Commentators

null 2° London Hi 7°C / Lo 0°C

Anne Penketh: Iranians don't believe that military strikes are coming

Saturday, 21 June 2008

Iran has become accustomed to Israeli threats of military action aimed at halting its nuclear programme. The Iranians have adopted a two-track response: to warn of the regional conflagration that would ensue, and to try to persuade the world that its intentions are purely peaceful, while insisting on its right to enrich uranium which is enshrined by treaty.

To that end, they point out that Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa banning Iran from holding weapons of mass destruction. A senior Iranian official admitted to visiting journalists that his country is well aware that, "if we attack Israel with one bomb, America would attack us with thousands of bombs. It's suicide".

They also know that a renewed Iranian threat to close the Strait of Hormuz would raise record oil prices still higher. The supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has warned that Iran would target US interests around the world in case of military attack. "If there is any attack, the whole region will be in flames," said an Iranian diplomat yesterday. "There would be a very, very strong response."

It is presumed that the targets the Iranians have in mind are the 150,000 US soldiers in Iraq and the 23,500 in Afghanistan. The Israelis must also be prepared for Iran to reactivate its Hizbollah allies in Syria, and Hamas in Gaza, which began observing a truce with Israel last Thursday.

But privately, Iranian officials continue to believe that the talk of military strikes is part of the West's carrot-and-stick pressure tactics aimed at coercing Iran into halting its uranium enrichment programme. They think the US is too tied down in Iraq to risk another military adventure with uncertain consequences. While the Israelis wield the stick, the Europeans and the US are dangling a carrot of a guaranteed fuel supply for a civil nuclear programme, which is what the Iranians say they want, although they insist on a domestic fuel cycle which is still not on offer from a West that fears a possible diversion towards a nuclear bomb.

The latest diplomatic offer to Tehran, endorsed by the US, contains a promise to renounce military action in case of an Iranian suspension. If Iran did agree to halt enrichment, the big powers would reaffirm "the obligation under the UN charter to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state...", the offer addressed to the Foreign Minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, states.

Although no official response to the New York Times report was forthcoming yesterday, the religious establishment lost no time before hitting back. "If the enemies, particularly Israel and its American backers, adopt a language of force against Iran, they can be sure that they will receive a strong slap on the face from Iran," said a conservative cleric, Ayatollah Ahmad Khatami. "The Iranian nation is a logical and brave nation and its reply to logical methods will be logical."

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Well Lets get something straight. Israel and Iran have much in common. Both are the only coutnries in the region that are not arab, Iranians (Persian), they both believe in slightly different religions iran that is (Shi''te is very different from Sunni. Both feel threatend and have always felt threatened by their arab neighbors if you didnt know arabs hate iranians because they think iranians think too highly of themselves because of their 4000 year history. With Israel's creation during the time of the late shah Iran was the first country to recognize its existence so relations havent always been like this Iran is home to several synaguoges and several thousand Jews, who actually have a seat in the parliament but this war is about Israel feraing Iran becoming a super power in the region and the possibility that the U.S will hold talks and continue relations with Iran because Israels only hope is U. S close friendship. The first comment is ignorant you know nothing about politics

Posted by Homeofthebrave | 21.06.08, 20:18 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Meanwhile back on planet earth Israel has to take a tough stance because the countries around them want to wipe them off the map. Heavy-handed, yes - but that doesn't make me sympathize Israel's Sharia neighbors, either. There's something pretty ironic about a "conservative cleric" talking about using logic - presumably part of being a conservative religious leader means you believe totally illogical things like that the earth is like 6,000 years old and holy texts are literal truth. And isn't this the country that had a "scientist" propose harnessing magical "Jinn" power? I hope that was just a cute joke.

TOo much literal religion, people! Maybe if everybody in the region wasn't motivated by self absorbed belief in their god-ordained superiority they'd figure out how to all live in harmony and you know, share. Yes fair is fair - but if religious people with nukes is the problem, MORE religious people with nukes is not the solution.

Posted by Crab Apple | 21.06.08, 15:53 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Last time I looked, it was still a crime to start a war, “preventative” à la Hitler or otherwise, and a sin to punish other people for the very thing you are doing yourself. Only in Bush’s perverse and Orwellian reversal of values, it’s de rigeur along with torture, armed robbery, grand theft and obtaining property by deception. But also, last time I looked, the US administration had got away with all of that, in Afghanistan and Iraq. And it is still compulsively pushing its luck, like any gambler.
The NYT is also publishing "cautious stories of success" in Iraq, AS IF it was all over and the Iraqis could now "live happily ever after" if only they tried hard enough - and AS IF the victims of Bush's colonial war should now all be swept under the carpet.
But of course this "partnership" mirage would instantly evaporate if the US attacked Iran as well, its third hubristic "war of choice" while STILL parading itself as the Middle East's social worker, not its greatest killer.

Posted by Julia Iskandar | 21.06.08, 05:24 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Is UN blind to the number of times Iran has been threatened by Israel and US? I would definitely build a nuclear bomb if I were threatened this many times by countries with all the WMDs US and Israel have. Israel is terrorizing the whole region. US is threatening the whole world.

Posted by Todd R. | 21.06.08, 05:13 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details