Troops gather on Georgian border
Less than a year after the enclave of South Ossetia erupted in war, this tinder box of the Caucasus is primed to flare up again, writes Shaun Walker
AFP/Getty
Russian troops patrol Tskhinvali in South Ossetia last August, after the war between Russia and Georgia
It's easy to see how things could spiral out of control: the two sides are braced for combat. At Ergneti on Georgia's border with South Ossetia, Georgian military police stand guard behind high barricades made of sandbags and two metre-high slabs of concrete. Out of sight barely 20 metres away, the forces of South Ossetia and Russia are mustered behind barricades of their own, their national flags fluttering.
The tranquility of the rolling green fields and lush vineyards belie it, but many fear that another summer war between Russia and Georgia like the one 11 months ago which killed hundreds of civilians is no more than a stutter of automatic gunfire away from breaking out. And if it happens, this standoff at Ergneti could be the flashpoint.
In the valley below is Tskhinvali, the South Ossetian capital. Today it shimmers in the heat but last August it was the epicentre of the war as the forces of the Russian Federation punished the Georgian army for asserting its right to rule the ethnically distinct entity of South Ossetia on its northern edge.
The tension is palpable. And the fear today is that this time, the Russian forces may carry out what last year they only threatened and topple the regime of the Western-leaning Georgian President, Mikheil Saakashvili.
Russian troops this week embarked on large-scale war games in the North Caucasus, just a few dozen miles away, preparation for "potential conflict situations in the region," the generals say. Similar exercises preceded the war last summer.
The mood at the Ergneti checkpoint is tense and the Georgian soldiers say there is absolutely no human contact between the two sides, despite the proximity. With the exception of a mangy stray dog, which wanders freely between the two posts, nobody is allowed to cross the border.
Locals need no reminding of how deadly a new war would be. In Ergneti itself, which before the war was home to about 200 people, only a few villagers have returned. Many houses here, and in other villages on the way to the Georgian city of Gori 20 miles away, suffered heavy damage from Russian aerial bombardment last August. The houses that remained standing were ruthlessly looted and torched by marauding Ossetian militias.
"I lost absolutely everything," says Gia Cheladze, 42, who has lived his whole life in Ergneti. With his family he escaped to Gori during the war. When he returned, he found his two-story house was a charred wreck. The windows and roof had been destroyed and everything of value looted. "I've worked hard all my life and in a couple of weeks it was all destroyed," he says.
He now lives with his elderly parents in a shack, beside the shell of his old house, a constant reminder of the threat of war. The money he received from the Georgian government was not enough to rebuild the house, and he claims that European aid distributed in the region was appropriated by a few families and then put up for sale.
Now, says Mr Cheladze, the villagers fear that their lives will be disrupted by war once again. "Everyone here is tense," he says. "This morning there was a huge explosion, I don't know where it came from. People say that 6 July is the day that something might happen. Maybe we'll leave for a few days around then; I can't bear yet another war."
Some Russian analysts dismiss the theory that Russia is looking for a new war and suggest that the Caucasus war games were a response to Nato military exercises which took place in Georgia recently and infuriated Moscow. There are some, however, such as Andrei Illarionov, a former adviser to Vladimir Putin, who say that Russia is looking to oust Mr Saakashvili permanently and may launch an invasion of the country on 6 July, the date that President Barack Obama makes his much-hyped first official visit to Moscow.
Mr Putin, now the Russian Prime Minister and still widely seen as the most powerful person in Russia, has a deep personal hatred of Mr Saakashvili and has expressed a desire to see him "hung by the balls".
"For Moscow it's quite galling to see that Saakashvili is still in power nearly a year after losing the war," says Lawrence Sheets, from the International Crisis Group in Tbilisi. "The statements coming out of Moscow with increasing regularity look very ominous."
Mr Sheets says the Georgian tactics in the event of an invasion by the Russian army are likely to revolve around guerrilla warfare and a defence of the capital, Tbilisi.
In a worrying sign, the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), which has had a mission in South Ossetia for more than a decade and had been monitoring the border region since last summer's war, was forced to close its mission in Georgia this week. Russia had insisted that for the mission to continue, it must recognise South Ossetia's independence. Apart from Russia, only Nicaragua has recognised South Ossetia and Abkhazia – Georgia's other breakaway zone – as independent countries, with the rest of the world still insistent that they are separatist territories that are officially part of Georgia.
Unwilling to change the mission's status, the OSCE has had to shut down shop and its Finnish head of mission left the country for good on Tuesday morning. For the same reason, a UN mission in Abkhazia is closing down.
The departure of the OSCE is "hugely important symbolically and psychologically," says Mr Sheets. Georgian officials fear that without international observers in place, it will be easy for the Russians to launch an attack in response to supposed Georgian provocations. Russia has stationed thousands of troops in South Ossetia since last summer.
With the situation volatile, even if Russia is not actively seeking a new war, a minor spat or a stray bullet could lead to disastrous consequences in the region.
"I don't think people in Europe and the US really understand just how dangerous this situation is," says Mr Sheets. "It's very scary and very explosive."
In an interview with The Independent yesterday, Mr Saakashvili expressed his concern about the situation. "Of course I'm worried," he said. "The idea of invasion looks crazy if you apply normal political logic... but [the Russians] operate with the logic of a street bully."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
The Yanks & their British vassals have just used NATO to re-train and -arm the war criminal Saakashvili's army of ethnic cleansers, finishing off with some rather ostentatious war games, in spite of Germany's objections:
The new round of NATO-Georgian saber-rattling against Russia is predictably accompanied by propaganda blasts from the Wurlitzer media, such as the present one, which trusts our collective microsecond-attention-span and amnesia to foist the lie about Russian war games preceding Saakashvili's ethnic cleansing wars, when Yank boots have barely left Georgian soil and were still on that soil last August, their guns still warm from their war games with the Georgians.
So what exactly happened during Saakashvili's last "assertion of Georgia's sovereignty" in South Ossetia? From what we could see in the Wurlitzer media, it looked like the Russkies just rode in roughshod and blasted Georgia to bits, especially the garrison town of Gori, from which Saakashvili's "sovereignty-asserting" tank columns and artillery had left for the South Ossetian capital of Tskhinvali. Even as the tanks and multiple rocket launchers were rolling, Saakashvili went on the air to tell his South Ossetian "citizens" to have no fear and sleep tight. Hundreds of them would never wake up. Here's how Tskhinvali looked after Saakashvili "asserted his sovereignty:"
Unfortunately the Russians are almost as bad at presenting their case to the world as the Western Wurlitzer media is good at distorting the truth. There isn't a single wide-angle overall shot in the above link. So here are some satellite images to clarify just who bombed who:
438 buildings full of sleeping civilians destroyed by Saakashvili's ethnic cleansers apparently isn't enough for the Indy, which is cheerleading for some more Georgian "sovereignty assertion."
Loony Andrei Illarionov can be dismissed straight away as he is nothing but a convenient talking head for the neocon propaganda about Russia. His long-standing admiration for Saakashvili and Bush W. is no secret, as well as his animosity to the Russian government and since recently to Barack Obama (sic!). The fact that Shaun Walker had to resort to such a fringe person only shows how desperate he was in finding useful opinions.
Lawrence Sheets, from the Saakashvili-friendly Brussels-based International Crisis Group, alarm: "The statements coming out of Moscow with increasing regularity look very ominous." That would have been much more pertinent here if Shaun Walker had quoted these "regular very ominous statements". What exactly is meant here?
Somehow Russian war games look alarming for Shaun Walker. But the NATO war games in May were of course just an innocent exercise in shooting, as the Independent didn't give a damn about them back then. (By the way it was the NATO war games which preceded the Georgian onslaught on South Ossetia - here again Shaun Walker is twisting facts. From July 15-31, 2008 (just one week before Saakashvili's offensive), the U.S. led a NATO Partnership for Peace exercise called Immediate Response 2008 in Georgia). The current Russian war game is just a legitimate response to what could have been easily avoided in May, if the NATO leadership had been less stubborn in its love affair with discredited Saakashvili.
What Shaun Walker is carefully eluding in his article is the suggestion that it's actually Saakashvili who could be interested in escalation of the situation. He has been besieged by the opposition for already 3 months - something that the reporter is again failing to say. The phantom of the foreign threat is the only means to re-consolidate his crumbling power.
For many years, President Saakashvili was trying hard to provoke Russians in to open confrontation, foolishly believing that with such provocative actions he will be scoring valuable political and financial points in the eyes of his ?sponsors?. Now however it is well too clear, it was a mistake with a disastrous consequences. And unfortunately he has only himself to blame.
I was in Georgia last August 2008 when President Saakashvili ordered his troops to bombard Ossetian capital Tskhinvali with cluster bombs, destroying civilian infrastructure and inflicting untold suffering on local people. In response to this unprecedented Georgian aggression, Russian army counter attacked Georgians forces, and pushed deep in to Georgian mainland proper.
I was quite surprised however, to see how many Georgians wished for Russian Army to reach the Capital of Georgia Tbilisi and liberate them from corrupt and bloodthirsty regime of Saakashvili.
The Russian state-run media has been running a grotesque anti-Georgian campaign effectively laying the grounds for another invasion and the barking lapdogs posting their nonsense on this thread have clearly swallowed it whole and have already got the pom-poms out ready to cheer on more pointless death and killing in Georgia.
Also these flapping heads from Moscow or St. Petersburg love to lecture Westerners on the REAL Georgia and the Caucasus, and yet they have probably not been within 500 miles of the place, as their utterly ignorant comments indicate.
What a truly spectacular lie.
You post exhibits your abject ignorance on the issues here, firstly the sideskirting of the issue that it was Georgia that started last years conflagration NOT Russia, nobody forced Georgia to act as it did, it knew the risks and knew that the reprisal would be swift and complete.
Good grief even Marcos of the Philippines never did that, not until later anyway. But for all the world to see, except the people who read. watch fox news under.
American, Brit, Dutch Imperialism is there for all to see. I hope you all don't miscalculate with Russia, the cause and effects could well be damming for all?
Why is it that the Independent believes NATO war games are benign while Russian war games are 'dangerous'? Indeed the idea that Russian war games would not be happening if there were no NATO war games never seems to enter the into the biased thinking of western media.
NATO has no business being in Georgia. Georgia is nowhere near the North Atlantic the last time I checked. Saakashvilli, that wonderful 'democrat', has spent the last few months attacking demonstrators in the capital of Georgia. Hardly any mention has been made of this in any 'Western' media. I wonder why?
Your article ends with the statement:
It is clear from Mr Saakashvilli's actions in the last few months, and also in the months after his so called 'election', that he too is most definitely a 'street bully'.
I notice also that your article makes no mention of the many dead that resulted from the Georgian forces callous attack on centres of Ossetian civilian population, uet makes sure to mention that Georgian civilians were killed in the Russin invasion that resulted from this unprovoked attack
NATO and Israel have been arming and training the Georgian army for years, all in order to force a violent showdown with Russia. I notice your article makes no mention that EU observers very belatedly came to the conclusion that it was Georgia that launched an unprovoked agressive attack which in turn caused the Russian reaction which resulted in the complete defeat of the Georgian aggressors.
@topolcats - Your posting "Finish the Job?????" - If the Russians do attack Tbilisi and turn it into another Grozny I hope it sits well in your stomach. While I am sure you are worried about the blatant Dutch imperialism sweeping the globe I'm amazed you aren't so keen to cry over Russia's long history of brutality in the Caucasus.
@forfsake - You are clearly a professional equivalency-er and have mauled some facts to suit your agenda but try and learn something about Georgia before you give your opinion.
The protests in Georgia have been going on for some time and the opposition have been allowed to block Rustaveli Avenue for months. There has been some isolated violence and some fighting happened when some hardliners tried to storm a police station but generally the opposition and govt have exercised restraint. Georgia is far from a perfect democracy but it is the most democratic country in the Caucasus. Russia claims to be incensed by 'Saakashvili the Dictator' while backing Kadyrov in Chechnya who 'disappears people' and carries out punishment attacks and killings on the families of men who have 'gone into the woods'.
The EU observers have reported no such thing. They were introduced after the war and have said consistently that Russian claims about Georgian troop build-up are false and they have been subject to attack from the separatist side. Novaya Gazeta in Russia concluded that the Russian invasion last summer had been planned for months and attacks by Ossetian militia were used to provoke an inevitable response from Georgia. You can claim the Georgian assault on Tskinvali was indiscriminate but to call it unprovoked is absurd. Do you happen to know how many civilians were killed in the Georgian attack? Maybe then the Independent could report it. Russia has prevented any access to the region while destroying entire Georgian and mixed-Ossetian and Georgian villages.
The NATO exercises in Georgia were pre-planned and involved no artillery or tanks and the Russians were invited to observe. The Russian exercises consist of thousands of troops, and hundreds of tanks and artillery. It is effectively an invasion force.
And if NATO and Israel?????????? are so keen on having a war with Russia why has the international community been so totally weak in the face of the invasion and occupation of a sovereign country.
While I'm sure to you guys Georgia is just a tiny piece of your very own jigsaw puzzle of Amero-Zionist world domination and MSM conspiracy that with a bit of hammering will fit. Unfortunately it is also a real place and I hope that Shaun Walker continues to highlight the imminent threat to people there.
1: Israeli involvement in training and supply of the Georgian military since Saakashvilli was 'elected' is well documented. Here is just ONE of the many online sources for this claim, from Israeli website YNETNews:
From Israeli website Haaretz.com we have a very interesting quote from that great 'democrat' Saakashvilli himself
Mr TieEater said that, not me.
2: As to who is to blame: Speigel.de reports that An EU commision into Saakashvilli's illfated military adventurism concluded:
Perhaps you should rant less and read more. "A little knowledge IS a dangerous thing", so you might want to keep in mind that "It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt"
Friday, 3 July 2009 at 08:13 pm (UTC)
As the Iranians and the Russians have recently proven, if you want to gun down unarmed demonstrators in the street, or invade your neighbour and ethnically cleanse large parts of it, just call them 'tools of Western imperialism' and you will soon have hordes of useful idiots in the West rallying to your cause.
Oh really? Isn't that the kettle calling the pot black? The thousands of Ossetians who fled into Russia following an unprovoked (unless you consider Georgia sending a spy probe flying over Ossetia or Abkhazia several months earlier which the Russians shot down a provocation) attack on a de facto independent region. On the night of 7th August it has been documented that Georgia unleashed an artillery assault on Tskinvali. Among the casualties were at least ten Russian peacekeepers (and whether you like it or not they were there at the prior agreement of all sides). That alone was enough to warrant Russian counterstrikes.
You should be damn well happy that Federal Government intervened. If tit hadn't you would have seen thousands of Russian irregulars mobilise to protect their friends in Ossetia and a resultant bloodbath with casualties in the thousands and real ethnic cleansing of the machine gunning whole villages variety. Instead you got a short sharp slap from regular forces which did not even attack or bombard Tblisi. In fact this may have been Russia's great mistake in this war. Instead of insisting on unconditional surrender like the allies did in 1945, they accepted a negotiated ceasefire as in 1918. The result was the growth of revanchist and stab in the back theories in Germany. Georgia was on its knees and the Russians held back. Now it is the one who has been re-arming and its president has making the same unfounded squeals he was making about this time last year, to whit - "oh my poor little country is so weak" "the Russians are barbarians and bullies" (on that he's not exactly wrong, just a hypocrite) "the Russians are making provocations" "we are a poor but valiant little democracy, please help repel invaders" "Ossetia and Abkhzia are indivisible from Georgia" (Yeah because that swine attcked Ossetia, killed unarmed civilians and made relations now so bitter the only way Georgia can reassert control is by force, and could only maintain control by ethnic cleansing).
Actually if anything I would be worried that Georgia will be the one to make an aggressive move. Russia has no reason to attack first. It now controls the two pleasant little mountain republics. Saakashvili is in trouble at home and is at best regarded as an idiot, if not a dangerously aggressive and dictatorial threat topeace and stability, in Washington and Europe, who nonetheless continue to pay lip service to their brave little ally in the Caucasus. Finally this petulant little clown provides a wonderful example of what happens when one of Russia's neighbours thinks it has western backing to stick two fingers up at its biggest trade partner, hydro-carbon supplier and pressure lever for unemployment and overpopulation.
You can see that even the Russia haters in the British government accepted Russia acted correctly. Initially clowns like Milliband accepted Saakashvilli's claim that Russia initiated the war. Then they corrected it to accept the innocent Georgians were provoked. Finally we got he ridiculous and incredibly hypocritical declaration that Russia's reaction was "disproportionate". If that is the worst hey can say, it is implicit that Russia was correct to react as they are criticising the manner, not the fact, of the response.
There was indeed prior agreement on all sides. South Ossetia had gone from a place where Russian and Georgian peacekeepers would sit and share cigarettes to a place where there were numerous incidents of kidnappings, shootings, roadside bombs and shelling. When Georgian villages peacekeepers and policeman came under consistent attack from Ossetian militia the Georgians saw no attempt by the Russian peacekeepers to intervene. If attacks on Russian peacekeepers gave Russia the right to invade Georgia, then surely it would follow that attacks on Georgian peacekeepers would give Georgia the right to intervene to protect the people in the areas of South Ossetia under Georgian control. I am sure you would just as eagerly defend Russia's carpet bombing of Grozny and the huge human cost it took to restore Russia's territorial integrity as you would condemn Georgia.
Whether Georgia made a huge mistake responding to the bait is definetely arguable, but the fact was that prior to this the Georgian government had been trying to solve the frozen conflict peacefully. Why did they build posh apartments, supermarkets, a hospital and hold concerts in the Georgian controlled areas of South Ossetia with a pro-Tbilisi Ossetian government. They even offered cash payments to Ossetians who moved into the Tbilisi controlled areas of South Ossetia.
Also if it was such a surprise attack why had Tskinvali been evacuated days earlier and why were there volunteers from North Ossetia travelling freely into South Ossetia. The irregulars did come and the Russian army effectively cleared a path for them to loot, rape and kill. Sorry if you don't feel it qualifies as the 'real ethnic cleansing of the machine gunning whole villages variety' as you call it.
As to Russia's claims of 'attempted genocide'. There are more Ossetians currently living in Tbilisi and the rest of Georgia than there are in Tskinvali. Prior to the war and since the war they have not been subject to attack or reprisals. In fact many are in mixed marriages with Georgians.
Finally, if you want to talk about the 'growth of revanchist and stab in the back theories like in Germany' I suggest you look at Russia following the cold war and the comments of some of the people here. Both the invasion of Czechoslovakia and the invasion of Poland were pre-empted by loud complaints of ethnic cleansing of German speakers in these countries.
I see you already have your excuses ready for if Russia attacks again however. I hope it sits well in your stomach.
Ho Ho Ho And so? What does the kettle have to say?
Is it so difficult to believe that Saakashvili is a clown who stupidly believed that either the Russians would not have the interest or will to respond to a sudden assault, or that if they did he would have rather more substantial aid from his backers in Washington and the other more hawkish NATO capitals. However considering the rebuff of his attempts to enter NATO such belief is bizarre.
Meanwhile I would wonder if Mr Walker, who has displayed incredibly biased journalism in this and many other articles, is laying the groundwork for another campaign of disinformation in the event of another dispute in the area. The displays of misinformation in this article do not go so afr as lies but must certainly be classified as misinformation;
1- And the fear today is that this time, the Russian forces may carry out what last year they only threatened and topple the regime of.... - really? When did they make this threat?
2- Russian troops this week embarked on large-scale war games in the North Caucasus, just a few dozen miles away, preparation for "potential conflict situations in the region," the generals say. Similar exercises preceded the war last summer. - No mention of the fact that these exercises have occurred on an annual basis since 2005? Furthermore the statement is clearly intended to lead those who don't know better to believe that the exercises were part of a build up to Russian aggression, as opposed to Russia having simply reacted to Georgian aggression. It is not stated but it is implicit.
3- The story of victim of brutality, while doubtless true, is that of a Georgian, adding one more example of Georgian victimhood to our collective consciousness. Any corresponding story, eg for balance, about Ossetian victims is conveniently absent.
4- the International Crisis Group in Tbilisi - So balanced journalism consists of relying on dodgy western think tanks and NGOs now does it? Ever heard of investigative journalism? going and doing the leg work on the ground yourself?
5- "hung by the balls" vs "Of course I'm worried," he said. "The idea of invasion looks crazy if you apply normal political logic... but [the Russians] operate with the logic of a street bully." - Any coincidence that the quote from Mr Putin portrays the man as an uncouth and aggressive hooligan, while the quote from Saakashvili portrays him as the poor little boy in the playground terrified of the school bully? (Not to mention the ridiculous aspect of this man who tagged along on the invasion of Iraq and gave the go ahead for indiscriminate bombardment of Tskinvali saying other people have the logic of a street bully).
South Ossetia before the war under the terms of a sixteen year-old ceasefire was divided between Georgian and mixed Georgian/Ossetian villages under the protection of Georgian peacekeepers, and Ossetian villages under the control of South and North Ossetian and Russian peacekeepers. It had been called a 'bloody chessboard' with a total population of 70,000.
Kokoity, who the Georgians say is a dictator and Russian puppet, was carrying out attacks on ethnic Georgians and Ossetians under the pro-Tbilisi areas led by Sanakoyev who they said is a traitor. This led to a response from the Georgians led by Saakashvili who the Russians say is a dictator and an American puppet, which led to a response from Russia which is led by Putin who many in the West say is a dictator. It didn't lead much of a response from the US.
Now if you wanted to discuss Saakashvili's democratic credentials versus Kokoity's or Putins's. Or why you see Russia's action in Chechnya as justified but not Georgia's action in South Ossetia. Or look at how even before the war there was widespread concern that Russia was trying to provoke trouble in South Ossetia as a response to the West's recognition of Kosovo. Or why Russia had to respond in South Ossetia because it relys so much on Ossetian support in the North Caucasus, then that would be an honest discussion.
Instead you want to claim amnesia of any event prior to August 7th, baselessly accuse the Georgians of a unprovoked genocide and claim Russia is pure as the driven snow, and instead of arguing the facts you complain of a western media conspiracy against Russia and keep repeating how 'everyone now realises Georgia started it.'
What about you, who do you support? You clearly believe one must either support Russia in Chechnya and Georgia in Ossetia or else support both the Chechen and Ossetian separatist movements. I know you support Georgia in its actions re Ossetia, so I presume you also support Russia's actions in Chechnya? I mean that was the logic of your rather spurious argument that as I am pro-Ossetian I should also be Pro-Chechn.
Also I did not once use the word Genocide. I accused Georgia of an unprovoked assault not an unprovoked Genocide. Please do not change my words, if you do wish to engage with me then respond to what I said and do not simply change my words to make them easier to argue against.
By the way I notice that though you denounce my allegations of media bias you didn't provide any counter-arguments to the list of examples I gave of bias in this article. I say everyone knows Georgia started it because all the people, except a few real fanatics like Fox News, who initially denounced Russia as the aggressor have quietly retracted their claims, or at least gone silent on the question. You are the only person I have found in quite a while to claim Russia started the war.
Also there is a big difference between occasional exchanges of small arms fire, as pre 7th August, and an all out attck with Grad rockets, artillery, tanks and the full force of a regular army.
Finally you prove an earlier point - the Russian irregulars came in with the Russian army to control them in some way. The irregulars would have come with or without the army, as they did in the past.. Imagine the bloodbath we would have seen if it had been an extended irregular war as opposed to a Georgian assault followed by a rapid retreat back to Tblisi in the face of Russian superiority
However you should also not put words in my mouth. I have never used a moronic phrase like 'Russia started it', or said that I am glad that Georgia launched an attack on Tskinvali. What I am saying is that Russia had been clearly planning military action in Georgia for months prior to August 2008, as reciprocity for the West ignoring its objections to the independence of Kosovo. Putin made specific threats at the time. Also Russia wanted to call the US bluff on Georgia's NATO bid. This is also what an investigation by Novaya Gazeta concluded. Pressure was applied to Georgia in various forms to produce some sort of reaction, and when it came Russia had a pretext for a full-scale invasion. I am not defending Georgia's reaction, I would simply argue that any country, whether it be a totalitarian state or a socialist utopia would have responded in the same way, including Russia.
You clearly get incensed by the Fox News portrayal of the conflict which sells the simplistic fairytale of an unprovoked attack by evil Russia on a country smaller than Ireland to uninformed mid-Westerners who have Rocky 4 on DVD, and I couldn't agree with you more. Surely then you can understand my fury at the many Fox News equivalents in Russia who peddle the fairytale of an unprovoked sneak attack on a Bethlem-esque sleeping town by wicked Georgians who like drinking Ossetian blood, especially when it is clearly intended to prime Russian public opinion for potentially further military action in Georgia.
Your argument seems to be based on the idea that Saakashvili is a new Milosevic, and that claims of provocations by South Ossetians can be dismissed as just the usual 'occasional small arms fire'. Neither of these arguments hold up to scrutiny.
As to what happened in Tskinvali, the Russians approach has been to make spectacular claims of Georgian atrocities while keeping South Ossetia on lock down from independent observers, investigators and journalists. If civilians were deliberately targeted by Georgian or Russian troops, then they should be prosecuted, however the Russia govt has prevented any kind of transparency or independent verification. Chechnya was exactly the same. Preventing any kind of independent observation or reporting meant atrocities against civilians could be carried with impunity.
However what I would criticise the Russian government for most of all is its archaic mentality in dealing with its neighbours. Rather than working with countries like Georgia and Moldova to solve frozen conflicts by peaceful means and by intenationalising the process, Putin has been using the situation as leverage in a zero sum game.
according to this Reuters wire report published on August 8, the day the conflict over South Ossetia went hot: (published in the Indy, so Mr Walker really should know this)
the Georgians were offered the chance to settle it without further bloodshed, and they, drunk with bloodlust, refused
Over 50% of Russian export revenue come from the gas and oil export
Gas export is a monopoly with Russia controlling all pipeline export routes from the East
This pipeline monopoly allows Russia to purchase Caspian gas at a discount as they have no one else to sell it to and also to actually meet its domestic and export requirements as its own production stagnates or falls.
The Nabucco piepline route depends on Georgia, there is no real alternative
Nabucco would break Russias monmopoly on Caspian ghas exports and thus the price the Caspians would get would go up (it has a bit just from the threat of gas supplies being offered to nabucco)
So, unlike the Iraqi oil that wasnt stolen or controlled, Russia is clearly playing the great game to defend its gas export business that pays backhanders that in reality finance the regime and its cronies
You often will see children who are guilty of something accuse the other side of exactly the thing they know thet have done
I dont think these idiots are "useful". Watch them cheer when Russia annexes the rest of Georgia and recall their shreiks as the US liberated and made politically free Iraqis. I despise these idiots. They are just idiots to me. Maybe they will fall off a car park roof or grab a policemans gun to shoot themselves with? I am an optimist really.