World

Partly Sunny with Showers 14° London Hi 16°C / Lo 8°C

Tom Cruise and a trial that could drive Scientology out of France

Movement accused of 'organised fraud' against two female members persuaded to part with €20,000

By John Lichfield in Paris

Tom Cruise (right) lobbied Nicolas Sarkozy not to support prosecution of the Church of Scientology, founded by L Ron Hubbard (left)

REX; GETTY

Tom Cruise (right) lobbied Nicolas Sarkozy not to support prosecution of the Church of Scientology, founded by L Ron Hubbard (left)

The Scientology movement went on trial in Paris yesterday for "organised fraud" in a case which could lead to the cult's organising bodies being outlawed in France.

The French state prosecution service has failed to back the trial but denies that its decision was influenced by the lobbying of French politicians, including Nicolas Sarkozy before he became President, by leading Scientologists, including the actor Tom Cruise. After an 11-year inquiry, following complaints from four French former Scientologists, an independent, investigating magistrate decided that the prosecution should go ahead.

Two female plaintiffs allege that, between 1997 and 1999, the French movement persuaded them to pay the equivalent of €20,000 each on drugs, vitamins, counselling, saunas and equipment to improve their mental and physical health. This included an "electrometer" to measure the state of their "spiritual condition".

The movement is accused of pretending to "identify and resolve alleged psychological difficulties" and "promoting the personal flowering" of its adepts with the "sole aim of seizing their resources" and "establishing psychological control over them".

Although individual Scientologists, including the cult's founder, L Ron Hubbard, have previously been convicted in France, this is the first time that the movement itself has been accused in a French court of systematic criminal activity. Seven leading members of the movement in France are also on trial.

Scientology, officially accepted as a religion in the United States, is on trial for "escroquerie en bande organisée" – or organised financial fraud. It is also accused of dispensing drugs illegally to its members. Two of the original plaintiffs have withdrawn their actions.

If convicted after a two or three-week trial, the main French organisations of the movement could be ordered to close down.

The cult's French spokeswoman, Danièle Gounord, protested yesterday that Scientology was the victim of a "heresy trial" and "mendacious accusations". Maitre Olivier Morice, lawyer for the two remaining plaintiffs, said the court would have an opportunity "once and for all" to examine the evidence that the leaders of the Church of Scientology are driven by financial gain.

This was the conclusion drawn by the report submitted by the investigating magistrate, Jean-Christophe Hullin, three years ago. He said that Scientology was "first and foremost a commercial organisation" motivated by "an absolute obsession with profit".

The French state prosecution service rejected Judge Hullin's conclusions and decided in 2006 that Scientology should not be sent for trial. Whatever outsiders might think, the prosecution service decided, Scientology was motivated by "religious conviction" and not "personal gain". The actor and Scientologist Tom Cruise had led a lobbying campaign to block the legal action, which is the latest of five against the movement in France since the 1970s. At one point, he sought, and was granted a meeting with M Sarkozy, before he became President. The prosecution service, or parquet, denies any connection between this political lobbying and its decision to recommend an acquittal.

Judge Hullin decided to send the case for trial despite the parquet's decision. Under French law, the investigating magistrate can, in effect, overrule the state prosecution service but the chances of a successful prosecution are inevitably dimmed.

The defendants, including the Church of Scientology itself, are formally accused of cheating the defendants "by systematic use of personality tests of no scientific value ... with the sole aim of selling services and products".

Scientology was founded in 1952 by a former science fiction writer, L Ron. Hubbard. Although the complete teachings of Scientology are available only to senior adepts, the core of its beliefs is that all humans are immortal beings who have strayed from their true nature. Human souls or "thetans" can be reincarnated. Many have already lived on other planets in the universe.

The movement "audits" the souls of members and would-be members and – in return for fees or donations – prescribes "purification" courses, including vitamins, drugs and lengthy saunas.

Scientology claims that it is a religion, like any other religion with beliefs that may seem implausible to outsiders. Its approach would, the cult argues, lead to a world without crime and war.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Ho Ho Ho
[info]rwthplb wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 11:19 pm (UTC)
Well - is Scientology that much different from (say) the Catholic Church (an easy target admittedly). OK, a longer established history and not a recent 'sci-fi writer on speed' invention, but many of the activities look very similar. The scientologists just appear to be a little better organized to shut down dissent than most of the established religions - and they do it very well.

Do they deserve tax free status - nahhh. Let the idiots who subscribe pay, that is their right, but please don't subsidize them.
Re: Ho Ho Ho
[info]brazil2009 wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 10:33 pm (UTC)
Could someone, please, explain to me why do we need a church to prescribe us -did I get it right?-vitamins? What for I wonder?
[info]ourmaninferney wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 12:10 am (UTC)
A "religion" that requires its adepts to pay more and more cash for "redemption" is automatically suspect.

A "religion" that won't reveal its "sacred texts" until its adepts have reached a certain level is automatically suspect.

A "religion" that copyrights its "sacred texts" and other works, and then sues violators, is automatically suspect.

Need I go on?
Unquestionably a commerically driven scam
[info]ayembee wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 12:51 am (UTC)
Given that L Ron Hubbard himself once said the following...

"Writing for a penny a word is ridiculous. If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion"

...I don't really see how it's defensible. The 'sacred texts' bear more than a passing resemblance to pulp sci-fi (written by a sci-fi author, quelle surprise), and are, frankly utterly risible. I suggest doing some research; Operation Clambake is a good point to start, and you can gasp in awe at the sheer scale of the psychological manipulation and weirdness of this bizarre, exploitative cult.

'Operation Clambake' info pack on Scientology: http://www.xenu.net/archive/infopack/
Re: Unquestionably a commerically driven scam
[info]sheikwaba wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 06:06 am (UTC)
I agree, I attended a session once.

They apparently believe that by telepathically communicating to a cosmic Jewish zombie, who is also his own father, you can free yourself from an evil sin force put there because a rib woman was persuaded by a talking snake to eat a magic apple.

Sounds crazy I know. They then wanted my money and to know what I'd been up to. Abhorrent.

At least I think it was Scientology....
Re: Unquestionably a commerically driven scam
[info]theelectrician wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 07:17 am (UTC)
Did they ask you to sit in a tiny room and whisper to an old man wearing a frock about the naughty things you'd done?
Re: Unquestionably a commerically driven scam
[info]sheumais wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 08:01 am (UTC)
Are you sure you hadn't wandered into Santa's Grotto?
Re: Unquestionably a commerically driven scam
[info]whiterabbi7 wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 12:40 pm (UTC)
You just really made my day.

Seriously :D
Re: Unquestionably a commerically driven scam
[info]thea2z wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 07:21 pm (UTC)
You are a riot. Everything I was thinking, but more cleverly expressed (and I am a writer). Bravo!
Praise me
[info]tovasco wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 02:51 am (UTC)
I hold to no religion... but if everybody followed my beliefs there would be no crime, war or even hunger. Nobody needs to give me money to follow my ideas and I pay taxes. Why should religions be special cases? Why does wearing a silly hat make you holy?
Deja Vu
[info]majorblimp wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 05:22 am (UTC)
A cult based upon a book; immortal souls offering resurrection; prayers and offerings for forgiveness of sins; extraterrestial beings (with or without wings) - hmm? I think I've heard this one before somewhere.
And Jesus, and Allah, and Yahweh....
[info]apeist wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 06:17 am (UTC)
All are organized financial fraud enterprises.

As long as there is ignorance and stupidity, religions will come (and go), and every faithful soul will claim, that theirs is the one true religion.

France should be a little more honest about it, and either condemn all, or none.
Re: And Jesus, and Allah, and Yahweh....
[info]corporeal4now wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 10:11 am (UTC)

All of the religions mentioned in your title are not money making scams as a core part of their operation (well perhaps some of the Christian sects might stray into that territory as far as properties are concerned).
It's all hogwash for credulaous morons
[info]steerpike66 wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 06:24 am (UTC)
Some of it is old and dusty. Some of it is new and shiny. And it's all shite.

Some threaten murder. Soem burn and stone you. other's just rip you off and sue you.

Charlatans.
JUST THE SAME AS CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM
[info]georgesign wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 06:52 am (UTC)
All mumbo-jumbo that seeks non-thinking recruits to indoctrinate to become willing sheep to follow the authority of a few "leaders" While they are at it why not ban all religions. They are all basically peddling a non-provable claim. Which can be summed up with the words like "scam" "con-trick" "bunkum".
NOTHING IS BETTER THAN RELIGION
[info]georgesign wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 06:56 am (UTC)
SO LET'S ALL WORSHIP NOTHING
The Problem Is ...
[info]infohiway wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 07:56 am (UTC)
Who was it that said, "Get thee behind me Satan."?
Well - ALL organisations are evil, dead, man-made fixions; cash-grabbing parasite scams with no: breath, soul, conscience, guilt, empathy nor inhibitions. By definition, sociopathic.

get it outlawed
[info]lee_ji_me wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 08:25 am (UTC)
the more hocus pocus that is outlawed the better, Tom Cruise is nuts
Re: get it outlawed
[info]drg40 wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 08:46 am (UTC)
Of course Tom Cruise is nuts. But then so are all the people who think that being a 'celeb' makes you a world class chef, or dancer or MP. Or even a passably interesting human being.

What Tom cruise does well is to put on make up and stand under the lights pretending to be someone else, speaking someone else's words. He doesn't have to believe a word he's saying. I would have thought those skills well qualify him to be a priest.
Re: get it outlawed
[info]lee_ji_me wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 04:07 pm (UTC)
yes, the world is full of scheisters
Gullible - Science fiction writer tells it all
[info]leonore35 wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 08:57 am (UTC)
As long as there are gullible people there will alwsys be religions/cults of various kinds
Looking at the Mormon foundations you find it is not much more ridiculous than Scientology,
Joseph Smith and Hubbard con men both, and you can find a host of other examples of cults which to any sensible person are without any foundation
Cannot imagine how the US govt classes a business as a religion
Scientology
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 09:57 am (UTC)
I find it quite irritating that they chose the name "Scientology" to make out they are in some way scientific whilst then practising mumbo jumbo rituals. I would say what kind of idiot gets taken in by this but then my brother converted to Jehovas Witness for a while, totally out of character.
Pyramid scheme - money generator
[info]corporeal4now wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 10:07 am (UTC)

Sponge off the members of public looking for God who fall into their "venus trap".
Should be banned all over the place as a money making scam.
scientology fraud
[info]abharrisson wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 10:49 am (UTC)
I was interessted to hear that scientology "audits" the souls and in return for fees prescribes purification... this is a modern day throw back to christian religion where sinners could buy their pennance.... I was reminded of other "refreshed" frauds.. most recently with madoff re-inventing the old Ponzi fraud..... it speaks volumes for the state the US is in that scientology is an officially recognised religion.... I wouldn't mind so much but its the outright commercialisation which marks it out as a fraud, much like all the TV "evangelists"... more like con artists... still if people are gullible enough.
This is good
[info]had_it wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 11:02 am (UTC)
If we can just convict Scientology, perhaps we can successfully prosecute the big four of religions that have caused more war, presecution, and death than any other human institutions: Chritianity, Islam, Judaism and Hinduism.

The Scientologists are acused of soliciting money by encouraging belief in things "of no scientific value." That is exactly what the big four do every tme they pass the collection plate.
This is good
[info]had_it wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 11:10 am (UTC)
If we can just convict Scientology, perhaps we can successfully prosecute the big four of religions that have caused more war, presecution, and death than any other human institutions: Chritianity, Islam, Judaism and Hinduism.

The Scientologists are accused of soliciting money by encouraging belief in things "of no scientific value." That is exactly what the big four do every time they pass the collection plate.
Hubbard's masterplan?
[info]sickofstupidity wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 01:09 pm (UTC)
If I were willing to give L. Ron Hubbard the benefit of the doubt - okay, if I were willing to be extremely charitable about him - then I might suggest the following, rather amusing, scenario for consideration:

Hubbard didn't believe a *single word* of his 'religion', and always intended it to be 'fake' religion, comprising the most preposterious and absurd ideas that he could think of - thetans, Xenu, etc. (he was probably laughing so much that he wet himself when he wrote all that stuff) - but with just enough pseudoscientific gobbledeegook to make it *sound* convincing to a certain type of person, so that it would catch on, gain a following and become self-sustaining.

In addition, he *wanted* his religion to attacked as ruthlessly materialistic and profiteering, and criticized for shamelessly exploiting the vulnerable and credulous, and for exerting an unhealhty - even dangerous - degree of psychological manipulation and control over its followers. And he always *intended* that his religion should one day be brought before the courts on these charges. And he hoped that it would be found guilty.

Why?

Because he wanted to expose *all* religions as fake, as comprising preposterous and absurd beliefs, as being ruthlessly profiteering, as exploitating the vulnerable and credulous and psychologically manipulating them. And he hoped that if these accusations could bring down *his* religion, then people might start to look at the 'respectable' religions - e.g. Christianity, Judaism, Islam - and wonder if they too could be guilty of the same crimes, and should be judged similarly. Or, if this did not happen, then at least it would expose, for all to see, the double-standards and hypocrisy of the political and legal establishment when it comes to the major organized religions, and the huge power and influence wielded by the vested religious interests in our society - power and influence that effectively place them above criticism, and above the law.

As I said, one must be extremely charitable to Hubbard to imagine that this was his real intention behind setting up Scientology. But if it *is* actually true, then Hubbard deserves to be rehabilitated and his reputation revised, from being one of an eccentric crank who invented his own religion, to that of a mischievous anti-theist whose plan to bring down *all* religions along with his own borders on sheer genius....
Scientology
[info]almostvoid wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 01:18 pm (UTC)
Scientology is less weird than Monotheism. As a religion it doesn't have to make sense and if people are silly enough to part with their money on top then so be it. No one is putting a proverbial gun to anybodies head forcing them into this cult. If Monotheism was scrutinized as much as Scientology [and I'm not a believer in either] than that delusional logic would be just as ridiculous as Scientologies creative mythology.
Scientology
[info]superkeith wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 01:52 pm (UTC)
Is this the cult that claims aliens have infected our minds and that they are the only ones that can save us from this if we pay. Well I suppose that is no more weird than the claims of any of the organised religions which seem to be about power and money.Amazing what people can be made to believe. Strange how all these beings and creatures are always invisible and can never actually be seen or touched or measured by their effect which makes it a little difficult to believe in any of them. I have been told that in the USA you are statistically more likely to have been taken by an alien than to win the national lottery. There are many who believe in a Supreme Being because it is the only explanation for them of the existence of the Universe but they do not support the doctrines of the organised religions because they find them lacking in moral and ethical values and indeed some of the tenets of some religions are against the law in the EU and UK. There are 45 creation myths, some of which appear more credible than the Abraham stories. In my personal opinion to qualify as a religion an ethos should involve no coercion in any of its tenets and practises and cost no money especially from the taxpayers and electors.
A con
[info]cfinnie wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 02:24 pm (UTC)
My ex-husband was a member in Los Angeles and dragged me in too. I was finally tossed out when they realized I would keep asking uncomfortable questions. For example, when you take their counseling sessions, it is with the goal of becoming an "operating thetan." Supposedly, when you reach a high enough level (though they keep adding higher levels) you can control matter and energy. So I wanted to know why people at the higher levels wore eyeglasses and had dental work. And why they needed so much of my money. They archly informed me that they didn't need to perform parlor tricks to satisfy me. And I told them they could then do without my money. They then persuaded my husband to take our only car, our child, the keys to the house, and all the money in our bank account and give it to the "church." It only took my father and I the rest of the day to get everything but his half of the money back. I am horrified that the U.S. calls them a church. They are not. The French court is absolutely right. They are only about money and have ruined more people than I can count.
Tradition, tradition
[info]lasvegasrich wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 03:47 pm (UTC)
All the accepted religions, Chrisitanity, Judaism, Muslim, and so on, have a history of many centuries, or even milleniums. Sure they need financial support for their survival, but that's part of being a member. Then you have Scientology, a movement started by a science fiction writer in 1952. It has attracted many followers, including movie actors such as Tom Cruise. Cruise while being interviewed by Matt Lauer on NBC's Today Show, went ballistic insisting that drugs used to alter the thinking of people with mental problems were not necessary. Scientology may be a way of life, but it is not a religion.
sheep versus people
[info]bamako1 wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 03:57 pm (UTC)
here is the obvious difference between Europeans and Americans who swallow everything lock stock an barrel. thank goodness for independent critical thinking - Americans are a nation of sheep.
Nonsense
[info]asonberg wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 03:59 pm (UTC)
Scientology is a nonsense "religion" and anyone taken in by it deserves what they get. I would say more but I must dash. I have to break out my spaceship from Area 51. I have a meeting with Xenu and I daren't be late!
The good that Scientology does.
[info]colin7 wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 04:23 pm (UTC)
Mark Twain said that faith is believing what you know ain't true. As irrational as it is - Scientology is no more irrational than Catholicism, Mormonism, Islamism, Hinduism, Protestantism, Jainism, Sikhism, and all the other isms.
The good thing is that Scientiology's silliness allows us to see the silliness of all the other supernaturally-inclined religions - which many comments here demonstrate.
Twain also said (and I'm paraphrasing) that 'the quiet confidence with which I know the other man's religion to be foolish, makes me wonder if mine is foolish too.'
This is the good that Scientology does.
Now If We Could Only Get Rid of Them in the US!
[info]us_atheist wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 05:14 pm (UTC)
Along with Televangelists like Jack Van Impe (great name, non?), James Dobson of Focus on the Family, Creflo Dollar (at least he's truthful about what he wants!), Jerry Falwell (deceased but still causing issues over here), Benny Hinn (just about as funny as Benny HILL), Joel Osteen (no further intro needed!), Tony Alamo, ad infinitum. We're overrun with charlatans like Scientology and it's "celeb" followers. All Hail Xenu! (NOT!)
No intermediaries needed
[info]freedomleedom wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 11:58 pm (UTC)
In order to communicate with our Creator one does not need intermediaries clerics and all their structured dogmas and dark churches.

Learn to do meditation; and the use of one's own words, and poetry show more value, and love to the Supreme Father than the repetitious, boring rituals of all religions. Presently, religion is being used to manipulate, control and exploit the masses, which is something that displeases greatly a God that is about unconditional love and honesty, while fear and dishonesty are mankind's tactics.
Nonsense comparisons.
[info]wolfyrik wrote:
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 at 08:28 am (UTC)
Is Tom Cruise a lawyer now? Why should he have the right to stop people from making claims against people who have wronged them? Why should scientologists be protected from facing charges of alleged crimes? Are they better than the rest of us? Are they above the law?
Oh and to the scientologists and people who are flooding the comments section comparing scientology's money-for-enlightenment to Christianity, Christianity doesn't charge a set fee for it's "redemption". You can get everything you want for free and if you like can give money, maybe 10p maybe £10 to help the pastors live, as they don't get real wages. It's entirely up to you. You still get the whole religion and all of it's services. Jesus, the talking snake, everything. In scientology if you don't pay the extortionate costs, you get nothing. They even lie about Xenu and body thetans being dead aliens as Graham Wilson did recently, on a bbc radio program, until you've paid upwards of £200,000. There really is no comparison.
Not about religion
[info]wolfyrik wrote:
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 at 08:34 am (UTC)
And of course stop trying to claim that this is about religion. It's about crimes that have been committed. If you want to look at groups who are picked on because of their beliefs, look at Ron's Org and the Freezone. These are groups of scientologists who for whatever their reasons have broke away from the "church" and chosen to practice their beliefs for free and in their own groups.
The church of scientology has tried numerous times to shut down these groups numerous times alleging copyright infringement and other claims (apparently it's breach of copyright to use scientology materials you have previously paid for, on your own if you don't presently give them money). The higher up levels of sietnology from OT3 the Wall of fire with Xenu etc, also state that there was no Christ.

End religious intolerance, stop the church if scientology now.
Drive Scientology out of France
[info]sailor10 wrote:
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 at 12:00 pm (UTC)
Well it couldn't happen to a nicer group of actors. I've been "in" Scientology as a staff member, a course supervisor, a minister of the church, a WISE business consultant as well as investing time aboard the Scientology ship "Freewinds". Apart from some practical business and organization techniques I consider Scientology as close to quackery as you could find.
Spiritual freedom is the public relations handle to bring in the inquisitive and the searchers with their pocket books. So today France maybe the tax exempt status next followed by dismantling of its undeserved tag as a religion from Australia to the European Continent. Its a business with a lousy product!
$cientology
[info]shanemcd3 wrote:
Saturday, 6 June 2009 at 11:34 pm (UTC)
Personally i am an atheist, although i was brought up as a catholic, not strictly, but you get my drift. And i am from ireland, so i know exactly how much corruption is in religion. However, saying that every religion is as bad as scientology is just insane. When i went to church, they never stopped you particapating if you had no money, i never gave a cent, they simply passed around a plate and if you wanted to give money you did. At most, people gave about 5 euros (6 dollars) of course there are some well-off people who would donate larger amounts, but there was no pressure whatsoever, unlike scientology where normal people are expected to pay thousands for a service, and thousands more for materials, books and all sorts of things, to the point where even the extremly well off are left without a cent to their name. When i would go to church i would be there for roughly 30mins. Even the deeply involved spent no more than a few hours a week at chuch and spending time with your family was promoted. Scientologists are expected to devote their entire life to scientology, even if it means cutting all ties with their familys, sometimes being made to work 20 hours a day, 7 days a week, for 40 cent an hour. When i went to church i was never instructed to do anything dangerous to myself or others. The CofS (church of scientology) believes that all illnesses and diseases are psycosomatic (in the mind) and denied many members much needed medication, which results in many deaths, such as john travoltas son who needed epilepsy medication. Many people are also denied food and water, and people are known to have starved to death in their care. All in all there are lots of dodgy health practises promoted by the CofS. When i was in church it was said to be a good thing to study your religion, from any source. The CofS attacks anyone who practises their beliefs outside the orginisation because they get no money out of it. When i wanted to leave my church no pressure was put on me, no one even noticed probably. When people try to leave the CofS they encounter a very different situation. They are harrased steadily and even sued, the percentage of people leaving the CofS who commit suicide are unbelievable. . . I could go on and on, but the point is that despite most religions having problems, they are not close to the level of scientology
scientology
[info]elainpris wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 12:36 pm (UTC)
Why are we surprised. There are and always will be scam artists, in religion or whatever.
While there are vunerable people they will thrive.
How many more so caled religions will spring up before we are educated in athe sams of religion. No we will not be as money talks and these cults make money.

Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date