World

Partly Sunny with Showers 12° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Chinese vessels 'harassed US Navy ship'

By Pauline Jelinek, Associated Press

The US Defense Department charged today that five Chinese ships shadowed and manouvered dangerously close to a US Navy vessel in an apparent attempt to harass the American crew.

Officials in the Obama administration said yesterday's incident followed several days of "increasingly aggressive" acts by Chinese ships in the region. The incident took place in international waters in the South China Sea, about 75 miles (120 kilometers) south of Hainan Island.

US officials said a protest was being delivered to Beijing's military attache at a Pentagon meeting today.

The USNS Impeccable sprayed one ship with water from fire hoses to force it away. Despite the force of the water, Chinese crew members stripped to their underwear and continued closing within 25 feet (8 meters), the Defense Department said.

"On March 8, 2009, five Chinese vessels shadowed and aggressively maneuvered in dangerously close proximity to USNS Impeccable, in an apparent coordinated effort to harass the US ocean surveillance ship while it was conducting routine operations in international waters," the Pentagon statement said.

The Chinese ships included a Chinese Navy intelligence collection ship, a Bureau of Maritime Fisheries Patrol Vessel, a State Oceanographic Administration patrol vessel, and two small Chinese-flagged trawlers, officials said.

"The Chinese vessels surrounded USNS Impeccable, two of them closing to within 50 feet (16 meters), waving Chinese flags and telling Impeccable to leave the area," officials said in the statement.

"Because the vessels' intentions were not known, Impeccable sprayed its fire hoses at one of the vessels in order to protect itself," the Defense statement said. "The Chinese crew members disrobed to their underwear and continued closing to within 25 feet (8 meters)."

Impeccable crew radioed to tell the Chinese ships that it was leaving the area and requested a safe path to navigate, the Pentagon said.

But shortly afterward, two of the Chinese ships stopped directly ahead of the Impeccable, forcing it to an emergency stop to avoid collision because the Chinese had dropped pieces of wood in the water directly in front of Impeccable's path.

"The unprofessional maneuvers by Chinese vessels violated the requirement under international law to operate with due regard for the rights and safety of other lawful users of the ocean," said Marine Maj. Stewart Upton, a Pentagon spokesman.

"We expect Chinese ships to act responsibly and refrain from provocative activities that could lead to miscalculation or a collision at sea, endangering vessels and the lives of US and Chinese mariners," Upton added.

In Beijing, Chinese officials did not immediately respond to voicemail messages and e-mail.

China views almost the entirety of the South China Sea as its territory. China's claims to small islets in the region have put it at odds with five governments — the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan.

The incident came just a week after China and the US resumed military-to-military consultations following a five-month suspension over US arms sales to Taiwan. And it came as Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi was due in Washington this week to meet with US officials.

Pentagon officials said the close encounter followed several other incidents involving the Impeccable and another US vessel Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday.

— On Wednesday, a Chinese Bureau of Fisheries Patrol vessel used a high-intensity spotlight to illuminate the ocean surveillance ship USNS Victorious as it operated in the Yellow Sea, about 125 nautical miles (231 kilometers) from China's coast, the Pentagon said. The move was made without notice or warning, US officials said. The next day, a Chinese Y-12 maritime surveillance aircraft conducted 12 fly-bys of Victorious at an altitude of about 400 feet (122 meters) and a range of 500 yards (457 meters).

— On Thursday, a Chinese frigate approached USNS Impeccable without warning and crossed its bow at a close range of approximately 100 yards (90 meters), the Pentagon said. This was followed less than two hours later by a Chinese Y-12 aircraft conducting 11 fly-bys of Impeccable at an altitude of 600 feet (183 meters) and a range from 100 feet-300 feet (30-90 meters). The frigate then closely crossed Impeccable's bow yet again, this time at a range of approximately 400-500 yards (366-457 meters) without rendering courtesy or notice of her intentions.

— On Saturday, a Chinese intelligence collection ship challenged USNS Impeccable over bridge-to-bridge radio, calling her operations illegal and directing Impeccable to leave the area or "suffer the consequences."

Sunday's incident is reminiscent of a similar early foreign policy crisis that forced former President George W. Bush to deal with Beijing shortly after he took office — China's forced landing of a spy plane and seizure of the crew in April 2001.

That incident between a Chinese jet and US Navy spy plane infuriated Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, who responded by breaking off US military contacts with China for a time.

The Chinese fighter jet collided in midair with a US Navy EP-3 surveillance plane. The Navy plane was so badly damaged that it made an emergency landing on China's Hainan Island.

The Chinese pilot died and the US crew of 24 was detained by the Chinese military for 11 days. China refused to allow US officials to fix the Navy plane and fly it off the island; eventually it was shipped home in pieces.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Whose sea is it anyway?
[info]older_greek wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 04:30 pm (UTC)
What is the US Navy's business in the area in any case? Does it "rule the waves" as did the British Empire. Who pays (the piper) for the US Navy and buys the gilt edged securities that fund it? If it is the communist China may be she has acquired the 'right' to call the tune.
An ancient Greek in London
Re: Whose sea is it anyway?
[info]usaconcerned wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 05:04 pm (UTC)
True That! Seeing how the United States Government has been selling off America a little at a time to the highest bidder, over many years China has bought and owns a large part of America's infrastructure. Once China drops there investment in the U.S. dollar, the hammer will fall and in the end U.S. Naval Vessels might just be flying a Chinese flag as well. The complete takeover of The United States Of America without a bullet ever being fired.
B.A. Brooks
http://www.uaff.us
[info]joekingagain wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 05:06 pm (UTC)
"international waters"

Look at the map, Hainan is literally in their backyard! I'm sure US ships will "hassle" a Chinese "surveillance" (i.e spying) ship if it came within throwing distance of the US coastline.
US crumbling fast
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 05:36 pm (UTC)
in the South China Sea, about 75 miles (120 kilometers) south of Hainan Island..... conducting routine operations.' Routine operations? Presumably that means spying or some other mischief.

Fortunately the American Empire is crumbling fast and the world should not have to put up with American hegemony, which is based on cheap oil and hypocrisy, for too much longer.

Propaganda
[info]voodoojedizin wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 06:19 pm (UTC)
Propaganda

If you really read this story it makes no sense at all.

"The Chinese crew members disrobed to their underwear and continued closing to within 25 feet" this in a bull! Does anyone believe that Chinese military officers are going to take their uniforms off because they're getting wet? There in small vessels in the ocean with sea spray. They were approaching so fast they had time to take their uniforms off.

The BBC article says the Chinese vessels through wood in front of the American ship to deter it. What were they throwing redwood trees, do you see the size of the American ship their talking about.

The only people that got aggressive or the Americans they spray their fire hose on them.

The other articles say that these were civilians on board the ship, and no article says exactly what that ship was doing there.

Propaganda misinformation why was this even printed? Because America got caught spying on China and they put out this ridiculous misinformation article.

And of course all the gov't news sites printed without question.
conducting routine operations
[info]johnsmith007 wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 06:19 pm (UTC)
We all know what the American routine operations are are don't we ?
Why did this happen?
[info]evanlit wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 06:49 pm (UTC)
I believe this has to do with China being a signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), while the United States is not. I believe the Chinese interpretation is that they can control the airspace and seas out to 200 miles, which corresponds to the Exclusive Economic Zone.

That said, I have to wonder what America would do if a Chinese spy ship was operating within 125 miles of it's coastline. They would probably harass it also. Hopefully the US and China can come to an understanding on this matter. These incidents only damage relations between two countries that have many reasons to remain friendly.

Of course the mutual spying will continue. It is expected and even necessary that both countries spy on other.
Flexing of muscles...
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 07:55 pm (UTC)
The American ships were probably trying to map China's sonar arrays on the sea bed of that area and likely caught out doing it and chased off.

America is a bit peeved with China's military ability, it was badly shown up last year in the Gulf when a Chinese sub popped up right in the middle of a Carrier groups defensive shield, a move by China to say that they could see them but the US could not see China's submarines.

China can and will react with force, our own Navy knows this from that incident a few decades back.
Anothe lesson for the Americans
[info]sketchley wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 08:00 pm (UTC)
Hahaha. The Americans are getting their asses whipped all over the world. Its so funny.

They got their asses whipped in Vetnam. They've so far failed in 8 years to beat a bunch of cavemen in the mountains of Afghanistan. They've failed to defeat the Iraqi resistance and are shortly to retreat out of that country. They've been virtually expelled from their own backyard in Latin America, where their only true puppet left is Colombia.

Re: Anothe lesson for the Americans
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Tuesday, 10 March 2009 at 01:47 am (UTC)
The USA has been a nation of barbarians for more than 200 years--murdering the original inhabitants that lined the North American Atlantic shorelines, to killing the Indians at Little Big Horn, to plundering gold from the Spanish invaders in California, to buying from France what was not France's to sell (the Louisiana Purchase) to the attack on a sovereign Panama to force through a canal that Ronald Reagan boasted "we stole it fair and square", to the totally insane conflict in Vietnam where American service personnel dumped living Vietnamese out of heliocopters and planes, or shot them dead in their homes as the American troops do today in Afghanistan and Iraq because of one village idiot (W Bush) and his misAdministration that believed they were on a "holy crusade" (supported by the prayer warriors of Sarah Palin, governor of Alaska) to root out the evil of Saddam Hussein who Ronald Reagan had Donald Rumsfeld install after ousting its King. The list of atrocities committed by the USA ranks next to those of the UK, who pushed into mainland China and force Christianity upon a people who fought back in the Boxer Rebellion, to invading South Africa, Rhodesia, and other African nations to bring it "the blessings of civilization" while stealing from the orignal owners from Cairo to Johannesburg. But all nations do this as nations have the absurd idea that they are following a manifest destiny promised in their books of religion. The real enemy is religion and until that is rooted out there will be no peace for this planet or its people.
8 METRES KNOT 8OLD KYNG KHOL GAS PAETUR METERS
[info]charityplayer wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 09:53 pm (UTC)


HI GUISE


*TCHYKNyyZ SHIP
*TCHYKNyyZ DGJYHUNGQK
*TCHYKNyyZ BELL
*TCHYKNyyZ QLUNK

*TCHYKNyyZ WOOD
*TCHYKNyyZ SAY
*TCHYKNyyZ NAVY RUM
*TCHYKNyyZ WAY

8 OIROPAEAN METRES = 8 YARDS + 26 YNCHEZ

26 YNCHEZ = 2 FEET + 2 YNCHEZ

8 YARDS 2 FEET 2 YNCHEZ = ALMOST A YARDARM ON THE LEVEL


AMMERRyKHANISTANS KNO GNUFFINGQK
Go Home!
[info]ejh16 wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 09:54 pm (UTC)
The Americans should go home.

What would the reaction be to Chinese warships conducting "routine operations in international waters" 120km off San Diego?

http://theunpeople.blogspot.com/
Mainland China
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Tuesday, 10 March 2009 at 01:40 am (UTC)
For more than one thousand years, China has thought (and taught its people) that it was the center of the world, and thereby the center of the universe. It still thinks that, and feels that any water that touches its shores belongs to China--as it wrongfully claims that Taiwan belongs to China (it does not). China's arrogance is so overwhelming that only the most ignorant will give into its saber rattling. Instead of patronizing China it is time the world boycott China as the nation destroys the forests of Burma, intimidates the Taiwanese and massacres and denies independence to the good people of Tibet. China may consider itself a dragon--but all dragons have slayers. China does not own the oceans or the air above them--and its attack on the navy airplane of the USA was an open declaration of war, confronting the very nation that has had the stupidity under W Bush to borrow over a trillion dollars to fund its illegal and immoral wars in Iraq and Afghanistan--while the Chinese laugh and make overtures to the Afghans to strip their land of vegetation to mine for copper.
(no subject) - [info]joekingagain - Tuesday, 10 March 2009 at 02:38 am (UTC)
Re: Mainland China
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Tuesday, 10 March 2009 at 06:00 pm (UTC)
Please do not say "your stupidity" as I left the USA years ago when I realized how pathetic the government had become under W and the GOPers who hail Limbaugh as a new messiah. I have condemned in books and papers the build up of a slaughter force that forced its way in to Iraq--a nation that was transmogrified by Ronald Reagan and his henchman Donald Rumsfeld to installed Saddam Hussein--with the troops pillaging, raping, and murdering with near immunity. The tragedy of Abu Gharib prison should be sufficient reason for the World Court to try W Bush, Condi Rice, Don Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Ashcroft, Powell, and the entire US military that was in Aghanistan or Iraq for crimes against humanity. The judgment of Nuremberg said no one is above the law and the excuse "I was just following orders" is sufficient to convict any conscript or officer who took part in an illegal war and trageted civilians. Sadly, only one German prosecutor showed the courage to suponea Rumsfeld for his role in the nefarious actions of W Bush--and no elese has dared for fear that the dollar would be pulled from them. Do not lump me in with the policies of 2001-2008, for I disown and denounce them and those in Congress who supported Bush.
(no subject) - [info]joekingagain - Tuesday, 10 March 2009 at 02:41 am (UTC)
Re: Mainland China
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Tuesday, 10 March 2009 at 05:55 pm (UTC)
The USA controls the world with a declining dollar--but the USA is also the most hated nation on earth. I have visited many nations (South America, Europe, etc) and have yet to find any real support for the USA--and in Latin America I find only contempt and loathing--except for the dollar. The true criminals are not the people of the USA but the CIA which acts illegally at all times since W Bush suspended basic civil rights and gutted the Act of Habeas Corpus by a easily controlled US Supreme Court--a bank of idiots from Kennedy to Scalia who put W into office twice by nullifying the will of the people and votes cast.
Re: Mainland China
[info]joekingagain wrote:
Tuesday, 10 March 2009 at 02:44 am (UTC)
Good reason for the US to build another base, station a few extra thousand troops abroad, employ even more surveillance on everyone else then? You could pretty much substitute, word for word, your "points" with that of America - the only difference being, they have actually realised their ambitions, their control over the world. You need to get real and stop spouting rhetoric.
Re: Mainland China
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Tuesday, 10 March 2009 at 05:52 pm (UTC)
The USA is nothing but a copy of Mainland China. Both nations have no respect for other nations, but laud their alleged wealth over poor nations, while their citizens visit "foreign" lands as if they were potentates. The true nature of the USA was seen when the W Bush Administration commissioned the most evil group on earth, the CIA to build illegal, immoral and vile prisons from Poland to Peru, Romania and Bulgaria, and elsewhere--prisons far worse than Abu Gharib prison--but this was with the full knowledge and support of Tony Blair and his gaggle of goons and a gullible populace who believed in the myths of WMDs while ignoring the the bin Laden family remain close friends of the Bush (Osama's brother built the Binladen airport outside of San Antonio TX) family. All of this fact--not rhetoric, and it can be found in any quality newspaper or an record under FOIA. The USA is neither paradise nor the promised land. Racism and illiteracy still prevail.
Total Nonsense
[info]mrpapagio wrote:
Tuesday, 10 March 2009 at 03:44 am (UTC)
I suppose the US could play by China's rules and simply declare the entire Pacific Ocean to be its exlcusive economic zone (if you actually read the LOS, it refers to rights to economic development, not exlcusive control of all who passes through). China is essentially unilaterally extending its territorial waters from 12 nautical miles to over 200 nautical miles. This has about as much legal basis (none), as would as US claim to the entire Pacific Ocean...How many of you would be so liberal in interpreting such a declaration if the US made it . For that matter, what prevents China from claiming sovereignty over the English Channel if it is allowed to simply make up its own rules as it goes. As China continues to build its Navy for offensive purposes, England will not be able to dispute such claims by the Chinese on its own territories - be careful what you wish for.
KOPPA IN *TCHIN
[info]charityplayer wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 09:58 am (UTC)
KOPPUR 8OTTOMDMB*
DJ: KOPPA IN *TCHIN A*D*ZIPPA2URFEND
[info]charityplayer wrote:
Thursday, 12 March 2009 at 10:12 am (UTC)
NZIPALF2RZED&P&Nni.\\\HAVTODAHAFFDAHAFFBISTROIND*AINQKyBOBIN

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date