Commentators

Showers (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 10°C / Lo 5°C

Christina Patterson: Ancient words clash with living cultures

Wednesday, 25 June 2008

The trouble with targets, as headteachers, hospitals and Gordon Brown could tell you, is that they're quite hard to hit. For the truly determined, however, there's always a way. Don't register patients until you're sure you can see them in the allocated time frame. Make A-levels easier. Cut the hurdles and fast-track.

In the great reforming tradition of Martin Luther, Pope John Paul II worked his silk socks off to raise the productivity of the Catholic Church. More souls, more miracles and more saints was the general message, and on the last of these, at least, he can hardly be faulted. During his pontificate, he created more saints than in the previous 17 papal reigns put together, hitting, before his death in 2005, a record-breaking 482. He even had a special saints' tsar (well, he didn't call it that) set up to expedite the process. Give him Simon Cowell etc, and he could surely have made it to a round 500.

Boring Benedict is taking a slightly more Germanic approach to the process. Checking the paperwork. Reading it, even. "His indication," says Archbishop Michele Di Ruberto, "is to do things with maximum seriousness, taking all the time necessary." All the time necessary? Just what planet is he on?

The planet he's on, of course, is the Vatican, a pretty little theme-park in one of Europe's prettiest capital cities, one which offers guided tours to American presidents, acrylic chasubles and near-annual diktats on sex. The Vatican favours a natural approach. No nasty chemicals, pills, jellies, ribbed accessories or any kind of (sorry, Cherie) "equipment" which might hinder the mass production of Catholic souls. And Italians, 88 per cent of whom describe themselves as Catholic, have responded with the lowest birth-rate in Europe. They have, it seems, chosen to emulate the sexual habits of the Virgin Mary.

Africa, however, has not. Unable to muster the self-control of their European cousins, African Catholics are continuing to copulate like there's no tomorrow, thus ensuring (by obeying the papal edict not to use a condom) that there is, indeed, for many of them, no tomorrow. You can't grow a soul without planting a (sometimes HIV-infected) seed, and you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs.

What no one has told the Africans is that you're not meant to take this stuff seriously. Look, OK, that's what it says in the rules, but do you think anyone in Italy ever obeys the rules? It would be like taking the latest publication from the Italian inland revenue and suggesting that it might in some way correspond to tax revenue received.

This, clearly, is a problem that extends to African Anglicans, too. As Rowan Williams agonises about the position of the Anglican church on issues ranging from Sharia law to homosexuality (in speeches so complicated even he sometimes doesn't seem to understand them), his African counterparts are preaching fire, brimstone and a book called the Bible. "It is an issue of Biblical authority and the Lordship of Jesus Christ," thundered the Bishop of Uganda on the Today programme on Monday, when asked about the divisions in the Anglican communion . "The word of God never changes."

Er, no. The words in that collection of historic documents assembled into what we now call the Bible, unlike the number of saints, and of A-grade passes at A-level, don't change. What changes are the cultures in which they're read. In the West (but not, for complex historical reasons, in the US), the leaders of our main Christian churches are largely intellectual men (yes, men) who thrive on theological nuance. In Africa, they aren't.

It's all a bit of a holy headache. The big tent of the Anglican communion is, I fear, set for the same fate as the saints' tsar.

Why don't you come on over, Valerie

It's hard to be a singleton. It's hard, in fact, to be Valerie Singleton. That, at least, was the message of an excruciatingly embarrassing interview she gave this week. Scotching the 30-odd-year-old rumour that she was a lesbian, Singleton launched into an exhaustingly detailed anc cliché-ridden account of her hetero(sexual) encounters over the years, starting with a "wonderful smoochy night" with Albert Finney and continuing with an evening with Purves in which "one thing led to another", "really enjoyable" sex with a man who "unfortunately was married" and so on, ad nauseam. "I am no goody-two-shoes," she said, a bit desperately. "It's a wonder that I ever appeared on children's television". No,Valerie, the wonder is that a single woman still feels she has to try so hard to prove she's not a shrivelled old prude.

* The solution to our problems, we're often told, lies within. Not in some creepy, new-age guru just-submit-to-the-universe kind of way, but really within us. In our chemicals, hormones etc. The trouble is that we appear to be the product of a slightly slapdash cook – one whose hand slipped just when he was adding the adrenaline or sprinkling the serotonin. Or even, it seems, omitting the oxytocin, the hormone which promotes romantic feelings, helps mothers bond with new-born babies, and reduces anxiety and shyness.

Now scientists have collected the stuff (from cows? mothers? lovers?) and bottled it. It will, apparently, soon be on sale, perhaps alongside footballers' fragrances, as a nasal spray. It is, says the neuroscientist who developed it, "a very safe product that does not have any side effects and is not addictive". So, no more shyness, no more binge-drinking, mortifying drunken encounters or agonised flashbacks. Marvellous, isn't it, how every day scientific discoveries bring us closer and closer to peace, harmony, utopia – and pharmaceutical profits.

c.patterson@independent.co.uk

Interesting? Click here to explore further

HOW MUCH LONGER WILL THE HUMAN RACE HAVE TO SUFFER THE INANITYS OF RELIGOUSE BRAINWASHING, AND INTOLERENCE OF PEOPLE WHO USE THEIR BRAINS FOR A CHANGE.

Posted by BEN | 30.06.08, 14:09 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Aiken: No one is 'qualified' in the way you suggest, of course. The Church believes in grace operating in the here and now. This may well be nonsense, of course, but if you are going to criticise Xianity tout court finding out its rudiments is a necessary preliminary step.
I refuse to respond to cheap insults about my intelligence, thank you, unsupported by evidence. The same goes for abusive language like 'claptrap.' To coin a phrase, it might be difficult to avoid sounding patronising.

Gdfrey: Maybe you're right. I never said it wasn't. I'm just not as cynical as you. Not sure what this implies: '.....' nor what you mean by 'public support' in this context.

God bless you all.

Posted by William Bapthorpe | 26.06.08, 09:05 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Nice job Christine. If the religious can't take your light ribbing don't take it too personally. You can't expect a sense of humour from God Botherers, after all the jokes on them!

Posted by matt | 25.06.08, 22:42 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Good article Christina, it seems obvious to me that religion changes to follow humanist thinking and not the other way round.
Unfortunately it's always a century or so behind.

Oh, and Mr Bapthorpe, if you can't see it was a Pope with a desire to gain public support who made a record number of saints, well.....

Posted by Gdfrey | 25.06.08, 15:24 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The catholic church venerates the 'virgin' mary - who is hardly in the bible at all! Why? Because 1) Catholic church was based on the Greco-Roman worship of various gods (saints) and an earth mother type; 2) 2000 years ago the word 'parthenos' (ancient greek) meant 'unmarried woman'; by the 4th century, when the bible was cobbled together, it had changed its meaning and meant 'virgin' - so the whole religion is based on a lie anyway! Why does anyone believe on all this mumbo-jumbo any more anyway?Don't forget the catholic church changes its mind whenever it wants - after torturing and murdering people for saying the earth goes round the sun, they have 'divine revelation' and admit they're wrong and whoops, sorry for all the killing and stuff! Even democracy was declared a sin in the 1840s! The catholic church believes in totla control of people - and it is only the reformation and people fighting against them that has led to democracy and human rights.

Posted by HumVee | 25.06.08, 14:59 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Well said. The words have changed on several occasions - in the course of translation as well as interpretation.

Who, by the way, is qualified to define, identify and recognise a divine fact? Please either make intelligent or (more) humorous contributions Mr. Bapthorpe!

Doctorates of African bishops? In what and from which institutions? It might be difficult to avoid sounding patronising. I think the point was that African witch doctors of all kinds can get away with unsophisticated claptrap (at home) while English ones have to produce very sophisticated claptrap to keep the inevitable derision to a minimum.

Posted by Aiken | 25.06.08, 09:54 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The Church doesn't create saints. The Church recognises the operation of the Holy Spirit in men and women of outstanding holiness. Canonisation is the earthly recognition of a divine fact.
If you find this and relate matters a 'headache', may I make a suggestion? Take some Aspirin and do some thinking.

Posted by William Bapthorpe | 25.06.08, 09:12 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

It might be better for the Independent to keep to its original policy of not discussing religion. This piece is tabloid rubbish "Boring Benedict" - for goodness sake. It is also incredible condescending and patronizing about Africans - I'm not sure whether Christina knows that more bishops in Africa have doctorates etc than do bishops in the west. But why be accurate when you can be patronizing.

Posted by Will | 25.06.08, 07:45 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Columnist Comments

steve_richards

Steve Richards: Damian Green will soon be forgotten

Cameron’s speech, though good, was upstaged by Brown’s mortgage coup.

matthew_norman

Matthew Norman: A written constitution is the answer

Jacqui Smith is Brown’s lightning rod when it’s the PM we should be frazzling

john_rentoul

John Rentoul: Thanks Queen, but it's about the Budget

The Queen's Speech never has a theme, New Labour has never fabricated one.