Commentators

null 2° London Hi 7°C / Lo 0°C

Armando Ianucci: Television still depends on a good story well told

Wednesday, 27 August 2008

In television, what happens, happens, and no matter what people say and do to make it happen differently, it doesn't. That's it. No one has the ability to draw a line under anything, no matter how much money and effort they put into trying.

For example, we've been told that Queengate is behind us. The TV industry is clean again. People have been punished. There are no more editorial tricks, and a root-and-branch review of editorial standards has been set in motion, so that never, ever, never again will editorial distortion ever have a place on our national TV screen.

But look at last Monday's coverage of the Chinese Olympic hope Liu Xiang pulling out of the men's 110m hurdles because of injury. Just after the race, we saw events in one order. Liu Xiang was seen earlier kicking a mat in frustration. He then went on to the track, but withdrew once he realised he couldn't go on. On the BBC's Ten O'Clock News several hours later, the race is quietly re-edited to make it look like he's kicking the mat on the way out. The laws of time are bent, millions of pounds spent on editorial bootcamps and Truth and Values waterboarding sessions are rendered unto dust, and once again, the British Television Industry comes crashing to its knees.

In fact, though, I find this quite encouraging. It's so easy to throw your hands up in despair if TV is going through a phase you don't like that you can forget that the basics never go away.

We will always cock-up. We will never get our house in order. Because, thankfully, it's human beings that make television programmes and thankfully, too, it's human beings that watch them. And human beings are illogical and irrational and unfair.

Trying to predict the curious, Brownian motion of public taste and opinion is as pointless as trying to dissect a puddle. If we feel it's our job to react to every shift in public whim, then we'll lose sight of the fact they've placed an enormous expectation on us to prove them wrong, to surprise them with programmes.

And the fact is, that in television, the perennials rather than the trends are what challenge us the most and keep us watching. The good story well told, the event recorded well and commentated upon expertly, the funniest show. Everything else – who they're for; how they've to look; what sort of music should be at the start; or into what mind-bogglingly tiny lozenge the credits are to be crushed at the end – all these are just trends.

Like Bill Oddie, they come and go with the seasons. Every now and then someone comes along and says the golden age of TV is over. Those glorious days in the 70s, the days of Come Dancing and Dr Who and The Banana Splits is over and we will not see their like again. And then we see their likes again.

Taken from the Alternative MacTaggart speech at the Edinbugh TV Festival 2008

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Talking of TV trends, don't forget 'film effect video'. Ever noticed that many recent programmes lack the immediacy and intimacy that similar ones did in the past but you can't quite put your finger on it? Well some time in the 90s it was discovered that by throwing away alternate video fields and playing the other one twice you could reproduce the slightly detached and supposedly high budget feel of film. Technically, the result is inferior, but it can be a useful trick to create a certain look. However, this gimmick has then been routinely applied to completely inappropriate programmes ever since (remember the "digitally remastered" Red Dwarfs?). I've noticed one programme which stands out by avoiding the trend, and that is Later with Jules Holland, and how much better it looks and feels compared to the competition.

Posted by Richard | 30.08.08, 19:25 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I hope Armando comes back again to the Indie blog ..

Paxo is well jealous of Coochy Ianucci and his haggis ;-)

Posted by St Michael | 27.08.08, 19:36 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Binky old thing - and a winebox in the glovebox I'll warrant. He's a terrible one for the drink is Paxie-boy. (How many stories has one heard of him getting lairy in the Newsnight/Uni Challenge studios: "What? You thought the Chatanooga Treaty of 1066 was a musical by Sondheim?" [Leaps up, cracks Snotty-Fotherington Minor on the hooter].) Ahhhhh, what to do with Paxo, now that middle age is here.

Posted by Rupert Fotherington-Smythe | 27.08.08, 15:54 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I wondered about Pax ..he was spotted in Camden recently driving a black BMW with Amy Winebox in the passenger seat !

Posted by Binky Boo | 27.08.08, 15:19 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Itchy Pants - He already does, who do you think "Kirsty Wark" is?! Made-up name if ever I heard one. She's got a touch of the tar brush about her, but ahr Jez didn't want to go too far just in case he got rumbled (he finds that Jamaican patois very difficult.)

Posted by Rupert Fotherington-Smythe | 27.08.08, 12:35 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Do you think Jeremy Paxman will be "blacking up" and speaking in Scots, on Newsnight whenever he presents it in an effort to increase his salary and profile

Poor Jezza's sort are now a dying breed at Auntie Towers

Posted by Itchy Pants | 27.08.08, 11:12 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details