Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 9° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Amy Barry: We are waiting for governments to act

Illegal diamon trades are flourishing in Ivory Coast, Guinea, Venezuela and Lebanon

Illegal diamon trades are flourishing in Ivory Coast, Guinea, Venezuela and Lebanon

In 2003, three years before the sweaty torso and grungy Rhodesian accent of Leonardo DiCaprio propelled the issue of blood diamonds to international attention, the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme was established as a way of cleaning up the diamond trade. The result of years of campaigning, it was designed to stop diamonds that finance conflict from entering the global market.

Industry, governments and civil society would work together to build a government-led import-export control scheme. It would restore credibility to an industry bruised by bad PR and, more importantly, prevent further civilian suffering, human rights abuses and conflict.

Six years after its creation and despite having all the tools in place, governments participating in the Kimberley Process are failing to address serious issues of non-compliance – smuggling, money laundering or human rights abuses. Zimbabwe is one of the most striking examples of this failure.

Kimberley Process participant governments must act immediately to restore the scheme's credibility. Firstly they should clarify and reassert the scheme's commitment to upholding basic human rights in the diamond sectors of participant countries. Secondly, members must act to improve and implement the scheme's monitoring mechanisms. Foot-dragging or obstructive behaviour by certain governments must not be tolerated. Finally, the KP must close major loopholes in cutting and polishing centres that allow conflict and illicit diamonds to reach international consumers. As a founding member of the Kimberley Process, Global Witness will be watching and waiting for governments to do the right thing.

The writer is head of communications at Global Witness, a campaign group

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Don't buy diamonds.
[info]twellian057 wrote:
Thursday, 25 June 2009 at 10:32 am (UTC)
Diamonds have little intrinsic value, it's all based on hype from the DeBeers company. Diamonds are not particularly rare and if you try to sell a second hand diamond, unless it is a really large and flawless gemstone, you will find out its true worth is only a tiny fraction of what you paid for it.
The way to stop the blood diamond trade is to stop buying diamonds. What are you going to use them for anyway? There are many more rare and beautiful gemstones if you must have "bling".
We don't need import - export controls that will push the price of diamonds up, further fuelling the conflicts in poor African states that have enough troubles as it is.
If diamond prices were to be allowed to drop to their true level of value, there would be no illicit trade. There is no point in trying to sell something that is virtually worthless. Come on people, the damned things are mere baubles!
Re: Don't buy diamonds.
[info]nightside242 wrote:
Thursday, 25 June 2009 at 01:28 pm (UTC)
That's an interesting point, could you point me to some more reading material on this subject?
Re: Don't buy diamonds.
[info]twellian057 wrote:
Thursday, 25 June 2009 at 02:18 pm (UTC)
Try this article I read some time ago, http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/198202/diamond
It explains some of the history of diamonds and the myth of why they are seen to be valuable.
We will have to wait long before we can act on some issues that are not harmful for now. I mean imme
[info]famulla wrote:
Thursday, 25 June 2009 at 05:17 pm (UTC)
That will be long. Will it not? The government is in the hands of the Parliament passing bills and acts. First, it has to cover the expenses that have been messed by the PMs Then it has to see the present catastrophes that are coming in like unemployment. The futures of the flood victims in the UK, the budgets that are not enough to provide cash in the recession time. We will have to wait long before we can act on some issues that are not harmful for now. I mean immediate danger.
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla

Columnist Comments

hamish_mcrae

Hamish McRae: A time for giving with a difference

With the recession, there is a shift from giving people things to giving them services

mark_steel

Mark Steel: Come rain or revo- lution, it's money they want

Haven't the 20th anniversary celebrations of the overthrow of communism been miserable?

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: Science must never be political or emotional

Politicians and action groups select favourable data, ignoring inconvenient evidence


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion