Commentators

Showers (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 10°C / Lo 5°C

Deborah Orr: I'm all for gay rights. I'm also for the right to use London's parks

If heterosexuals began carving up common land in every town so they could shag each other with no strings attached, no one would consider it a great idea’

Saturday, 27 September 2008

Some years ago, when George Michael was arrested in a US lavatory, he found that people were surprisingly sympathetic about his sexual proclivities. Everything was laughed off, in a way that was rather cheering. It was all a sign that the population was relaxed, and that the battle for gay acceptance was being won. This week, however, Michael felt the need to apologise "for screwing up again" after he was caught with crack cocaine in an underground loo on Hampstead Heath, one that is well known to be a meeting place for gays.

Maybe it is only the drugs that Michael is apologising for. But maybe he, and some other gay men, ought to start thinking again about the way in which they conduct their sexual lives also. Until recently, there were good reasons why men met in the dark, in sheltered public spaces, in secret, to have illegal encounters, and many people felt sympathy with what was rightly seen as a desperate plight.

Now, after years of fighting for gay equality, men and women can marry others of their own gender and live happily ever after. They can pay, if they wish to, to go to clubs or spas where they know that not very discreet sex is on the agenda. They can advertise in the papers, in magazines, or on the internet. They are free to indulge in what Father Ted Crilly once called "the rough and tumble of homosexual life". But there appears to be no decline in clandestine activity.

In Stoke Newington cemetery, earlier this summer, a dance company, Nonsuch, gave a free performance at the foot of a little ruined castle. Families had gathered in the sunshine to listen to the singing and join in the dancing. The festivities flushed out another group, and a gang of sweaty, mostly leather-clad, young men stumbled out from the undergrowth to see what was going on. Two of them came over and took some pictures on their mobiles, talking loudly, so that they could be heard above the live opera.

"Look at this!" one exclaimed, in a thick foreign accent. "Only in Britain!"

I'm afraid we all felt somewhat chagrined to be considered eccentric objects of bemused pity by people who spent their Saturday afternoons monopolising graveyards so that they could have sex in them. Green space is a precious commodity in London, and it's annoying that there are so many places where one can't go. When I moaned about this to a friend, she snorted. She'd found herself rinsing human excrement out of her dog's beard, after she'd been foolish enough to walk him near the spot on Clapham Common that is the unofficial dogging zone for gay humans.

One does begin to wonder why gay men are quite so keen to retain their special status, as people who have a weird dispensation to have sex al fresco in places requisitioned as suitable for the purpose. If heterosexuals began carving up common land in every town so that they could shag each other with no strings attached, no one would consider it a great idea.

I'm all for equality, but perplexed as to why there's so little sign that it might cut both ways. Maybe old habits die hard. But maybe, some members of the gay community have obsessed about their own rights for so long now that they've forgotten that anyone else's might be deserving of respect as well.

We should heed this drama's stark lessons

You have to feel sorry for that devoted band who watch 'The Wire' on FX. For them, the fifth and final series is over. But for those many of us watching on DVD, it's only just begun. Nevertheless, it is landmark shows such as this one that inspire the greatest regret about the atomisation of televisual culture.

If ever a television drama deserved to be the subject of focused, mainsteam debate, week by week, on both sides of the Atlantic, this is it. Exploring the drug-dealing culture of Baltimore, 'The Wire', pictured above, examines a number of the ways in which ruthless, highly profitable criminal activity impinges on wider society. On the front line, of course, are the police, working to a narrow agenda that much of the time they know only too well is pointless.

But also intelligently examined is the ease with which clever, ambitious dealers move into mainstream business, and buy political influence; the havoc wrought on families by drug use and the culture it fosters; and the ghastly effect it has on the education system that struggles to engage the children caught up in "the corners".

Gang culture in Britain is, thank heavens, nothing like as deeply embedded and precisely organised as it is in the US. But there is every sign that matters could develop in a similar fashion here. 'The Wire' is a warning to this country, and one that should be heeded.

Our children could learn much from this trip down memory lane

It is troubling, every time one walks into the bedroom of one's seven-year-old, to see Balfour and Campbell-Bannerman crouched in a corner each, Asquith poised halfway up the step-ladder, and Lloyd George and Bonar Law peeking over the cusp of the platform bed. But that imagery, hopefully, will soon settle down, and Britain's prime ministers will only pop up when I want them to.

Like a lot of adults nowadays, I was never expected to learn long historical lists at school, and saw no reason why that situation should ever be rectified. Then I met an arresting young man called Ed Cooke, who insisted passionately that such knowledge really helped a person, and that it needn't be boring to absorb it.

To prove his point, he visited my home this week, and took me on a "memory walk" around it. After one hour and 20 minutes, and the creation of a narrative stuffed with spatial, verbal and visual clues, I'd become the sort of woman who could recite, at the drop of a jaw, every prime minister this country has ever had, and in order.

And it's not just a party piece – although I confess my thrilling new trick has already been thrust on the unsuspecting guests at one innocent party. Suddenly, all my chunks of knowledge about the history of British parliamentary democracy hang on a solid backbone. Just as one meander across a city can familiarise you with its character in a way that a thousand journeys on the Underground never can, one handy list can foster intellectual order where previously chaos reigned.

Sadly, Ed can't come round to everybody's house. But he insists that's not necessary. He's written a book, published by Penguin, and called Remember, Remember, offering vivid, silly narratives that threaten instant party recall of all US presidents and every king and queen of England and Britain. There's also a chapter that confers the ability to draw an accurate map of Europe.

The book is by no means a poor option. There's not much room in the shower, now that it houses a tattooed, dripping Viscount Melbourne, flanked by a pair of naked, shivering Robert Peels. It's downright disturbing that Disraeli and Gladstone (pictured left), alongside their evil twins, Disraeli and Gladstone, grin so manically as they lie in a row, hogging the marital bed. My house now teems with dead politicians. They lounge around, everywhere I look, like the corpses in An American Werewolf In London. There, is where the book, I'll wager, has a definite advantage over the more intimate stroll down memory lane that I was treated to.

Much has been said and written about the commodification of the female form. Much pondering has gone into speculation about the effects this may have on children. But I think my 10-year-old son has the drop on all that theory.

"Mum, how do they get women to do those things for those adverts?"

"What adverts?"

"Oh, you know, all of them. Pretty much."

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

89 Comments

Remember remember is brilliant! Never read anything like it. What an original way of making learning so much fun!

Posted by Craig | 03.10.08, 17:05 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

ROB SWIFT

Just to note - second part of my comment is directed at BEN LIGHT, not you, so apologies for any offence.

FUNSTER - spot on mate. In fairness though, it seems like some posters are using the issue as some sort of standard of gay liberation, which it isn't. It's about standards of behaviour, courtesy and common politeness for all.

Shagging in public is intrusive and inappropriate, unless you are a dog, squirrell or other small mamnmal. It's not right to embarass others, constantly grandstand or make a nuisance of oneself.

This sort of behaviour ranks alongside shouting and swearing in the street at night, banging on peoples doors and running away, or acting in a threatening manner.

We all need to pull our horns in a bit in public. There is no need to always be trying to act as if one is on stage. The public don't really want to be forced to participate in silly behaviour of this kind, and why the hell should they.

Posted by Andrew | 03.10.08, 15:08 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

GAY AGENDA

Yeah. Right. That'st the trouble. I'm not really bothered by the disgusting behaviour. I'm just incredibly sexually uptight; though I'm afraid your little winky probably wouldn't be up to the job of loosening me up.

Your second statement gives the game away a bit though. parks are intended in the main for kids, animals and relaxing adults, not as outdoor bouduoirs for exhibitionist tossers.

I've got a better idea. You stay in the car and do whatever you want. It'll be much warmer for you and the rest of us won't have to see your pimply little a**e. We will take care of the broken glass and other problems for the kids. Best if you and your mates stay as far away from them as possible in fact - not becauser you are gay, but because you have no sense of adult responsibility. I woudln't trust you with the care of a goldfish.

By the way, have you noticed how I have to use *** for any vaguely sexual words. Perhaps the editor needs a good bumming.

Posted by Andrew | 03.10.08, 14:54 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Andrew, what you need... is a good bumming. It might 'loosen you up' a bit!

Leave the kids in the car, though. They should be at home anyway, they might prick their little feet on some broken glass or a sharp bit of concrete and we wouldn't want that now, would we?

Posted by THE GAY AGENDA | 02.10.08, 23:45 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I'm a bit p**d off by the number of (supposed) straights who see this as a convenient excuse to bash gays in general.

FACT - a minority of gays do (apparently, for reasons that frankly baffle me) like to behave like dogs on heat in public places (though, oddly enough, I can't say I've ever come across any myself)

FACT - a lot of straights (for equally baffling reasons) seem to like to do the same

Personally I find both equally objectionable. It's all about basic consideration and modesty. It has NOTHING to do with gay rights.

We should expect the same standard of behaviour from gays and straights; nothing more, nothing less

Posted by Funster | 02.10.08, 22:20 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Rob Swift

You are quite right about lovers lanes Rob, but they don't usually tend to be right in the middle of recreation areas. However, nowadays as people don't have to sneak off to get laid they are more of a fond memory than anything else. A memory of when secluded spots were the only place available for a bit of romance.

Bit different from today when its all bums out and form a circle to watch don't you think?

Rob Swift

You are one of a number of correspondents to imply that objections to public sex are somehow right wing and to say rather grandly that we should all "grow up".

Spot on mate! Perhaps you would like to point out the deeply mature and sophisticated aspects of f*****g in public, leaving soiled underwear and used condoms lying around and generally acting like a pig.

Explain it to me. No honestly, I really want to know. Or is it all actually uncredibly childish like getting your winky out in frontof your auntie?

Posted by Andrew | 02.10.08, 22:15 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

On a point of interest/information, on the matter of men having sex with men in public places (known as cruising grounds), it is certainly an activity that has seen it's day. Many places are dangerous and have received attention from the police and local councils to increase secuirty and safety - often as these places are also frequented by people looking to commit crime e.g. robbery, without fear of it being reported, as well as those wishing to harm individuals for their own reasons. However, it still takes place as the majority of the men involved tend to be married or have girlfriends and seek to satisfy their urges/curiositiy quickly and anonomously. So before any one decides to pass judgement on 'gays', do you know where your husban/boyfriend is right now??!!

Posted by Andy | 02.10.08, 20:06 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

As a man who was married and is now gay I have seen all sides of the coin and to be honest this article is utter rubbish.

I could take you to any amount of Straight "lovers Lanes" in probably every town in this country and If you did your research you might also come across thousands more places for alfresco sex for the Hetros.
Is it just a case of you dont like to admit that humans of any sex will have sex in places that you dont approve of.
Its time this country grew up about sex and stop wasting police and public money on trivial matters.

Posted by rob swift | 02.10.08, 18:57 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Sorry, is there a mix up on the web, this looks like an article of the Telegraph!

And ahem... have you not heard of dogging a common heterosexual practice?

Grow up and do your research a bit better next time.

Posted by Ben Light | 02.10.08, 17:38 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

GAY AGENDA

Yes mate spot on! It IS all about bumming!

I visit parks and other such public places to enjoy the view, to let my children play on the swings, walk the dog, have a picnic, play footie, feed the ducks, sunbathe perhaps.

I don't go to watch a couple of people having it off - straight or gay. There's a place for bums and bumming and children's play areas, ornamental shrubberies or a graveyard were people pay respects to their dead relatives isn't it.

Why should they have to put up with you and your mates parading your fat sweaty a***s and run the gauntlet of your various body fluids in a public place? This behaviour is nothing more than veiled aggression. Why don't you just p***s off and stop bothering people?

Why don't you act like human beings instead of rutting animals without thought or feeling? and for f****s sake stop trying to pass the whole sordid carry-on off as some sort of liberation struggle.

Kindly pull up your trousers and go home sir.

Posted by Andrew | 02.10.08, 16:45 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

89 Comments

Columnist Comments

steve_richards

Steve Richards: Damian Green will soon be forgotten

Cameron’s speech, though good, was upstaged by Brown’s mortgage coup.

matthew_norman

Matthew Norman: A written constitution is the answer

Jacqui Smith is Brown’s lightning rod when it’s the PM we should be frazzling

john_rentoul

John Rentoul: Thanks Queen, but it's about the Budget

The Queen's Speech never has a theme, New Labour has never fabricated one.