Anne Penketh: Our part in China's brutal crackdown
Wednesday, 6 August 2008
The ghost of Tiananmen haunts China's Olympic Games. For the West, it is the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre by the Chinese army on 4 June 1989 that is commemorated each year. But the Chinese government will never forget the mammoth demonstrations by ordinary Chinese outside the Great Hall of the People for two months that made the Communist Party tremble.
When Mikhail Gorbachev arrived in Beijing on 14 May 1989, Chinese students were already camping out in the giant square in central Beijing demanding greater democracy. But the presence of the Soviet leader, who had launched his own campaign of perestroika and glasnost back home, galvanised the protesters and they swelled to more than a million.
The student protests, triggered by the death of the purged pro-reform Chinese leader Hu Yaobang, turned into an anti-government movement that spread like wildfire through other Chinese cities. Western reporters couldn't believe their luck: they were broadcasting history live via satellite from Tiananmen Square to the rest of the world. Those of us who had travelled with Gorbachev were writing down the names of the Chinese protesters, who were happy to be identified – unlike the Russians whose identities we had carefully protected in Communist Russia for fear of KGB retaliation. We all did it, carried away by emotion, watching the Goddess of Democracy being wheeled into the square, while Dan Rather proclaimed breathlessly: "There is little doubt this is a turning point for China and for world communism. It could well be a people's revolution." How careless and irresponsible we were.
When the crackdown came, following the declaration of martial law, it was merciless. The television pictures were scrutinised by the authorities for faces, and our reports for names. On 10 June, ABC television reported that Central Chinese TV (CCTV) had shown their images of a Chinese man and appealed for his capture for "rumour-mongering". Zhao Ziyang, the Communist party leader who dared challenge his colleagues by going to the square to try to persuade the hard core of hunger strikers to end their protest, became a non-person. When he died three years ago, he was still a pariah – the price he paid for political dissent. That is how powerful the memories of Tiananmen are for the Communist Party leadership.
Chinese authorities have now promised to allow live broadcasts from the square by foreign TV stations for the first time since 1989 – as long as they apply 24 hours in advance. It is to be hoped that the Olympics broadcasters from Tiananmen will have learned from our bitter experience nearly 20 years ago, when the images of the government's critics were sent straight to the studios of CCTV.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

Sorry I don't really get the point of this article. You are a Western journalist who, I assume working for The Independent, is pro-democracy yet you seem to imply that western TV stations should not cover the demonstartions in case the Chinese authorities arrest and torture protestors?
Your sentiments are correct but are completely misguided. Surely you would have realised by now that state TV stations as well as police surveilance units have a much better grasp of technology thatn they did 20 years ago, and that images on the BBC or CNN are more than likely to be recorded by the Chinese themselves.
The British government complains loudly of abuse abroad, but look at the recent protests at the energy station in the UK, or any demonstration at all in London - armies of police with surveillance units ready to enforce the 'strong arm of the law'.
Posted by Olly | 06.08.08, 16:55 GMT
Ms Penkth, get over with it. As a participant of 1989 protest in Beijing, I find it strange that you seem to have more grievance than the people who were atcually there. Hello, something is weird here!
Your paternal arrogance is a sure sign of your belief of white supremacy and "the West" knows it all. If you look at the world history, you will find that the 400-year European domination is a aberration not God-sanctioned destiny.
If you want to look for a cause for your time /energy, you will find right in your community; your nation and other old Europe is gouing to be a Eurabia in a generation. I can't wait to see it happen! God bless China and the U.S. of A.
Posted by Shawn | 06.08.08, 15:41 GMT
Tom, I assume you *are* English since your English is lousy, bit sad really. You should try and improve it until you reach my Chinese standards. Perhaps you should argue the points of George Archer instead of making comments about his use of language.
Posted by keith | 06.08.08, 15:13 GMT
Deborah Shlian, "From what I understand" ??!! WHAT A JOKE.
Posted by kkk | 06.08.08, 14:52 GMT
From what I understand, the Chinese government has done its best to make sure that there will be no demonstrations in Beijing like those in 1989 including closing down the place where ordinary citizens can go to protest perceived injustices, shutting off blogs of activists, warning dissidents to stay out of the city and as you write, making sure that there is a 24 hour lead time for foreign TV stations to broadcast (just in case there are some demonstrations). Deborah Shlian, author or Rabbit in the Moon (n international thriller that takes place during the student democracy movement that ended at Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989)
Posted by Deborah Shlian | 06.08.08, 14:34 GMT
Sorry, that first sentence should read
'Tom, I do not read Lola's comment the way you do'.
My apologies.
Posted by Technomist | 06.08.08, 14:20 GMT
Tom, I do not read Anna's comment the way you do. She has not described any current protests as terrorism. She has described the obsession of the media with Tienanmen as passe, which is a bit unfair to Ms Penketh who probably does have some real feelings of guilt to get off her chest, but as a general point , is fair enough.
If you, Tom, were to want to have a protest today in Westminster, near to Parliament, you would find that it would be treated as illegal (because of the fear of terrorism) unless you had been granted prior permission. People walking round with TV cameras, video recorders and clandestinely using mobiles to film without such prior permission, would similarly find their collars felt these days, for the same justifications as the Chinese would use in these modern times.
The Chinese government does suffer from a democratic deficit, but are not so much different from our own government in many more respects than you may appreciate.
Posted by Technomist | 06.08.08, 14:12 GMT
George Archers I assume you Chinese pretending to be English.. a bit sad but try improving your English before pretending to be a native English speaker, it would look a little less obvious then. and Lola .. since when is legitimate protest terrorism... what rubbish !
Posted by Tom | 06.08.08, 13:58 GMT
Anna has an axe to grind and seems to hate Chinese. She should write about America's and Israel's and Nato's and E.U.'s killings taking place right now.Cina's crack down is nothing compared to Iraq's invasion which killed over 1 million and continues today. I like to remind this paper that America killed it's own on Sept 11 2001 and worse of all the over 5,000 dead US soldiers that dead for a bunch of pack of lies.
Anna try writing about the lies Blair told on the British and if that was not worse than the chinese crack down--you will loose hands down lady--
Posted by george archers | 06.08.08, 12:28 GMT
Oh please Anna Penkith you are writing propaganda rubbish here now - China has a right to crack down on terrorism especially during the Olympics - the Tiannanmen Square time was another time in China's history and it has long passed. These kind of anti-Chinese ideas based on trying to make China out to be a terrible country etc etc are so OVER - I think it is time that the western media moved on and faced that China has a system that the west can learn from.
Posted by lola | 06.08.08, 09:52 GMT