World

Showers (AM and PM) 13° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Was British diplomat set up by the Russian secret service?

Official filmed having sex with prostitutes may have been victim of 'honey trap'

By Kim Sengupta

CCTV images filmed inside an Ekaterinburg brothel apparently showing British diplomat James Hudson having sex with two prostitutes

PA

CCTV images filmed inside an Ekaterinburg brothel apparently showing British diplomat James Hudson having sex with two prostitutes

The Foreign Office says it is fed up with "silly jokes" about "from Russia with love". The official line is that there are far too many real problems in places like Iran and Afghanistan to spend time worrying about a junior diplomat being indiscreet in the Urals.

Yesterday, a four-minute video surfaced featuring 37-year-old British diplomat James Hudson, entitled "Adventures of Mr Hudson in Russia". It shows the deputy consul general in Ekaterinburg cavorting with two prostitutes. He has since resigned.

A spokeswoman for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) said: "The FCO expects all its staff to demonstrate high levels of personal and professional integrity and takes all allegations of inappropriate behaviour seriously.

"That said, we are not in a position to confirm or deny the allegations in this story, and we do not generally comment or individual members of staff or individual personal matters."

But, her colleagues confirmed that Mr Hudson was indeed the man in the film, seen entering a room – reportedly a brothel – drinking on a sofa, and kissing two blonde women in their underwear. In one scene a female voice asks in broken English: "Would you like it?"

Last weekend, it emerged that the holiday snaps of the next head of MI6, Sir John Sawers, taken by his wife, were freely available for the public to view on Facebook. Thanks to comments by the Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, he is in danger of being known forever as "the spy in Speedos".

But the case of Mr Hudson is a bit more serious. It has been suggested that the diplomat might have been lured into a "honey trap" by the Russian intelligence service FSB, the successor to the KGB, with the aim of embarrassing the British Government.

Mr Hudson joined the FCO in 1994, and his postings had included Sarajevo, Havana and Budapest. He married his wife, Sally, in London in 1996, but they divorced the following year. The couple have one child.

There is no evidence that he worked for any of the UK's intelligence arms, and his rank would not have given him access to many secrets. The consensus in diplomatic and security circles was that the FSB had merely taken advantage of an opportunity which presented itself.

One source told The Independent: "FCO staff are given warnings about the risks involved, and this is what happened when this was ignored. There is a more relaxed approach to using brothels in Russia among certain sections of the business community, but this should not extend to diplomats."

There has been a series of rows between Britain and Russia over spying in recent years. Last week, the British Government accused Russia of being actively engaged in cyber espionage, while security agencies have claimed there is a steady rise in the number of Russian agents active in the UK.

The murder of former FSB officer Alexander Litvinenko continues to provoke controversy, with Russia refusing Britain's request to extradite a suspect, Andrei Lugovoy.

One of the most widely reported allegations of recent years was MI6's use of a fake "rock" left in a Moscow street, acting as a transmitter and sending data to a palmtop computer. The plan was supposedly inspired by a David Attenborough wildlife programme in which a tiny camera was hidden inside artificial elephant dung.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

So...
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 12:06 am (UTC)
... the FCO claim it was all the fault of the nasty Russians eh?

Is this the same FCO that used to give out advice to officials and government agents on "beware Russian hotels because every room is bugged and camera'd?"

I am sure the FSB are chuckling with glee at the hugely moronic Mr Hudson, who also broke protocol I imagine by sauntering off with ladies of the night, or is Mr Hudson used to more than one lady deciding to bed him at once...?

For even if it isn't a trap, it hints at extremely sordid behaviour committed by our agents overseas, thing is, Mr Hudson knew the rules, he knew that even as a low staffer he was fair game, the question is did he solicit them or did they solicit him?

If he did the running then he is a disgrace, if he allowed his libido to get the better of him to the point of betraying this nations secrets, then that is far worse.

Perhaps the FCO should put in an order for 10 sacks of Bromide for its embassies.
Sir Humphrey Legge-Over strikes again
[info]reiksares wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 04:52 am (UTC)
Dearie-me, yet another of our Public-School-educated twonks has been caught in flagrante. The film is most amusing!!

I bet the veins are bulging on Miliband's scrawny neck this morning! ROFL!

"Something for the weekend, Mr Hudson?" Bwaaaaaaaaahahaha!

Britain's name dragged through the mud again on Miliband's watch.
And just out of sight of the camera in the video
[info]reiksares wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 05:05 am (UTC)
are the "KGB"men forcing him into bed with that girl at gunpoint, with a glass of whisky.

According to Kim Sengupta, that is.
[info]edwren wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 07:17 am (UTC)
Whatever they didnt force him into bed (or did they?!!?). Bet he wishes he was Italian. He'd be looking at a promotion now
No traitor
[info]robert_hardy wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 07:56 am (UTC)
Give the poor fellow the benefit of the doubt, bloody stupid he might have been, but he obviously turned down the blackmail attempt by the FSA, and the pictures and the loss of his career are the price he has had to pay.
Alex The Meercat says...
[info]ron_broxted wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 08:01 am (UTC)
Compare the brothel dot com. Is simple.
Hope He Used Protection
[info]rants_a_lot wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 08:05 am (UTC)
He should have kept it in his pants.

On the subject of spying, I hope we are spying on Russia as I'm damn sure they will be spying on us.
Yes, they forced him to have sex with the girls!
[info]old_green wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 08:34 am (UTC)
And perhaps the Russians forced MPs to fiddle their expenses also.
[info]irishinrussia wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 10:37 am (UTC)
So it was a honey trap? Big problem, honey trap is when you pay or persuade a woman to seduce a man and then capture him in a compromising position. Visiting Brothels in a foreign country is not a honey trap, its just damn stupid. Especially if you are a diplomat. Even more especially if you are a diplomat, in Russia and from a country that is considered to be somewhat hostile and supportive of Russian enemies.

Finally, I HOPE THE RUSSIANS ARE SPYING ON YOU AS I AM DAMN SURE YOU'RE SPYING ON THEM
yuk
[info]acidpen wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 11:21 am (UTC)
what kind of a sicko kisses a dirty old brass on the mouth? and from what i see from that grainy picture an ugly one to boot! Shame on him on all levels! he should watch more 007 movies
[info]doug_piranha wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 11:36 am (UTC)
"But the case of Mr Hudson is a bit more serious. It has been suggested that the diplomat might have been lured into a "honey trap" by the Russian intelligence service FSB, the successor to the KGB, with the aim of embarrassing the British Government. "

Embarassed ? pff - about what exactly ?
I recall a Russian President - getting drunk all the time and acting like a loon for all the
world to see. Some civil servant pays for sex - and we are supposed to be embarassed ?

Someone wrote "Britain's name dragged through the mud" - get a grip !
what is all the fuss about ?

Oh an by the way - it takes two to tango.
Honeytraps only work if the dope complies and jumps into the trap.
What a misnomer - there is no trap - because the mark has to be a willing partner - and
Honey ? no much honey involved with two tarts, is there ?


Professional Integrity
[info]vviittaa wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 11:56 am (UTC)

He could have said 'No'
Silly boys games
[info]temujin99 wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 01:09 pm (UTC)
Britain is getting more silly each week.
Is the whore to the right or left of the picture ?
[info]pcsobilly wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 01:42 pm (UTC)
.
Re: Is the whore to the right or left of the picture ?
[info]walterwall wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 04:08 pm (UTC)
Nice one!
Diplomatic Expenses
[info]schnozzle wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 02:46 pm (UTC)
I would hope that a due allowance is made for British Diplomats to continue their political work wherever it takes them, should this be to a brothel -a notoriously expensive facility-then their expenses should be raised proportionately.
Just because it is on the menu you don't have to eat it
[info]walterwall wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 04:01 pm (UTC)
I should have hoped that someone in what is supposed to be a responsible job might be more prudent and disciplined.
too many real problems in places like Iran and Afghanistan
[info]webcore wrote:
Saturday, 11 July 2009 at 04:33 am (UTC)
Well get the f*** OUT of Iran and Afghanistan!

The biggest demonstration in British history tried to convey the message that the British people did not want to go to war, yet Blair ignores the clearest expression of public opinion in over 200 years and decides to murder brave British servicemen in wars that only serve to make people hate the UK more.

The problems in Iraq and Afghanistan are created by a pathetic and ineffectual government - that pathetic and ineffectual government should stop using those problems as an excuse for ignoring other more pressing problems such as the alienation of the British people by the favouring of ridiculous superstitious ideologies and ancient cultural myths.

For Many, Marriage Is Sexless, Boring and Oppressive: Time to Rethink the Institution?
[info]famulla wrote:
Saturday, 11 July 2009 at 05:07 pm (UTC)
For Many, Marriage Is Sexless, Boring and Oppressive: Time to Rethink the Institution?
What a long kiss woow from morning my PC loads this and i watch it wow i mean the sexless love wow Let us talk of the spending these days all advocate. Brown says spend, spend to save. I disagree with spending and saving as I think spending is for pleasure, the economic term, my choice. The saving is forced by the government. Is this democracy? I wonder. How will we agree the stock with cash flow?
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla


What a bunch of hypocrits
[info]reasoned_person wrote:
Sunday, 12 July 2009 at 08:30 pm (UTC)
This person is a single man. If he wants to buy sex (and so long as it's legal) why shouldn't he?

He's no more stupid that the reader who assumed he was a "Public-School-educated twonk". By paying for sex who has he hurt? It's time this country let go of its sexual hangups and just got on with living.

The fact that this pman has resigned shows he has a good deal more integrity than all of our MPs whose noses dipped into the trough.

Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date