Commentators

Showers (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 10°C / Lo 5°C

Daniel Howden: Hope for Africa lies in political reforms

Monday, 8 September 2008

There is already famine in Africa but it is not the fault of the Soil Association or British organic food markets. Up to 14 million people in the Horn of Africa are at risk of starvation and this has little to do with Western-imposed attitudes to organic farming. Millions more are suffering in Zimbabwe, and food riots have flared from Egypt to Mozambique. The root of the problem in almost every case is political, not scientific.

For agriculture in Africa, the real problems stem from a global trade system that favours richer countries and large corporations, chronic under-investment by corrupt governments, and the gross distortion of food prices caused in large part by the explosion of biofuels.

Trade inequality has seen rich countries dumping subsidised food on to African markets, while erecting barriers themselves. Now prime African farmland is being switched from food to fuel – on the most food-insecure continent on the planet.

Making matters worse is the prospect of African governments selling off prime farmland to wealthy countries such as Saudi Arabia, creating the horrifying prospect of fortified farms exporting food from starving countries. The agribusiness giants who have developed and patented genetically modified crops have long argued that their mission is to feed the world, rarely missing an opportunity to mention starving Africans.

Their mission is, in fact, to make a profit.

Land rights for small farmers, political stability, fairer markets, education and investment hold the key to feeding Africa but offer little prospect of increased profits.

The climate crisis was used to boost biofuels, helping to create the food crisis; and now the food crisis is being used to revive the fortunes of the GM industry.

Daniel Howden is The Independent's Africa correspondent

Interesting? Click here to explore further

In the search for solutions to the world food crisis it seems there seems to be an assumption that Africa must follow the development path of the rich nations. At the heart of proposals for a new Green Revolution for Africa lies a model of industrialised growth in which large industrialised farms replace the small family farm. It is on the back of assumptions such as these that the GM industry is riding.

If we want to question these assumptions we need only highlight the failure of the previous attempt to introduce a ‘Green Revolution’ in Africa. This market driven solution failed to take account of various factors, including climatic variability. Aside from the many other negative health and environmental impacts of a ‘Green Revolution,’ the concentration on a narrow range of ‘improved’ seeds will lead to the loss of agricultural biodiversity. This seems particularly foolhardy in the light of climate change.

Dr. Dan Taylor
Director – Find Your Feet

Posted by Dr. Dan Taylor | 08.09.08, 16:05 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Another one of the endless stream of sensationalist media articles that use a broad brush to paint a grim picture of Africa and African agriculture. It conveniently reinforces the twin myths that the continent is one homogenous basket case and that commercial agribusiness in Africa is synonymous with exploitation. Neither are constructive contributions to any debate on the future of African agriculture.

Although it doesn't make exciting or dramatic reading, large agribusiness (even the bete noires of multinational corporations and the biofuels industry) has contributed significantly to agricultural development in Africa and certainly has a role to play in the future. Not all capitalism is rapacious and irresponsible!

Posted by Rob | 08.09.08, 14:20 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

We sent millions to help the starving in Ethiopia in the 1980’s. What was the result? The population of Ethiopia has almost doubled and they are starving again.

I live in Africa and agree that stability will help. But the bigger problem is the lack of family cohesion. Fatherless children. Women get pregnant and the father goes away to make another sexual conquest.

Aid from the West makes the problem worse, not better. It leads to large population increases without the resources or responsibility to maintain them. Africa makes it’s own problems. Time for us to stop feeling guilty and stop this aid business.

Posted by Frank | 08.09.08, 12:21 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I agree wholeheartedly with Daniel Howden. Its people like Sir David King (staunch lobbyists for the GM industry) who twist scientific evidence for multinational propaganda for their own profit . Big Oil and big GM are destroying the rich and fertile plains of Africa in tandem while puppets like King applaud. It is a disgrace to see a Knight of the Realm so beholden to huge US business interests and fat cat policy at the expense of small farmers. These huge corporations are the ones who have in fact ravaged Africa and left millions to starve. Sir David King should be stripped of his Knighthood.

Posted by Madge Davies | 08.09.08, 05:12 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details