heavy price? The red zone pay well for the big ones, the income of the small is like they have, small, meager.
Women with bigger breasts already pay a heavy price
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla
Catholic Church
[info]jwolfbauer wrote:
Wednesday, 20 May 2009 at 08:43 pm (UTC)
As a true believer in my faith and my church, I'm not just sadden, I'm mad as hell! I'm sick and tired of this kind of display from the heads of the Catholic Church, and those who work in its name. I see this in terms of they are worse than the Germans were during the horrendous killing of the Jews, because they profess to be the one and only church! This has been going on too long! If the Vatican does not do something right this moment then I will not give one more cent to this church. Names, those responsible from the very beginning either will be held accountable and charged for unspeakable actions on the children of Ireland, or the Catholic people will rebell in numbers! We, as Catholic need to know who to contact about this Tourture, Persecution, and Agonizing of these children all children of the CATHOLIC CHURCH.
unwelcome distraction
[info]leon_rosgarten wrote:
Wednesday, 20 May 2009 at 10:18 pm (UTC)
OK, but this is just distracting the public from the real issues, the oppression
of the Muslim people by the zionists, american crimes, zionist conspiracies
and land-grab. We must get back to these asap.
Re: unwelcome distraction
[info]lima_charlie wrote:
Wednesday, 20 May 2009 at 11:02 pm (UTC)
I wonder if you would say to the face of one of the many victims that the systematic sexual abuse which took place in these institutions and which they had suffered as a child from those entrusted to care for them was an 'unwelcome distraction'?

I doubt it...

Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date