Adrian Hamilton: We are still fighting the Cold War
Thursday, 14 August 2008
The brief, brutal war in Georgia is not a victory of the Russians over the West. That is just a schoolboy way of looking at the whole sorry episode. Nor is it, as David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary and would-be Labour leader, would have it, some disgraceful resurgence of Russian imperialism for which they must be punished by withdrawal of international privileges. That is to completely misunderstand the situation on the ground and in the Kremlin.
At least Moscow's strategy is clear. It's to reconsolidate Russia's position and self-confidence following the humiliations of the collapse of the Soviet Union. It's the West's response to the end of the Cold War which has been so muddle-headed. While Mr Miliband and President Bush accuse Moscow of reverting to the behaviour of the past, it is Washington and London that have in fact continued the Cold War mindset. Russia was forced to re-evaluate its position by its dismal and humiliating experience in the 1990s. The West, for its part, regarded the fall of the Berlin Wall as a triumph on its part and directed policy towards consolidating its gains by locking in the former Soviet Republics into their associations as if we were still in a world of competing blocs.
Nato was opened up to new members, led by Russia's ancient enemy, Poland. The EU was extended to include Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, the Baltic States and then Bulgaria and Romania. The whole process was seen not as an organic development of these institutions, or even a policy of pursuing self-interest, but as an historic process of absorption of former enemies, a steady march of democracy across a ravaged post-Cold War landscape.
The ideals may have been noble but the effect is what we are witnessing now. Nato, once a clearly-defined defensive transatlantic alliance, has been redefined as a multi-national, military force that could be used as an instrument of intervention around the world, the offensive arm of Western democracies acting in concert. It is now seriously in danger of splitting apart over mutual recrimination in its Afghan deployment and in the arguments at the Bucharest summit last April over Georgian membership.
It is just as bad within the EU. What was once the most effective commercial grouping since the Hanseatic League is now beating itself to self-destruction through overhasty expansion eastwards and fundamental divisions as to its future form. The arrival of new entrants from central and eastern Europe has divided the Union on the question of Russia but also on the broader relationship with the US – the division between "old Europe and new Europe" as the US Vice-President Dick Cheney so helpfully put it.
Georgia is the exemplar and the cause of many of these woes. Ever since the Rose Revolution brought democracy into being in Tbilisi in 2003, it (and Ukraine) have been used as the pawn to outside interests rather than for the good of its own people. Blazoned as the forerunner of democratic change throughout the Caucasuses and even central Asia, armed to the teeth by the US and (intriguingly) Israel, it has been induced to send troops to Iraq and Afghanistan to prove that the US has a "coalition of the willing" in its fight against terror and encouraged to take on Russia head-to-head over the enclaves.
It should have been able to take advantage of its position as the small country squeezed between big adversaries to play the one off against the other. Instead it has been induced to take sides with one over the other and got trounced in the process. It has every reason to feel let down by its allies.
But then so have we. Nato very nearly split earlier this year on the issue of offering it a fast-track to membership. Behind all the façade of peace-making determination at the summit of EU foreign ministers yesterday there were deep divisions between the new east European members wanting total condemnation of Moscow and the forces of Paris and Berlin recommending caution.
It is simply hot air to talk in the terms used by the hapless Europe minister Jim Murphy, left in charge of foreign policy pronouncement as the crisis unfolded, when he argued that Georgia, or anyone else, had the right to apply for membership of Nato and the EU without Russia asserting a veto. It's not Russia that should stop Georgia becoming a member but the the institutions themselves.
Georgia has no contiguous border with the EU and meets none of the economic requirements for membership of an organisation that has already got itself into enough problems with trying to absorb Bulgaria and Romania prematurely without a new member lacking even common borders. Nato membership is even more problematic. The US wants Georgia as an inroad into the Russian sphere of influence, Georgia wants membership to give it a military backing against Russia. Yet, as Chancellor Merkel keeps pointing out, it is not in Nato's interests to be dragged into the kind of territorial squabble that we have just witnessed.
Punishing Russia for its actions would only serve further to damage our own interests for the sake of disguising our impotence. The military co-operation now halted was primarily concerned with disabling nuclear arsenals. The EU-Russian economic association discussions have as a main spring talks on energy security of crucial importance to ourselves. Worst of all is the step of holding G7 meetings without Russia. The G8 is an association of industrialised nations aimed at improving international co-operation on economic issues. Never has that co-operation been more needed.
Russia does pose a problem to Europe and the West. Its fierce form of nationalism poses a host of questions about resources, defence and the future of a whole host of individual countries through the Caucasuses and central Asia. But until we make up our own minds of what it is that we represent and what our associations are for, we'll never be able to meet that challenge. It's not the Cold War we're returning to, but the bitty, brutal and shifting world of the 19th century. Only we don't have the gunboats to control it.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited




Comments
53 Comments
By the way, both Joseph Stalin and his brutal right hand Lavrenti Beria were Georgians. South Ossetia was given to Georgia when Stalin was drawing republic's boarders. Wake up. Saakashvilli is fooling the West big time.
I see USA is backing Saakashvilli - one of the indications that this guy is trouble. Saddam and Osama Bin Laden were supported and trained by US as well. What a surprise? Saakashvilli oreders a few villeges to be eraised from the fase of this earth.
Don't you see where your tax dollars are going? Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Georgia, Ukraine, all pandering "Big Russian Bear" idea to get money and other support and favors from the West. If you walk on the street of those places and conuct a poll, you will have hard time finding people who worry about Russian invasion in to their country. If you don't believe me, may be try going there (Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania are part of EU and you don't need a Visa) and see for yourself.
Posted by FromUSAwithLove | 15.08.08, 04:33 GMT
Carlos my friend, the world has changed dramatically over the recent past and you don't seem to have noticed. Please wake up or just get on your bike (sort of thing) and go and see for yourself what these apparently detestable Russians are like.
Posted by Hypocrites 'R' US | 15.08.08, 03:30 GMT
Citizens of America's European vassal states must be dreaming to believe there could ever be a cosy relationship with an independent minded Russian political elite and their own intellectual titans like Brown, Milliband and Cameron. As for the citizens of Europe's new members, well, when they're represented by the likes of Poland's xenophobic dwarf Lech Kaczynski, (who'll jump through a hoop to please his American masters) there's absolutely no hope. Poland Prime Minister, Donald Tusk (what an appropriate name) proudly announced Thursday the conclusion of an agreement for the installation of an American missile defence shield, allegedly required to protect America against an attack from Iran! I don't know why the citizens of Europe continue to believe in themselves as being European when, in reality, they're just nothing more than American canon fodder.
Posted by Hypocrites 'R' US | 15.08.08, 01:27 GMT
Stalin was Georgian .City of Birth Gori. Lenin was Tatar of Origin. Karl Marx was German. Soviet Union was build by Bolseviks in Russian soil when there was a power void at Russia after Russia's defeat at WW1.They executed 30,0000,0000 Russians, and starved to Death 20, 000,000.It is exactly the same like Mafia taking control of Italy after Italy's defeat at WWII, and rename Italy into Koza Nostra. When Godfathers go down will you blame Michalangelo DaVinci and Italian Opera Singers for the Criminal Gang?
Posted by kastor | 15.08.08, 00:43 GMT
Hamilton is perfectly right.Its the west which is totally biased and blaming Russians for the whole fiasco.Imagine if a colony of US was bombed by an enemy wouldnt US react immediately and save them.In fact US would have bombed and also used NATO and stayed there for many years together in the nameof stabilisation.Without Russia G7 is powerless as they know Russia being the largest country of the world and Moscow being the home of billionarires city generates lot of business.Bush has been very wise in not helping Georgia with armed forces when they were humiliated in the 5day war.Starting a thrid world war with another superpower would have also showed the missing WMD effect.
Georgia should be isolated after humanitarian aid is given and taught not to disobbey senior orders from Bush.Putin is one of the best Presidents a country can have ..he might sometimes be shrewd but he has improved the Russian economy so well that all G7 countries heads put together wouldnt have achieved.
Posted by Pranab | 14.08.08, 22:58 GMT
This would have been the perfect opportunity for NATO/ US and EU to work with Russia in order to allow S Ossetia to decide its future. Just as we, rightly I believe, expected Russia to do with Kosovo. Instead we have our supposed leaders playing 19th century balance of power games with Russia. We could have proved we believe in universal rights across the international stage, not just for pro-western groups.
Posted by JT | 14.08.08, 22:50 GMT
I cannot believe that Bush has been mad enough to comit US troops to Georgia. Okay, they are described as "humanitarian aid", but then Vietnam started with "advisers".
The US military is certainly very large, but it is not terribly effective, as witness the way huge numbers of them have been bogged down in the sands of Iraq by a bunch of irregulars armed with improvised explosive devices. If they come up against regular Russian troops, they will quite simply get creamed.
Merkel is right. Exisiting NATO members should have nothing at all to do with this folly. That includes Her Majesty's Government.
Was there really ever any long-term prospect that Russia would tolerate an unstable, violently pro-US, anti-Russian, regime right on its southern doorstep? Like any state, Russia is entitled to act to protect its interests, and it has done so. What on earth are the makers of Western policy thinking of?
Posted by John Davies | 14.08.08, 22:06 GMT
Naughty, naughty Russia. Those horrible pansy Rambo Russians should have just stayed in their barracks across the border and enjoyed the spectacle of Georgia's operation 'Clear Field' - an act of friendship towards South Ossetia to celebrate the opening of the Olympics.
Posted by Hypocrites 'R' US | 14.08.08, 22:06 GMT
As to my personal understanding of the situation: Russia doesn’t need to invade Georgia. Why do that? Georgia exists on a much smaller scale than Russia. Russia is the BIGGEST country in the world (almost twice bigger than US). Russia has oil, gas, coal, wood, diamonds, gold, wood, etc, etc. Invading Georgia would not bring us any good, but can do much harm. We've HOPEFULLY learned our lessons in Chechnya.
Clearly, this has been ‘inspired’ by Saakashvili’s friends in the Bush administration to hide US economy downfall AND distract the American voters from REAL problems inside their country so that they would focus on a ‘Russian scare’ and vote for McCain in the elections. Somebody in Washington really doesn’t want Obama to become next US president. Is it an issue of race? I don’t know, and I dont care, because I LIVE IN RUSSIA. Its none of my business to care - who will become next American president. It really would be nice if the US has the same approach and just LET GO ALREADY!
Posted by Freebee | 14.08.08, 22:05 GMT
Merkel is correct and if Georgia is allowed into NATO Britain should get out before it gets sucked into yet another war.
Miliband should resign for his absurd outburst or redeem himself by insisting that the Georgian leaders be arrested and appear in The Hague charged with attempted genocide. The same goes for Cameron.
Brown and Miliband should insist that Israel and the USA stop financing and training Georgia's army.
Russia poses no problem whatsoever to law abiding citizens of the West. It does of course, pose a problem to the International Bankers and Zionists who run the West and are mad as hell at Putin for not doing what he is told.
Posted by scousekraut | 14.08.08, 21:47 GMT
53 Comments